thehandsom you are lacking of understanding as usual, what i said read carefully, the articles which you here usually post from Zaman and its puppets adore sharia, thats what i pointed out. Do you have reading? I didnt live among you, i lived among those fethullah supporters and witnessed their real face.  I dont care if you adore sharia or not. I just showed their mentality, and it seems to me you like it very much. Do you remember the honest girl which she said she dont like Atatürk in the program teketek? Her husband lost his job, these AKP puppets fired her husband. And you remember the “çakma liberal” girls there , nothing happened to them because they were sneaky, i just portray you like those çakma liberals and portray chiko as pawn.  I think nothing wrong with it , i dont need to show any post of you that belittle Atatürk actually your posts tell everything

Ým sorry i havent seen your post, things became calm as i hope so i thought i can do other things than following that thread if i may, and also took me time to try to translate it.

So the result?

What a surprise..Canli is not deleting Janissary´s post..

Great moderation Canli..

I just want to share some of my thoughts on the establishment of a Kurdistan, and some of the possible intentions that may lurk behind such an idea.

True, the idea of establishing a new country called Kurdistan, which will supposedly include southeastern Turkey, parts of Iran and Iraq, has been around for a while. But, on the contrary to your suggestion, this idea has nothing to do with the thoughtful & benevolent sentiments about giving ´landless people´ their land that they can call their own in the name of justice or fairness. The Kurdish issue, as well as the Armenian issue, has always been political tools designed, implemented and propogated by Western countries. Depending on the specific geopolitical circumstances of each time period, the Kurdish & Armenian cards are played by the big players, such as the US, Germany, France, and the UK, for the sole purpose of protecting their vested interests in the region. The involvement of Germany & the UK in funding & arming the PKK, and escalating violence in Turkey is well known.  

Whether the Turkish army reacted the right way or not to these externally imposed challenges is debatable. However, the real cuplrits behind this state-sponsored terrorism were Germany & the UK, not really Turkey. I have always felt that the Turkish army should have been smarter and have employed different tactics to deal with the problem. For over a decade, over one third of the government´s revenues went into dropping bombs on its own land and people. The Turkish army literally shot itself in the foot.

....................................................................................................

tami tami..

It is a historical document..

British does not refer to ethnicity the way you know it in the uk..

Even the PM G Brown is trying to figure out what british is..

So sorry but keep sucking your thumb and make sure it down not get all wrinkly..

By the way great writing cynicmystic, describes many of the points, thanks, why dont you post this also on your coloumn?

 Excuse me ?

yea yea, being Turk does not refer to ethnicity either and thats defined in the Turkish constitution. and the word british comes from the briton race as I proved.

ok theH, you`re getting funny, and I`m not interested in your crappy rhetoric which Ive proved wrong. have fun. you still suck.

For some Kurdish people, their home is in Turkey.