Welcome
Login:   Pass:     Register - Forgot Password - Resend Activation

Forum Messages Posted by Melek74

(1506 Messages in 151 pages - View all)
<<  ... 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 [146] 147 148 149 150 151


Thread: Turkey seeks names of YouTube´s Ataturk insulters from U.S.

1451.       Melek74
1506 posts
 05 Dec 2008 Fri 06:17 pm

 

Quoting Elisabeth

This is where I fail to understand how Turks feel about insulting Turkishness.  I am really not trying to insult anyone, but my very nature, as an American, almost forces me to question EVERYTHING. 

 

I am running back to the lounge now!

 

Maybe it´s more your ability to think critically I´m sure you recall how people here were brain-washed by the government and media to believe that if you criticize the war in Iraq and the president then you´re un-patriotic and anti-American and many people actually BELIEVED it. Being American doesn´t protect anybody from being simple minded and lack critical thinking skills, but at least nobody gets thrown to jail if the do happen to question everything 

 

I hope I´ll get a list of "10 things you can´t say here" when I visit Turkey. Otherwise I´ll probably rot in prison there.



Thread: Turkey seeks names of YouTube´s Ataturk insulters from U.S.

1452.       Melek74
1506 posts
 05 Dec 2008 Fri 04:52 pm

 

Quoting armegon

Someones praising terrorists in Turkish parliament nowadays, is it free for Obama to praise Bin Ladin in US parliament? Is it enough for freedom of expression?{#lang_emotions_rolleyes}

 

I´m sorry, I have difficulty understanding the point you´re making and how it relates to my question. If you´re saying that freedom of expression means you can say whatever you want, then no, I don´t think that´s what it means - definitely there are social rules that apply and consequences of making statements against those rules. Just like there are rules on this forum about what one can say and consequences of it as well. But what freedom of speech guarantees is that you won´t get jailed for having an opinion and expressing it.

 

What my question inquired about is, for the Turkish people, do they even question the legality or validity of the law that makes it a crime to insult turkishness? Does anybody consider if to be contrary to the guarantees of the constitution? Or do people think it´s ok? And what exactly is "turkishness"? Are there specifications which say what you can or cannot say? Obviously Ataturk is one, any others?



Thread: Turkey seeks names of YouTube´s Ataturk insulters from U.S.

1453.       Melek74
1506 posts
 05 Dec 2008 Fri 03:26 pm

 

Quoting Elisabeth

 This is a good point.....I often wonder why people get upset when someone makes a comment about a leader of their country.  Personally, I really don´t care what people think of my countries leaders.  I feel more strongly about protecting their rights to disagree with me rather then being upset about someone insulting a US leader. 

 

+1000 

 

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."      Voltaire

 

How does Turkey reconcile the guarantee of freedom of expression and dissemination of thought in its constitution with laws in the penal code that make insulting Turkishness a crime? Wouldn´t the law be unconstitutional?



Thread: Condeming Terrorism and Mumbai

1454.       Melek74
1506 posts
 03 Dec 2008 Wed 03:35 pm

 

Quoting CANLI

 Ãraq has nothing to do with 11/9,so its not true,let me remind you it was the weapon of mass destruction excuse which wasnt there.

 

I agree with you on that one, I think it´s one of the most shameful events in American history. I was referring to the war in Afghanistan when I said it was in response to the 9/11.



Thread: Condeming Terrorism and Mumbai

1455.       Melek74
1506 posts
 03 Dec 2008 Wed 03:23 pm

 

Quoting thehandsom

I was not trying to justify the terrorism at all.

But when your own goverment´s actions are directly or indirectly responsible of thousands and thousands of deaths in the world, you dont show the same reaction and then, you fail to see what the result is.

You might have a huge Jewish lobby in the states. But in the end, you are supporting Israel which has been using your weapons, your intelligence, your money and your protection in the UN and keeps killing Palestinians. 

How can you say that you are NOT responsible of the deaths of the Palestinians? Of course you are..

When you say ´ah ours is a war but theirs is terrorism´ is hugely misleading and also kind of justification from your end for your wars. 

Can you tell me what the difference is? (yours wars are killing many people and mainly for your ecenomical interests)

 

In the end, you wars are feeding the terrorism in this world and the reality is that your wars are responsible much more deaths than ´the terrorism as a whole´ ever will be.


 

You´re assuming that you know what my feelings and opinions are about the war in Iraq, probably because I´m in the USA, and of course, you all know what Americans are like and what they think. I´m no more responsible for actions of my government than you are for the actions of yours. My power ends with my vote in the elections, which does not always result in the win of my candidate. I do not think the war in Iraq is justified, I hope Bush gets tried as a  war criminal, and I´m probably as outraged at what´s happening as you are. But I do think that war differs from terrorism in that you know who your enemy is, your intended target are not civilians (although they are mostly affected and all too many die), and you identify yourself as being at war. Targeting innocent civilians, who are not involved in any way in military actions, who do not have the opportunity to fight back and who don´t even know you´re coming, is an act of terrorism and incredible cowardice, no matter how justified you feel in it.



Thread: Condeming Terrorism and Mumbai

1456.       Melek74
1506 posts
 03 Dec 2008 Wed 01:09 am

 

Quoting thehandsom

well..Americans can start by trying to solve the palestinian-israeli problem by not backing Israel in every single opportunity which is Al qaida´s main propaganda and if it is done, I think, they will find hard to bring new reqruits..

Iraq and Afghanistan are two major sticking points as far as the west is concerned since W Bush created a huge mess there. In my mind, it will take years to clear..

If they deal with that mess then the west can start to feel secure again.

Between India and Pakistan, I dont think these terrorists activities will stop until injustice in Kashmir is corrected..

 

I hope you don´t mean that acts of terrorism are ok, because the Americans, Jews, (and you forgot to throw the Christians in the mix) brought it on themselves? In my book there´s a difference between an act of war and an act of terrorism. Whereas I agree with you on the main points (about USA supporting Israel - you need to consider the huge Jewish lobby in the USA as well to understand why, and about the huge mess created by Bush), I don´t think that´s justification for terrorism. And let me remind you, the wars were a response to acts of terrorism (9/11/01) and not vice versa. When it comes to India and Pakistan, I´m not sure if it is about Kashmir ... the terrorists did target mainly Americans, Brits, and Jews (based on the reports I´ve seen). It seems to me to be another act against the "evil West".



Thread: Condeming Terrorism and Mumbai

1457.       Melek74
1506 posts
 02 Dec 2008 Tue 03:55 pm

I was sort of tongue in cheek with the religion as a cause (I don´t think it´s a direct cause, but definitely a contributing factor), but the topic intrigued me enough to do some research. I found this article http://www.meteck.org/causesTerrorism.html, which I found to be very interesting. Definitely it points out that there´s no single cause of terrorism. So how can we get rid of the cause if we can´t even isolate it?



Thread: Condeming Terrorism and Mumbai

1458.       Melek74
1506 posts
 02 Dec 2008 Tue 02:34 pm

 

Quoting thehandsom

I think, you can not get rid of terrorism unless you get rid of what is causing it ..

 

 Religion? {#lang_emotions_wink}



Thread: practice/exercise pages?

1459.       Melek74
1506 posts
 01 Dec 2008 Mon 08:38 pm

http://users.telenet.be/orientaal/classroom.html

 

http://www.dilmer.com/practice/

 

http://cali.arizona.edu/maxnet/tur/

 



Thread: hý to all of you

1460.       Melek74
1506 posts
 01 Dec 2008 Mon 05:16 pm

Here´re some websites that have a lot of audio materials for the study of Turkish:

 

http://langmedia.fivecolleges.edu/turkish/index.html

http://www.international.ucla.edu/turkishtutor/

 

You could also buy a book that has some CDs - I´m using "Teach Yourself Beginners Turkish" and "Teach Yourself Turkish" - both of which come with CDs.

 

I hope that helps.



(1506 Messages in 151 pages - View all)
<<  ... 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 [146] 147 148 149 150 151



Turkish Dictionary
Turkish Chat
Open mini chat
New in Forums
Crossword Vocabulary Puzzles for Turkish L...
qdemir: You can view and solve several of the puzzles online at ...
Giriyor vs Geliyor.
lrnlang: Thank you for the ...
Local Ladies Ready to Play in Your City
nifrtity: ... - Discover Women Seeking No-Strings Attached Encounters in Your Ci...
Geçmekte vs. geçiyor?
Hoppi: ... and ... has almost the same meaning. They are both mean "i...
Intermediate (B1) to upper-intermediate (B...
qdemir: View at ...
Why yer gördüm but yeri geziyorum
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much, makes perfect sense!
Random Pictures of Turkey
Most liked