Turkey |
|
|
|
Turkey cannot turn its back on democracy
|
1. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 08:30 pm |
News Politics
[By Today's Zaman] Turkey cannot turn its back on democracy
The General Staff issued a statement in the late hours of Friday night. Since the statement was very harsh, some likened it to a "military memorandum." The stability that has been sustained in the last four-and-a-half years was clouded. On the other hand, some commentaries made over the General Staff's stance were even harsher. The negative atmosphere that emerged in a very short time, unfortunately, reflected a landscape that would severely embarrass Turkey in the international arena. International news agencies reflected this picture, which will likely shake the trust in Turkish democracy and harm stability.
The debate sparked late in the night was not at all a befitting scene for Turkey. Intellectuals who managed to get over the initial shock immediately adopted a common stance in favor of resolving all problems through democratic means. This stance is important. In fact, things like military memoranda or coups not only harm politics but also all the institutions of the state and the nation at large.
Following the statement of the General Staff, all the eyes were riveted on the government. Government spokesman Cemil Çiçek read out a very meticulously written statement prepared after hours of deliberations, and underlined important details. In the statement, which highlighted the fact that the General Staff was an institution attached to the government, he pointed out that the government was seriously concerned and upset; he mentioned efforts to "incite the judicial system against the government" and drew attention to an imminent danger. "We should frustrate the efforts of some people with evil intentions trying to pit our Turkish Armed Forces against our government," Çiçek stressed.
Considering the statement in its entirety, we see that the government adopted a dignified stance against a possible military operation but without being obstinate, and offered dialogue to prevent certain malicious circles from getting what they desire. This is the right move.
Certain groups have been making particular and painstaking efforts to create a rift between the government and certain institutions of the state. There may have been certain events which were easy to misinterpret, and there may have been certain attitudes which cannot not be approved; however being a state necessitates being even-tempered and acting in a sound-minded fashion. The reflection of Turkey's state tradition on institutions and politics definitely entails acting in an imperturbable manner. Turkey has so to say it has digested democracy and the republic not only through its citizens but also through its institutions. We should be able to see this clearly; Turkey is also going through a very critical process. Now, everyone is carrying a large wicker basket full of eggs on their backs. The plummeting of the Turkish economy would serve no one, neither the politicians nor the military and it would have grave consequences which we would altogether have to suffer. It is unthinkable for Turkey, which has made a great headway in the EU process, to renounce democracy and become introverted. We cannot rashly sacrifice the benefits we have so far made from the republic and democracy for the sake of the evil instinct of polarization.
Today is the day everyone should remember their responsibilities. While Çiçek noted on Friday that "We should frustrate the efforts of some people with evil intentions trying to pit our Turkish Armed Forces against our government," ANAVATAN leader Erkan Mumcu said, "Regime guardianship would bring no good to the country; we should now take each other by the hand," and leader of DYP Mehmet Ağar stressed, "The only existing path is democracy."
At this stage, there are important duties that should be assumed, first and foremost by CHP leader Deniz Baykal. Fomenting tensions all the time will neither benefit the government nor the opposition. Any effort to polarize the society will cause serious harm to this country. Therefore, everyone from the soldiers to civilians, from the media to the business world must act responsibly and look for ways of a resolution within democracy, no matter how big the problem is.
The Turkey of 2007 has assigned this responsibility to everyone. Overlooking this reality is tantamount to heading into an obscure adventure in which our descendants will definitely hold us responsible before history. There is no need for such an adventure. The Turkey of today and tomorrow invites everyone to take upon themselves a responsibility.
That responsibility is consolidated by the belief that we can’t afford to turn our backs on democracy.
28.04.2007
|
|
2. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 08:36 pm |
Kaddersokak, what is your personal opinion?
|
|
3. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 08:45 pm |
my personal opinion is democracy forever. Turkey is not a third world country so army should be under the civilian control that is the government elected by Turkish people. only in third world countries those who contol means of violence control government.
|
|
4. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 08:47 pm |
Quoting kaddersokak: my personal opinion is democracy forever. Turkey is not a third world country so army should be under the civilian control that is the government elected by Turkish people. only in third world countries those who contol means of violence control government. |
Army is also under civilian control in Turkiye until they attempt to change the unchangable laws...Turkiye is a secular democratic republic...
|
|
5. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 08:54 pm |
Quoting armegon:
unchangable laws QUOTE]
OMG, İs it Qu'ran, or Bible ?!!! |
|
|
6. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 08:58 pm |
Quoting CANLI: Quoting armegon:
unchangable laws QUOTE]
OMG, İs it Qu'ran, or Bible ?!!! |
It is the laws of Kemal Ataturk, the founder of Turkish Republic and turkish people are not ungrateful...OK? |
|
|
7. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 09:03 pm |
Quoting armegon:
Army is also under civilian control in Turkiye until they attempt to change the unchangable laws...Turkiye is a secular democratic republic... |
İ accept if that is your opinion and your choice,but at least dont fool yourself and call it democratic.
Democratic nation is ALWAYS under civilian control,and army duty is protect her from outsider threats.
Even the insider is the police duty not the army.
So dont tell me its democratic.
|
|
8. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 09:06 pm |
Quoting armegon: turkish people are not ungrateful...OK? |
Ungratful ?!!!
İts your LİFE !
Ok,i gave up ,world is a lovely place to live in
|
|
9. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 09:11 pm |
Quoting CANLI: Quoting armegon:
Army is also under civilian control in Turkiye until they attempt to change the unchangable laws...Turkiye is a secular democratic republic... |
İ accept if that is your opinion and your choice,but at least dont fool yourself and call it democratic.
Democratic nation is ALWAYS under civilian control,and army duty is protect her from outsider threats.
Even the insider is the police duty not the army.
So dont tell me its democratic.
|
there is nothing undemocratic issue here...U can not think Turkiye as your country or any other country else in the world...Turkiye's situation is very different, Turkiye is in a very important region and has lots of enemies so always should has a powerfull army...
|
|
10. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 09:13 pm |
Quoting CANLI: Quoting armegon: turkish people are not ungrateful...OK? |
Ungratful ?!!!
İts your LİFE !
Ok,i gave up ,world is a lovely place to live in  |
If there is not a leader like Kemal Ataturk then there is not a country called Turkish Republic today...
|
|
11. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 09:22 pm |
Quoting armegon:
If there is not a leader like Kemal Ataturk then there is not a country called Turkish Republic today... |
armegon, you shouldn't really say that
Türkiye was there and is there and will be there by her sons
Türkiye was a very strong country,it was an Empire,and that was before Kemal Ataturk.
İt was greater than USA these days,and was standing face to face to the Roman Empire,and the whole West.
And that was by her men ,and will always be
So Türkiye is rich by her men,you really shouldnt say that.
One man no matter how great he was wont make Türkiye.
Türkiye already great,and that what make EU afraid of her
|
|
12. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 09:25 pm |
Quoting CANLI: Quoting armegon:
If there is not a leader like Kemal Ataturk then there is not a country called Turkish Republic today... |
armegon, you shouldn't really say that
Türkiye was there and is there and will be there by her sons
Türkiye was a very strong country,it was an Empire,and that was before Kemal Ataturk.
İt was greater than USA these days,and was standing face to face to the Roman Empire,and the whole West.
And that was by its men .
So Türkiye is rich by her men,you really shouldnt say that.
One man no matter how great he was wont make Türkiye.
Türkiye already great,and that what make EU afraid of her  |
Hahaha you dont know Turkish history, do u know what happened in independence war?
|
|
13. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 09:28 pm |
Please people, do not get too emotional or personal. It's an interesting topic and I would feel sad if it get's locked because of this.
|
|
14. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 09:37 pm |
Quoting armegon:
Hahaha you dont know Turkish history, do u know what happened in independence war? |
Not really,do you care to tell me what happened ?
|
|
15. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 09:41 pm |
We still see Ataturk the only real turkish hero. he has blond hair and blue eyes. This is taught us in schools. all the foreign countries are our enemies. this is taught us in schools too. Ataturk passed away in 1938 but we visit his mosaleum and talk to him as if he is alive. Ataturk said the only real friends of Turks are Turks (not Americans, Europeans, or Arabs). Ataturk lived between 1881 and 1938. has anything changed in the world since 1938?
our economy is not good, our democracy is not good but we do not care because we have a powerfull army and we can kill our enemies.
|
|
16. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 09:47 pm |
I understand why Atatürk is important to many turks even today because the allies tried to tear the rest of the empire apart and he prevented that but it doesn't mean that the rules and laws regarding society back then still are as valid today, because times have changed a lot since then.
|
|
17. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 09:47 pm |
Quoting kaddersokak: We still see Ataturk the only real turkish hero. he has blond hair and blue eyes. This is taught us in schools. all the foreign countries are our enemies. this is taught us in schools too. Ataturk passed away in 1938 but we visit his mosaleum and talk to him as if he is alive. Ataturk said the only real friends of Turks are Turks (not Americans, Europeans, or Arabs). Ataturk lived between 1881 and 1938. has anything changed in the world since 1938?
our economy is not good, our democracy is not good but we do not care because we have a powerfull army and we can kill our enemies. |
So you stayed at primary school and do not need to search and learn the revolutions of Atatürk, you can only describe phisically...So many things changed till 1938 but enemies of Turkiye still remain, there are always lessons to take from history... why are we learning history?Is history a story u listen when you are sleeping?
|
|
18. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 09:53 pm |
Quoting CANLI: Quoting armegon:
Hahaha you dont know Turkish history, do u know what happened in independence war? |
Not really,do you care to tell me what happened ? |
Please check other leaders what they said about Ataturk. Here we are talking about Kemal Ataturk the great leader of Turkiye so if u love Turkiye and talk about Turkiye, you should know something about Kemal Ataturk and respect him and his country...i cannot tell u longly about turkish history, u can find lots of documents on net, if u have some problems to understand then u can ask me why a pm or mail...
|
|
19. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 10:03 pm |
Quoting kaddersokak:
our economy is not good, our democracy is not good but we do not care because we have a powerfull army and we can kill our enemies. |
This is a powerful statement and I have read on another thread that someone stated that Turkey has lots of enemies. What is it about your enemies? Who are they? As far as I am aware Turkey has many allies. It concerns me that you are saying because you have a powerful army you do not care about democracy. A powerful army is not the answer to democracy, as has been stated in another related thread.
|
|
20. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 10:12 pm |
Quoting libralady: Quoting kaddersokak:
our economy is not good, our democracy is not good but we do not care because we have a powerfull army and we can kill our enemies. |
This is a powerful statement and I have read on another thread that someone stated that Turkey has lots of enemies. What is it about your enemies? Who are they? As far as I am aware Turkey has many allies. It concerns me that you are saying because you have a powerful army you do not care about democracy. A powerful army is not the answer to democracy, as has been stated in another related thread. |
Thats not a powerful statement, that is the fault of politicians after the time of Kemal Ataturk...Our economy cannot be good, but people want honour not money u cannot understand this. In Turkiye Turks are being abased. Also our democracy is fine. Our enemies are imperialist countries who try to divide Turkiye's unity like in independence war...I want both democracy and powerful army maybe u undersyood wrong?
|
|
21. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 10:16 pm |
a powerfull country has three things:
a powerful economy
a powerful democracy
a powerful army
our enemies are not greeks, americans, arabs, or europeans, the real enemy is the enemy inside that is who are against economic and democratic stability and who supports military intervention in politics...
now all the people make fun of us because in our country government is warned by armed forces which is supposed to be under civilian control...
|
|
22. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 10:20 pm |
Quoting armegon: Quoting libralady: Quoting kaddersokak:
our economy is not good, our democracy is not good but we do not care because we have a powerfull army and we can kill our enemies. |
This is a powerful statement and I have read on another thread that someone stated that Turkey has lots of enemies. What is it about your enemies? Who are they? As far as I am aware Turkey has many allies. It concerns me that you are saying because you have a powerful army you do not care about democracy. A powerful army is not the answer to democracy, as has been stated in another related thread. |
Thats not a powerful statement, that is the fault of politicians after the time of Kemal Ataturk...Our economy cannot be good, but people want honour not money u cannot understand this. In Turkiye Turks are being abased. Also our democracy is fine. Our enemies are imperialist countries who try to divide Turkiye's unity like in independence war...I want both democracy and powerful army maybe u undersyood wrong? |
Forgive me but you are not Kaddersokak?? No I dont understnd that is why I ask. But it is a powerful statement when one says they have a powerful army and will kill our enemies!! What I am saying, who are these enemies? Who are these imperialist countries? Maybe I am being naive and I should know but I am on the outside looking in.
|
|
23. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 10:20 pm |
"but people (Turks) want honour not money"
then why on the earth do hundred of thousands Turkish people apply for American green card lottery or why do hundreds of people wait in front of the emabssies to get a visa to Europe?
|
|
24. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 10:20 pm |
Quoting kaddersokak: a powerfull country had three things:
a powerful economy
a powerful democracy
a powerful army
our enemies are not greeks, americans, arabs, or europeans, the real enemy is the enemy inside that is who are against economic and democratic stability and who supports military intervention in politics...
now all the people make fun of us because in our country government is warned by armed forces which is supposed to be under civilian control...
|
If it is ok for army to take control whenever it wants then why do we have elections, we can just live in a Totaliterian regime like and ban elections and generals can rule the country. All that money for elections will not be wasted at least
|
|
25. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 10:21 pm |
Quoting kaddersokak: a powerfull country had three things:
a powerful economy
a powerful democracy
a powerful army
our enemies are not greeks, americans, arabs, or europeans, the real enemy is the enemy inside that is who are against economic and democratic stability and who supports military intervention in politics...
now all the people make fun of us because in our country government is warned by armed forces which is supposed to be under civilian control...
|
So you think like that look at weapons of PKK where they made from...Do People make fun of us at the time of Kemal Ataturk?You are right we have also enemies inside, read "Gençliğe Hitabe" and decide who they are..Okeyto?
|
|
26. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 10:24 pm |
Quoting kaddersokak: a powerfull country has three things:
a powerful economy
a powerful democracy
a powerful army
our enemies are not greeks, americans, arabs, or europeans, the real enemy is the enemy inside that is who are against economic and democratic stability and who supports military intervention in politics...
now all the people make fun of us because in our country government is warned by armed forces which is supposed to be under civilian control...
|
Thanks, that makes more sense but I am sure no one is laughing at you (Turkey), at such a serious issue.
|
|
27. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 10:30 pm |
Quoting ruthless87: Quoting kaddersokak: a powerfull country had three things:
a powerful economy
a powerful democracy
a powerful army
our enemies are not greeks, americans, arabs, or europeans, the real enemy is the enemy inside that is who are against economic and democratic stability and who supports military intervention in politics...
now all the people make fun of us because in our country government is warned by armed forces which is supposed to be under civilian control...
|
If it is ok for army to take control whenever it wants then why do we have elections, we can just live in a Totaliterian regime like and ban elections and generals can rule the country. All that money for elections will not be wasted at least  |
You go and read my other comments, then write here...I know your aim and what you have written about Ataturk...
|
|
28. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 10:34 pm |
Quoting kaddersokak: "but people (Turks) want honour not money"
then why on the earth do hundred of thousands Turkish people apply for American green card lottery or why do hundreds of people wait in front of the emabssies to get a visa to Europe? |
How do u know?Do u work for American embassy?You say thousands then hunreds... And also i see nothing wrong about that...People sure want money but first honour...If u only want money then okey...
|
|
29. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 10:45 pm |
Quoting armegon:
there is nothing undemocratic issue here...U can not think Turkiye as your country or any other country else in the world...Turkiye's situation is very different, Turkiye is in a very important region and has lots of enemies so always should has a powerfull army... |
We are in a very difficult stiuation too,we have lots of enemies too,and we should have a powerful army too,but we also have some choices ,and not forced by our army!
|
|
30. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 10:52 pm |
Quoting CANLI: Quoting armegon:
there is nothing undemocratic issue here...U can not think Turkiye as your country or any other country else in the world...Turkiye's situation is very different, Turkiye is in a very important region and has lots of enemies so always should has a powerfull army... |
We are in a very difficult stiuation too,we have lots of enemies too,and we should have a powerful army too,but we also have some choices ,and not forced by our army!
|
Good, i dont know which country you are from, but do not compare Turkiye with your country or any other country, all has its special situations...
Sağlıcakla Kal!!
|
|
31. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 11:02 pm |
"Turkey has a special stiuation or a condition" is another discourse to justify the undemocratic acts in Turkey. That means Turkey has a special stiuation so in Turkey we can not have full democracy, Turkey is a modern country but army should be more powerfull than government.
Yes, Turkey is a special case because we do not have a real democracy but we say we are a modern country. If we want to be a modern country in European standarts, representatives selected by people, not armed forces, should govern Turkey.
if we do not trust civil goverments, turkey will continue to be a special case.
|
|
32. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 11:06 pm |
Quoting kaddersokak: "Turkey has a special stiuation or a condition" is another discourse to justify the undemocratic acts in Turkey. That means Turkey has a special stiuation so in Turkey we can not have full democracy, Turkey is a modern country but army should be more powerfull than government.
Yes, Turkey is a special case because we do not have a real democracy but we say we are a modern country. If we want to be a modern country in European standarts, representatives selected by people, not armed forces, should govern Turkey.
if we do not trust civil goverments, turkey will continue to be a special case.
|
If one goes by Armegon's view then one can also say that, foreigners should not be allow inside Turkey, because they might be spies.
How about taking it one stage further, like in 1984.
|
|
33. |
29 Apr 2007 Sun 11:12 pm |
Quoting kaddersokak: "Turkey has a special stiuation or a condition" is another discourse to justify the undemocratic acts in Turkey. That means Turkey has a special stiuation so in Turkey we can not have full democracy, Turkey is a modern country but army should be more powerfull than government.
Yes, Turkey is a special case because we do not have a real democracy but we say we are a modern country. If we want to be a modern country in European standarts, representatives selected by people, not armed forces, should govern Turkey.
if we do not trust civil goverments, turkey will continue to be a special case.
|
I do not say anything like that the army should be powerful than government...I said army's duty is to protect first 4 laws of Constitution...Dont basterdize the subject...Dont you want Kemal Ataturk?the thoughts of Kemal Ataturk? In world the right of women of to elect and being elected given by Turkish Republic first...Dont you want these 4 laws then nothing can be talked with you...You can also change the name of country and the flag or anything...huh?
|
|
34. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 02:04 am |
Protecting the 'secular democratic social law-state ', as turkish republic is defined in our constitution, is no contradiction to democracy.One cannot talk about democracy unless there is secularism.One cannot talk about democracy in a country where people have to live according to the rules of a certain religion.Islamist states cannot be called democracies and our oh-so-democrat islamists who keep harping on about democracy, admitt democracy is not the aim,it is just a tool to get them there where they wanna be.Which is an islamist state thats run by Sheria.And this is islamist-fashism.
Secularism is an essential component of democracy and therefore protected in our constitution. It's one of the unchangable principles of the constitution.Twist it all you want,Army does not intervene with politics.They respect democractic institutions.But when these founding principles of our democracy is at stake its their duty to protect the regime acording to our constitution.No regime is suicidal.
KADDERSOKAK, go spam other boards with your islamist propaganda and anti-republican drivel taken from Fettullah Hoca press.We've heard it all before and we are not impressed
All you can fool is some foreigners here with very limited knowledge about Turkey matters.And they are not the ones who will decide about Turkey's future
Anyway,noone wants a coup here, so forget about Armed Forces, meet the Unarmed Forces of Turkiye we are relying on
After more than 1 million protestors in Ankara 2 weeks ago, now 3- 4 million demostraters rally in Istanbul to show their support to our Secular Republic,and protest AKP and its presidential candidate.
kadersokak baksana kaç kişiyiz saysana sonra da dön senin 2. cumhuriyetçi/takkeli taifesini bi say bakalım .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Mrihah8HVU&mode=related&search=
sing along kadersokak , bir başkadır benim memleketim...lay lay lay lay lay lay lay lay....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3gN34XQao0
I hear the footsteps of early elections, there we will take care of this AKP government.
|
|
35. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 03:00 am |
Quoting leander: One cannot talk about democracy in a country where people have to live according to the rules of a certain religion.Islamist states cannot be called democracies and our oh-so-democrat islamists who keep harping on about democracy, admitt democracy is not the aim,it is just a tool to get them there where they wanna be.Which is an islamist state thats run by Sheria.And this is islamist-fashism.
|
When people lie,does that made lying right ?
Helal ?!!!!!!
When applying İslam in a wrong way,then what is wrong is the İslam or the methods,hidden agenda ?!!
And btw,what do you think inspired Westen Democratic countries while putting their own laws ?!
Did they all invent it ?so its all some how very much close to each other,they all got the border lines in one time by hidden inspiration?
But not from religions,No ?!!!
Cannt be ,huh ?!!!
You just memorize,you dont analyze !
Shaking head !!!
And btw,take care of what you are calling fascism !
You can call system fascism ,but NOT religion!
|
|
36. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 03:11 am |
|
|
37. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 08:30 am |
Caglayan Square is very near my home, so we went there yesterday to take part. Turkey is special, and different. You cannot compare its struggle to modernize and maintain its independence to any other country's.
In a sense, this country is still being governed by Ataturk (and thats a good thing).
The constitution is very clear regrading secularism. Some feel that Buyukanit was out of line in his midnight statement on Friday. But it is his duty to make clear that unsecular leadership in Turkey will not be tolerated. And by announcing this at midnight on Friday, he minimized any damage to turkish stock market and economy.
Lets not forget that Erdogan spent time in jail as mayor of Istanbul, after wideranging laws he made that are in-line with fundamental islamic law. Some no different than what we would expect from Taliban or Iranian government. Is this the direction we want Turkey to follow?
And since erdogan and gul have come to power, islamic teaching has received more priority in public schools. Schools hold contests for children who can memorize and recite the Koran the best. This is not the type of education needed to move Turkey forward.
Even TUSIAD has come forward with its opposition to an AK Party Presidency.
Turkey is secular and will remain secular...
|
|
38. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 09:12 am |
I have no fear about secularism. I dont think they can forward turkey to an islamic state. coz R. tayyip and gul have worked very much for European Union more than other goverments before. but now? all of the ppl in cağlayan meeting are against to join EU. and I wanna ask... did erdogan decide to join european union??? NO. turkey applied to be a member 40 years ago. if they had a different opinion they would give up this... Turkey's face is towards to west but these ppl still think different coz tayyip and gul are religious...Being religious is not dangerous. it s their belief, and I respect this and it s none of our businees if his wife has head scarf. Turkey is a democratic country and turkish nation wanted these ppl to govern us. and it s not duty of BUYUKANIT to warn goverment. his duty is protect turkey against enemies. if they think they can warn goverment, they must warn kurdish parties coz his duty is defending the rights of turkish soldiars...
|
|
39. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 09:23 am |
Of course being religous is not wrong. But, bringing religion into government is wrong. The constitution set by Ataturk is clear. If Turkey has to choose between satisfying EU law or satisfying Ataturk law, who do you think they will choose?
|
|
40. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 09:44 am |
Quoting KeithL: Of course being religous is not wrong. But, bringing religion into government is wrong. The constitution set by Ataturk is clear. If Turkey has to choose between satisfying EU law or satisfying Ataturk law, who do you think they will choose? |
yes... they dont say anything opposite and I didnt hear anything against secularism from them. just his wife has head scarf and they go to mosque on friday. is this bringing religion into government? it s not right to use someone's family (head scraf of his daughter or wife) for politic aims. I just see what they do for this country and as I see they do good things, in the way of EU they are being successful. and now turkey's economy better than before. and this is the way ataturk showed to follow. for turkey it s impossible to turn back from secularism and it s nonsense to worry. our mosr importent subject is economy not our president's belief.
|
|
41. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 09:50 am |
Than why are the public school's showing greater emphasis in teaching Islam? This has happened during the rise of AK Party. This is a greater concern than his wife's headscarf...
|
|
42. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 09:59 am |
Quoting KeithL: Than why are the public school's showing greater emphasis in teaching Islam in public school's? This has happened during the rise of AK Party. This is a greater concern than his wife's headscarf... |
turkey's education curriculum hasnt changed. Religion lessons are same as before. same lessons and same subjects...if you dont know. head scarf is still forbidden in schools. and religious schools are closed. I dont see any difference about this. Ak party didnt change anything. if they wanted they would allow head scarf in schools.
|
|
43. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 10:08 am |
Thats not what I hear from those I know with children in school. And others feel the same way. This is the same man that banned alcohol in istanbul 10 years ago. He or Gul, or any other AK Party leader cannot be trusted as President.
And if they are so good for economy, then why has TUSIAD also spoken out against them?
|
|
44. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 10:22 am |
I dont understand KeithL,are you againist people to have their own believes?
Or even choices in what they wear?
If governmet allow this,that make it a bad government?!!!
|
|
45. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 10:25 am |
I believe in following Ataturk's outline for secularism. I have no problem with women wearing headscarves. Or men being religous.
But in the past AK Party/Welare party beliefs have influenced politics and law. This alone makes Erdogan or Gul unacceptable for President.
|
|
46. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 10:35 am |
But Erdogan has been elected by people,wont that say anything at all ?
Like maybe they want him ??!!!
I dont really know what is the problem,
People of Turkiye will say what they want, why to control that by an army threat ?
|
|
47. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 10:41 am |
He was elected as Prime Minister, not President. Millions of Turks have marched in the last weeks. Turks are voting, with their voices and their feet. Aren't you listening?
|
|
48. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 10:54 am |
Turkiye is only Istanbul and Ankara ?!
Why dont you see and listen to others too not just people who are in picture?!
|
|
49. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 11:03 am |
I dont know where you get your information from. People bussed in from all regions of turkey for both events, not only Istanbul and Ankara. And I'm sure you are aware that Istanbul and Ankara are the two largest cities. Between them, they represent about 25% of the country's population.
And soon, there will be a rally in Germany by Turks who live there, also against AK Party.
Look who is against the AK party gaining the presidency. It is the well educated Turks. University staff, business leaders, senior military staff. Do you think these people are stupid?
Not living in Turkey, where do you form your opinion on this subject?
|
|
50. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 01:44 pm |
thats really interesting ,as if 2 different Turkish people living in our wonderfull country,and some of em using secularism as a political weapon,sure a a few people (only a few mariginals) wants an islamic country,but thats never barrier for the other millions,and not easy to believe how come this much discussions about beliefs in a secualr and law country??i believe thats no problem in the big part of Turkish people about beliefs,but just some mariginals (especially who calls theirself intellectual and democratical)using secualrism for ther selfish political aims and worries.Friends!!!Turkey is a law country,and has a big power,so everythings will be finer when we trust each other more and we respect to rules of democracy...
|
|
51. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 04:08 pm |
We will fix the problems. Don't you worry. Those Arab admirers in Turkia can be sure they will pay for their actions.
|
|
52. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 04:12 pm |
Democracy will win!
|
|
53. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 04:56 pm |
Quoting erdinc: We will fix the problems. Don't you worry. Those Arab admirers in Turkia can be sure they will pay for their actions. |
Yes!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
54. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 08:03 pm |
Quoting KeithL: Thats not what I hear from those I know with children in school. And others feel the same way. This is the same man that banned alcohol in istanbul 10 years ago. He or Gul, or any other AK Party leader cannot be trusted as President.
And if they are so good for economy, then why has TUSIAD also spoken out against them? |
Who, when, where, why, how!? I didn't know that.
|
|
55. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 08:30 pm |
Something that I can't underatand...
What kind of power does the president have compared to the PM? When the army is concerned about AKP why did they allow Erdoğan to become PM?
Like janissary said earlier, Turkey is secular country and there's just no chance that it will change. With that said, it is impossible to seperate politics and ethics completely. Islam has deep roots in Turkey and that is bound to influence ethic questions, same goes for all other countries.
|
|
56. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 09:18 pm |
We should discuss about law of elections. Because they are there for 36 percent. But they represent 64 of congress. Do you think this is fair? Democracy is not system. It is a way of living. And has to protect itself. If not, there wont be a democracy at all. It is hard to reach in this condition for fundemantalist which they are in now. So they have to protect their places. They have to change all of the republican basics, so they could get all the power and never give it back. Lighten up, they are the wolves who looks like sheep!
|
|
57. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 09:54 pm |
Quoting aslı: We should discuss about law of elections. Because they are there for 36 percent. But they represent 64 of congress. Do you think this is fair? Democracy is not system. It is a way of living. And has to protect itself. If not, there wont be a democracy at all. It is hard to reach in this condition for fundemantalist which they are in now. So they have to protect their places. They have to change all of the republican basics, so they could get all the power and never give it back. Lighten up, they are the wolves who looks like sheep! |
Did this matter about the parliament came to peoples' mind just now? All of those parties who are oppose to the election system(Presidential and 10% in parliament), were once in government.
Also I want to ask everyone whether they have chosen to be born as whatever race they are?
|
|
58. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 09:57 pm |
Quoting qdemir: Quoting KeithL: Thats not what I hear from those I know with children in school. And others feel the same way. This is the same man that banned alcohol in istanbul 10 years ago. He or Gul, or any other AK Party leader cannot be trusted as President.
And if they are so good for economy, then why has TUSIAD also spoken out against them? |
Who, when, where, why, how!? I didn't know that.
|
Erdogan was mayor of Istanbul in the 1990's. And when he was mayor, he tried to ban the sale of alcohol in Istanbul. He did this by introducing a law saying it was forbidden to sell alcohol within "100 or 200" meters of camii's. Well, there are camii's everywhere. So this law would have shut down every pub in Istanbul.
|
|
59. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 10:29 pm |
Quoting aslı: We should discuss about law of elections. Because they are there for 36 percent. But they represent 64 of congress. Do you think this is fair? Democracy is not system. It is a way of living. And has to protect itself. If not, there wont be a democracy at all. It is hard to reach in this condition for fundemantalist which they are in now. So they have to protect their places. They have to change all of the republican basics, so they could get all the power and never give it back. Lighten up, they are the wolves who looks like sheep! |
this election laws were conducted by loser of the last election.did u forget it???turkish ppl gave this right to AKP to govern country.yes it is 36 percent,and they have rights. so others (%64)must have thought this before and result of next election will be same again...
so we want democracy and respect to ppl who elected governers...
kisses u all
|
|
60. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 10:42 pm |
So how did the speech go tonight?
|
|
61. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 10:43 pm |
This is not democracy. Who is representing me and fighting for my rights now? And if they fights, is 36 of congress enough for the represent of %64 of Turkey? I love Ataturk, Ilove Turkish republic and I love who loves this country as much as me(love this country the way it is, "Turkish Republic").
|
|
62. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 10:47 pm |
Quoting KeithL: Quoting qdemir: Quoting KeithL: Thats not what I hear from those I know with children in school. And others feel the same way. This is the same man that banned alcohol in istanbul 10 years ago. He or Gul, or any other AK Party leader cannot be trusted as President.
And if they are so good for economy, then why has TUSIAD also spoken out against them? |
Who, when, where, why, how!? I didn't know that.
|
Erdogan was mayor of Istanbul in the 1990's. And when he was mayor, he tried to ban the sale of alcohol in Istanbul. He did this by introducing a law saying it was forbidden to sell alcohol within "100 or 200" meters of camii's. Well, there are camii's everywhere. So this law would have shut down every pub in Istanbul. |
Only the parliment is entitled to enact any legislation, and in some cases the council of ministers is allowed to enact some legislation by decrees.
According to an existing law, no bar, night club etc is allowed to be opened within 100m from any school. However, unfortunately the law isn't put into practice in big cities.
|
|
63. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 10:54 pm |
Quoting aslı: We should discuss about law of elections. Because they are there for 36 percent. But they represent 64 of congress. Do you think this is fair? Democracy is not system. It is a way of living. And has to protect itself. If not, there wont be a democracy at all. It is hard to reach in this condition for fundemantalist which they are in now. So they have to protect their places. They have to change all of the republican basics, so they could get all the power and never give it back. Lighten up, they are the wolves who looks like sheep! |
18 percent governed turkey before AKP but nobody said this is unfair at that time. and they caused a big ecomomic crise. that s why turkish nation didnt let them to go in Turkish Grand National Assembly again. Rules can change but not for some ppl. all of the leftist parties were in cağlayan but they will see others in next election....
|
|
64. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 10:59 pm |
Quoting janissary: Quoting aslı: We should discuss about law of elections. Because they are there for 36 percent. But they represent 64 of congress. Do you think this is fair? Democracy is not system. It is a way of living. And has to protect itself. If not, there wont be a democracy at all. It is hard to reach in this condition for fundemantalist which they are in now. So they have to protect their places. They have to change all of the republican basics, so they could get all the power and never give it back. Lighten up, they are the wolves who looks like sheep! |
18 percent governed turkey before AKP but nobody said this is unfair at that time. and they caused a big ecomomic crise. that s why turkish nation didnt let them to go in Turkish Grand National Assembly again. Rules can change but not for some ppl. all of the leftist parties were in cağlayan but they will see others in next election.... |
If you are calling CHP a leftist party, All i can say to you(although Deniz Baykal(Chairman of CHP) is General Secretary of Socialist International (?)) CHP is on right of MHP(BNP of Turkey for those who know English politics)
|
|
65. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 11:14 pm |
Quoting libralady: So how did the speech go tonight? |
?????
|
|
66. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 11:16 pm |
Quoting libralady: Quoting libralady: So how did the speech go tonight? |
????? |
it was a good speech.
|
|
67. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 11:20 pm |
You are still on right- left. This is not about that. Are you ready to be forced on their rules, wear turban, join some cult, not to go somewhere without some male relative male with you? Go ahead! This is not about righties or lefties. By the way are calling Atatürk on left? Funny. Atatürk knows his nation's nature. That s why he removed caliph. But I guess some of you ready and willing to obey one again.
|
|
68. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 11:24 pm |
Quoting aslı: You are still on right- left. This is not about that. Are you ready to be forced on their rules, wear turban, join some cult, not to go somewhere without some male relative male with you? Go ahead! This is not about righties or lefties. By the way are calling Atatürk on left? Funny. Atatürk knows his nation's nature. That s why he removed caliph. But I guess some of you ready and willing to obey one again. |
nobody forced me to do these things for 4 years. he is prime minister for 4 years. why I cant see these things???
|
|
69. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 11:31 pm |
I really dont understand... if they are really against secularism and modernism. why they worked very hard for joining EU and succceed to get a date...
|
|
70. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 11:41 pm |
Anyone here heard about trojan horse? Until you in the castle you need to be look and behave nice. Once you are in, swords can be use! Read about Iran, learn how they became like this. Not with swords, not with face to face fighting. Democratic elections, after a couple years; you are not sure that, milkman knocking on your door. First of all they shot the pilots at 3 am in their home so any of the precious fighter Plane could not escape!
|
|
71. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 11:49 pm |
And somebody surely recall about adultery law. And alcoholic beverages at bosphorus, mosque in taksim square(like every mosque is overcrowded, needed new ones. We can pray everywhere if we are Muslims.) And remember he has charged about being against this country.They dont force u anything by now. They are busy with getting their sons rich(one of them killed a famous singer while walking on sidewalk,has not been charged), selling all Turkey has. When done, we will be next! I am not ready, please you first!
|
|
72. |
30 Apr 2007 Mon 11:58 pm |
Nobody needs to worry about secularism in Turkey. Just see the steep erosion of moral values in society; what kind of tv programmes are on the top in the ratings, the role models of the teenagers in society, the pornographic newspaper (Posta) outselling all the meanstream newspapers. Secularism is definitely not in danger. Secularism is nil itself without democracy. Some within the army who deem society's love of army on themselves have had the temerity to rape democracy. Why are the staunch defenders of secularism keeping silent?
"Democracy is really cool when it is for me only?"
|
|
73. |
01 May 2007 Tue 02:45 am |
Quoting azade: Something that I can't underatand...
What kind of power does the president have compared to the PM? When the army is concerned about AKP why did they allow Erdoğan to become PM? |
i'm a little confused on this myself as i have read conflicting reports on the president's actual roles.
some sources say that the president is only a figure head and has limited power compared to the prime minister who controls parliament and the government. others have said that the president has a veto on all laws and appoints many senior figures within the establishment.
traditionally, the president is a major upholder of the separation of religion and state. atatürk founded turkey as a strictly secular state. i would think that this wouldn't continue to occur if the president is a deeply religious person...it would be a conflict of interest so to speak.
one more thing to note is that if gül is elected as president, the prime minister AND the president of turkey will be from the same political party. some people say that this would make it easier for the ak party to push an "islamic" agenda into turkey.
|
|
74. |
01 May 2007 Tue 12:51 pm |
I don't care if the europeens or other super democratic countries think Turkey is an anti-democratic country, because that means whether they don't know enough about Turkey or they are in favor of an Islamic Turkey or a weaker Turkey.
Turkey is a very particular country, Turkish nation is a very particular nation, in order to understand what's been really going on in Turkey, you have to look really very close to Turkey as close as an individual living in Turkey.
In our constitution, the things that can never be changed or even questioned are clear, the priciples of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, and in the constitution the role of the turkish army is also very clear, "guardian of the Atatürk's regime". What is Atatürk's regime? It's a secular democratic republic. So, now you're calling Turkey an anti-democratic country? The europe is calling us anti-democratic? What is it to them? We don't want to enter the European Union anymore. They think that for us entering the EU is a matter of life and death.
All the world has seen what our people can do in case of an attack to our values. The instituion which turkish people trust the most is the army.
"The turkish army belongs to the turkish nation and the turkish nation belongs to the turkish army."
Every turkish person borns as a soldier, we don't need any democracy lessons of a Union that we will never enter into and of which imperialistic members would finish us if we had never done the independence war of Mustafa Kemal. Now, they consider it anti-democratic to follow our leader.
|
|
75. |
01 May 2007 Tue 01:23 pm |
Quoting KeithL: I dont know where you get your information from. People bussed in from all regions of turkey for both events, not only Istanbul and Ankara. And I'm sure you are aware that Istanbul and Ankara are the two largest cities. Between them, they represent about 25% of the country's population.
And soon, there will be a rally in Germany by Turks who live there, also against AK Party.
Look who is against the AK party gaining the presidency. It is the well educated Turks. University staff, business leaders, senior military staff. Do you think these people are stupid?
Not living in Turkey, where do you form your opinion on this subject?
|
İ get my information from Turkish people not only live in İstanbul and Ankara .
And i dont really understand what you aim for .
Do you say only well educated people, University staff, business leaders, senior military staff have rights for election and choose who is their leaders,and other people NOT ?!!
İ dont think all those people are stupid,i think everyone entitled to his opinion whether he is well educated or NOT!
Beside everyone of those got his own agenda which indicate his opinion.
And rally in Germany by Turks who are living there away from their home land not feeling the achievement that their current government which been elected by poeple of Türkiye did,what would that say ?!!!
And i wonder those Turk who live in Germany where do they form their opinion about this subject from ?!!!
You are living in İstanbul,then where do you form your opinion about what other people who live outside think ?!
İ guess those are not logic questions,right ?!
|
|
76. |
01 May 2007 Tue 01:42 pm |
Quoting erdinc: We will fix the problems. Don't you worry. Those Arab admirers in Turkia can be sure they will pay for their actions. |
İ dont understand who you refer to by saying Arab admirers,surely not the army
Then you must've meant the government,but i didnt see any action or anything from the governmet toward Arab countries more than normal between countries.
All the government interest in one direction EU .
Beside,this sentence is very much racism to me really.
Who admire Arab will pay for it.
How nice,that too is what secularism said ?
İ thought you with the government not against it,specially that you represent it as i understood!
|
|
77. |
01 May 2007 Tue 02:42 pm |
Quoting janissary: I really dont understand... if they are really against secularism and modernism. why they worked very hard for joining EU and succceed to get a date... |
Even themselves are confused. Within their party there is not a unity I think. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan comes from a party that is really islamic and before he had very radical ideas like changing the state completely to an islamic state, but later he established his own party and gained the sempathy of the people using both religion (not in a radical way) and also giving promises to make Turkey enter in the european union. It was a very big promise since the people believed everything would get better, especially economically.He might also have understood that only with the support of european union and US, he could get to power. And one of their biggest enemy is the army which is really secular and does not let any religious party rule the country. And the EU and the USA do not want the turkish army be so powerful. Maybe, the EU is only tactics for T. Erdoğan because years ago in his speeches he had said "he would use every possible way in order to accomplish their dreams (islamic dreams)" , he had also said, "democracy was just a tool for them to be successful" and with the help of EU, they can get to every possible high position. He also later said he had changed his old ideas, and he became a conservatrive democratic.
I think now he is being used by US in the plans of making the middle east a union of moderate islamic states. And the real secular democrats cannot trust Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, because it is not clear what he wants to do.
|
|
78. |
01 May 2007 Tue 04:43 pm |
First of all i am sorry for my English because i tried to translate quickly .
Portrait and some Declarations of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan through 1994-2006
*The time when he was the Major of İstanbul;
“Elhamdülillah we are the supporters of Sheriaâ€(21.11.1994 Milliyet)
“I am against the celebration of New yearâ€(19.12.1994 Sabah)
“I didnt go to dervish lodge(tekke), i went to dergahâ€(22.11.1997 Gözcü)
“No need to stand like a stake when showing respect to Atatürk†(12.5.1994 Hürriyet)
“Every 10th of November people make useless fussâ€(14.11.1994 Hürriyet)
“Alcohol should be bannedâ€(1.5.1996 Hürriyet)
“We will change İstanbul into Medinaâ€(Akis)
“All the schools in Türkiye will be changed into İmam Hatip(school for raising İmams) schoolsâ€(17.9.1994 Cumhuriyet)
“The colour of green(the colour of sidewalk) is civilisationâ€(25.6.1994)
“Only Imams should marry people officiallyâ€(9.5.1995 Milliyet)
“I am at the side of to open TBMM(Parliament) with praysâ€(When he was the major of İstanbul, every year opening of municipality council made by prays instead of Independence March. And again after an opening of the council, he gave this declaration)(8.1.1996 Milliyet)
“I am the Imam of İstanbulâ€(8.1.1995 Hürriyet)
“Advertisement of swimsuit is a exploitation of lustâ€(6.3.1996 Hürriyet)
“National lottery is a crueltyâ€(29.9.1994 Hürriyet)
“ President of Republic soon will be from İmam-Hatip.These days are so closeâ€(5.2.1996 Akit)
“There is no need of Kemalizm or a regime similar to Kemalizm in the future of countryâ€
“Mosques are our barracks, minarets are our bayonets, mümins(believer) are our soldiersâ€
“Democracy is not a aim, only a vehicle for us. We are affilied to democracy until we reach our aimsâ€
“Democracy is a tram for us. When we came to stopping place we want, we will get offâ€
*He was speeching to the public at meeting.
“A cow is sitting on the middle of our way, closing our way, blocking us to reach our range. We will remove that cow from our way at first with words gently, then we will remove somehow by the help of you†(Here cow means Secular Republic and Revolutions of Atatürk.)
*Again at a meeting
“Turkey should be divided into states. And some authority of central governance should be given to these states. And Majors should be the most authorized person. And at that regions everykind of education should also be under control of themâ€(is the same expressions of dividers like PKK)
“You can’t be secular and muslim both. You must choose to be a muslim or to be a secular. It is impossible, both of them can not be togetherâ€
“Our reference is İslam. Our only goal is Islamic Stateâ€
“If you say “Ne mutlu Türküm Diyene†others have right to say “Ne mutlu kürdüm â€â€(a reminder from the declaration of Turkish Military “Who is against the conception of Atatürk’s motto “Ne mutlu Türküm Diyeneâ€, are the enemies of Turkish Republic(27.4.2007) )
“1.5 billion of world of Islam are waiting impatiently to stand up of our muslim people. We will stand up and this rebellion will startâ€
The date of wedding invitation of his son “29 Zilkade 1421â€(using Arabic takvim)
*After he became PM
“I am marketing Turkiye. For us given money is important. We market and sell everything, who give money, can take every worth of Turkiyeâ€
“They insist to say secularism is going to be removed, of course can be removed if the people wantâ€
“Women can sit where they want, it is none of your businessâ€( Said to a journalist at a meeting of AKP in Kars asking why women and men sitting apart (at different places))
“The salary given to me is too low(not enough), how much salary do you takeâ€(said to the PM of Germany)
“There is a identity problem in Türkiye. And the concept of “Turk†should be commented as a sub-identity. Anyone who wants then can say “I am a Turkâ€â€
“People who are walking with the alleged flags of PKK are wrong but low flight of F-16s of Turkish Army is also wrong, both are wrongâ€(He equals PKK with Turkish Army)
“We will be taken out of Cyprus likewise how Syria is taken out of Lebonan, they say “ leave out of Cyprus and we will do it like a sheep†â€
“It is impossible for one person to say i am both muslim and secularâ€
“Did you drink too much? Your mouth smells alcoholâ€(said to the ambassodor of Austria)
“Stop and listen!...Stop and listen!...9 months 10 days!â€(said to a citizen at his speech)
“Look here! Do you think this nation need to work for you all the timeâ€(said to the farmers in Erzurum)
“Is this your job to give a judgement about turban?, This is the job of ulema. What ulema says, it is rightâ€( said to the Human rights court of Europe)
“Who are you? Ulema can give judgement about turbanâ€(said to Danıştay(state coucil court). A few weeks after this declaration, a radical terrorist attacked to the judges of Danıştay who gave judgement about turban and killed one of them, injured othersâ€
“Don’t shake your hand and arm! Every part of your body shaking!â€(said to member of parliament)
“Ulan terbiyesizlik yapma! Artistlik yapma ulan! Hadi ananı da al git buradanâ€(said to a farmer in Mersin, its a rude expression so translation is difficult)
After hundreds of placement hadn’t approved by President of Republic, he decided to execute these places by proxies and said(target is President of Republic):
“We don’t do anything contrary to law, there is a rule like this in Sheria law.â€
“What can(will) i talk to that woman?â€(said to mother of a martyr)
“Military service is not a place to lay down and restâ€( said to the relatives of martyr)
“Call that impostor, What does he want?â€( said to a citizen in Germany whose money stolen by green capital…Also at the same meeting he made the ambassador of Turkish Republic booed by people.)
He abased YOK president Prof. Dr. Erdoğan Teziç by saying he is not celever in an argo way.
“I am guaranty to him, i trust him like my father, i believe in him as how i believe in meâ€
(said at Parliament(TBMM), he became guaranty to Yasin El-Kadı, Then who is Yasin El-Kadı?His name is listed as a sponsor of El-kaide by United Nations)
When PKK ceased fire:
“And then we don’t do military operations†(He is making jest to PKK)
He abased the former president of Turkish Republic of North Cyprus Rauf Denktaş.
“They are shouting as they are in a football match, these are not nice thingsâ€( said to the people who were shouting “Türkiye is secular, will remain secularâ€)
At AKP General Congress:
. Şerefsizler(dishonests)
. Bizim çocuklar açmı kalsın be!
. Kes ulan sesini(Shut up)
. Sana üç nokta koyarım
. Otur ulan oturduğun yerde, herşeye burnunu sokma
*And the others:
Before the elections of 2002 and after he just became PM
“I changed developing myselfâ€
In the 4th year of his government:
“I never changed. Islamic opinions never changeâ€
Lastly his oath against to Republic in 1980’s;
“I am affilied to Muhammed and muslim ummah. Türkiye has become a irreligous, secular state. I make oath(swear) on my religion, Allah and every holy things that i will devote myself to make a war against irreligous secular state of Mustafa Kemal, i will prevent all the irreligous laws of Mustafa Kemal to be performed and i will try to form a state of Sheria†Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.
When we look at his some declarations through this 12 year when he was a major of İstanbul and when he is now PM;
All can see that he is loyal to his oath in 1980’s and working and trying hardly to perform his oath today. One who can’t or don’t want to see these actions, maybe those are blind or anything else.
“ President of Republic soon will be from İmam-Hatip. These days are so closeâ€(5.2.1996 Akit)
Which civil society organization has attened to the meeting at Çağlayan and which are not;
Attended: CHP, DSP, MHP, ANAP, DYP, GP, SHP, İP, BBP, HP, DİSK, TÜRK-İŞ, KESK, BAROLAR, ODALAR etc.
Not attended: AKP, SP, DEHAP, TKP, ÖDP, EMEP.
Also there will be a new meeting on 13th of May in İzmir Gündoğdu.
p.s: Who says economy is good, is also wrong. They took Türkiye with 220 billion dollars debt. And now the debt is 480 billion dollars. It is a record in whole history of Republic. Although they sold every worthies and big companies (Türk Telekom, Tüpraş, Erdemir, Seka, and so many KİTs), where has these moneys gone?. Let me remind some bid defraudations(60 big bid defraudations files are awaiting.) which are given to their partners to make them powerful. Türkiye’s ecomony stands up on hot money at stock exchange that belongs 70 % of foreign investors who make money with speculations not make any investments.. And how can one think that when the barrel cost of petroleum increases and then inflation decreases? Can one call this is an healthy economy?
|
|
79. |
01 May 2007 Tue 05:07 pm |
People knew these facts and people voted for him knowing these facts. I don't like AKP as well but I am against a military takeover as well. So wait until the summer and vote for the people you want and make sure that they are secular if that your biggest worry. This is what happens in democratic countries.
|
|
80. |
01 May 2007 Tue 08:02 pm |
Quoting ruthless87: People knew these facts and people voted for him knowing these facts. I don't like AKP as well but I am against a military takeover as well. So wait until the summer and vote for the people you want and make sure that they are secular if that your biggest worry. This is what happens in democratic countries. |
It's not just a "democratic" country, it's also a "secular" country which can never be changed even in a democratic way.
|
|
81. |
01 May 2007 Tue 08:04 pm |
armegon I had another reason to like you. Thanks for remainding those things. Some of us has fish memory. Again, democracy should protect itself, what it takes. Army just made a warning nothing further. They are pretty aware that it is not 80 anymore. Democracy for everyone.
|
|
82. |
01 May 2007 Tue 08:31 pm |
Quoting aslı: armegon I had another reason to like you. Thanks for remainding those things. Some of us has fish memory. Again, democracy should protect itself, what it takes. Army just made a warning nothing further. They are pretty aware that it is not 80 anymore. Democracy for everyone. |
I was wondering who controls the army and who chooses all the generals?
|
|
83. |
01 May 2007 Tue 09:32 pm |
Quoting ruthless87:
I was wondering who controls the army and who chooses all the generals? |
+100000
Exactly,no way it would be the government !
As if the Army is an independent Organization been ruled by the army itself!
So who is in charge ?!
|
|
84. |
01 May 2007 Tue 09:35 pm |
Our Supreme Court has ruled that the first round of prime minister elections are invalid.
http://www.ntvmsnbc.com/news/406777.asp
What this means is that Islamic politician Abdullah Gül won't become the new president.
The presidency is a critical place for Islamic politicians because it has the power to assign supreme court members and university presidents.
Islamic politics is very easy to understand. This is what they want to do step by step:
1. Critical administrative units will be occupied by Islamic rooted people. (this has already happened in most areas. Imams are in charge on top positions of eduactional departments or healt departments or even on fire department. Everywhere you see them. These days you can't even become a headteacher in any local school in Turkia if you are not close to Islamic politics).
2. headscarf will be allowed at universities for students. That will be the breaking point if it happens.
3. headscarf will be allowed for lecturers at universities
4. headscarf will be allowed for teachers at public schools
5. headscarf will be allowed at secondary schools for students
6. headscarf will be allowed at primary schools for students. Imagine even one generation (10 years) kids growing with the religious education, all brain washed.
A few years ago I was a teacher in a school in Ankara and there comes this new maths teacher into the teachers room wearing a headscarf. We were all shocked and told her that she can't go into the classroom like that. She become mad and said she was a ring of a chain and would fight for their ideas and didn't care for the rules not even for the constitution. Off course she was reported and dismissed from the job.
7. weekend days will be changed to friday and saturday so it will include the holy friday.
8. Working hours will be changed according praying times.
9. Number of prayer rooms (mescit) will increase in official departments.
10. Islamic marriage (imam nikahı ) will become legal and equal to official marriage.
11. Polygamy will become legal. Already many of the AK party members have multiple wives.
12. Alcohol will be banned.
13. Wearing swimsuits will be banned for females.
14. Islamic police department will be established.
Edit:
I forgot to mention what would happen if the Islamists would get the presidency. The president has the power to assign presidents of all state universities and members of our central higher education administration. So everthing would be set to allow headscarf in universities.
|
|
85. |
01 May 2007 Tue 09:40 pm |
What is your source erdinc? Is it something they have proclaimed or otherwise announced?
|
|
86. |
01 May 2007 Tue 09:54 pm |
In addition to..
Most important thing, A.Gül made a secret deal with Colin Powell on April 2th 2003. He had told about to Sedat Sertoğlu who journalist of Vatan newspaper..who was C.Powell..he was foreign ministry of USA..
" A.Gül bu gizli anlaşmanın yapılmasından bir buçuk ay sonra Vatan gazetesi yazarı Sedat Sertoğlu’na yaptığı açıklamada şunları söylemiştir:
“Ben bu gezileri yapmadan önce şimdi senin oturduğun koltukta (eliyle koltuğu vurdu) ABD Dışişleri Bakanı Powell oturuyordu. Onunla 2 sayfalık 9 maddelik bir plan üzerinde anlaştık. Ama ben her yaptığımı kalkıp açıklayamam ki…Powell Suriye’ye giderken de benimle konuştu. Gizli olan bir sürü gelişme varâ€.
Abdullah Gül bu görüşmede Irak’ı işgalini desteklemekte ve aralarında ülkemizin de bulunduğu “Ortadoğu’daki bütün rejimlerin değişeceğini†söylemektedir.
|
|
87. |
01 May 2007 Tue 09:54 pm |
Quoting erdinc: Off course she was reported and dismissed from the job.
|
You really hate veiled women !
Omg,do you see that justice ?!
To bane her for what she chose to wear ?!
People are FREE,free to have their own ideas,to do what they want,free to wear what they want.
people've been borne free,why chaining them ?!
İf they want to cover up and walk in the streets,let them,if they want to walk naked,then let them too!
Ohh God and you argue about secularism ?!
You afraid that an İslamic governmet rules people accourding to their believes,but you want to rule people accourding to your believes too.
You afraid İslamic government will bane women who not wearing Hijab and force them,and you bane women who wear Hijab and force them the other way,to take it off!
İ dont understand the logic!
Both are same to me,but in opposite directions,and both are taking women freedom away !
Pity
|
|
88. |
01 May 2007 Tue 10:05 pm |
Here is my source for imam supervisor on eduactional department: http://www.radikal.com.tr/haber.php?haberno=60233
Here is my source for imam supervisor on hospital:
http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/4851097.asp?m=1&gid=69&srid=3041&oid=4
This newspaper article mentions the planned ban on alcohol:
http://www.milliyet.com.tr/2005/12/30/siyaset/axsiy02.html
Here is an article that mentions a moscue advertising their marriage office:
http://www.bianet.org/2006/08/24/84113.htm
I could go on for ages. The thing is that with their actions they are alowing radicals to spread and they encourage radicalism. They are just hiding right now but they have many times said things like changing secularism to a new system.
Ömer Dinçer, undersecretary of the prime ministry said that the republic and secularism should give way for Islamic coalescence. The high court ruled that his views were agains the constitution. Source:
http://www.hukuki.net/haber/index.asp?id=601
|
|
89. |
01 May 2007 Tue 10:07 pm |
Quoting CANLI: İf they want to cover up and walk in the streets,let them,if they want to walk naked,then let them too! |
The thing is, a democratic secular government might not mingle with people showing their religious preferences, but an islamic government will do so, and will never allow people to show too much skin for example, let alone to walk naked,..
Your example is utopic Canlı.. :-S
|
|
90. |
01 May 2007 Tue 10:16 pm |
Quoting azade: What is your source erdinc? Is it something they have proclaimed or otherwise announced? |
Do you really need a source? My simple horse sense tells me that those things could be a logical consequence of having an islamist government?
|
|
91. |
01 May 2007 Tue 10:26 pm |
Armegon,
Your post should have explained to anyone that did not understand why AK Party (or any other fundamental islamic polticians) cannot become President.
And for those that keep pointing out Erdogan was elected PM, remember, he had less than 40% of the vote. So a majority of Turks did not vote for him.
I will agree that he has been OK as PM, but as President, never.
|
|
92. |
01 May 2007 Tue 10:30 pm |
Quoting CANLI: Quoting KeithL: I dont know where you get your information from. People bussed in from all regions of turkey for both events, not only Istanbul and Ankara. And I'm sure you are aware that Istanbul and Ankara are the two largest cities. Between them, they represent about 25% of the country's population.
And soon, there will be a rally in Germany by Turks who live there, also against AK Party.
Look who is against the AK party gaining the presidency. It is the well educated Turks. University staff, business leaders, senior military staff. Do you think these people are stupid?
Not living in Turkey, where do you form your opinion on this subject?
|
İ get my information from Turkish people not only live in İstanbul and Ankara .
And i dont really understand what you aim for .
Do you say only well educated people, University staff, business leaders, senior military staff have rights for election and choose who is their leaders,and other people NOT ?!!
İ dont think all those people are stupid,i think everyone entitled to his opinion whether he is well educated or NOT!
Beside everyone of those got his own agenda which indicate his opinion.
And rally in Germany by Turks who are living there away from their home land not feeling the achievement that their current government which been elected by poeple of Türkiye did,what would that say ?!!!
And i wonder those Turk who live in Germany where do they form their opinion about this subject from ?!!!
You are living in İstanbul,then where do you form your opinion about what other people who live outside think ?!
İ guess those are not logic questions,right ?! |
I only ask because your words sound like the words that are spoken by people thathate Ataturk. There are those that wish Turkey was still ruled by Islamic Law. So these people, and the secular followers of Ataturk will never agree on this issue. Additionally, the people that hate Ataturk are more influenced by Arab Agenda, not Turkish Agenda. This is what the post refering to Arab followers was referring. Not rascism.
|
|
93. |
01 May 2007 Tue 10:42 pm |
KeithL.....
My words are very clear,and no need to prediction.
İ didnt say i hate Atatürk,i didnt even talk about him.
İ said in any case Army should NOT threat a governmet.
İ said army SHOULD be ruled by governmet.
So,where did you get the idea of me hate Atatürk from ?!
Why do you all leave the main issue and talk about branches ?
Who said we are discussing the 4 laws or something like that ?
The point was,a government has been elected by people should only rule both people and army.
İf the people dont want it,then dont elect it !
Tell me again,where did you get the Atatürk issue from ?
Does anyone say something you dont agree with,you accuse him/her of hating Atatürk even if the issue not been brought up ?!
|
|
94. |
01 May 2007 Tue 11:00 pm |
Quoting Elisa: Quoting azade: What is your source erdinc? Is it something they have proclaimed or otherwise announced? |
Do you really need a source? My simple horse sense tells me that those things could be a logical consequence of having an islamist government?  |
Of course a source is needed, at all times. I doubt that Gül would actually stand up and proclaim those changes in society, so when somebody says they are going to do so and so, it is a personal analysis. For me personally, it has never crossed my mind that AKP was an islamist party, although I know that it has religious roots, so of course I want to know how someone has come to the conclusion they have.
And just for the record, that a party may have roots in relgion (any religion) doesn't mean they are fundamentalist or want to change the society completely.
Erdinc - thanks for posting your sources. I'd like to read more up on it
|
|
95. |
01 May 2007 Tue 11:01 pm |
Quoting erdinc: Our Supreme Court has ruled that the first round of prime minister elections are invalid.
http://www.ntvmsnbc.com/news/406777.asp
What this means is that Islamic politician Abdullah Gül won't become the new president.
The presidency is a critical place for Islamic politicians because it has the power to assign supreme court members and university presidents.
Islamic politics is very easy to understand. This is what they want to do step by step:
1. Critical administrative units will be occupied by Islamic rooted people. (this has already happened in most areas. Imams are in charge on top positions of eduactional departments or healt departments or even on fire department. Everywhere you see them. These days you can't even become a headteacher in any local school in Turkia if you are not close to Islamic politics).
2. headscarf will be allowed at universities for students. That will be the breaking point if it happens.
3. headscarf will be allowed for lecturers at universities
4. headscarf will be allowed for teachers at public schools
5. headscarf will be allowed at secondary schools for students
6. headscarf will be allowed at primary schools for students. Imagine even one generation (10 years) kids growing with the religious education, all brain washed.
A few years ago I was a teacher in a school in Ankara and there comes this new maths teacher into the teachers room wearing a headscarf. We were all shocked and told her that she can't go into the classroom like that. She become mad and said she was a ring of a chain and would fight for their ideas and didn't care for the rules not even for the constitution. Off course she was reported and dismissed from the job.
7. weekend days will be changed to friday and saturday so it will include the holy friday.
8. Working hours will be changed according praying times.
9. Number of prayer rooms (mescit) will increase in official departments.
10. Islamic marriage (imam nikahı ) will become legal and equal to official marriage.
11. Polygamy will become legal. Already many of the AK party members have multiple wives.
12. Alcohol will be banned.
13. Wearing swimsuits will be banned for females.
14. Islamic police department will be established.
Edit:
I forgot to mention what would happen if the Islamists would get the presidency. The president has the power to assign presidents of all state universities and members of our central higher education administration. So everthing would be set to allow headscarf in universities. |
erdinc,
loved it! thank you, mate!
|
|
96. |
01 May 2007 Tue 11:05 pm |
Canli, I'm not saying you hate Ataturk. You may not even know who Ataturk is. But it is true that the very pro-islamists hate Ataturk. When you go to other Islamic countries and discuss Turkish politics, they speak of Ataturk as their worst enemy.
|
|
97. |
01 May 2007 Tue 11:10 pm |
KeithL.....
My words are very clear,and no need to prediction.
İ said in any case Army should NOT threat a governmet.
(By turkish constitution, this is armys duty.)
İ said army SHOULD be ruled by governmet.
(Turkey is different than other countries. It is armys responsibility to protect the constitution and the people from the government)
The point was,a government has been elected by people should only rule both people and army.
(37% of people voted for erdogan for PM, not President. An islamist cannot become President. Its that simple)
|
|
98. |
01 May 2007 Tue 11:36 pm |
Quoting KeithL: Canli, I'm not saying you hate Ataturk. You may not even know who Ataturk is.. |
Well thank you,but not to mention that im highly educated,but at least that i can read !
So i know who Atatürk is !
|
|
99. |
01 May 2007 Tue 11:39 pm |
Quoting Elisa: Quoting CANLI: İf they want to cover up and walk in the streets,let them,if they want to walk naked,then let them too! |
The thing is, a democratic secular government might not mingle with people showing their religious preferences, but an islamic government will do so, and will never allow people to show too much skin for example, let alone to walk naked,..
Your example is utopic Canlı.. :-S |
Elisa,check this out,and you will understand what do those women feel İ have an opinion !
|
|
100. |
01 May 2007 Tue 11:46 pm |
Quoting CANLI: Elisa,check this out,and you will understand what do those women feel İ have an opinion ! |
Just to make it clear: I understood very well that your saying people "wanting to walk naked" was a figure of speech.
|
|
101. |
01 May 2007 Tue 11:47 pm |
Quoting KeithL: Canli, I'm not saying you hate Ataturk. You may not even know who Ataturk is. But it is true that the very pro-islamists hate Ataturk. When you go to other Islamic countries and discuss Turkish politics, they speak of Ataturk as their worst enemy. |
100% true!
|
|
102. |
01 May 2007 Tue 11:51 pm |
Quoting femme_fatal: Quoting KeithL: Canli, I'm not saying you hate Ataturk. You may not even know who Ataturk is. But it is true that the very pro-islamists hate Ataturk. When you go to other Islamic countries and discuss Turkish politics, they speak of Ataturk as their worst enemy. |
100% true!
|
İ hope you also didnt mean that its true i dont know Atatürk.
|
|
103. |
01 May 2007 Tue 11:57 pm |
Quoting Elisa: Quoting CANLI: Elisa,check this out,and you will understand what do those women feel İ have an opinion ! |
Just to make it clear: I understood very well that your saying people "wanting to walk naked" was a figure of speech.
|
Well of course a figure of speech when they walk in the streets,but walking on beaches is different,they do walk naked .
My point is,people seek freedom for themselves,they should allow others to have it.
What you accept for yourself,you should accept it for others!
|
|
104. |
02 May 2007 Wed 12:02 am |
Many Islamic countries are hundreds of years behind civilization. In many Islamic countries females are considered like objects to be bought and sold. They have no rights at all. They have no right to chose the man they are going to marry, no right to vote, no right for inheritance, no right for modern education, no right to work, no right to chose where they live, no right to divorce (asking for divorce would be main reason for killing them).
In many Islamic countries even a cow is considered more valuable than girls. Females are not even counted as children of a family. In many of those countries if you ask a man how many children he has he might say five. This means he has five sons. They don't count the girls. Girls will be sold when they become 13.
Ottomans have ruled those countries for hundreds of years. Those are our neighbours. We have a responsibility in those lands to help our neighbours. We need to help them to become more modern.
For now let's solve our domestic problems but in the future we are going to help our neigbours. Don't worry, with time we'll fix them.
|
|
105. |
02 May 2007 Wed 12:10 am |
None of this matters now. With early elections in June, Erdogan and Gul are finished. And they only have themselves to blame.
|
|
106. |
02 May 2007 Wed 12:19 am |
Quoting erdinc: Our Supreme Court has ruled that the first round of prime minister elections are invalid.
http://www.ntvmsnbc.com/news/406777.asp
What this means is that Islamic politician Abdullah Gül won't become the new president.
The presidency is a critical place for Islamic politicians because it has the power to assign supreme court members and university presidents.
Islamic politics is very easy to understand. This is what they want to do step by step:
1. Critical administrative units will be occupied by Islamic rooted people. (this has already happened in most areas. Imams are in charge on top positions of eduactional departments or healt departments or even on fire department. Everywhere you see them. These days you can't even become a headteacher in any local school in Turkia if you are not close to Islamic politics).
2. headscarf will be allowed at universities for students. That will be the breaking point if it happens.
3. headscarf will be allowed for lecturers at universities
4. headscarf will be allowed for teachers at public schools
5. headscarf will be allowed at secondary schools for students
6. headscarf will be allowed at primary schools for students. Imagine even one generation (10 years) kids growing with the religious education, all brain washed.
A few years ago I was a teacher in a school in Ankara and there comes this new maths teacher into the teachers room wearing a headscarf. We were all shocked and told her that she can't go into the classroom like that. She become mad and said she was a ring of a chain and would fight for their ideas and didn't care for the rules not even for the constitution. Off course she was reported and dismissed from the job.
7. weekend days will be changed to friday and saturday so it will include the holy friday.
8. Working hours will be changed according praying times.
9. Number of prayer rooms (mescit) will increase in official departments.
10. Islamic marriage (imam nikahı ) will become legal and equal to official marriage.
11. Polygamy will become legal. Already many of the AK party members have multiple wives.
12. Alcohol will be banned.
13. Wearing swimsuits will be banned for females.
14. Islamic police department will be established.
Edit:
I forgot to mention what would happen if the Islamists would get the presidency. The president has the power to assign presidents of all state universities and members of our central higher education administration. So everthing would be set to allow headscarf in universities. |
This is called intention reading.
- This government never told anything about headscarf.
- Noone can say that headscarfed people are 2nd class people.
- AKP is not an Islamist group exactly. If you say they were Islamist, you fail all the other Islam ideas.
- Any government cannot carry out your list even if they wanted. And I think you are talking as if we had never lived a military action before. Even a little action about headscarf, or alcohol ban, or Islamic any application like police, imam marriage, swimsuit, imam teacher etc. makes military move without asking anyone. Everyone knows it, this government know it, and you know it too. We know what Erbakan said. Erdoğan has never had radical speeches since they founded AKP. He always say: "We want peace, stability, trust, and a better Turkey" and many of the movements are this way. Maybe there were some individual talks of parliamenters, but they can't be said that "they want an Islamic system for Turkey". Look at the statistics, which government was so succesful in the last 50 years? Which government could show the defraudations of the previous sessions? Which government's Turkey has as much as this number of happy people?
I have no doubt that their claim is NOT an Islamic or religious administration. This is very clear that you are trying to make people be afraid of this government. Please be fair! Talk about their actions, but not mention the UNPERFORMED THINGS.
|
|
107. |
02 May 2007 Wed 12:25 am |
I agree that Erdogan has been OK as PM. But the hundreds of thousands of demonstrators proves that the people do not want to see him or Gul as President. And it also proves how much the people trust Buyukanıt.
|
|
108. |
02 May 2007 Wed 12:28 am |
Quoting erdinc: Many Islamic countries are hundreds of years behind civilization. In many Islamic countries females are considered like objects to be bought and sold. They have no rights at all. They have no right to chose the man they are going to marry, no right to vote, no right for inheritance, no right for modern education, no right to work, no right to chose where they live, no right to divorce (asking for divorce would be main reason for killing them).
In many Islamic countries even a cow is considered more valuable than girls. Females are not even counted as children of a family. In many of those countries if you ask a man how many children he has he might say five. This means he has five sons. They don't count the girls. Girls will be sold when they become 13.
Ottomans have ruled those countries for hundreds of years. Those are our neighbours. We have a responsibility in those lands to help our neighbours. We need to help them to become more modern.
For now let's solve our domestic problems but in the future we are going to help our neigbours. Don't worry, with time we'll fix them.
|
İ wonder what do you mean by MANY İslamic countries?
And anxious to know how many of them have you actually visited,watch in TV,or even surfed the net watching their Pictures !
Anyway,info is there for who wants to know,not hard to get!
So you will help them and save them,and want them to become more modern ?!
Hmmm,only in Dubai ' city in the United Arab Emirates'there is a hotle got no similarity in the whole world !
But still you want to save them,then control them by telling them what to do,even what to wear !
Tell you something ?!
American Media is better
İts making a good job in a very short time and doesn't control them too
Better deal,,huh ? ohh God !lol
|
|
109. |
02 May 2007 Wed 12:30 am |
Comparing Dubai to typical Arab cities is ridiculous. Lets look at damascus, tehran, bahgdad, cairo, these kinds of cities for comparison.
|
|
110. |
02 May 2007 Wed 12:34 am |
Quoting KeithL: Comparing Dubai to typical Arab cities is ridiculous. Lets look at damascus, tehran, bahgdad, cairo, these kinds of cities for comparison. |
Dubai was not for comparison,Dubai was for the sentence 'we will help them to be modern'
And ok,i agree,lets talk about Cairo,although it will be off the topic here,but what about it ?
What he said can be applied on Cairo ?!!!
That is what i call it ridiculous!!!
We are an İslamic country because we have a Muslims majotity,but our law not set from İslam as in İran and Saudi Arabia,İslam is one of the sources,the other is the French law !
So you must define first what do you mean by İslamic country ?
Muslims or systems ?!
|
|
111. |
02 May 2007 Wed 12:36 am |
Cairo lives under islamic law and is living the way most cities did 50 years ago.
|
|
112. |
02 May 2007 Wed 12:43 am |
Yeah, Cairo may look like so, but at least it is still called a city. So what about Istanbul, the least developed but the biggest village of the world?
|
|
113. |
02 May 2007 Wed 12:47 am |
Quoting mltm:
Even themselves are confused. Within their party there is not a unity I think. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan comes from a party that is really islamic and before he had very radical ideas like changing the state completely to an islamic state, but later he established his own party and gained the sempathy of the people using both religion (not in a radical way) and also giving promises to make Turkey enter in the european union. It was a very big promise since the people believed everything would get better, especially economically.He might also have understood that only with the support of european union and US, he could get to power. And one of their biggest enemy is the army which is really secular and does not let any religious party rule the country. And the EU and the USA do not want the turkish army be so powerful. Maybe, the EU is only tactics for T. Erdoğan because years ago in his speeches he had said 'he would use every possible way in order to accomplish their dreams (islamic dreams)' , he had also said, 'democracy was just a tool for them to be successful' and with the help of EU, they can get to every possible high position. He also later said he had changed his old ideas, and he became a conservatrive democratic.
I think now he is being used by US in the plans of making the middle east a union of moderate islamic states. And the real secular democrats cannot trust Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, because it is not clear what he wants to do. |
Exactly, what a wonderful summary!! Their aim is to weaken Turkish Army. Puppets of USA and EU…obedient AKP…
To see how muslim(new term moderate and democratic muslim, her nasılsa) they are and how they use religion for obtaining political advantages, a few examples are enough;
1-They say “we will solve the problem of turban(headscarf)â€, on the other hand although they have the majority of the Parliament, they had no attempt to solve, they only talk(exploitation continues)
2-He says “I am the Imam of İstanbulâ€, on the other hand he says “if needed i can also wear priest cloth for my partyâ€(maşallah we have got priest Imam at last)
3- He says “I am at the side of parliament to open with praysâ€, on the other hand he said he would pray for the hero american soldiers(surprisingly(!!) he forgot people of Iraq)
And so on…
|
|
114. |
02 May 2007 Wed 12:50 am |
Quoting KeithL: Cairo lives under islamic law and is living the way most cities did 50 years ago. |
Cairo lives under İslamic law ?!!!
What İslamic law allows topless beaches ?!
İf you care to tell me which Ayat in Kor'an said that i will be grateful !
İ dont say i approve,but its here!
What İslamic law allow alcoholic to be bought and sold ?!
.......,....ect
Again,i dont say i approve too.
And btw,Alcohol not forbbiden only in İslam,but also in Tawrah 'Jewish religion' and Christianity in case you forgot!
Cairo is similler to İstanbul for those who dont know,that says even by Turkish people who came here,saying 'even there is same poor man in the alley!'
We are not a rich country although we can be some day soon inşallah,that's we lack,money because of our wars.
People tend to believe the worst in anything related to İslam,
The worst about Muslims,or the worst about Countries.
So you know,i wont argue with you what you already know,you said you've visited Egypt before,so you know better,so i wont argue.
And who want to know us,can visit us,can see us in TV,read about us,even surf the net too.
Knowledge is here for who wants to know !
|
|
115. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:03 am |
I am not an expert at all on cairo.
But, here are a few of my observations.
I stay at Nile hilton and other hotels similar in that area. These hotels have bars and casinos. My egyptian colleagues are not allowed to join me. You must have a foreign passport to enter.
The only place I know where there are pubs is on the island where the consualtes are. So alcohol is not so freely available.
Segregated subways. Women in front only, no men.
I am not saying these are bad laws for cairo. but i donot wish to see them come to istanbul.
Nude beaches in Cairo? Did I miss soemthing?
|
|
116. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:07 am |
Quoting Quasimodo: Yeah, Cairo may look like so, but at least it is still called a city. So what about Istanbul, the least developed but the biggest village of the world? |
Great....the hatred shows its colors.
We'll be more than happy to keep you out.
|
|
117. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:10 am |
I have no intention to live in the jungle anyway. Did I call it the least developed village? Oh, I have changed my mind! The most dangerous jungle in the world! No thanks!
|
|
118. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:12 am |
Quoting KeithL: I am not an expert at all on cairo.
But, here are a few of my observations.
I stay at Nile hilton and other hotels similar in that area. These hotels have bars and casinos. My egyptian colleagues are not allowed to join me. You must have a foreign passport to enter.
The only place I know where there are pubs is on the island where the consualtes are. So alcohol is not so freely available.
Segregated subways. Women in front only, no men.
I am not saying these are bad laws for cairo. but i donot wish to see them come to istanbul.
Nude beaches in Cairo? Did I miss soemthing? |
Welll,ask any high school kid and he will bring it to you !
As for UG,there are 1 or 2 for women only,and others are mixed
And that was upon our demand 'women' after some incident!
So who chose to ride there its up to her,who doesnt she can ride the other ones.
Well,is there beaches in Cairo ?!
Beaches is where Sea,or oceans are.
And no need to say that im talking about other city on the beach,i thought you got that instantly.
Ok,im talking about Dahab and Ras Mohamed in Sinai.
Fair enough ?
|
|
119. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:16 am |
What about my egyptian colleagues not being able to join me in certain hotel restaurants? Is this the islamic freedom you are speaking of?
|
|
120. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:19 am |
We have gone off topic here.
New elections are coming in june. The people will speak. Turks will have their democracy.
|
|
121. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:27 am |
Keithl, stop fighting with canlı and quasimodo. If they are capable to think like us, we would not having this argument at first place. They will learn that democracy is not a vehicle, it is an aim! Lets wait to the next election
|
|
122. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:31 am |
Quoting KeithL: What about my egyptian colleagues not being able to join me in certain hotel restaurants? Is this the islamic freedom you are speaking of? |
KeithL,alcohol is forbidden in the 3 religions not just İslam.
Our Christian people dont accept it too,our church dont accept it,and dont accept when Christians drink it too.
And our governmet try to respect our believes.
Although,i doubt what kind of restaurant you are referring at ,
İ went to the Disco,and alcohol were serving there for who wants to drink Egyptians,or foreigners .
Before you ask, in Cairo.
And again,im not happy about it tho.
|
|
123. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:31 am |
You are right aslı, my last post stated as such.
And not arguing I hope. Sharing and explaining ideas.
Except for Quasi. I'm willling to pass a law banning him from istanbul...
|
|
124. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:35 am |
Quoting CANLI: Quoting KeithL: What about my egyptian colleagues not being able to join me in certain hotel restaurants? Is this the islamic freedom you are speaking of? |
KeithL,alcohol is forbidden in the 3 religions not just İslam.
|
Canli, this is our point. We do not want to be governed by islamic law (or any religous law).
|
|
125. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:38 am |
Quoting aslı: If they are capable to think like us, we would not having this argument at first place. |
aslı,the meaning of your sentence not nice really,and contain insult too.
We can argue ,we can debate,but there is a level of respect that we must not cross it!
İ will be mature enough and assume that you didnt use the right words,and you just meant that we dont see things same way you both see it,and that i can accept.
Everyone entitled to his opinion.
And i wish in no time you will confirm that !
|
|
126. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:42 am |
Quoting caliptrix: be fair! Talk about their actions, but not mention the UNPERFORMED THINGS. |
I'm talking about their actions. Let me explain two new terms to our foreign friends: 'haremlik' and 'selamlık'. The -lik is just a contructive suffix. Probably you understand harem and selam.
Haremlik-selamlık means that women are separated from men during any event, meeting or whenever a community comes together.
This is even common practice in a neigbour family visit. Women go into one room and men into another room. I think I can show you hundreds different examples of this practice carried by AK party members and supporters in official departments.
Women were separated from men and keep away in hospitals, council meetings, hotels, birthday parties, beach holiday and even cashier's desks. Look at this picture. You will see mens desk and womens desk. This is Istanbul and they are paying their water bills to councils pay desk.
Step by step they apply Islamic lifestyle to every possible occasion.
According religious customs females sexual attractiveness is something bad and needs to be hiden. The headscarf and veil is there to hide sexual charm. Those people have difficulty with sex in their mind. Once I had a friend who was a university student to become a dentist. He had a walkman and was listening to religious music when he was on the street because he was turned on by seeing girls on street wearing jeans. In his past religious eduaction in imam school they told him it was bad to get turned on and those girls were doing wrong of course.
In general we can say that Islam has some issues with female sexuallity.
|
|
127. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:52 am |
I really don't understand why the claim in the title of this thread is talking about Turkey turning its back on democracy! I thought that democracy is when people control the government (not the other way round) and protest when they don't like what the government is doing. That's exactly what Turkish people are doing right now and that's what democracy ought to be like. They proved that their democratic system is more mature then it might seem to be.
|
|
128. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:58 am |
İt turned its back when army threated not when people talk
thats much difference catwoman.
|
|
129. |
02 May 2007 Wed 02:01 am |
Quoting erdinc: According religious customs females sexual attractiveness is something bad and needs to be hiden. The headscarf and veil is there to hide sexual charm. Those people have difficulty with sex in their mind. Once I had a friend who was a university student to become a dentist. He had a walkman and was listening to religious music when he was on the street because he was turned on by seeing girls on street wearing jeans. In his past religious eduaction in imam school they told him it was bad to get turned on and those girls were doing wrong of course.
In general we can say that Islam has some issues with female sexuallity. |
Of course, if a man gets turned on all the time even by jeans, he seriously needs help and needs to stop objectifying women (such behavior is a dictionary definition of being a pervert, which is pandemic these days). The real problem is that religions (not only Islam) blame women for men's sexual perversions, don't hold men responsible for their sexual assaults on women and justify men's sick behavior due to jealousy and insecurities when they are rejected by women. Women have a lot of power in their hands that men really want to control, otherwise, they will be very lonely. Of course, I'm not even talking about all the other ways of discriminating against women, not just sexual. You described it well in one of your previous posts.
|
|
130. |
02 May 2007 Wed 02:03 am |
They are dying for you. They are waiting your borders while you are scratching in your comfy bed.( you is not a person here, no offence) They have right to say something for their myrtyr's sake. Have some respect or do not go gallipoli for crying.
|
|
131. |
02 May 2007 Wed 02:07 am |
Islam has some issues with female sexuallity??!!
İ suggest you read about İslam erdinc before you discuss it!
From a reliable source i mean !
Of course its nature to be turned on,not bad,but bad not to control it,or else we'll be like animal !
And where do you want women to stand in this picture ?
Leave an empty desk and stand there behide the man ?!!
|
|
132. |
02 May 2007 Wed 02:12 am |
The desks on that picture are devided by sex as men's desk (bay veznesi) and womens desk (bayan veznesi). Not the poeple on that picture but the mayor of Istanbul led by AK party is doing wrong here.
This is a water payment desk of Istanbul council and is an official department.
You might think this is very normal but according their belive men and women need to be separated everywhere including classrooms. They want to start the separation in first class in primary schools.
Maybe those who claim to know a lot about other Islamic countries will tell us about their primary schools. Are girls and boys sitting mixed or not? Tell the truth.
|
|
133. |
02 May 2007 Wed 02:13 am |
Quoting CANLI: İt turned its back when army threated not when people talk
thats much difference catwoman. |
But Canli, people's demonstrations were supporting the army, they aren't opposing the army, but the government! Why are you so bothered that it's the 'army' threatening the government? Are we suddenly arguing over semantics here? It is really a weak argument, like there's nothing left to counter argue with. If you don't like the word 'army', then just look at the millions of people who are protesting. If it's the army that keeps secularism in Turkey, then be it!
|
|
134. |
02 May 2007 Wed 02:15 am |
Quoting CANLI:
aslı,the meaning of your sentence not nice really,and contain insult too.
|
Let her say whatever she likes, Canli. Take it easy. We can give these two supposedly democracy and modernity warriors hell. Now just charge your charger, take aslı for yourself, and leave KeithL to me. Or vice versa! Hehe! For they both might find this the differentiation man-woman. Well, I take asli, and you take KeithL. This is surely much more modern and democratic, the furthest point in modernity and democracy at that, and maybe more fair.
|
|
135. |
02 May 2007 Wed 02:21 am |
catwoman,what kind of system that would be then?ruled by 2 forces the governmet and the army ,watching over each other ?!
İf people dont want the governmet,then people dont choose it.
Army only lead war or revolutions and must be supported by people,or else it will fall down too!
So its in people hands,and its people's choice to have it the way they want,not the army supporting direction against another.
|
|
136. |
02 May 2007 Wed 02:23 am |
Quoting Quasimodo: Quoting CANLI:
aslı,the meaning of your sentence not nice really,and contain insult too.
|
Let her say whatever she likes, Canli. Take it easy. We can give these two supposedly democracy and modernity warriors hell. Now just charge your charger, take aslı for yourself, and leave KeithL to me. Or vice versa! Hehe! For they both might find this the differentiation man-woman. Well, I take asli, and you take KeithL. This is surely much more modern and democratic, the furthest point in modernity and democracy at that, and maybe more fair. |
rotfl...Deal lol
|
|
137. |
02 May 2007 Wed 02:25 am |
Canlı,
In the Islamic countries you have been so far how were boys and girls sitting at primary schools? Where they sitting mixed or separated? I'm sure you are going to dance around this question and wont give any information.
|
|
138. |
02 May 2007 Wed 02:29 am |
Quoting erdinc:
Maybe those who claim to know a lot about other Islamic countries will tell us about their primary schools. Are girls and boys sitting mixed or not? Tell the truth. |
The truth is YES !
And my nephew who is 4 years old got a girl friend in his KG class as same as his brother who is 7 years old in Primary ,and after confincing from my side he convinced he shouldnt marry her because his father is paying him allowance,and he will wait till he works !
See? didn't i tell you Media is faster than you ?
|
|
139. |
02 May 2007 Wed 02:32 am |
Quoting erdinc: Quoting caliptrix: be fair! Talk about their actions, but not mention the UNPERFORMED THINGS. |
I'm talking about their actions. Let me explain two new terms to our foreign friends: 'haremlik' and 'selamlık'. The -lik is just a contructive suffix. Probably you understand harem and selam.
Haremlik-selamlık means that women are separated from men duing the event, meeting or whatever happens. Women go into one room and men into another room. I think I can show you hundred different examples of this practice carried by ak party members and supporters.
Women were separated from men and keep away in hospitals, council meetings, hotels, birthday parties, beach holiday and even cashier's desks. Look at this picture. You will see mens desk and womens desk. This is Istanbul and they are paying their water bills to councils pay desk.
Step by step they apply Islamic lifestyle to every possible occasion. |
Let's talk about now:
- they say: "haydi kızlar okula" "girls, come to school"
but look at what the same people do:"schools are forbidden covered girls"
- they say: "my mother has headscarf too"
and what they do: "strictly forbidden covered women in schools, in militarial areas, in many hospitals (that's a reality!), in all "kamusal alan" public areas. so, you say "no dilemma"?
- Let's talk the realities: in many towns of big cities, PEOPLE CAN'T GO TO MOSQUES WITHOUT BEING AFRAID! always we are in doubt if someone follows us because of writing us in a blacklist. or we cannot talk about religious sensibilities in publicity. Whenever I go to my university, I am afraid if someone knows about I dont drink alcohol because of my religion. I can't find easily a little room to pray because they (who are they? you know) never want us to be religious. this system made people enough UNRELIGIOUS. Don't defence that Turkey is religious or wants a religious system. I can accept that we are traditional, but never religious. ONLY because of some radicals, you cannot blame all religious people. But/and you still do that. Don't say that there are many radical people, or I would understand that you think all religious people are radical. There are not many "haremlik selamlık" places! I can't find one even though I live in a religious town.
Look at your seventh point, it is really very tragic-comic. If I thought that you were stupid, I would laugh. But I know you are very intelligent, so this is very clear that you speculate everything in worst way.
Your photo is also very manipulative. Can you tell me the number of the areas like your example? I can say the percentage must be only 1. You don't need to try hard to find them. You have to study much more in order to find a place like in your example. And yes, it can't be more, because there is the power of military still. Yes, military thinks like you, so don't be afraid. We fear enough because we are blamed for the things that we never did.
Quote: According religious customs females sexual attractiveness is something bad and needs to be hiden. The headscarf and veil is there to hide sexual charm. Those people have difficulty with sex in their mind. Once I had a friend who was a university student to become a dentist. He had a walkman and was listening to religious music when he was on the street because he was turned on by seeing girls on street wearing jeans. In his past religious eduaction in imam school they told him it was bad to get turned on and those girls were doing wrong of course. |
What's wrong with other's belief idea? Where is your secularism? Can't you stand the ideas of OTHERS?
Be in peace, although you don't think same as the others. We need more respect, not the complain.
|
|
140. |
02 May 2007 Wed 02:33 am |
Quoting CANLI: İf people dont want the governmet,then people dont choose it.
Army only lead war or revolutions and must be supported by people,or else it will fall down too! |
canli, the army IS supported by people, that's the point! and people DON'T want this government, that's why they are protesting! what are you talking about???
|
|
141. |
02 May 2007 Wed 02:34 am |
Quoting erdinc: Canlı,
I'm sure you are going to dance around this question and wont give any information. |
You want pictures ?!
They were dancing Valse together last year in the school final term party !
|
|
142. |
02 May 2007 Wed 02:39 am |
Quoting CANLI: And my nephew who is 4 years old got a girl friend in his KG class as same as his brother who is 7 years old in Primary ,and after confincing from my side he convinced he shouldnt marry her because his father is paying him allowance,and he will wait till he works !
See? didn't i tell you Media is faster than you ? |
Canli, first of all, let's not quote children having so called "girlfriends", that's irrelevant. And besides, you're quoting exceptions, not the norms.
|
|
143. |
02 May 2007 Wed 02:42 am |
Quoting catwoman: Quoting CANLI: İf people dont want the governmet,then people dont choose it.
Army only lead war or revolutions and must be supported by people,or else it will fall down too! |
canli, the army IS supported by people, that's the point! and people DON'T want this government, that's why they are protesting! what are you talking about??? |
catwoman,what are YOU talking about ??!!!
Bush has won the election for %51 of the American people,and by time,he lost many of his credits.
And many people dont want him now.
Soo,its time for American army to march in ?!!!
Are you seriouse ?!
|
|
144. |
02 May 2007 Wed 02:54 am |
Hey people,i live here ...
Our schools are mixed boys and girls together from KG up till college.
There are only some girls school which are not much,and they are Nuns schools
Which of course are chrisian schools and run by Nuns,but they also accept Muslims,and there are lots of Muslims girls there.
And there are boys schools,which rulled by preasts,christians too and also accept Muslims.
As for Muslims schools ,they are not much at all,and contain both boys and girls in same class but not sitting together.
İf you want to get the picture right.
From 20 mixed school 'boys and girls sitting beside each other'
There is 2 Christian schools,and 1 Muslims school.
And catwoman ,the term girlfriend,and boyfriend is very much relevant,for how would they have boyfriend or girlfriend and they dont meet !
And now as i said its starting at a very young age too,thanks to the Media again!
10 yrs ago were only between kids from 13 till up,now the scale is coming down!
|
|
145. |
02 May 2007 Wed 02:59 am |
This picture shows a classroom in Pakistan. I think classrooms in Islamic countries are generally like this. Pictures on
this page on the other hand, were taken ten days ago in Turkia. These are primary school students aged from 5 to 12 gathered together for a birthday celabration of the Islamic prophet. The event was carried in a sports hall with permission and attendance of local authorities and instead with out national anthem it started by kids reading Quran.
People from poor backgrounds who have not much hope for a better life have reserved their hopes for the afterlife and have found consolidation in religion.
|
|
146. |
02 May 2007 Wed 03:33 am |
Here is a picture
PRIMARY Stage
There are some trips too if you check on the site,and its in English.
And here is a picture from an islamic language school,and notice the girl who is not veiled standing between the others in the Final term party,and she was choosen to sing with them
El Nozha School
And another,
Saint Fatima
And there is something i want to tell you,whether islamic or not,but women tend to be together ,specially in crowded places.
Or in parties,social events.
İf you notice,you would find women leting men together and they gather up to dedikodu .
Same is every where,at schools,girls prefer to sit beside girls,to talk,to share some girly things.
To talk about boys!
Or do you expect them to do that with boys ?!
When there is a line,to pay something ,i prefer to stand behind woman not a man.
Woman is an social creature,we can talk together in no time,and kill time.
Unlike men,it would be boring to stand in lines with them !
Maybe not logic to you,but thats true !
|
|
147. |
02 May 2007 Wed 05:15 am |
Quoting CANLI: Bush has won the election for %51 of the American people,and by time,he lost many of his credits. And many people dont want him now. Soo,its time for American army to march in ?!!! Are you seriouse ?! |
Yes, I wish they did march in!!! As long as there is SOMEBODY who has a working brain, I will support them.
|
|
148. |
02 May 2007 Wed 05:23 am |
Thanks Canli, we can also read about Islam in Egypt and women's rights in Egypt from other sources... that seem to slightly contradict with what you're saying.
|
|
149. |
02 May 2007 Wed 07:55 am |
Again Canli, you are missing the original point. We don't care how Islamic law effects peoples lives in other countries. If you are happy with it,i am happy for you.
But here in Turkey, the people have rejected it. And will continue to reject it it.
The voting in June will show this. Early elections is what the people wanted, and what the militray wanted.
|
|
150. |
02 May 2007 Wed 09:53 am |
that is not what i say catwoman,that is what i live!
And there is much difference between what said and what been lived,exactly same as what KeithL said about this topic too !
Same as i read they beat veiled women in Turkiye and drag them into jail for nothing except they wear scarf Hijab!
Some Turkish friends here in TC told me that is not true, so what do i believe then ?!
As i said Knowledge are there for those who seek it ,and facts are here for those who live or will live it!
|
|
151. |
02 May 2007 Wed 09:56 am |
Quoting KeithL: . is what the people wanted, . |
+100000000
That is the point KeithL ,that is what im talking about.
Islamic law or not was not the issue,we just been off the Topic.
And that is THE TOPIC what people want,and that i accept and its very much ok with me.
Let people choose without having any swards on their necks !
And by that i rest my case
|
|
152. |
02 May 2007 Wed 10:06 am |
Another question: I read earlier that the Supreme Court said the last vote was invalid because there were only 361 instead of 367 members of Parliament when voting. But now I read that the AK party wants a new round of votes, starting tomorrow. With Gül still as their candidate. Anyone who can explain?
|
|
153. |
02 May 2007 Wed 10:34 am |
Quoting CANLI: Quoting KeithL: . is what the people wanted, . |
+100000000
That is the point KeithL ,that is what im talking about.
Islamic law or not was not the issue,we just been off the Topic.
And that is THE TOPIC what people want,and that i accept and its very much ok with me.
Let people choose without having any swards on their necks !
And by that i rest my case  |
But, if the military had not threatened Erdogan, there would be no early elections. This was a confrontation between Erdogan and Buyukanit. The people have chosen Buyukanit. Clearly.
Again, I realize that this balance of power between government and military only works correctly in Turkey, but this system does work...
|
|
154. |
02 May 2007 Wed 10:35 am |
Quoting Trudy: Another question: I read earlier that the Supreme Court said the last vote was invalid because there were only 361 instead of 367 members of Parliament when voting. But now I read that the AK party wants a new round of votes, starting tomorrow. With Gül still as their candidate. Anyone who can explain? |
AK party did want the voting to continue. But constitutional court has thrown out first round of votes.
|
|
155. |
02 May 2007 Wed 10:47 am |
Quoting KeithL: AK party did want the voting to continue. But constitutional court has thrown out first round of votes. |
I know, but in Dutch news they said the AK-party wants to start all over again, not continuing (because the court said no). They say it was announced by several Turkish tv stations. The new dates are: May 3rd and if needed also May 7th, 11th and 15th. Is that possible?
|
|
156. |
02 May 2007 Wed 11:00 am |
Erdogan may ask for a new vote in parliment, but it will be impossible to get 2/3 vote needed.
|
|
157. |
02 May 2007 Wed 11:12 am |
Well then there's no problem is there? If people change their minds and don't like their government then they will just have to elect another one next time. It's clearly not healthy for the army to meddle, and if you think it is then YOU join them in overthrowing the government YOU go get yourself killed for absolutely silly reasons.
I'm sorry but I think you guys are paranoid. Turkey's been secular for ages now hows that goign to change? and like caliptrix said look at what the government has accomplished since they came to power, instead of looking at their personal beliefs. It's thanks to them bridges are slowly being built towards joining the EU at some point. Surely taking a more religious course would be a huge contradiction and ruin all of that.
|
|
158. |
02 May 2007 Wed 11:21 am |
Quoting KeithL:
But, if the military had not threatened Erdogan, there would be no early elections. This was a confrontation between Erdogan and Buyukanit. The people have chosen Buyukanit. Clearly.
Again, I realize that this balance of power between government and military only works correctly in Turkey, but this system does work... |
Then they should have waited till the election time comes and not interfear .
Ohh, i dont know really what we argue about, not just you KeithL but all of you.
You are drawing democracy the way you want because it suite you this way in that stiuation !
And there is no such thing saying that works only for Turkiye.
So every country in the whole world can say same,starting from Taliban in afganistan,till Sadam in Iraq,then they were not wrong and their systems suit them too!
Every country can plan her own democracy and no one can object about it !
That is not logic !
And if army march in catwoman everytime they dont like a government ,it would be a millitary system.and turn into jungle!
I dont accept what Bush doing ,but of course i wont accept if the army march in too.
And no need to argue more in what is obvious !
|
|
159. |
02 May 2007 Wed 11:45 am |
The most ironic thing of all Canli is that your country, Egypt, has no democracy at all. Your presidential elections have had only one candidate since the early 80's. And Mubarik is grooming his son to become the next king....I mean president.
|
|
160. |
02 May 2007 Wed 11:53 am |
Quoting erdinc:
Look at this picture. You will see mens desk and womens desk. This is Istanbul and they are paying their water bills to councils pay desk.
|
I can't believe that! This is not possible?!
|
|
161. |
02 May 2007 Wed 11:54 am |
Quoting CANLI: Quoting KeithL:
Then they should have waited till the election time comes and not interfear .
|
The Presidential election by Parliament is now. General Elections are later. The term of President is 6 years. There was no time to wait.
No blood has been shed. No swords were drawn. Only military enforcing constitution.
And now, Erdogan wants to change constitution. So, he does not accept the constitution the way that Ataturk had it drafted. Even more reason he has to go.
|
|
|
162. |
02 May 2007 Wed 11:56 am |
Quoting mltm: Quoting erdinc:
Look at this picture. You will see mens desk and womens desk. This is Istanbul and they are paying their water bills to councils pay desk.
|
I can't believe that! This is not possible?! |
This is Erdogan's AK Parti Istanbul....and his vision for Turkey.
|
|
163. |
02 May 2007 Wed 12:05 pm |
Quoting KeithL: The most ironic thing of all Canli is that your country, Egypt, has no democracy at all. Your presidential elections have had only one candidate since the early 80's. And Mubarik is grooming his son to become the next king....I mean president. |
So ?! that means what ? We accept it and accept all other way of not having Democracy in every country?!
We should change our minds and our concepts ?
So what would be the difference between us and poor not educated people?!!!
Again,i dont understand your logic !
Off to work, Cya
|
|
164. |
02 May 2007 Wed 12:36 pm |
I hope one day all the muslim countries will come to the point of Turkey. I wish they had the same army, the army of Mustafa Kemal who would fight for the democracy and secularism, but unfortunately the armies of the islamic countries are the guardians of the İslamic regime and they haven't had a leader like ours, so it's very difficult for the poor people protest against these islamic governments. There's not an army that would back them.
We watch the new measures taken in İran. They have even banned the western hair styles for men.
Look at the poor girl being arrested by the islamic police http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gj7_q97dqek
I am really very sorry about the peoples of these countries, I admire iranian, arabian cultures and languages, but because of their islamic traditions applied in their countries and because of the arab leaders who sell their country to USA they are ages behind. These people don't deserve to live like this.
It has been a little out of topic, but even if Turkey is a democratic secular country, it's not a France, there's always a need to protect our current regime, because there's always a possiblity to be like İran. It's not realistic to say that Turkey can never be an İslamic country, these islamists organize so well that it can be very late to fix it back.
|
|
165. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:09 pm |
You know,now i understood that you dont know anything about Muslim countries but you are still talking about them !
I dont mean just you ,mltm but all !
What should really be called Muslim Country is the only country is applying the islamic law "Shari'a"
And that goes for only 2 country Iran and Saudi Arabia.
Other countries not using Shari'a in their laws most of them using the French law as main recourse.
Therefor they are not ruled by an Islamic government.
Same in Egypt,our law is form from our needs,and from the French law as main recourse
As for our army,Elhamdulillah we have a strong army protecting our nation,our borders from our enemies.
And lead many wars ends just 30 yrs ago by Peace agreement between us.
To tell you the differences between the countries it needs lots of time and space,and this thread not its place.
You really need much to know,for you are mixing things up.
If you search you will get an idea,and if any need further information PM me,and i will help if i can.
|
|
166. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:22 pm |
Canli, Egypt doesnt have real elections. How can you say your country emulates french government?
|
|
167. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:22 pm |
Yes, I agree that we lack a lot of knowledge about muslim countries, we consider most of them equal to İran, and see all the muslims equal to talibans.
And we including the turks are prejudiced against especially the arabs. We consider all of the arabs as a one nation. We look down upon them and refuse to learn more about them. All of my turkish friends made fun of me when I told them I was going out with an arab.
I have noticed this lack of knowledge in me and lately I have started to be more interested in these countries and people. That doesn't mean that I admire their unseculiar regimes, but there are other things to admire.
|
|
168. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:29 pm |
Quoting KeithL: Canli, Egypt doesnt have real elections. How can you say your country emulates french government? |
Ohh KeithL,review my post again,have i said french government?
Or i said french law ?
You are just arguing with me and didnt even bother to read my post ...
Ok, there are diffence of having almost the same law,and applying it same way !
I wish there was a copy of it in English so it would spare me all that kind of arguments!
I will search,maybe i find and i will send you the link .
|
|
169. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:31 pm |
How can you criticize Turkish government, when your government doesnt have real elections? This is specifically what I am asking.
|
|
170. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:32 pm |
Quoting mltm: Yes, I agree that we lack a lot of knowledge about muslim countries, we consider most of them equal to İran, and see all the muslims equal to talibans.
And we including the turks are prejudiced against especially the arabs. We consider all of the arabs as a one nation. We look down upon them and refuse to learn more about them. All of my turkish friends made fun of me when I told them I was going out with an arab.
I have noticed this lack of knowledge in me and lately I have started to be more interested in these countries and people. That doesn't mean that I admire their unseculiar regimes, but there are other things to admire. |
I agree with that too.
I've noticed it.
There is one thing i must point it too,there is difference between Egyptians and Arabs.
Egyptians are not Arabs,Arabs are the people who lived original in deserts.
Egyptians were always here,beside our Nile
|
|
171. |
02 May 2007 Wed 01:34 pm |
Quoting KeithL: How can you criticize Turkish government, when your government doesnt have real elections? This is specifically what I am asking. |
Ok,if your brother is lying,you will admire other people for lying and consider lying not wrong ?!
Close ?!
And that is exactly the reason,glad about the Turkish experience in Democracy and hate to see it blown away with an army threat !
Anladin mi ?
I wish !
|
|
172. |
02 May 2007 Wed 02:38 pm |
Quoting mltm: Quoting erdinc:
Look at this picture. You will see mens desk and womens desk. This is Istanbul and they are paying their water bills to councils pay desk.
|
A photoshop pro could have done a much more better job.
Do you cordially expect people on here to believe such a make-believe illusion. It is very evident how amateur with photoshop whoever has done it is as s/he is quite bad at using the masking and rendering properties of the photoshop.
S/he is not only an amateur but also too silly to grasp the simple fact that cash desks (or anything else) are numbered from left to right in a consecutive order.
Additionally, the numbers are printed on cash desks windows which are at eye level.
And also, who took this picture and when and where did s/he take it? S/he isn't the only person who pays his/her bills at İSKİ cash desks.
|
|
|
173. |
02 May 2007 Wed 03:22 pm |
I think the picture is real. The numbering is understandable.
It says:
women's desk 1
women's desk 2
men's desk 1
men's desk 2
|
|
174. |
02 May 2007 Wed 03:30 pm |
Quoting erdinc: I think the picture is real. The numbering is understandable.
It says:
women's desk 1
women's desk 2
men's desk 1
men's desk 2
|
I should think that they wouldn't mix the lines, but they do. First women, than men, than women and men again. If they are so strict, why this?
|
|
175. |
02 May 2007 Wed 04:29 pm |
faşizm susmanın memnuniyeti değil söylemenin mecburiyetidir.
|
|
176. |
02 May 2007 Wed 05:06 pm |
Quoting ruthless87: faşizm susmanın memnuniyeti değil söylemenin mecburiyetidir. |
What does it say? Can you translate please? You say something about fascism, that I see.
|
|
177. |
02 May 2007 Wed 09:05 pm |
Well, on Sunday 6th we all know more. A new try to elect a president.
|
|
178. |
02 May 2007 Wed 09:23 pm |
Regardless of the outcome and our beliefs I hope we can all agree that we don't wish this to turn into violence.
|
|
179. |
02 May 2007 Wed 09:38 pm |
Quoting Trudy: Well, on Sunday 6th we all know more. A new try to elect a president. |
I don't think so. They announced that they will not vote for President again until after General Elections.
|
|
180. |
03 May 2007 Thu 11:00 pm |
I just want to say that I feel very proud of Turkish people who had the brains and guts to stand up against corruption and political manipulation. If only the Americans and other nations had the guts to do the same thing, god, we would have a so much better world.
|
|
181. |
03 May 2007 Thu 11:08 pm |
Quoting catwoman: I just want to say that I feel very proud of Turkish people who had the brains and guts to stand up against corruption and political manipulation. If only the Americans and other nations had the guts to do the same thing, god, we would have a so much better world. |
+100000000
|
|
182. |
03 May 2007 Thu 11:59 pm |
Quoting erdinc: Many Islamic countries are hundreds of years behind civilization. In many Islamic countries females are considered like objects to be bought and sold. They have no rights at all. They have no right to chose the man they are going to marry, no right to vote, no right for inheritance, no right for modern education, no right to work, no right to chose where they live, no right to divorce (asking for divorce would be main reason for killing them).
In many Islamic countries even a cow is considered more valuable than girls. Females are not even counted as children of a family. In many of those countries if you ask a man how many children he has he might say five. This means he has five sons. They don't count the girls. Girls will be sold when they become 13.
Ottomans have ruled those countries for hundreds of years. Those are our neighbours. We have a responsibility in those lands to help our neighbours. We need to help them to become more modern.
For now let's solve our domestic problems but in the future we are going to help our neigbours. Don't worry, with time we'll fix them.
|
hehehe, thanks again!
btw, here is an example of how iran became extreme islamic very democratic way:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOxK4xGfves
everything went smoothly democratic with the help of brainwashed students, so that pahlavi had to give up, he didnt want to use his army.
they say pahlavi wanted to repeat ataturk's achievments, but then he failed, he let democracy take over the power, he lost against cunning people.
history is an open book to learn from, but we never do!
|
|
183. |
04 May 2007 Fri 12:13 am |
"AFTER: Working with infamous terrorists"
Hehe! Fantastic! You know, femme fatal, labelling Yasser Arafat as a terrorist no longer works. This is true with Nelson Mandela! Both are already heroes.
|
|
184. |
04 May 2007 Fri 12:23 am |
Quoting panta rei: "AFTER: Working with infamous terrorists"
Hehe! Fantastic! You know, femme fatal, labelling Yasser Arafat as a terrorist no longer works. This is true with Nelson Mandela! Both are already heroes. |
its a huge mistake to compare a terrorist to mandela!
mandela is a great and peaceful personality!
indeed mandela is a hero!
a terrorist is not!
appreciate your comments!
|
|
185. |
04 May 2007 Fri 12:29 am |
C'mon femme fatal! Mandela, like Afarat, was yesterday's terrorist!
|
|
186. |
04 May 2007 Fri 12:40 am |
Quoting panta rei: C'mon femme fatal! Mandela, like Afarat, was yesterday's terrorist! |
the books i've read about mandela dont say anything about his terrorist past
|
|
187. |
04 May 2007 Fri 12:50 am |
Quoting erdinc: Many Islamic countries are hundreds of years behind civilization. In many Islamic countries females are considered like objects to be bought and sold. They have no rights at all. They have no right to chose the man they are going to marry, no right to vote, no right for inheritance, no right for modern education, no right to work, no right to chose where they live, no right to divorce (asking for divorce would be main reason for killing them).
In many Islamic countries even a cow is considered more valuable than girls. Females are not even counted as children of a family. In many of those countries if you ask a man how many children he has he might say five. This means he has five sons. They don't count the girls. Girls will be sold when they become 13.
Ottomans have ruled those countries for hundreds of years. Those are our neighbours. We have a responsibility in those lands to help our neighbours. We need to help them to become more modern.
For now let's solve our domestic problems but in the future we are going to help our neigbours. Don't worry, with time we'll fix them.
|
no body needs ur help. go ahead and modernize and democratize Turkey first. Ottoman period is over.
|
|
188. |
07 May 2007 Mon 09:04 am |
Quoting kaddersokak: no body needs ur help. go ahead and modernize and democratize Turkey first. Ottoman period is over. |
Turkey has the 16th largest economy in the world, the largest of any muslim nation. And this is without the benefit of oil export. Turkey is by far the most democratic muslim nation in the middle east as well. Arabya should be so lucky to be governed by Turks again instead of American and British.
|
|
189. |
10 May 2007 Thu 09:41 pm |
Quoting armegon: First of all i am sorry for my English because i tried to translate quickly .
Portrait and some Declarations of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan through 1994-2006
*The time when he was the Major of İstanbul;
“Elhamdülillah we are the supporters of Sheriaâ€(21.11.1994 Milliyet)
“I am against the celebration of New yearâ€(19.12.1994 Sabah)
“I didnt go to dervish lodge(tekke), i went to dergahâ€(22.11.1997 Gözcü)
“No need to stand like a stake when showing respect to Atatürk†(12.5.1994 Hürriyet)
“Every 10th of November people make useless fussâ€(14.11.1994 Hürriyet)
“Alcohol should be bannedâ€(1.5.1996 Hürriyet)
“We will change İstanbul into Medinaâ€(Akis)
“All the schools in Türkiye will be changed into İmam Hatip(school for raising İmams) schoolsâ€(17.9.1994 Cumhuriyet)
“The colour of green(the colour of sidewalk) is civilisationâ€(25.6.1994)
“Only Imams should marry people officiallyâ€(9.5.1995 Milliyet)
“I am at the side of to open TBMM(Parliament) with praysâ€(When he was the major of İstanbul, every year opening of municipality council made by prays instead of Independence March. And again after an opening of the council, he gave this declaration)(8.1.1996 Milliyet)
“I am the Imam of İstanbulâ€(8.1.1995 Hürriyet)
“Advertisement of swimsuit is a exploitation of lustâ€(6.3.1996 Hürriyet)
“National lottery is a crueltyâ€(29.9.1994 Hürriyet)
“ President of Republic soon will be from İmam-Hatip.These days are so closeâ€(5.2.1996 Akit)
“There is no need of Kemalizm or a regime similar to Kemalizm in the future of countryâ€
“Mosques are our barracks, minarets are our bayonets, mümins(believer) are our soldiersâ€
“Democracy is not a aim, only a vehicle for us. We are affilied to democracy until we reach our aimsâ€
“Democracy is a tram for us. When we came to stopping place we want, we will get offâ€
*He was speeching to the public at meeting.
“A cow is sitting on the middle of our way, closing our way, blocking us to reach our range. We will remove that cow from our way at first with words gently, then we will remove somehow by the help of you†(Here cow means Secular Republic and Revolutions of Atatürk.)
*Again at a meeting
“Turkey should be divided into states. And some authority of central governance should be given to these states. And Majors should be the most authorized person. And at that regions everykind of education should also be under control of themâ€(is the same expressions of dividers like PKK)
“You can’t be secular and muslim both. You must choose to be a muslim or to be a secular. It is impossible, both of them can not be togetherâ€
“Our reference is İslam. Our only goal is Islamic Stateâ€
“If you say “Ne mutlu Türküm Diyene†others have right to say “Ne mutlu kürdüm â€â€(a reminder from the declaration of Turkish Military “Who is against the conception of Atatürk’s motto “Ne mutlu Türküm Diyeneâ€, are the enemies of Turkish Republic(27.4.2007) )
“1.5 billion of world of Islam are waiting impatiently to stand up of our muslim people. We will stand up and this rebellion will startâ€
The date of wedding invitation of his son “29 Zilkade 1421â€(using Arabic takvim)
*After he became PM
“I am marketing Turkiye. For us given money is important. We market and sell everything, who give money, can take every worth of Turkiyeâ€
“They insist to say secularism is going to be removed, of course can be removed if the people wantâ€
“Women can sit where they want, it is none of your businessâ€( Said to a journalist at a meeting of AKP in Kars asking why women and men sitting apart (at different places))
“The salary given to me is too low(not enough), how much salary do you takeâ€(said to the PM of Germany)
“There is a identity problem in Türkiye. And the concept of “Turk†should be commented as a sub-identity. Anyone who wants then can say “I am a Turkâ€â€
“People who are walking with the alleged flags of PKK are wrong but low flight of F-16s of Turkish Army is also wrong, both are wrongâ€(He equals PKK with Turkish Army)
“We will be taken out of Cyprus likewise how Syria is taken out of Lebonan, they say “ leave out of Cyprus and we will do it like a sheep†â€
“It is impossible for one person to say i am both muslim and secularâ€
“Did you drink too much? Your mouth smells alcoholâ€(said to the ambassodor of Austria)
“Stop and listen!...Stop and listen!...9 months 10 days!â€(said to a citizen at his speech)
“Look here! Do you think this nation need to work for you all the timeâ€(said to the farmers in Erzurum)
“Is this your job to give a judgement about turban?, This is the job of ulema. What ulema says, it is rightâ€( said to the Human rights court of Europe)
“Who are you? Ulema can give judgement about turbanâ€(said to Danıştay(state coucil court). A few weeks after this declaration, a radical terrorist attacked to the judges of Danıştay who gave judgement about turban and killed one of them, injured othersâ€
“Don’t shake your hand and arm! Every part of your body shaking!â€(said to member of parliament)
“Ulan terbiyesizlik yapma! Artistlik yapma ulan! Hadi ananı da al git buradanâ€(said to a farmer in Mersin, its a rude expression so translation is difficult)
After hundreds of placement hadn’t approved by President of Republic, he decided to execute these places by proxies and said(target is President of Republic):
“We don’t do anything contrary to law, there is a rule like this in Sheria law.â€
“What can(will) i talk to that woman?â€(said to mother of a martyr)
“Military service is not a place to lay down and restâ€( said to the relatives of martyr)
“Call that impostor, What does he want?â€( said to a citizen in Germany whose money stolen by green capital…Also at the same meeting he made the ambassador of Turkish Republic booed by people.)
He abased YOK president Prof. Dr. Erdoğan Teziç by saying he is not celever in an argo way.
“I am guaranty to him, i trust him like my father, i believe in him as how i believe in meâ€
(said at Parliament(TBMM), he became guaranty to Yasin El-Kadı, Then who is Yasin El-Kadı?His name is listed as a sponsor of El-kaide by United Nations)
When PKK ceased fire:
“And then we don’t do military operations†(He is making jest to PKK)
He abased the former president of Turkish Republic of North Cyprus Rauf Denktaş.
“They are shouting as they are in a football match, these are not nice thingsâ€( said to the people who were shouting “Türkiye is secular, will remain secularâ€)
At AKP General Congress:
. Şerefsizler(dishonests)
. Bizim çocuklar açmı kalsın be!
. Kes ulan sesini(Shut up)
. Sana üç nokta koyarım
. Otur ulan oturduğun yerde, herşeye burnunu sokma
*And the others:
Before the elections of 2002 and after he just became PM
“I changed developing myselfâ€
In the 4th year of his government:
“I never changed. Islamic opinions never changeâ€
Lastly his oath against to Republic in 1980’s;
“I am affilied to Muhammed and muslim ummah. Türkiye has become a irreligous, secular state. I make oath(swear) on my religion, Allah and every holy things that i will devote myself to make a war against irreligous secular state of Mustafa Kemal, i will prevent all the irreligous laws of Mustafa Kemal to be performed and i will try to form a state of Sheria†Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.
When we look at his some declarations through this 12 year when he was a major of İstanbul and when he is now PM;
All can see that he is loyal to his oath in 1980’s and working and trying hardly to perform his oath today. One who can’t or don’t want to see these actions, maybe those are blind or anything else.
“ President of Republic soon will be from İmam-Hatip. These days are so closeâ€(5.2.1996 Akit)
Which civil society organization has attened to the meeting at Çağlayan and which are not;
Attended: CHP, DSP, MHP, ANAP, DYP, GP, SHP, İP, BBP, HP, DİSK, TÜRK-İŞ, KESK, BAROLAR, ODALAR etc.
Not attended: AKP, SP, DEHAP, TKP, ÖDP, EMEP.
Also there will be a new meeting on 13th of May in İzmir Gündoğdu.
|
Amazing how some people STILL act as if they don't understand what AKPs aim is after reading all of these!
Good summary armagedon, but we need to add these to the list. :
'This is the end of the Republican period.Secular system has failed and we deffinately want ot change it'
This is what AKPs presidential candidate, Abdullah Gül has said to brittish newspaper Guardian some time ago.
Another one from AKP leading politicians :
Bulent Arinc:'Secularity definition in the constitution must be changed!'
Erdogan :'Don't say that.You are talking too early.We have some 10-15 years to get there.'
What more proof do you want that their aim is to change Turkey's secular regime? Slowly but surely ,step by step they are planning to get there.Of course they refrain from doing too pretentious things that will wake people up, before they get hold of all government bodies ,state institutions, justice, universties,etc..
But using the power of being the current government, they get their millitants to important positions in the Education department, Justice department and Security Forces.They change the system that requires exams(objective criteria) to get into those departments, so they can take 'their' man (islamist Akp millitants) in, by applying subjective critereas and don't have to take the ones that have scored the highest points in the exams.Police departments are already filled with islamist millitants.They try to infiltrate into the army as well, but couldn't do it so far.
Before the 'head in the sand people' wake up, they will get hold of whole establishment.
They already took care of the media by threatening and blackmailing the bosses.Not respecting free speech, blackmailing media bosses , pressure media channels and threatening the only remaining oposing media channel and the companies that put their adds on that channel,( kanalturk).There are two big media holdings in Turkey: One is 'Dogan Media' which is under enourmous pressure and caved in.Dogan Media Group even closed the anti-government paper Gözcü although it was selling well.
The other one; Ciner group that owns (Sabah,aksam..atv, etc.).And guess what, government body TMSF seized control of them, claiming there were some ilegalities! After the seizure, Sabah's news manager Fatih Altayli and some other journalists resigned, saying TMSF (in the hand of AKP) puts pressure on them to censure anti-government news and pressure them to hire akp millitant writers like Nazli Ilicak.
They got hold of Uzan media (anti- akp ) long time ago and they even turned music chanels like Kral TV to news chanels, so AKP sympathisers and anti republic journalists like Ahmet Altan can invite likeminded poeple and feed people with their propaganda.Not to mention state channels like TRT already became AKP media .Plus they have their own islamist media ; tv channels ,papers like Zaman , Vakit, Yeni Şafak,etc..
AKP STYLE FREE SPEECH AND FREE MEDIA!!!
If that's not the road that leads to fascism , i don't know what is.
|
|
190. |
10 May 2007 Thu 09:51 pm |
Quoting CANLI: Quoting leander: One cannot talk about democracy in a country where people have to live according to the rules of a certain religion.Islamist states cannot be called democracies and our oh-so-democrat islamists who keep harping on about democracy, admitt democracy is not the aim,it is just a tool to get them there where they wanna be.Which is an islamist state thats run by Sheria.And this is islamist-fashism.
|
When people lie,does that made lying right ?
Helal ?!!!!!!
When applying İslam in a wrong way,then what is wrong is the İslam or the methods,hidden agenda ?!!
And btw,what do you think inspired Westen Democratic countries while putting their own laws ?!
Did they all invent it ?so its all some how very much close to each other,they all got the border lines in one time by hidden inspiration?
But not from religions,No ?!!!
Cannt be ,huh ?!!!
You just memorize,you dont analyze !
Shaking head !!!
And btw,take care of what you are calling fascism !
You can call system fascism ,but NOT religion! |
Learn the difference between 'islam' and 'islamism/islamist', -thats obviousely used as a political term and has nothing to do with islam itself-) before you dare to accuse people of disrespecting their own religion in a threatening tone. No wonder that kind of intolerant atmosphere, where likes of you are ready to treathen everyone who don't sound islamist enough for Arab standarts, created terrorist organisations like 'Muslim Brothers', trademarks of Egypt..They are the ones that disrespect and tarnish our beautiful religion.Not the turkish perception of islam which has an emphasis on tolerance ,undertsanding, peace, love of God and love of what God created, and don't reduce islam to just a piece of clothing.
Quote: You dont analyse you just memorize. |
I would analyze your post but i couldn't understand it.I'll do it when i find a a Canli To English Dictionary.
I have yet to hear anything from you that is a sign of analytical thinking.If you think parroting what you read on islamist Arab media about Turkey's secular system impresses anyone here, you are sadly mistaken.
I don't want you to get wasted here my oh-so-analytical-thinking friend.Instead of constantly bashing the turkish democracy which is the only democracy in the muslim world, you'd better use your 'analytical thinking abilities' to save Arab 'democracies' from the pathetic situation they are in.Start with your own country.
I hate to break it to you, but here in Turkey we are not really interested in getting advice from Arab islamists, on their profound(!) experiences on democracy
So, give yourself a rest.
|
|
191. |
10 May 2007 Thu 11:07 pm |
leander,
im forced, i have absolutely no choice but to say: BRAVO!
you're genious! i bow my little head before you!
excellent post!
may God bless turkey with people like you!
i absolutely loved your post!
|
|
192. |
11 May 2007 Fri 01:26 am |
Thank you femme_fatal
Evidently there are MANY people that think and feel the way i do,i knew that they are out there, but seing the incredible crowds on the 14th and 29th april, DESPITE the discouragement of the rally by the mass media, gave me even more hope for our future.
On Sunday another rally, this time in Izmir! On Mothers Day, millions will visit Zübeyde Hanim's (Atatürk's Mother) house.
|
|
193. |
11 May 2007 Fri 03:00 am |
Quoting leander: Thank you femme_fatal
Evidently there are MANY people that think and feel the way i do,i knew that they are out there, but seing the incredible crowds on the 14th and 29th april, DESPITE the discouragement of the rally by the mass media, gave me even more hope for our future.
On Sunday another rally, this time in Izmir! On Mothers Day, millions will visit Zübeyde Hanim's (Atatürk's Mother) house.
|
You are hopeful but what about those whose freedoom has already been limited? What about those girls who can not enter the university campuses because of their headscarves?
I think following article explains the current stiuation in Turkey. I put it 2-3 hour ago but somebody deleted it.
Two Turkeys: Democrats vs anti-democrats
by Bulent Kenes
“Two Turkeys†has been a definition used, particularly by the foreign media, since the April 14 demonstration in Ankara’s Tandoğan Square.
According to this definition, the hundreds of thousands that converged on the square made it crystal clear that there were now two Turkeys with different lifestyles, political understandings and worldviews. That is, the Turkish nation was divided right down the middle due to the policies pursued by the Justice and Development Party (AK Party), and those who felt that their secular and modern lifestyles were under threat took to the streets and expressed their reactions to the other Turkey, which they “otherized†at the top of their lungs.
In news reports and analyses published or broadcast, a claim is being put forward that the current political team, whose roots are claimed by some to be based in Islam -- although they now have a different political understanding and agenda -- is threatening secularism, the “cement†of Turkey, and thus secularism is under threat. So how befitting is this definition and approach for the reality in Turkey?
I should note that the definition “Two Turkeys†is correct. And this situation is not only true for us today; it extends back to the first years of the republic. The only difference between today and the past is that the two Turkeys now are more closely knitted, only physically though, in their common living areas, and they are seen together more often. I should also note with great care that it would not be tantamount to separatism to call either this external division or this appearance “Two Turkeys,†since such a definition would only be a socio-political determination that is virtually impossible to deny. We should not be afraid of such a realistic determination.
In fact, the “Two Turkeys,†or possibly even more Turkeys, have always existed in Turkey. However, until recently there was only a certain segment of society that claimed all social, political, cultural and economic power and therefore occupied a far greater place in the notorious “public area†than it deserved, and as a result only that segment of the society was predominantly visible.
What was really misleading was the reflection of that appearance. And what was missing was the sight of the “other Turkey†on the stage. So what has really changed in the scene is that both Turkeys are now in plain sight.
I agree with the determination that there are “two Turkeys.†However, the naming of these two Turkeys is not at all befitting the reality in Turkey; this is obvious because these two Turkeys cannot be described as either secular versus anti-secular, modern versus Islamist or republican versus democrat. The best term to describe the pieces that make these two Turkeys is democrats versus anti-democrats.
At this point to which we have arrived, the Turkish nation doesn’t have any problems with secularism, modernism or republicanism. Turkey’s people favor a secularism that has universal qualities, a real modernism and a real republicanism. Furthermore, they vitally need these, as they don’t exist in Turkey within universal norms. And this demand is above all made by the morally conservative, politically progressive religious segments of society.
But, in addition, this repressed segment has been harboring grudges against efforts to empty these terms -- which is against democracy’s tenets and against a certain minority’s attempt to make them into a means to tyrannize the majority.
What is opposed is a skewed understanding of secularism that dauntlessly purports to possess the right to interfere in the religious preferences of individuals, to push everything religious out of the social sphere and to deprive hundreds of thousands of their most fundamental right to education only because of their religious preference, as a result of which they decide to dress in a certain way.
What is also opposed is the imposition of a monolithic modernism at a time when post-modernism, where individual preferences and differences are prioritized, is the dominant element and a despotic understanding of modernism that cannot stand lifestyles other than the one that could be categorized as that single type.
And moreover, what is opposed is the crooked elitist, Jacobin and oligarchic republicanism that overlooks people’s expectations and preferences and insults their will.
Briefly, the “two Turkeys†in Turkey are actually two camps: One camp has democrats who support secularism, modernism and republicanism, which is the soul of democracy; and the anti-democrats. The anti-democrats empty concepts like secularism and republicanism, which everyone needs like air and water to formulize the co-habitation and peaceful coexistence that preserves differences, and isolate them from democracy to exploit them as a means for repression and subversion. What is really opposed is this attempt to turn these vital concepts into a crooked means to perpetrate the above-mentioned atrocities.
The reality in Turkey today is not secularism and the republic being under threat. Just the opposite -- the thing whose existence is threatened by much paranoia is democracy itself, just as has befallen us four times during the brief history of our young democracy.
|
|
|