Quoting portokal:

as it was said here, statement number 2 is correct.
Deli Kizin, first statement did not emphasize on sexual practices, as you did in the end, it was just an example, perhaps more eloquent in pointing the difference between practicing and freedom of speaking.
In my opinion,considering segregation, it is not a good choice to wear head scarves in any other forms of institution.
Even statement number 2 in the first post enumerates topics related to personal freedom, which includes religion.
i think that the headscarf issue appeared in universities first as in the highest form of education. could be a first step in separating religion from public life in a healthy way.
Regarding what you said, deviating the initial post, if freedom of speech is accepted, that is valid for any subject, not just subjects which are subjectively favored. freedom of speech does not limit the subject of discussion, but the concept of discussion (and dialog) in itself limits the ways of addressing, requiring assertive communication.
I will not follow here all the course of this thread, but you have deviated with your first answer, in which you said that number 2 is correct, and this freedom of speech should have been extended (which is true, and added a plus to your answer, but was not the object of question). But stating after that number 1. thus implying logically number 3 is incorrect is redundant. If following the logical course, number 2 being correct, 1 and 3 are not. But the question was which is correct (not which is not correct).
Thus you entered into the "alogical" realm, and the lack of correct answering lead you to incorrect statements and in the end to an unclear emphasizing on the sexual freedom, which might have been the starting point for you in delimiting the correct answer (number2).
AlphaF pointed you the mistakes, but in the way to face you with them, does enhancing the "logical uncertainty" behind your affirmation.

AlphaF, I disagree with the way you lead (by questions) your discussions with Deli Kizin because I think it is sometimes harder to learn this way, because this method is dual, either cristalize, or confuses even more, not according attention to the undesired mistakes in thinking and aiming to find eventual hidden tendencies as being hided, but true.
This is the method I would use for a candidate at an interview, a selection, for example. Aiming to find out what a person actually desires, but not aiming at the fact that a person maybe desires/needs a healthier way of thinking. The latter can be practiced along with illogical realms such as jokes.

Quoting portokal:

portokalfa sounds perfect, i accept this name only as a deeper symbol and after discussing this with Alfa.

Quoting Deli_kizin:

Quoting portokal:

Quoting Deli_kizin: Quoting portokal: portokalfa sounds perfect, i accept this name only as a deeper symbol and after discussing this with Alfa. Do you, Portokalfie, your answer to this? (please dont tell me you have to discuss this perfectly too with your Alfa before being able to answer).

Quoting Deli_kizin:

Do you, Portokalfie, accept to be Alphas 4th cyberwife, through good and bad times, in sickness and health, what is your answer to this? (please dont tell me you have to discuss this perfectly too with your Alfa before being able to answer).