General/Off-topic |
|
|
|
what caught my eye today
|
4480. |
16 Feb 2010 Tue 08:07 pm |
Thanks for your opinions but I still don´t think there is any violation of privacy here. I am sure there already is a term for what I am going to say but I don´t know it: I believe it can not be considered a violation of privacy as long as the observer does not have any connection or specific interest in the observee. No one would be disturbed about this whole scanning issue if it was completely executed by a computer, because the observer, in this case the computer, would not be concerned about you. But obviously; image recognition software isn´t that mature as of now, thus there is need for human assistance. So the securtiy guard looks at the picture before his eyes, not really different than what the computer does, and tries to recognize shapes in it. To the observer it isn´t a naked body, it´s a mathematical entity, a bunch of pixels which need to be identified.
Let a program which fills a picture with random pixels run for an infinite amount of time; and some of its output will be your naked photos, of all sorts, some even naughtier than you can ever imagine. There will even be one that shows you riding a donkey on the top of Eiffel tower. It´s simply data.
Edited (2/16/2010) by Yersu
Edited (2/16/2010) by Yersu
|
|
4481. |
16 Feb 2010 Tue 10:28 pm |
The Latest Discussion section has turned out to be the Language Section...
|
|
4482. |
16 Feb 2010 Tue 11:07 pm |
My eye caught some snow today, but nothing caught my eye itself 
|
|
4483. |
17 Feb 2010 Wed 03:58 am |
What a load of bs... Someone has to bring these Islamist crackheads to line. I am afraid with the way things are going now, these people will alienate themselves and agitate others more and more. When it all comes cracking down, the progressive and humanitarian Muslims, which I think are the only real Muslims anyway, will also be a target.
I wonder if I could get away with saying this...exactely my thoughts!
|
|
4484. |
18 Feb 2010 Thu 02:31 pm |
Airport body scanners violate Islamic law, Muslims say
Saying that body scanners violate Islamic law, Muslim-American groups are supporting a “fatwa” – a religious ruling – that forbids Muslims from going through the scanners at airports.
The Fiqh Council of North America – a body of Islamic scholars that includes some from Michigan – issued a fatwa this week that says going through the airport scanners would violate Islamic rules on modesty.
“It is a violation of clear Islamic teachings that men or women be seen naked by other men and women,” reads the fatwa issued Tuesday. “Islam highly emphasizes haya (modesty) and considers it part of faith. The Quran has commanded the believers, both men and women, to cover their private parts.”
More
***********
Is this group right or are the moaning? Body scans - not my favourite idea as well - are invented and placed because of increasing terrorism. Should we accept them then, should we stop travelling or is the alternative of a (thorough!) search enough?
I think that many countries will still prefer the full body search - this will only show up where someone has got something a bit unusual in his or her pants or eaten a rather odd lunch Do you think this could be a way to cure obesity??? 
Oh and I think they are moaning .......... again! They are not in use yet (I don´t think!)
Edited (2/18/2010) by libralady
[Added a bit more]
|
|
4485. |
18 Feb 2010 Thu 08:09 pm |
French Politicians Blast Fast Food Chain´s New Halal Menu
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,586579,00.html?test=latestnews
I am wondering why politicians are even commenting publically about a private business´s decision to serve halal food. It is not like they are saying that non-muslims are not welcome. Is it a hardship not to get bacon on your burger? Seems like much ado about nothing!
|
|
4486. |
18 Feb 2010 Thu 10:14 pm |
French Politicians Blast Fast Food Chain´s New Halal Menu
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,586579,00.html?test=latestnews
I am wondering why politicians are even commenting publically about a private business´s decision to serve halal food. It is not like they are saying that non-muslims are not welcome. Is it a hardship not to get bacon on your burger? Seems like much ado about nothing!
I don´t think the halal menu is a big deal, and most French people don´t give a hoot either. It´s only in 8 of the 350 restaurants. Only the extreme right-winged (aka RACIST) politicians seem to complaint about it. So, there isn´t much ado about it! No customers complained. I don´t get angry when a menu only offers halal, and I don´t get angry when a menu only offers fish or only vegetarian either If I want a piece of pork I´ll just go somewhere else, and most normal French people are the same, I think.
|
|
4487. |
20 Feb 2010 Sat 01:08 pm |
What´s the deal with the Dutch gov´t collapsing today???? 
|
|
4488. |
20 Feb 2010 Sat 01:26 pm |
What´s the deal with the Dutch gov´t collapsing today???? 
No idea. I heard it on the radio a couple of hours ago. They were arguing about soldiers in Afghanistan, should ´we´ stay or not. Now we have to wait, will this administration continue as a minority in parliament or do we get new elections?
|
|
4489. |
20 Feb 2010 Sat 07:33 pm |
Ugh... AGAIN?! This is the 4th (!!!!) government colapsing under this president... I´m too young to be voting for the 4th time... I´m in my mid twenties!
I´m so not looking forward to getting into the whole election thing again, trying to figure out who to vote for now. Can´t I just cast one anti-vote instead? (Anti-right winged a-hole Wilders vote ofcourse )
|
|
4490. |
20 Feb 2010 Sat 07:36 pm |
Ugh... AGAIN?! This is the 4th (!!!!) government colapsing under this president... I´m too young to be voting for the 4th time... I´m in my mid twenties!
I´m so not looking forward to getting into the whole election thing again, trying to figure out who to vote for now. Can´t I just cast one anti-vote instead? (Anti-right winged a-hole Wilders vote ofcourse )
And rumours go that the next administration will be Bakellende V...... 
|
|
|