I think this post came into some conclusions:
1-First of all we have a ´Kurdish problem´ despite the fact people still trying to ignore it with "foreign powers" etc.
2- This problem is created by us by not giving simple and basic rights to some people who happened to be citizens of Turkey opposing to considering them as immigrants. (examples were shown from various countries about how they solved this type primitive-nationalistic problems)
3- ´Only terrorism´ as an idea seems quite smelly, nobody buys it anymore.
4-Turks speak Turkish, Kurds speak Kurdish.
5- With s++´s admission and cystic´s approval, "we did kick out of the Armenians"!! (btw..if Turkey goes to an international court and if Turkey defends herself like s++ with cystic´s logic, Turkey will lose it in the first session)
Ottomans were right to relocate Armenians. Nobody can say anything about it. Yes they were "kicked" (that´s your word). Turkey is ready for any international court. Go tell it your Armenian friends. You seem to be happy with the "kick" word used in this context by the way.
Thank you for all your coorperation!!
ps. Nobody should get worried.. I am not going to ask and embarres anybody with the question: ´why the hell you were opposing me in the first place´
.
Actually Armenians forced Turks to kick themselves.
There was mutual agreement between Turks and Greeks to exchange population. So we didn´t kick them.
What makes you think we should have kicked the Kurds. We fought together against the condors occupying Anatolia.