Welcome
Login:   Pass:     Register - Forgot Password - Resend Activation

Turkish Class Forums / News articles, events, announcements

News articles, events, announcements

Thread locked by a moderator or admin.
Saddam Sentenced To Death
(103 Messages in 11 pages - View all)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11
90.       tirrogan
0 posts
 07 Nov 2006 Tue 12:14 am

Quoting teaschip:

Today is a divine justice for the Iraqi people. Saddam got what he deserved for the crimes against humanity committed during years of brutal dictatorship. He sent millions of people to their deaths. And you ask is there any benefit to kill Saddam? I think this is better answered by the Iraqi people who's children, husbands, wifes, parents, brothers, sisters, uncles, aunts, grandparents who were murdered by Saddams reign. In my opinion Saddam and Hitler can rot in hell together and compare notes. Justice has finally been served!


i really think which day will be a divine justice for the U.S Politicians.Saddam got what he deserved and what will U.S politicians deserve for these dyings in iraq? Giving freedome a country didnt have to be like that.didnt U.s killed ppl in hiroshima and negazaki.who sentenced them to death.i dont appriciate Saddam.i know what kind of man who is.he really deserved this.but i am asking you teaschip.everyday alot of ppl are dying with the freedome which you gave them in iraq.everyday children, husbands, wifes, parents, brothers are still dying in iraq.do u know this?what did U.S prevent in iraq.just read what u wrote and realize the massacre u are doing in iraq......

91.       robyn :D
2640 posts
 07 Nov 2006 Tue 12:15 am

Quoting teaschip:

Quoting Joey:

Quoting robyn :

Quoting Joey:

Quoting robyn :

how is it that england and america dont go into countries like north korea and japan and say what they do to their people is wrong..or how about zimbabwe..i'll tell why..they have no oil..
saddam did wrong and killed innocents but him being killed doesn't bring back the dead and doesn't solve a thing....maybe blair and bush should be put on trial for sending all the soldiers to fight for an unjust war... or the american government for funding the IRA in previous years..neway these 'weapons of mass destruction' were given to iraq in the first place by england and america ...maybe we should kill our governments in that case too



It is not the English government but the UK government, in fact many of the top posts are held by Scots and I have to admit that Tony Blair was born and partially educated in Scotland You speak of Nth. Korea,the Americans suffered heavy casualties protecting the south when they were invaded by the north in the 1950's and look at the difference between the two countries now.As for invading Japan looking at the number of japanese cars on our roads I think the opposite is true Sure the Americans have made mistakes, haven't we all? But I for one will always be grateful to the Yanks for the help they have given us over the years, after all we in Britain might be speaking almanca



well the situation in north korea hasn't changed much since the 1950's if u do ur research..consequently japanese human rights records are some practises are atrocious..also i see u avoided the zimbabwe issue..rather wisely and whether the posts are held by scottish people or people educated in scotland is irrelevant..they have their own parliament
the phrase 'passing the buck' springs to mind


Zimbabwe is a fellow member of the Commonwealth of Nations. As long as it has the support of some members there is very little that can be done.



Joey, it's almost point less to have a real debate here. Because first you need knowledge and facts about politics, world events & history. Which I'm finding very difficult for some people to discuss here. You seem to have a good deal of knowledge though, found your post interesting. Thanks for the enlightment



trying to suggest that people have no knowledge just because they dont agree with is kind of immature teaschip..i do my research which is why i am in a position to offer such information and insight..i however dont believe that someone is has no knowledge of facts just because they disagree with my opinion...

92.       tirrogan
0 posts
 07 Nov 2006 Tue 12:23 am

the only reason for the Saddam death is to take the votes at the coming election.they just care about the election.they just put him in the oven.when the elections come, it will be ready to eat.Some ppl are doing policy on Saddam.thats all....

93.       arabianofelix
144 posts
 07 Nov 2006 Tue 01:01 am

Quoting aenigma x:

Quoting arabianofelix:

Quoting Netzen:

..."YE SHALL KNOW THEM BY THEIR FRUIT"



those who consumed their fruits came to be the most ungrateful of all mankind.



This kind of comment just completely alienates me, and I don't think the forum is the place for it.



Nothing is pointed at you. I'm only elaborating on your quote: "Ye shall know them by their fruit"

94.       arabianofelix
144 posts
 07 Nov 2006 Tue 01:09 am

Quote:


Are you saying he is also blameless? "The last to save his race's dignity?" Are you quite sure about this statement? Yes we SHOULD know all the facts before making a decision, and I think my views on the trial and verdict have been made quite clear here, but I think you also need to check ALL your facts before making such a statement like this...



He is not blameless. His fault is he was forced to befriend the wrong people. It is well known who made him do this. GWB will tell you why is he doing this for his papa...it ain't my fault his dadddy took his pants down for them. and Then blamed Saddam for the incident.

Quote:

and I think my views on the trial and verdict have been made quite clear here

-- did you even watch at least ONE trial. or at most a trial in full. the Judge was speaking English for God's sake. Yes or No, why has they changed the judges few times. Cuz their plan wasn't going their way. He knows his faults, but he sin't responsible. and The Dujail incidence isn't his fault.

Lets not make this an argument. I just hate things going in the wrong direction, especially if such ambitious and lovely people like all of you here are effected. in fact, everyone in the world. and Truly, our views and abstracted views. and brainwashed isn't the right term. or you say, ain't "politically correct"...

95.       aenigma x
0 posts
 07 Nov 2006 Tue 01:14 am

Arabianofelix - you are preaching to the converted! I have already said that I believe the trial was a sham and as a member of Amnesty International support their views on this also. I am against this war in EVERY way!

All I am saying here is...please...please...let us not make this man a martyr. He is not an innocent victim. The people of Iraq are the innocent victims here.

96.       Roswitha
4132 posts
 07 Nov 2006 Tue 01:18 am

97.       christine
443 posts
 07 Nov 2006 Tue 02:25 am

Quoting aenigma x:


...please...please...let us not make this man a martyr. He is not an innocent victim. The people of Iraq are the innocent victims here.



=1

98.       Capoeira
575 posts
 07 Nov 2006 Tue 03:03 am

Quoting teaschip:

Quoting Joey:

Quoting robyn :

Quoting Joey:

Quoting robyn :

how is it that england and america dont go into countries like north korea and japan and say what they do to their people is wrong..or how about zimbabwe..i'll tell why..they have no oil..
saddam did wrong and killed innocents but him being killed doesn't bring back the dead and doesn't solve a thing....maybe blair and bush should be put on trial for sending all the soldiers to fight for an unjust war... or the american government for funding the IRA in previous years..neway these 'weapons of mass destruction' were given to iraq in the first place by england and america ...maybe we should kill our governments in that case too



It is not the English government but the UK government, in fact many of the top posts are held by Scots and I have to admit that Tony Blair was born and partially educated in Scotland You speak of Nth. Korea,the Americans suffered heavy casualties protecting the south when they were invaded by the north in the 1950's and look at the difference between the two countries now.As for invading Japan looking at the number of japanese cars on our roads I think the opposite is true Sure the Americans have made mistakes, haven't we all? But I for one will always be grateful to the Yanks for the help they have given us over the years, after all we in Britain might be speaking almanca



well the situation in north korea hasn't changed much since the 1950's if u do ur research..consequently japanese human rights records are some practises are atrocious..also i see u avoided the zimbabwe issue..rather wisely and whether the posts are held by scottish people or people educated in scotland is irrelevant..they have their own parliament
the phrase 'passing the buck' springs to mind


Zimbabwe is a fellow member of the Commonwealth of Nations. As long as it has the support of some members there is very little that can be done.



Joey, it's almost point less to have a real debate here. Because first you need knowledge and facts about politics, world events & history. Which I'm finding very difficult for some people to discuss here. You seem to have a good deal of knowledge though, found your post interesting. Thanks for the enlightment

Odd, the only "enlightened" posts are the ones that share your point of view. Might I add that the U.S. only entered WWII after we were bombed at Pearl Harbor, NOT when intelligence reports came back confirming the Holocaust! We seemed to have left out that important bit of history. So I guess your early assumption that some have problems backing their arguments with important historical data is VERY true! Hey even I agree. It makes for a more romantic story to say that we entered into the war to 'save' the world from the Axes of Terror! Opps, am I confusing WWI, Iraq and Afghanistan here?!?!? Will the 'real' historians here set the record straight? lol

99.       robyn :D
2640 posts
 07 Nov 2006 Tue 03:10 am

Quoting Capoeira:

Quoting teaschip:

Quoting Joey:

Quoting robyn :

Quoting Joey:

Quoting robyn :

how is it that england and america dont go into countries like north korea and japan and say what they do to their people is wrong..or how about zimbabwe..i'll tell why..they have no oil..
saddam did wrong and killed innocents but him being killed doesn't bring back the dead and doesn't solve a thing....maybe blair and bush should be put on trial for sending all the soldiers to fight for an unjust war... or the american government for funding the IRA in previous years..neway these 'weapons of mass destruction' were given to iraq in the first place by england and america ...maybe we should kill our governments in that case too



It is not the English government but the UK government, in fact many of the top posts are held by Scots and I have to admit that Tony Blair was born and partially educated in Scotland You speak of Nth. Korea,the Americans suffered heavy casualties protecting the south when they were invaded by the north in the 1950's and look at the difference between the two countries now.As for invading Japan looking at the number of japanese cars on our roads I think the opposite is true Sure the Americans have made mistakes, haven't we all? But I for one will always be grateful to the Yanks for the help they have given us over the years, after all we in Britain might be speaking almanca



well the situation in north korea hasn't changed much since the 1950's if u do ur research..consequently japanese human rights records are some practises are atrocious..also i see u avoided the zimbabwe issue..rather wisely and whether the posts are held by scottish people or people educated in scotland is irrelevant..they have their own parliament
the phrase 'passing the buck' springs to mind


Zimbabwe is a fellow member of the Commonwealth of Nations. As long as it has the support of some members there is very little that can be done.



Joey, it's almost point less to have a real debate here. Because first you need knowledge and facts about politics, world events & history. Which I'm finding very difficult for some people to discuss here. You seem to have a good deal of knowledge though, found your post interesting. Thanks for the enlightment

Odd, the only "enlightened" posts are the ones that share your point of view. Might I add that the U.S. only entered WWII after we were bombed at Pearl Harbor, NOT when intelligence reports came back confirming the Holocaust! We seemed to have left out that important bit of history. So I guess your early assumption that some have problems backing their arguments with important historical data is VERY true! Hey even I agree. It makes for a more romantic story to say that we entered into the war to 'save' the world from the Axes of Terror! Opps, am I confusing WWI, Iraq and Afghanistan here?!?!? Will the 'real' historians here set the record straight? lol


+1million capo canim!!!!!!!!!!

100.       teaschip
3870 posts
 07 Nov 2006 Tue 04:37 am

Quoting Capoeira:

Quoting teaschip:

Quoting Joey:

Quoting robyn :

Quoting Joey:

Quoting robyn :

how is it that england and america dont go into countries like north korea and japan and say what they do to their people is wrong..or how about zimbabwe..i'll tell why..they have no oil..
saddam did wrong and killed innocents but him being killed doesn't bring back the dead and doesn't solve a thing....maybe blair and bush should be put on trial for sending all the soldiers to fight for an unjust war... or the american government for funding the IRA in previous years..neway these 'weapons of mass destruction' were given to iraq in the first place by england and america ...maybe we should kill our governments in that case too



It is not the English government but the UK government, in fact many of the top posts are held by Scots and I have to admit that Tony Blair was born and partially educated in Scotland You speak of Nth. Korea,the Americans suffered heavy casualties protecting the south when they were invaded by the north in the 1950's and look at the difference between the two countries now.As for invading Japan looking at the number of japanese cars on our roads I think the opposite is true Sure the Americans have made mistakes, haven't we all? But I for one will always be grateful to the Yanks for the help they have given us over the years, after all we in Britain might be speaking almanca



well the situation in north korea hasn't changed much since the 1950's if u do ur research..consequently japanese human rights records are some practises are atrocious..also i see u avoided the zimbabwe issue..rather wisely and whether the posts are held by scottish people or people educated in scotland is irrelevant..they have their own parliament
the phrase 'passing the buck' springs to mind


Zimbabwe is a fellow member of the Commonwealth of Nations. As long as it has the support of some members there is very little that can be done.



Joey, it's almost point less to have a real debate here. Because first you need knowledge and facts about politics, world events & history. Which I'm finding very difficult for some people to discuss here. You seem to have a good deal of knowledge though, found your post interesting. Thanks for the enlightment

Odd, the only "enlightened" posts are the ones that share your point of view. Might I add that the U.S. only entered WWII after we were bombed at Pearl Harbor, NOT when intelligence reports came back confirming the Holocaust! We seemed to have left out that important bit of history. So I guess your early assumption that some have problems backing their arguments with important historical data is VERY true! Hey even I agree. It makes for a more romantic story to say that we entered into the war to 'save' the world from the Axes of Terror! Opps, am I confusing WWI, Iraq and Afghanistan here?!?!? Will the 'real' historians here set the record straight? lol



Interesting Capo, you actually did some research here. But you may want to go back and do a little more regarding Japan and Pearl Harbor, my friend. You are a teacher correct? So, any further enlighment would be beneficial from you, in fact I welcome it. Now this is a discussion, not a debate. I have no problem with people throwing facts at me, this helps me learn a great deal. The problem I have if you take notice in previous posts here are the uneducated wanting to argue. I won't even address Tirrogans post, because I fine no value in his response. We could all benefit from a little history, but please don't misconstrue it. I have alot of respect for people at this site that can provide knowledge, but not alot of bullshit that has no meaning. I'm speaking primarily to politics which I believe is a no no here. Oh well, I will suffer the slap on the hand if I must. Lastly to address the age concern here. I must admit I have rethought that comment and really age is not an issue. I'm thinking more like a Personality Assessment. You know, "Do you play well with others"? I just took one at work and the results were interesting.

(103 Messages in 11 pages - View all)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11
Thread locked by a moderator or admin.




Turkish Dictionary
Turkish Chat
Open mini chat
New in Forums
Why yer gördüm but yeri geziyorum
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much, makes perfect sense!
Etmeyi vs etmek
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much!
Görülmez vs görünmiyor
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much, very well explained!
Içeri and içeriye
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much for the detailed ...
Present continous tense
HaydiDeer: Got it, thank you!
Hic vs herhangi, degil vs yok
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much!
Rize Artvin Airport Transfer - Rize Tours
rizetours: Dear Guest; In order to make your Black Sea trip more enjoyable, our c...
What does \"kabul ettiğini\" mean?
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much for the detailed ...
Kimse vs biri (anyone)
HaydiDeer: Thank you!
Random Pictures of Turkey
Most commented