Turkey |
|
|
|
Sex and the City
|
70. |
26 Dec 2007 Wed 09:15 pm |
I think the case is the other way around. Well sort of. Femme has both hotheaded arguments and insults. If she focused more on sticking to her points and less on putting people in stereotype boxes then maybe the debates here would be more rewarding (and FUN) for everyone around here.
This is not fair actually since it's not just femme it's loads of people lately
|
|
71. |
26 Dec 2007 Wed 09:20 pm |
Quoting azade: I think the case is the other way around. Well sort of. Femme has both hotheaded arguments and insults. If she focused more on sticking to her points and less on putting people in stereotype boxes then maybe the debates here would be more rewarding (and FUN) for everyone around here. |
Yes, I agree with you on this. I just have a problem with people's responses to femme because they respond the exact same way when a more measured criticism is expressed as well... I've been a victim of that in the past, so I know what they say and do and what they really want and accept.
|
|
72. |
26 Dec 2007 Wed 09:22 pm |
Quoting thehandsom:
haha
My protection is more important than yours..sorry!!!
I dont think she needs anybody's protection btw. we all very well know she is capable of defending herself .. |
i dont defend myself nor my personality!
i defend my opinions, my viewpoints!
they have a problem with my freely expressed opinions thats why they attack my personality, because they have no strong contr-arguments to mine.
im not afraid of criticism, im afraid of brainwashed or shallow people.
all in all, i was erlik han, s++, prym, canli, umut long time ago when i was young.
and i understand them well! i was patriotic and nationalistic!
|
|
73. |
26 Dec 2007 Wed 09:27 pm |
Quoting azade: I think the case is the other way around. Well sort of. Femme has both hotheaded arguments and insults. If she focused more on sticking to her points and less on putting people in stereotype boxes then maybe the debates here would be more rewarding (and FUN) for everyone around here.
|
azade, dont scope on me (you are just promoting me by insulting me), scope on your own business. e.g. be a nice student like dilara.
Quoting azade:
This is not fair actually since it's not just femme it's loads of people lately  |
and it hurts you!
|
|
74. |
26 Dec 2007 Wed 09:31 pm |
Got you Fem! I do not hate everything Western and praise everything Eastern. You are ascribing attributes and actions to me that are false. I protest.
Quoting femme_fatal: ........you hate everything western and praise everything eastern.
Quoting alameda:
"In law, defamation is the communication of a statement that makes a false claim" |
thats what exactly you alameda do!
|
Your statement is simply not true. Saying it is so, does not make it so. You are using the tactic of the "big lie"
the Big Lie
|
|
75. |
26 Dec 2007 Wed 09:37 pm |
Quote:
"In law, defamation is the communication of a statement that makes a false claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may harm the reputation of an individual, business, product, group, government or nation. Most jurisdictions allow legal actions, civil and/or criminal, to deter various kinds of defamation and retaliate against groundless criticism." |
I think this is a wee bit dramatic, Alameda, concidering that we could be anyone in this forum.....I could be a 600 pound man from Malaysia. The accusation of slander does not fit for virtual people. At least that is my opinion...and I am sticking to it.
|
|
77. |
26 Dec 2007 Wed 09:58 pm |
Quote: Quoting Elisabeth:
"In law, defamation is the communication of a statement that makes a false claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may harm the reputation of an individual, business, product, group, government or nation. Most jurisdictions allow legal actions, civil and/or criminal, to deter various kinds of defamation and retaliate against groundless criticism." |
I think this is a wee bit dramatic, Alameda, concidering that we could be anyone in this forum.....I could be a 600 pound man from Malaysia. The accusation of slander does not fit for virtual people. At least that is my opinion...and I am sticking to it. |
To quality for accusing someone of slander or libel you have to be materially inconveniced by it. Anyone can say anything about you that they like, but unless it affects your job, career or home, you have no claim
|
|
78. |
26 Dec 2007 Wed 10:22 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: ............To quality for accusing someone of slander or libel you have to be materially inconveniced by it. Anyone can say anything about you that they like, but unless it affects your job, career or home, you have no claim  |
That is debatable AEnigma, you have to make the claim, then it's up to the the defendants to defend themselves.
In this case, in my opinion, it's whole groups that have been slandered.
There is also the issue of, Hate Speech which is outlawed.
|
|
80. |
26 Dec 2007 Wed 10:24 pm |
Quoting alameda: That is debatable AEnigma, you have to make the claim, then it's up to the the defendants to defend themselves.
In this case, in my opinion, it's whole groups that have been slandered.
There is also the issue of, Hate Speech which is outlawed.
|
You must have different laws in the US. No wonder so many of you are always suing eachother of the slightest thing. The only winners are lawyers!
|
|
|