Alameda, I don´t think anyone here thinks organ transplant is a petty thing. So we all know that you need drugs to make it work, and even then, there are no guarantees. If you´d rather die than have somebody´s liver or heart, fine. It´s your choice. And I´m sure that a person who gets the liver you wouldn´t take, will be glad to be next on the list. I sure would 
Informed decision is the key, hence the donor cards or the ones whose name I have forgotten that say "do not resuscitate". Also, your family should know whether you´d rather live as long as possible even if it means having your bodily functions artificially supported, or would rather prefer to be not supported mechanically.
The bottom line is, it should be a matter of preferrence, not general rule or law.
Daydreamer.....actually I agree 100% with you.....regarding the matter of consent....and that is the issue. If someone willingly, and with knowledge donates their organs and tissue, G-d bless them. The probem is too many times this is not the case.
How about the people who were coerced out of their organs, or who´s organs were stolen from them? We know for a fact of the case of Alistair Cooke (I was a fan and listened to his broadcasts every morning), whose tissue was stolen with out permission. His tissue, being from a cancer victim ,and from a 96 year old was not even legally permissable, but still it was done. It only was an accident that revealed the case......and a whole network of criminals who "harvested", sold and traded in the "tissue".
When so much is at stake, there are those who will do highly unethical and illegal things to profit. There has to be a method to clearly limit illegal and unethical "harvesting". It´s downright goulish and gruesome. 
|