|
This only goes to prove my point that objections are not about what is said, but WHO is saying it. Both Alameda and Canli are the biggest objectors to "insults" and yet when the insults come from a different direction (maybe towards those who they object to) then they find it perfectly acceptable.
Actually AE, that is not the case at all, seems you didnt get what i mean
Ãf you went through my post here and other posts before regarding cynic´s insulting posts, you would find i havent agreed with them too.
But im also against the idea that the bads erase the goods.
And i believe it is his right to take the credit for that.
His posts in the language forum are there and people still get benefit from them.
They are useful to learners, so that was a loss to us .
His posts in political forum were also informative and strike some point that i wasnt paying attention to.
So i cant just skip an eye on all this as if they are not there.
Ãt isnt fair.
Yes many of his posts caused disruption and also were flammable, crude and this everyone already know and said it
But he also has informative posts and was helpful to others in language/translation forums and that what i am adding.
Ãts his right.
|
