Turkey |
|
|
|
Turkish Legal System
|
20. |
15 Dec 2007 Sat 11:40 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: I agree some people here insincerely confuse "insullting" with "critisizing" here..but not that many. They think they are smart.
We also have some "honest" insulters, who know what they are doing ))))))) |
Insulting is an art. It should have some truth and also some wit I reserve it mainly for my friends rather than waste it on my enemies
|
|
21. |
15 Dec 2007 Sat 11:47 pm |
It is next to impossible for my American husband, to grasp any system that criminalizes the expression of ideas and thoughts and opinions. US constitution prohibits punishment for expression of thoughts and opinions. But he understands that many countries, Turkey included, have laws which criminalize certain expressions, and believes that with the passage of time these laws will wither away.
|
|
22. |
15 Dec 2007 Sat 11:59 pm |
I think AlphaF deliberately understood me wrong. And it is a misconception to think that Holland is a good place to curse Turkey. If you hear Wilders speak on foreign affairs, please dont think you know us all. Holland has a big integration-problem and there are some people who have a strange way of dealing with it. But Dutch government or society does not encourage to curse or discriminate against Turks. And yes, I felt offended by this just a tiny bit
In Turkey the line between insult and criticism is too small, not only in some peoples head.
I dont think I ever purposedly insulted someone, but to me there is not only an important difference between insult-criticism, but also a difference in how people receive so called 'insults'. What is an insult to one, can be criticism to another.
Just as an example (no misunderstandings please, I have no opinion whatsoever on this, just to draw an example)
"Atatürk was an idiot because he didnt mention Kurdistan like he did in a former treaty."
Insult or criticism? Whats it for you? And whats it for the one you say it to?
I couldnt be bothered to put someone in jail for it or give a money ceza. Actually I see no harm in this at all. But Im pretty sure that many Turks will jump up and say you are offending Turkishness.
|
|
23. |
16 Dec 2007 Sun 12:02 am |
Quoting Roswitha: It is next to impossible for my American husband, to grasp any system that criminalizes the expression of ideas and thoughts and opinions. US constitution prohibits punishment for expression of thoughts and opinions. But he understands that many countries, Turkey included, have laws which criminalize certain expressions, and believes that with the passage of time these laws will wither away. |
The US may have "Freedom of Speech" to a degree, but their censorship of TV, film and literature is far more extreme than in the EU.
Apparently US citizens are unable to decide for themselves what is appropriate for an adult to hear
|
|
24. |
16 Dec 2007 Sun 12:08 am |
Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting Roswitha: It is next to impossible for my American husband, to grasp any system that criminalizes the expression of ideas and thoughts and opinions. US constitution prohibits punishment for expression of thoughts and opinions. But he understands that many countries, Turkey included, have laws which criminalize certain expressions, and believes that with the passage of time these laws will wither away. |
The US may have "Freedom of Speech" to a degree, but their censorship of TV, film and literature is far more extreme than in the EU.
Apparently US citizens are unable to decide for themselves what is appropriate for an adult to hear  |
And is turkey the land of freedom?
Are you defending law 301 that is fair and just, or saying that that "yes we are limiting human rights but others also do it?"
|
|
25. |
16 Dec 2007 Sun 12:08 am |
Quoting Deli_kizin: "Atatürk was an idiot because he didnt mention Kurdistan like he did in a former treaty."
Insult or criticism? Whats it for you? And whats it for the one you say it to? |
I would say that it is definitely an insult. You are calling him an "idiot" which is a insult and is untrue. You could say:-
"In my opinion, Ataturk was wrong to not mention Kurdistan like he did in a former treaty".
Just my opinion
|
|
26. |
16 Dec 2007 Sun 12:10 am |
Quoting boradiz: Are you defending law 301 that is fair and just, or saying that that "yes we are limiting human rights but others also do it?"
|
I am not defending Law 301!!!!! I was replying to Roswitha's post about US Freedom of Speech. I was correcting her statement - your freedom of speech in the US has it's limitations
|
|
27. |
16 Dec 2007 Sun 12:14 am |
Quoting AEnigma III: I would say that it is definitely an insult. You are calling him an "idiot" which is a insult and is untrue. You could say:-
"In my opinion, Ataturk was wrong to not mention Kurdistan like he did in a former treaty".
Just my opinion  |
Well, this is my opinion too. But then I think there is a difference between idiot and many worse words too.
I find it ridiculous that for saying such a thing, on grounds of madde 301, you could get punished.
And that is what makes the difference between criticism and insult, and insults and insults, so hard.
|
|
28. |
16 Dec 2007 Sun 12:15 am |
Quoting Deli_kizin: And that is what makes the difference between criticism and insult, and insults and insults, so hard. |
I think the best way to remember it is that criticism is not personal - you can criticise an action, opinion, etc. Insults are usually personal and involve name-calling or untruths.
|
|
29. |
16 Dec 2007 Sun 12:16 am |
Aenigma,except for pornography which uses children, any "censorship" of films, etc. in the USA is imposed by the media industry, and not the government. Of course there are restrictions on pornography, which is far different than restrictions on political expression and opinion.
|
|
30. |
16 Dec 2007 Sun 12:18 am |
Quoting AEnigma III:
I think the best way to remember it is that criticism is not personal - you can criticise an action, opinion, etc. Insults are usually personal and involve name-calling or untruths. |
Couldn't agree more
|
|
|