General/Off-topic |
|
|
|
abortion is not a forbidden topic, is it...?
|
120. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 08:15 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting SERA_2005: At least you have agree that your comment was flippant,maybe you have a degree in that! |
Flippant, but true. Certainly not "misleading"   |
Give it a rest,its way over due.Of course it was misleading, to say something is a fact when it just simply isnt!
|
|
121. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 08:21 pm |
Quoting SERA_2005: Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting SERA_2005: At least you have agree that your comment was flippant,maybe you have a degree in that! |
Flippant, but true. Certainly not "misleading"   |
Give it a rest,its way over due.Of course it was misleading, to say something is a fact when it just simply isnt! |
Give what a rest? Can you prove your view or disprove mine? No! You just want to make implications that I am wrong!!
You are naive if you think otherwise. Whilst I wish you a liftime of daily bonking, I fear you will be in for a bit of a shock after a few years of your relationship!
|
|
122. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 08:29 pm |
For Sera:-
Even Wikipedia acknowledge this fact!
"The frequency of sexual intercourse might range from zero (sexual abstinence) to 15 or 20 times a week.[1] The average frequency of sexual intercourse for married couples is 2 to 3 times a week. However, recent evidence shows that 43% of married couples have sex a few times a month"
|
|
123. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 08:32 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: For Sera:-
Even Wikipedia acknowledge this fact!
"The frequency of sexual intercourse might range from zero (sexual abstinence) to 15 or 20 times a week.[1] The average frequency of sexual intercourse for married couples is 2 to 3 times a week."
|
No wonder you spout such rubbish if you getting your information from such unreliable sources as wikipedia.Don't you know any idiot can go on there and write what they want,the information you just have is by no means fact.Although i do agree with you that some couples may have less sex as get further into their relationship however i reject the claim that is happens as a matter of course.
|
|
124. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 08:35 pm |
Quoting SERA_2005: No wonder you spout such rubbish if you getting your information from such unreliable sources as wikipedia.Don't you know any idiot can go on there and write what they want,the information you just have is by no means fact.Although i do agree with you that some couples may have less sex as get further into their relationship however i reject the claim that is happens as a matter of course. |
Sera you are like an annoying rash
(1) I do not use Wikipedia for my information - it is really common knowledge when you talk to friends!!! EVERYONE knows this fact!!! I used Wikipedia to show you how common a knowledge it is - which is why I said "EVEN WIKIPEDIA...."
(2) Incidently, did you know that Oxford University recently checked wikipedia and found it to be more accurate than any encyclopedia? Amazing eh?
(3) Nice to see you are backing down from your original comment. There are always exceptions to every rule, but I am talking about the majority here!
|
|
126. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 10:10 pm |
I promise I won't click on the link...
|
|
127. |
23 Jan 2008 Wed 12:23 am |
Quoting AEnigma III: ... interesting article in the Times about Wikipedia which explodes the myths of it's inaccuracy 
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/magnus_linklater/article3193083.ece?openComment=true
(the link is for Alameda ) |
I L O V E Wikipedia...it is a good start...I always check out the links and sources...
|
|
128. |
24 Jan 2008 Thu 12:32 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting SERA_2005: No wonder you spout such rubbish if you getting your information from such unreliable sources as wikipedia.Don't you know any idiot can go on there and write what they want,the information you just have is by no means fact.Although i do agree with you that some couples may have less sex as get further into their relationship however i reject the claim that is happens as a matter of course. |
Sera you are like an annoying rash
(1) I do not use Wikipedia for my information - it is really common knowledge when you talk to friends!!! EVERYONE knows this fact!!! I used Wikipedia to show you how common a knowledge it is - which is why I said "EVEN WIKIPEDIA...."
(2) Incidently, did you know that Oxford University recently checked wikipedia and found it to be more accurate than any encyclopedia? Amazing eh?
(3) Nice to see you are backing down from your original comment. There are always exceptions to every rule, but I am talking about the majority here! |
Thanks for the coherent reply,even the insult beautiful! You can say what you like about wikipedia but it still do not wish to view it as a reliable source. If you want to use it go ahead but be aware that it is not without its problems and no academic would take you seriously if you said ''well its from wikipedia' to them that would be like saying 'well its from The Sun newspaper'
|
|
129. |
24 Jan 2008 Thu 02:40 pm |
Quote: Quoting SERA_2005: Sera you are like an annoying rash
(1) I do not use Wikipedia for my information - it is really common knowledge when you talk to friends!!! EVERYONE knows this fact!!! I used Wikipedia to show you how common a knowledge it is - which is why I said "EVEN WIKIPEDIA...."
(2) Incidently, did you know that Oxford University recently checked wikipedia and found it to be more accurate than any encyclopedia? Amazing eh?
(3) Nice to see you are backing down from your original comment. There are always exceptions to every rule, but I am talking about the majority here! |
Thanks for the coherent reply,even the insult beautiful! You can say what you like about wikipedia but it still do not wish to view it as a reliable source. If you want to use it go ahead but be aware that it is not without its problems and no academic would take you seriously if you said ''well its from wikipedia' to them that would be like saying 'well its from The Sun newspaper' |
YET AGAIN, I will re-state that I did not use Wikipedia as my source, but gave the link saying "EVEN Wikipedia.." (incidently the subject about married couples and (lack of) sex was in the news again the same day of our last "debate" which rather made me laugh!
You are very funny Sera, and have a very amusing view on things
|
|
130. |
27 Jan 2008 Sun 06:47 pm |
Quote: Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting SERA_2005: Sera you are like an annoying rash
(1) I do not use Wikipedia for my information - it is really common knowledge when you talk to friends!!! EVERYONE knows this fact!!! I used Wikipedia to show you how common a knowledge it is - which is why I said "EVEN WIKIPEDIA...."
(2) Incidently, did you know that Oxford University recently checked wikipedia and found it to be more accurate than any encyclopedia? Amazing eh?
(3) Nice to see you are backing down from your original comment. There are always exceptions to every rule, but I am talking about the majority here! |
Thanks for the coherent reply,even the insult beautiful! You can say what you like about wikipedia but it still do not wish to view it as a reliable source. If you want to use it go ahead but be aware that it is not without its problems and no academic would take you seriously if you said ''well its from wikipedia' to them that would be like saying 'well its from The Sun newspaper' |
YET AGAIN, I will re-state that I did not use Wikipedia as my source, but gave the link saying "EVEN Wikipedia.." (incidently the subject about married couples and (lack of) sex was in the news again the same day of our last "debate" which rather made me laugh!
You are very funny Sera, and have a very amusing view on things  |
I am glad i have amused you so.
|
|
|