After watching the Russian team top the New Zealand team last night it has now been clear that French team did also let NZ team easily beat them so as not to face up the Greek team and instead preferred the Turkish team but their plan didn´t work out as they expected either.

it´s kinda long but any help is appreciated. Thanks (:

"This past few weeks have been quite tough for me.

I´ve been reaching out to you, trying to get in contact, but you just don´t seem to care. And it´s killing me.

When I went to the doctor last week I found it really hard to accept. I sent you a message straight away, thinking that if we spoke you would make me feel better. But you didn´t. You were´nt interested at all. This has been tearing me up inside all week. I really need you right now. I don´t think you realise how much you mean to me. I miss you. I miss everything about you. I only hope you feel the same way."

Oh we most certainly have. And although we might differ in some aspects, I believe that past should not influence present and future relations. The only thing that should be taken into account is today

Mansur Al Hallaj pondered all his life about the nature of God and then spelled out this phrase: "Ana´l Hakk". It translates into English as "I am God." 

I still disagree. If scientists assume creation as the only possible explanation to certain phenomena, it means they consider their theories proven beyond doubt. And this is just wishful thinking. Nobody can guarantee that

a) creationism in this case will not be excluded in the future

b) all scientists will agree

Resorting to creationism is merely admiting that you have no idea how something works and you lack faith that it will ever be explained Knowing our smart species, nothing is impossible

God can be proved when some scientific researches need a creator to explain some scientific events.

But this not a proof but a belief,and a need to explain something scientific by the help of a metaphysical Higher Being. You say no human mind can understand God and then you say God can be proved scientifically by human mind, just a contradiction.  I think you should differentiate between, because metaphysical knowledge does not depend on objective criteria but fully personal experience and methodology, there is no static meanings of it.

No human mind can understand god or find it in universe in a space or time. Because i believe there is nothing except god. We are parts of it but we are not it. This is hard for us to understand fully.

It is simply saying that "God did not create anything but Himself" like in Sufism(Vahdeti Vücud or Vahdeti Şuhud). If you still not read, I advice you to read about Ibn Arabi and Imam Rabbani if you are insterested this kind of mystic belief system, though I do not share the same belief, they are experts on this as far as I know... 

Disappointing result for Scotland but I thought the referee had an excellent game.

Now we should discuss the issues that general public is unaware of? Like Turkish nationalism, fanatic love for Ataturk even if it means banning popular video sites or unsolved kurdish and Armenian issues?

I trust science and i believe one day god will be proved by it.

Check this book:  http://www.amazon.com/There-God-Notorious-Atheist-Changed/dp/0061335304/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1283521923&sr=8-1