| 1199. |
10 Jun 2008 Tue 02:30 am |
|
Sorry for interrupting
Quoting thehandsom: I previously mentioned this on several occasions : We entered northern Iraq many times -I lost count to be honest-
They did not solve anything. did they? |
Did it need to solve the problem? I think no need, we entered Iraq using our international rights and if the attacks continues, our rights also reserved. They came from Iraq, killed our people then you want Turkey to watch, we sure go and kill the terrorists.
Quoting thehandsom: I am still amazed after zillions of incursions, people -generically speaking- still support these, while shaking with national pride!!
All we end up with deads..
This is very sad, annoying and quite pathetic. |
Because people want to see them killed who first sneaky killed civilians, soldiers. Are u still amazed? Tell the terrorists, do not kill our people, do not damage the peace of country then maybe you wont.
Quoting thehandsom: I don't think you have much knowledge about the deep state in Turkey. when you say 'SO-called deep-state', you show your 'impeccable' knowledge about it by trying to make them as a trivial matter. |
The fact i called like that i thought they do not represent the folks of Turkey. Actually they are not deep, but no one can touch them or their puppets because of external protection. Mr.handsom do u think Turkey is free country? Turkey lost her freedom in 60s
Quoting thehandsom: So what is deep-state exactly, in a nutshell?
As Demirel (ex PM and the ex president of Turkey) put it: 'Deep state is the Army'. btw.. |
Haha, Demirel did not use the words “deep state†with the same meaning of yours. He confessed something there; said “we have inability to govern the country because of anarchyâ€. And whats the source of anarchy? Army caused anarchy?. Surely not, at that period actually during the period of cold war, CIA organised many counter guerilla organisations as a strategy of NATO in country against the ideology of communism and lots people died because of this silly cold war games of two-poled world. But also army made lots of mistakes especially Evren. And MIT was used to control these groups by CIA. Mumcu realised that there was a relation between these counter guerilla groups, cia and pkk. Thats the betrayers i mean, then see what happened pkk firstly given under the control of Iran, after Syria and now found their real masters. See how crooked relations. PKK had never given a decision with self determination in its history always related to external sources. And Uğur Mumcu detected these betrayers who permeated in the state, could also be army members but saying deep state army is nonsense. As i said before the ones who did not accept the exacted south-east politics, immediately annihilated like Mumcu or general Eşref Bitlis.
Quoting thhandsom: Ugur Mumcu was killed by the deep state..was he not? |
Yes, but not the deep state u described.
Quoting thehandsom: Well I disagree on that..
We have to live together.. |
Who says? And i talked about the Kurds who serves for the aims of imperialists and the ones who dream a Kurdistan on the lands of Turkey.
Quoting thehandsom: But what I am sure that, most of the Turks are unaware of where the borders of those terms. |
But you sure . You the only one aware of .
Quoting thehandsom: If you think that what you have as nationalism in turkey is the nationalism Ataturk tried to implement, then you have no idea about the transformation of Turkish nationalism during second world war. |
What you try to say?. Somebody erased the ideology of Atatürk nationalism during WW2, students still learn them in schools.
Quoting thehandsom: What you have is the racist nationalism of Nihat Atsiz not nationalism of Ataturk!!
Even if we ignore Nihal Atsiz factor, we are talking about the time which was 100 years ago. It was the rise of nationalism etc. |
Haha, and you follow the nationalism of Atatürk? You contradict yourself above. You are talking about here that Kurds were obsessed, imprisoned ,why you only needed to voice Kurds, or u forgot the mention Turks or other ethnicities who were obsessed, imprisoned during the same period. You are double-faced Mr.handsom, and I can call u Kurdish-racist.
Quoting the handsom: Nationalism itself, as an ideolgy, classify people as 'us' and 'them' . |
These completely wrong description. Whats the classification dependant? If race, then it is racism. All nations in the world call people “us†and “themâ€. They support their countries football team while playing against another country for example.
Quoting thehandsom: That is part of the reason why it is easy to slide into racism from nationalism (same rule applies to religion as well). |
This not includes Atatürk nationalism. And i guess u will again say i have no knowledge of transfromation of Turkish nationalism.
Quoting thehandsom: The Kurdish problem is purely the result of this extremist nationalism for example. And it is so obvious, the extend of nationalism is undermining Ataturk's main objective of westernization for Turkey.. |
, You are again false, if u want to see the source of Kurdish problem, just read again my previous post, you will observe who are real problems and this atmosphere surely encourages extremists just like left-right fight before, now ethnicity is being used.
Quoting thehandsom: As one of our professors(Baskin Oran) put it 'nationalism was the necessary to build a state 100 years ago but now you have to get rid of the nationalism in order to keep your state together'. |
Again not includes Atatürk nationalism. Baskın Oran, sweety old-man, confusing all and himself also .
|
|