* There are internationally accepted definitions of terror and terrorism. The way you describe terrorism is irresponsible and it is not backed by any established civilized norm of thinking.
* There is a Kurdish problem in Turkey and this problem did not start in 20´s. There have always been Kurdish uprisals in Anatolia. Ottomans used various methods such as offering titles or money to the kingpins or sending them on exile if they lay hold of them. The way you write about this matter one might think you are Kurdish uprisal guru but you don´t even know the Ottoman leg of this complicated subject.
* You call the Turkish Armed Forces incompetent. The Turkish Armed Forces are manned by the citizens of this country. They do not use chemical weapons nor do they nuke the terrorists. They fight with arms available to all militaries in the world. They are our sons, brothers, uncles or friends. They risk their lives to carry out the orders they have been given. Now these people have a strong character, they are not seeking solutions they are just intercepting attacks by terrorists on this country. We count on our army for the defense of this country. This is not unique to Turkey. Wherever you go, all the militaries in the world function like this. You would rave about the compulsory military service in Turkey. You know there are other options. You could flee from this country and vilify the regime in Turkey to get a British residence permit. Thousands of people did this, it is not something new. You might scorn this but it takes guts just show up at the recruiting office and be one among the thousand deployed onto the enemy.
This is getting increasingly boring actually..But for the sake of looking for the truth:
- Terrorism is not an entity itself..Terrorism is the result of a social/economic/political dissatisfaction. Specially if the people who are not satisfied, can not express themselves the other ways(in the parties; in the parliaments etc) ..(There were over 50 groups in Turkey before 1980s that openly declared the armed struggle was the means they will use.. Many of them can be categorized as terrorists but only one group, Turkish Communist Party, had help from Soviets. And they were even not committed fully into armed struggle. None of the others had any foreign help agencies etc.)
- For the fantasists, I kept asking if them to show any proof!! was there a single proof? A HUGE NO.. I suspected the camp in Holland can be a camp but even it turned out to be not a camp at all.. The camp in France..? I can not see anything there!! With the way our fantasists definition, all these clubs/cultural organizations in all over Europe can be considered as camp.. But they are not!! so what do we have here after all those discussions? just fantasies..suspicions!! (I also explained "why getting rid of ´foreign elements´ out of discussion is so difficult for generations who are brain washed with those excuses decay after decay") It has been the army that was trying to conceal how incompetent they were in the combat!! In the end our entire army is fighting with terrorists for last 30 years and they are still up and fighting there..
-In the end WE HAVE A KURDISH PROBLEM in Turkey..And considering the support for the terrorists is HUGE (Kurdish party getting 1/3 of the votes from Kurds), a solution has to be developed for Kurdish problem+ PKK. You can not separate them now..There is no solution.
- I also explained in my numerous posts about those 17.000 deaths/ burning villages/ forcing people out/ all those cases went to EU Human Rights courts/ children killed etc.. Without taking all those into consideration when talking about the Kurdish problem will NOT have any credibility..
-I also explained about the reasons of the latest surge of PKK attacks.. If I am not wrong, I EVEN TOLD HERE THE ATTACKS WERE IMMINENT AND COMING! (because you dont need to be ´extra clever´ to see that: we stopped the opening; started to arrest Kurdish politicians; Apo pulls out of the talks.. AND PKK STARTS..Are you that BLIND to see above? is it a the rocket science?)
Basically in the end:
- We have a Kurdish Problem.. Our Kurdish issue has been the problem since 1920s.
- Thinking that "it is something to do with other countries or their secret services etc" has been excuses by the state to beef up the nationalistic feelings...And it was further developed by the fantasists whenever something happened without giving any proof.. (it is almost like having an argument with a person who believes in Dogma actually.. How do you believe without any evidence: I dont need evidence to believe that.. Allah allah!!)
- Thinking ´this is a terrorism problem only´ was WRONG in the first place and caused us almost 70.000 deaths..
- I think in the end, we Turks now realized there is no end to this fight.. We are not winning this war with armed struggle...We have to make peace.
- The peace will be and can be made between fighting parties..
- We have been saying ´terrorism only´ and tried to finish our Kurdish problem with the guns only and FAILED..
- More armed fights will only increase the resentment between Turks and Kurds.
The question is really very simple in the end:
- Looking at the problem as ´Terrorism only´ and keep fighting (like we did last 30 years and caused 70.000 death) and cause more resentment (and in the end split of Turkey)
- Accepting that ´it is not terrorism only´ and making peace, no more killing and living EQUALLY with the Kurds..