6844. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 03:41 pm |
Quoting femme_fatal: Quoting thehandsom:
I never ever said that Ottomans DID NOT commit war crimes. And I am quite ashamed of my country's human rights records.
|
yes, correct, 'im not that much loud about those issues, as im when its related to US and the west!'
Quoting thehandsom:
Iraq is not your country..Share the intelligance or not..I dont care. I always said Turkey should not invade Northern Iraq.
|
invasion! i can see how tomorrow iraq is going to be 51 state of USA.
Quoting thehandsom:
Yes. You made your decision about Iraq, because of the OIL. Everybody knows that Iraq was not a threat to USA.
Are you suggesting that because you need oil and oil has huge impact on you(r economy), so you have right to invade a country and get 1.000.000 million people killed?
As I said before: this is day time oil robbery.
|
'because of OIL' is a very cheap and shallow statement i always hear!
1. iraq is not the only OILY country. the saudi is much richer with oil, then why not 'invade' saudi or all the other oily countries? USA has enough powerful military to do so.
2. if USA needs oil it could have had it long ago, it could have occupied the whole area a half century ago.
3. USA has alerady has a potential influence on the OIL market, in other words it has the most of consessions and the market under the control.
pls, read about a bit of oil and its history, i recommend the book THE PRIZE of daniel yergin, the authority in this sphere.
|
You are cracking me here again femme..
Does USA need to invade Saudi for oil?
USA NEED oil today and tomorrow.
And when do you call an invasion 'an invasion' then?
haha
|
|