General/Off-topic |
|
|
|
Lockerbie Bomber goes free
|
20. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 12:56 pm |
Robert Fisk is one of the best middle east correspondents of our time..
And, thehandsom is one of the best Turkish correspondents of our time... in fact, of ANY time .....
|
|
21. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 12:59 pm |
And, thehandsom is one of the best Turkish correspondents of our time... in fact, of ANY time .....
..Please dont make me feel shy!!
|
|
22. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 02:20 pm |
..Please dont make me feel shy!!
Awww I don´t think it is possible for someone as imperious as you to be shy
|
|
23. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 08:49 pm |
I am sorry to keep on about this GG but you say you are sickened by the release of a sick man who may or may not be guilty of planting this bomb. On the other side of the coin we have the downing of the Iranian airliner with the loss of 224 plus 66 children and the perpetrator gets a Legion of Merit medal. Something wrong somewhere.
You are sorry and yet you you are still accusing me of having no compassion for this incident? Just because I made a comment on conspiracy theorist????? You are so far out of field it´s ridiculous!!
I lived in Iran and the Iranian people are very dear to my heart!
And if you think I am going to argue with you that there is "something wrong somewhere" you are sorely mistaken!!
and handsom.........fix your damn post on 2!
Edited (8/23/2009) by girleegirl
|
|
24. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 09:19 pm |
You are sorry and yet you you are still accusing me of having no compassion for this incident? Just because I made a comment on conspiracy theorist????? You are so far out of field it´s ridiculous!!
I lived in Iran and the Iranian people are very dear to my heart!
And if you think I am going to argue with you that there is "something wrong somewhere" you are sorely mistaken!!
and handsom.........fix your damn post on 2!
Yes handsom do as you are told, you are breaking ranks and going against the protocol here.
I was only pointing out the absurdity GG of the American indignation at the release of a man that may or may not have been a pawn in the PanAm bombing and their awarding of a medal to the guy who ordered the firing of the missile that blew up the Iranian airliner with the huge loss of life.
|
|
25. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 09:46 pm |
I am ´refusing´ to adjust it because I was ´ordered´ here!!!!
ps..I dont what breaks it really..It is not the active page anyway..
|
|
26. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 10:10 pm |
Yes handsom do as you are told, you are breaking ranks and going against the protocol here.
I was only pointing out the absurdity GG of the American indignation at the release of a man that may or may not have been a pawn in the PanAm bombing and their awarding of a medal to the guy who ordered the firing of the missile that blew up the Iranian airliner with the huge loss of life.
I don´t speak for the American people...I speak for myself. What I don´t understand is why you have taken a small comment I made about conspiracy theroists and blown it into some big thing about American compassion.
And you keep saying this man "may or may not have" been responsible....when you can prove to me that he isn´t responsible then I will have comapssion for him.
Edited (8/23/2009) by girleegirl
|
|
27. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 10:22 pm |
I don´t speak for the American people...I speak for myself. What I don´t understand is why you have taken a small comment I made about conspiracy theroists and blown it into some big thing about American compassion.
And you keep saying this man "may or may not have" been responsible....when you can prove to me that he isn´t responsible then I will have comapssion for him.
It was you´re LoL smiley that did it. So speaking for yourself do you condemn the awarding of the medal to the ships commander? And why should handsom not speak for himself?
|
|
28. |
23 Aug 2009 Sun 10:41 pm |
I don´t speak for the American people...I speak for myself.
And you keep saying this man "may or may not have" been responsible....when you can prove to me that he isn´t responsible then I will have comapssion for him.
Well praise the Lord for that!!!
Guess you missed the "Innocent until proven guilty" part of USA jurisprudence?
|
|
29. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 01:25 am |
But, despite all that controversy around him, he was proven guilty, right? I mean he was in jail for a reason (I am not discussing here whether or not the sentence was right as I don´t have enough knowledge, just the mere fact that his imprisonment meant finding him guilty)
|
|
30. |
24 Aug 2009 Mon 02:37 am |
But, despite all that controversy around him, he was proven guilty, right? I mean he was in jail for a reason (I am not discussing here whether or not the sentence was right as I don´t have enough knowledge, just the mere fact that his imprisonment meant finding him guilty)
That does seem to be the case, although, there does appear to be some controversy regarding the judgement.
My comment was regarding this comment: "..............you keep saying this man "may or may not have" been responsible....when you can prove to me that he isn´t responsible then I will have comapssion for him"
I don´t think it´s ever wrong to have compassion.
|
|
|