General/Off-topic |
|
|
|
Muslim Athlete Disqualified Over Uniform
|
1. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 05:27 pm |
Should she be disqualified?
Muslim Athlete
|
|
2. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 07:22 pm |
what a boring link about Islam, please let people do what they like
|
|
3. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 07:48 pm |
Quoting elham: what a boring link about Islam, please let people do what they like |
I'm also happy to see you gave this alot of thought with your intelligent response.. A link about Islam? Why even have rules and regulations in sports, if we should let people do what they want.
|
|
4. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 07:55 pm |
I am not against for subjects involving Islam
|
|
5. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 09:27 pm |
sure standarts and rules needed for everything for don't creat a chaos,and at other hand why the most of people have very double standarts when making comment about rules,my rules good urs bad,is there any bigger prejudice more then that??Democracy is a life style and its meaningfull when we feel its necessary in our each cells and i think sport areas and beachs have to be more democratical in big tolerance
|
|
6. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 09:38 pm |
Quoting MrX67: sure standarts and rules needed for everything for don't creat a caos,and at other hand why the most of people have very double standarts when making comment about rules,my rules good urs bad,is there any big prejudice?? |
It's called having an opinion MrX.. Sure you can express your thoughts about rules and some rules are meant to be criticized or even broken. But to comment "you should let people do what they want" is an irresponsible view..with out any explanation,again this is my opinion. If we let people do what they want, you really think our society will have any order.
However, referring to sports specifically they do have specific attire and I believe everyone should be upheld to these standards. In American soccer (football) you are not permitted to wear jewerly. Well, if I am a Christian who wears a cross...I am required to take it off. Guess what, if I refuse I am not permitted to play. Why should this girl be considered an exception to the rule, because of her faith?
|
|
7. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 09:41 pm |
Quoting teaschip1: Quoting MrX67: sure standarts and rules needed for everything for don't creat a caos,and at other hand why the most of people have very double standarts when making comment about rules,my rules good urs bad,is there any big prejudice?? |
It's called having an opinion MrX.. Sure you can express your thoughts about rules and some rules are meant to be criticized or even broken. But to comment "you should let people do what they want" is an irresponsible view..with out any explanation,again this is my opinion. If we let people do what they want, you really think our society will have any order.
However, referring to sports specifically they do have specific attire and I believe everyone should be upheld to these standards. In American soccer (football) you are not permitted to wear jewerly. Well, if I am a Christian who wears a cross...I am required to take it off. Guess what, if I refuse I am not permitted to play. Why should this girl be considered an exception to the rule, because of her faith? |
if aim to eating grape thats ok,but if aim to beat to grape grower no fair on that..
|
|
8. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 09:47 pm |
Quoting MrX67: Quoting teaschip1: Quoting MrX67: sure standarts and rules needed for everything for don't creat a caos,and at other hand why the most of people have very double standarts when making comment about rules,my rules good urs bad,is there any big prejudice?? |
It's called having an opinion MrX.. Sure you can express your thoughts about rules and some rules are meant to be criticized or even broken. But to comment "you should let people do what they want" is an irresponsible view..with out any explanation,again this is my opinion. If we let people do what they want, you really think our society will have any order.
However, referring to sports specifically they do have specific attire and I believe everyone should be upheld to these standards. In American soccer (football) you are not permitted to wear jewerly. Well, if I am a Christian who wears a cross...I am required to take it off. Guess what, if I refuse I am not permitted to play. Why should this girl be considered an exception to the rule, because of her faith? |
if aim to eating grape thats ok,but if aim to beat to grape grower no fair on that.. |
I'm sorry I don't understand..could you please explain?
|
|
9. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 10:00 pm |
Quoting teaschip1: Quoting MrX67: Quoting teaschip1: Quoting MrX67: sure standarts and rules needed for everything for don't creat a caos,and at other hand why the most of people have very double standarts when making comment about rules,my rules good urs bad,is there any big prejudice?? |
It's called having an opinion MrX.. Sure you can express your thoughts about rules and some rules are meant to be criticized or even broken. But to comment "you should let people do what they want" is an irresponsible view..with out any explanation,again this is my opinion. If we let people do what they want, you really think our society will have any order.
However, referring to sports specifically they do have specific attire and I believe everyone should be upheld to these standards. In American soccer (football) you are not permitted to wear jewerly. Well, if I am a Christian who wears a cross...I am required to take it off. Guess what, if I refuse I am not permitted to play. Why should this girl be considered an exception to the rule, because of her faith? |
if aim to eating grape thats ok,but if aim to beat to grape grower no fair on that.. |
I'm sorry I don't understand..could you please explain? |
my mean if you say all this only for democratical order no harm,but if you defence some restrictions with some cultural or belief prejudices then really not fair..
|
|
10. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 10:04 pm |
Quoting MrX67: Quoting teaschip1: Quoting MrX67: Quoting teaschip1: Quoting MrX67: sure standarts and rules needed for everything for don't creat a caos,and at other hand why the most of people have very double standarts when making comment about rules,my rules good urs bad,is there any big prejudice?? |
It's called having an opinion MrX.. Sure you can express your thoughts about rules and some rules are meant to be criticized or even broken. But to comment "you should let people do what they want" is an irresponsible view..with out any explanation,again this is my opinion. If we let people do what they want, you really think our society will have any order.
However, referring to sports specifically they do have specific attire and I believe everyone should be upheld to these standards. In American soccer (football) you are not permitted to wear jewerly. Well, if I am a Christian who wears a cross...I am required to take it off. Guess what, if I refuse I am not permitted to play. Why should this girl be considered an exception to the rule, because of her faith? |
if aim to eating grape thats ok,but if aim to beat to grape grower no fair on that.. |
I'm sorry I don't understand..could you please explain? |
my mean if you say all this only for democratical order no harm,but if you defence some restrictions with some cultural or belief prejudices then really not fair.. |
Ok, I believe I understand now. As long as we are consistent with our rules. For example, we don't discriminate against one religion vs the other. It's ok for you to dress one way because your Christian, but because your Muslim you can't. If this is what you mean, I totally agree. I think we should be held to the same standards, no matter what religion we are.
|
|
11. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 10:06 pm |
Quoting teaschip1: Quoting MrX67: Quoting teaschip1: Quoting MrX67: Quoting teaschip1: Quoting MrX67: sure standarts and rules needed for everything for don't creat a caos,and at other hand why the most of people have very double standarts when making comment about rules,my rules good urs bad,is there any big prejudice?? |
It's called having an opinion MrX.. Sure you can express your thoughts about rules and some rules are meant to be criticized or even broken. But to comment "you should let people do what they want" is an irresponsible view..with out any explanation,again this is my opinion. If we let people do what they want, you really think our society will have any order.
However, referring to sports specifically they do have specific attire and I believe everyone should be upheld to these standards. In American soccer (football) you are not permitted to wear jewerly. Well, if I am a Christian who wears a cross...I am required to take it off. Guess what, if I refuse I am not permitted to play. Why should this girl be considered an exception to the rule, because of her faith? |
if aim to eating grape thats ok,but if aim to beat to grape grower no fair on that.. |
I'm sorry I don't understand..could you please explain? |
my mean if you say all this only for democratical order no harm,but if you defence some restrictions with some cultural or belief prejudices then really not fair.. |
Ok, I believe I understand now. As long as we are consistent with our rules. For example, we don't discriminate against one religion vs the other. It's ok for you to dress one way because your Christian, but because your Muslim you can't. If this is what you mean, I totally agree. I think we should be held to the same standards, no matter what religion we are. |
thx,that was the what i want to know
|
|
12. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 10:16 pm |
Quoting teaschip1:
However, referring to sports specifically they do have specific attire and I believe everyone should be upheld to these standards. In American soccer (football) you are not permitted to wear jewerly. Well, if I am a Christian who wears a cross...I am required to take it off. Guess what, if I refuse I am not permitted to play. Why should this girl be considered an exception to the rule, because of her faith? |
In the example you mention there is a difference for two reasons.
Jewellery is forbidding in contact sports because they are potentially dangerous. Fingers can get caught in necklaces, earrings can get ripped out etc. Actually you can just use tape over your earrings so if you want to wear a cross just do that.
Also wearing a cross is not a requirement in christianity, but convering of the body in islam is (or at least highly recommended).
|
|
13. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 10:22 pm |
Quoting azade: Quoting teaschip1:
However, referring to sports specifically they do have specific attire and I believe everyone should be upheld to these standards. In American soccer (football) you are not permitted to wear jewerly. Well, if I am a Christian who wears a cross...I am required to take it off. Guess what, if I refuse I am not permitted to play. Why should this girl be considered an exception to the rule, because of her faith? |
In the example you mention there is a difference for two reasons.
Jewellery is forbidding in contact sports because they are potentially dangerous. Fingers can get caught in necklaces, earrings can get ripped out etc. Actually you can just use tape over your earrings so if you want to wear a cross just do that.
Also wearing a cross is not a requirement in christianity, but convering of the body in islam is (or at least highly recommended). |
i think thats matter of if we can accept others with their all differences(especially cultural&belief)more then the religions...
|
|
14. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 10:23 pm |
Quite easy: as long as the rules upon clothing in certain sports dont change, she has to dress just like anyone else.
Though she mentions that last year she was allowed to go like this, I think that shows inconsistency, but even then, she should dress conform the rules.
|
|
15. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 10:26 pm |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Quite easy: as long as the rules upon clothing in certain sports dont change, she has to dress just like anyone else.
Though she mentions that last year she was allowed to go like this, I think that shows inconsistency, but even then, she should dress conform the rules. |
i bet you are a strong defender of freedoms?
|
|
16. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 10:30 pm |
I'm convinced that would make loads of young muslim woman drop sports because they can't compromise with their faith - the whole 'do I want to play some sports in this life or go to heaven in the next' scenario is going to play a huge role.
It is important not to lose these woman, to encourage them to play their part in society and the opposite is going to happen if they will be excluded from these kinds of activities.
|
|
17. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 10:31 pm |
Quoting MrX67: i bet you are a strong defender of freedoms? |
I sense you mean that ironically.. But YES I AM. This has nothing to do with freedom. If it was about freedom, I can also join that competition naked.
|
|
18. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 10:35 pm |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Quoting MrX67: i bet you are a strong defender of freedoms? |
I sense you mean that ironically.. But YES I AM. This has nothing to do with freedom. If it was about freedom, I can also join that competition naked. |
to be naked in brain better way to be naked on body
|
|
19. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 10:37 pm |
Quoting azade: I'm convinced that would make loads of young muslim woman drop sports because they can't compromise with their faith - |
The point is that their faith doesnt OBLİGE them to do so. And I think for a big amount of these women the rule that they either dont know better or have pressure from family/society counts.
You are right that maybe they should not be excluded, but if they have an inner fight 'sports-heaven', it means they dont know their own faith well and dont have any faith in the goodness of their own deity.
|
|
20. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 10:46 pm |
Quoting azade: I'm convinced that would make loads of young muslim woman drop sports because they can't compromise with their faith - the whole 'do I want to play some sports in this life or go to heaven in the next' scenario is going to play a huge role.
It is important not to lose these woman, to encourage them to play their part in society and the opposite is going to happen if they will be excluded from these kinds of activities. |
+1,001
|
|
21. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 10:57 pm |
Quoting MrX67: to be naked in brain better way to be naked on body |
Just to put it in extremes: what if my personal faith of naturalism, tells me that I should do sports naked? Will you exclude me from the competition, or will you be naked of brain and let me be naked of body during the competition?
Im too much of a dinsiz to discuss religious matters and Im sick of this 'but my religion tells me so' even when it doesnt. But Azade has a good point, because Muslim women need more than ever to be included in our society and join any activity available. But then again, I dont think I find 'faith' a suitable reason to join or not to join something on free basis.
|
|
22. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 11:33 pm |
Quoting azade: Quoting teaschip1:
However, referring to sports specifically they do have specific attire and I believe everyone should be upheld to these standards. In American soccer (football) you are not permitted to wear jewerly. Well, if I am a Christian who wears a cross...I am required to take it off. Guess what, if I refuse I am not permitted to play. Why should this girl be considered an exception to the rule, because of her faith? |
In the example you mention there is a difference for two reasons.
Jewellery is forbidding in contact sports because they are potentially dangerous. Fingers can get caught in necklaces, earrings can get ripped out etc. Actually you can just use tape over your earrings so if you want to wear a cross just do that.
Also wearing a cross is not a requirement in christianity, but convering of the body in islam is (or at least highly recommended). |
So covering of the body in islam is a requirement? You are contradicting yourself here azade.. My example was merely to show that anyone with a religious belief could state it is against their religion in order to have the rules bent in sports. If we allow one religion, we would have to allow every religion. This makes no sense..
|
|
23. |
17 Jan 2008 Thu 11:51 pm |
I don't think you read what I wrote. Covering the body in islam is, by the vast majority of muslims, seen as a requirement. Wearing a cross, as you used as an example, is not a requirement. It's not about simply stating something is a requirement just for the heck of it, it is of huge importance to them. That's a fact. Now, what you want to do about it, that's something that can be put to debate.
|
|
24. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 01:33 am |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Quite easy: as long as the rules upon clothing in certain sports dont change, she has to dress just like anyone else.
Though she mentions that last year she was allowed to go like this, I think that shows inconsistency, but even then, she should dress conform the rules. |
+1000000000
|
|
25. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 01:39 am |
Quoting azade: I don't think you read what I wrote. Covering the body in islam is, by the vast majority of muslims, seen as a requirement. Wearing a cross, as you used as an example, is not a requirement. It's not about simply stating something is a requirement just for the heck of it, it is of huge importance to them. That's a fact. Now, what you want to do about it, that's something that can be put to debate. |
Well... this is against the western secular society. Religion is supposed to be a private matter and it should be of no public importance or special treatment. If you are a muslim who can't accept these rules, than you should move to saudi arabia, western society is obviously incompatible with your beliefs. If you want to stay and participate, you have to accept the rules.
|
|
26. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 01:48 am |
Quoting azade: I'm convinced that would make loads of young muslim woman drop sports because they can't compromise with their faith - the whole 'do I want to play some sports in this life or go to heaven in the next' scenario is going to play a huge role.
It is important not to lose these woman, to encourage them to play their part in society and the opposite is going to happen if they will be excluded from these kinds of activities. |
Obviously such women have a cultural clash issue they need to sort out for themselves. They may need some counseling and education to overcome their hang-ups. Muslim men didn't put such dumb restrictions on themselves, so they don't have problems participating in public life and sports, how smart of them!
|
|
27. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 02:08 am |
"getting religion involved in any subject and/or any subjects with religion as the main theme is prohibited"
|
|
28. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 02:47 am |
"The custom-made, one-piece blue and orange unitard covers her head, arms, torso and legs. Over the unitard, she wears the same orange and blue T-shirt and shorts as her teammates."
"But meet director Tom Rogers said Kelly's uniform violated rules of the National Federation of State High School Associations, which sanctioned the event. Uniforms are required to be "a single-solid color and unadorned, except for a single school name or insignia no more than 2 1/4 inches," he said."
if the girl's uniform violated the rules as stated in the article, then her whole school should have been disqualified...
i thought it was rather hilarious that the meet director asked the girl to wear an extra t-shirt (so 2 t-shirts) over her unitard...
"including placing a plain T-shirt over her unitard and then wearing her team uniform over it."
by the way, professional track athletes do wear unitards like the girl's.
|
|
29. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 06:19 am |
Like she said, she didn't have a problem with them telling her she couldn't compete because of the multicolor of the outfit, she just wishes she would have told her earlier. I'm sure she could have had an all blue or all orange one made up and been fine.
|
|
30. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 06:21 am |
Quoting lalisia: "getting religion involved in any subject and/or any subjects with religion as the main theme is prohibited" |
+ 1,001
|
|
31. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 11:04 am |
In my opinion, sport is one place that relgion should not encroach into. There has always been rules in sport, and for a very good reason. It is where the phrase "level playing field" comes from. Everyone, who partipates in a particular sport are equal, despite colour, race or creed.
When I used to compete as teenager, we had rules on clothing, some we did not like, one because the clothes were horrible, and two they were expensive for the parents. But if we wanted to compete for our school then we did as we were asked.
To me this is no different, and if this girl wants to compete then she should respect the rules.
|
|
32. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 01:03 pm |
Quoting libralady: In my opinion, sport is one place that relgion should not encroach into. There has always been rules in sport, and for a very good reason. It is where the phrase "level playing field" comes from. Everyone, who partipates in a particular sport are equal, despite colour, race or creed.
When I used to compete as teenager, we had rules on clothing, some we did not like, one because the clothes were horrible, and two they were expensive for the parents. But if we wanted to compete for our school then we did as we were asked.
To me this is no different, and if this girl wants to compete then she should respect the rules. |
+1!!!
|
|
33. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 01:35 pm |
some people look at the women or girls as they r alien who wears hasema on beachs,any comment about that?>>>>http://www.hasema.com/ i think main problem not shape of clothes or wearing stilies,thats matter how much we tolreated to differences unless this diversities don't give any harm social peace or order??
|
|
34. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 02:35 pm |
Quoting MrX67: some people look at the women or girls as they r alien who wears hasema on beachs,any comment about that? |
In my case, I certainly dont look at them "as if they are alien", but more out of pity. Invariably they are struggling in the heat to enjoy themselves on beaches in ridiculously impractical clothing while their husband and children are happily dressed in cooler, more practical western swimwear.
|
|
35. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 03:36 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting MrX67: some people look at the women or girls as they r alien who wears hasema on beachs,any comment about that? |
In my case, I certainly dont look at them "as if they are alien", but more out of pity. Invariably they are struggling in the heat to enjoy themselves on beaches in ridiculously impractical clothing while their husband and children are happily dressed in cooler, more practical western swimwear.
|
ridiculously ???thats very hard word for judge a life style???
|
|
36. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 04:17 pm |
Quote: ridiculously ???thats very hard word for judge a life style??? |
That is MY opinion MrX67. And yes it is, particularly as this "life style" seems to only apply to women.
|
|
37. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 04:22 pm |
Quoting libralady:
To me this is no different, and if this girl wants to compete then she should respect the rules. |
If you're finding the article too long to read, then take a look at posts #28 and #29
|
|
38. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 04:36 pm |
Hey Teaschip
No I don't think she should have been disqualified and the person who disqualified her should be investigated. Having read a couple fo articles about this, it appears that she was wearing the same uniform for three terms and that at the same time her uniform was against the colour regulations (two colours instead of one) - so either the previous three terms the coach was turning a blind eye to the rule and letting her wear it - which is not her fault but his - and when she entered this professional meet they disqualified her on the grounds of the uniform being inaccurate.
However, the mother says they tried to get her to take off her hood, if this is true then the person should be investigated totally. If it is not true and the mother has twisted words, she should likewise be exposed.
But I don't think she should have been disqualified on the grounds that she covered up - no way. But she or any other athelete for that matter - should be disqualified if the uniform is breaking the rules !
|
|
39. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 04:51 pm |
Quoting Cacık:
Hey Teaschip
No I don't think she should have been disqualified and the person who disqualified her should be investigated. Having read a couple fo articles about this, it appears that she was wearing the same uniform for three terms and that at the same time her uniform was against the colour regulations (two colours instead of one) - so either the previous three terms the coach was turning a blind eye to the rule and letting her wear it - which is not her fault but his - and when she entered this professional meet they disqualified her on the grounds of the uniform being inaccurate.
However, the mother says they tried to get her to take off her hood, if this is true then the person should be investigated totally. If it is not true and the mother has twisted words, she should likewise be exposed.
But I don't think she should have been disqualified on the grounds that she covered up - no way. But she or any other athelete for that matter - should be disqualified if the uniform is breaking the rules ! |
I don't agree, you can use the same analogy for any rule then. I ran a stop sign a couple times, an officer saw me do it and looked the otherway maybe even gave me a warning. However, the 3rd time I ran the stop sign he gave me a ticket. Just because nothing was said the first two times, doesn't mean it was right. I do agree that they should have been more proactive and addressed the issue the first time. Because I can see how it would send a message it's permissable.
However, why can't people either conform to the rules set by an organization or opt not to participate because of their beliefs. We can sit here and discuss the same scenario in the workplace, it's called a dresscode.
|
|
40. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 04:54 pm |
Quoting teaschip1: I don't agree, you can use the same analogy for any rule then. I ran a stop sign a couple times, an officer saw me do it and looked the otherway maybe even gave me a warning. However, the 3rd time I ran the stop sign he gave me a ticket. Just because nothing was said the first two times, doesn't mean it was right. I do agree that they should have been more proactive and addressed the issue the first time. Because I can see how it would send a message it's permissable. |
I don't think that THIS is the right comparison! There's no rule to give anybody a chance until the 3rd time. If rules are followed, than they should have been followed from the beginning - the fact that they weren't looks very suspicious.
|
|
41. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 05:06 pm |
Quote: Quoting AEnigma III: ridiculously ???thats very hard word for judge a life style??? |
That is MY opinion MrX67. And yes it is, particularly as this "life style" seems to only apply to women. |
how you can read their brains with ur own experiences,doesn't any possibility she doin that by to be willing with her all heart and with her free will?????
|
|
42. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 05:18 pm |
Quoting catwoman: Quoting teaschip1: I don't agree, you can use the same analogy for any rule then. I ran a stop sign a couple times, an officer saw me do it and looked the otherway maybe even gave me a warning. However, the 3rd time I ran the stop sign he gave me a ticket. Just because nothing was said the first two times, doesn't mean it was right. I do agree that they should have been more proactive and addressed the issue the first time. Because I can see how it would send a message it's permissable. |
I don't think that THIS is the right comparison! There's no rule to give anybody a chance until the 3rd time. If rules are followed, than they should have been followed from the beginning - the fact that they weren't looks very suspicious. |
There are many rules & laws that allow for flexability. Look at our own judicial system & work enviornment! But, I do see your point.. With over 4,000 known religions in the world, anyone could make their case. That is what I'm trying to point out. In my example of wearing a cross..Maybe my religon or belief is that I carry a rosary or wear a cross. So the next person's religous belief is they dress covered from head to toe. I think flexability needs to come from the individual and if they feel it is compromising their religion, then simply don't participate.
Bye the way, if you were the person running the stop sign, wouldn't you be glad if you weren't cited.
|
|
43. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 05:25 pm |
I think both girl and the coach broke the rules really. She should not have broken the uniform code in the first place by using multi-coloured attire. AND the coach should not have allowed it the first time either - perhaps they are both to blame ! Had it been corrected in the first instance we would not have this news report !
|
|
44. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 06:39 pm |
Quoting MrX67: some people look at the women or girls as they r alien who wears hasema on beachs,any comment about that?>>>>http://www.hasema.com/ i think main problem not shape of clothes or wearing stilies,thats matter how much we tolreated to differences unless this diversities don't give any harm social peace or order?? |
Nice link MrX67...Thank you. It's good that at last someone has made something for shy women so they can go to the beach and swim. Previously, there was no accomodation for these women.
I may note, not all ladies like to expose their flesh to possible scruitiny...I know a number of Western women who are not Muslim who would find an opportunity to cover themselves in an elegant and stylish manner a relief. A lot of women just do not go anyplace where swim wear is expected.
Here is my choice
|
|
45. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 08:12 pm |
Running a stop sign is a very serious matter, in my native country it costs you your license. You initially had a point but maybe you should work on your comparisons. Colours may break a rule but it's hardly the same thing as causing potential danger to people in traffic.
I hope the girl shows up in the right colours next time so she can prove what she can do, "even" as a hijabi.
|
|
46. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 08:21 pm |
Quoting azade: Running a stop sign is a very serious matter, in my native country it costs you your license. You initially had a point but maybe you should work on your comparisons. Colours may break a rule but it's hardly the same thing as causing potential danger to people in traffic.
I hope the girl shows up in the right colours next time so she can prove what she can do, "even" as a hijabi. |
Of course I wasn't comparing apples to apples anyone could see that. I don't think any comparison would appease you Azade.
|
|
47. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 08:54 pm |
Quoting azade: I hope the girl shows up in the right colours next time so she can prove what she can do, "even" as a hijabi. |
I also hope that hijabis can prove that they can show up in the right colors.
|
|
48. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 09:36 pm |
Quoting teaschip1: Quoting azade: Running a stop sign is a very serious matter, in my native country it costs you your license. You initially had a point but maybe you should work on your comparisons. Colours may break a rule but it's hardly the same thing as causing potential danger to people in traffic.
I hope the girl shows up in the right colours next time so she can prove what she can do, "even" as a hijabi. |
Of course I wasn't comparing apples to apples anyone could see that. I don't think any comparison would appease you Azade. |
Make a proper comparison then instead of one that has very little to do with the subject because it did exactly sound like you were saying running a stop sign and showing up in wrong colours in a competition are the same thing.
|
|
49. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 09:38 pm |
Quoting catwoman: Quoting azade: I hope the girl shows up in the right colours next time so she can prove what she can do, "even" as a hijabi. |
I also hope that hijabis can prove that they can show up in the right colors.  |
Yes hopefully she won't make that mistake again. Apparently is was not intentional - well duh who wants to train hard and enter a competition they think plan on getting disqualified from
|
|
50. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 11:04 pm |
Quoting azade: Quoting teaschip1: Quoting azade: Running a stop sign is a very serious matter, in my native country it costs you your license. You initially had a point but maybe you should work on your comparisons. Colours may break a rule but it's hardly the same thing as causing potential danger to people in traffic.
I hope the girl shows up in the right colours next time so she can prove what she can do, "even" as a hijabi. |
Of course I wasn't comparing apples to apples anyone could see that. I don't think any comparison would appease you Azade. |
Make a proper comparison then instead of one that has very little to do with the subject because it did exactly sound like you were saying running a stop sign and showing up in wrong colours in a competition are the same thing. |
I assumed you were familiar with the term shared abstraction. It's when someone uses an analogy that doesn't necessarily have a direct relation..but an idea, a pattern an attribute or effect. And look closer, I never said they were the SAME thing.
I wonder if the girl will now claim she was color blind too...
|
|
51. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 11:08 pm |
Quoting teaschip1: I assumed you were familiar with the term shared abstraction. It's when someone uses an analogy that doesn't necessarily have a direct relation..but an idea, a pattern an attribute or effect. And look closer, I never said they were the SAME thing. |
Teas... I think you need a lecture from qdemir on generalizations vs distinctions...
|
|
52. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 11:17 pm |
Quoting catwoman: Quoting teaschip1: I assumed you were familiar with the term shared abstraction. It's when someone uses an analogy that doesn't necessarily have a direct relation..but an idea, a pattern an attribute or effect. And look closer, I never said they were the SAME thing. |
Teas... I think you need a lecture from qdemir on generalizations vs distinctions...  |
I think I just need to speak in layman's terms, instead.
|
|
53. |
19 Jan 2008 Sat 02:01 am |
Im sorry but the haşema looks like what I used to wear as a kid when it was RAİNİNG!
As for Alameda, I wonder what is stylish and elegant about them. Some of them can be claled stylish because htey seem to try to follow 'trends', but they are far from elegant and I think that is about the point!!
To feel uncomfortable to wear something that shows your flesh because of possible scrutiny, is just turning the world upside down. It is too ridiculous for words that a woman should feel uncomfortable in the presence of a man, that it makes her WANT to dress something like that. Tastes differ, but Im sure you agree with me that most of them look like you are in rainy Holland trying to stay dry on your bike!!
Its one thing that a woman covers her hair, its another that she goes to the beach dressed entirely.
Actually, if I were to be on a beach where women dress like this, they would make ME feel uncomfortable. I would probably feel as if they are looking at me like a western w**** asking to get raped. In fact, I am only enjoying the sunshine (that humans actually need) and the salt of the sea on my body.
If a woman dresses this willingly, she keeps a system where the man has the power over the woman going. If a woman is, maybe without realising it, forced into wearing these, I can only feel sorry for her.
And just for the record: Im a very modest dresser and you would never catch me wearing clothes that show too much of 'private skin'. But this is not a case of modesty and shyness, it goes much deeper into the roots of a way of thinking, that one should stay far away from.
|
|
54. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 04:40 pm |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Actually, if I were to be on a beach where women dress like this, they would make ME feel uncomfortable. I would probably feel as if they are looking at me like a western w**** asking to get raped. In fact, I am only enjoying the sunshine (that humans actually need) and the salt of the sea on my body.
If a woman dresses this willingly, she keeps a system where the man has the power over the woman going. If a woman is, maybe without realising it, forced into wearing these, I can only feel sorry for her.
And just for the record: Im a very modest dresser and you would never catch me wearing clothes that show too much of 'private skin'. But this is not a case of modesty and shyness, it goes much deeper into the roots of a way of thinking, that one should stay far away from. |
This is very very true DK. Why muslim men assume that you are on the beach "displaying yourself" - are they completely sick? Out of interest do muslim women who completely cover themselves suffer any physical ill-health due to lack of sunshine - health experts recommend at least 15 minutes per day. As far as I am aware you would suffer lack of vitamin D ...
Covering yourself does not stop sick men thinking sick things - they just find other things to get sapik about! In Victorian times when UK women word long dresses, the accident sight of an ankle was enough to excite them!
|
|
55. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 05:19 pm |
Just as an extra info:
Couple of years ago I was in Sile/Istanbul with my parents on the beach. And we saw several women wearing those head to toe covering things. And the men with them were wearing very long swimming trunks. They were trying to enjoy themselves.
My first thought was 'oh well, they have right to be there and enjoy themselves as like any other citizens'. But bizaarly my mother, who is a quite devoted muslim, did not take the same view. Her reaction was :'What is this? if you are that muslim what are you doing here?'. She also said that (in her simplistic turkish way) 'they are trying to say that all these girls wearing normal swimming costumes on this beach are all prostitutes'.
That was what her opinion was about the subject!!
|
|
56. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 06:21 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: Just as an extra info:
Couple of years ago I was in Sile/Istanbul with my parents on the beach. And we saw several women wearing those head to toe covering things. And the men with them were wearing very long swimming trunks. They were trying to enjoy themselves.
My first thought was 'oh well, they have right to be there and enjoy themselves as like any other citizens'. But bizaarly my mother, who is a quite devoted muslim, did not take the same view. Her reaction was :'What is this? if you are that muslim what are you doing here?'. She also said that (in her simplistic turkish way) 'they are trying to say that all these girls wearing normal swimming costumes on this beach are all prostitutes'.
That was what her opinion was about the subject!!
|
i think your mother has to be aware of who has different life style they minimum have to same right to use beachs minimum as much as her right,but seems she has effected from extrem secular discussions while judding em by don't ask any question to them??really very sad
|
|
57. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 06:36 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: Just as an extra info:
Couple of years ago I was in Sile/Istanbul with my parents on the beach. And we saw several women wearing those head to toe covering things. And the men with them were wearing very long swimming trunks. They were trying to enjoy themselves.
My first thought was 'oh well, they have right to be there and enjoy themselves as like any other citizens'. But bizaarly my mother, who is a quite devoted muslim, did not take the same view. Her reaction was :'What is this? if you are that muslim what are you doing here?'. She also said that (in her simplistic turkish way) 'they are trying to say that all these girls wearing normal swimming costumes on this beach are all prostitutes'.
That was what her opinion was about the subject!!
|
If that is your mother's opinion, then what was SHE doing on the beach?
|
|
58. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 06:37 pm |
+10000000!!!!
|
|
59. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 07:03 pm |
friends we talking about a main human right or freedom,how can we judge other one's prefer while this choice doesn't give any harm to social order????if we say nooooo you can't do that then this beahviour doesn't give to same right to other side??anyone can imagine this position can creat bigger problems???
|
|
60. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 07:18 pm |
Quoting MrX67: friends we talking about a main human right or freedom,how can we judge other one's prefer while this choice doesn't give any harm to social order???? |
I clearly understand your point of view based upon freedom and religious preferences, and yes they should be free to anybody. The problem here is that this whole idea STEMS from a PROBLEM in SOCİAL ORDER. Maybe the women wearing these indeed do this willingly, freely, because they think it is right for their religion. However, they IDEA in the religion that makes women do this, is the RESULT of distorted ideas about MEN and WOMAN.
So behavior like this, simply cant be put down to freedom, because the ideas behind it, are right against that same freedom you try to defend!
|
|
61. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 07:21 pm |
Quoting catwoman: Quoting thehandsom: Just as an extra info:
Couple of years ago I was in Sile/Istanbul with my parents on the beach. And we saw several women wearing those head to toe covering things. And the men with them were wearing very long swimming trunks. They were trying to enjoy themselves.
My first thought was 'oh well, they have right to be there and enjoy themselves as like any other citizens'. But bizaarly my mother, who is a quite devoted muslim, did not take the same view. Her reaction was :'What is this? if you are that muslim what are you doing here?'. She also said that (in her simplistic turkish way) 'they are trying to say that all these girls wearing normal swimming costumes on this beach are all prostitutes'.
That was what her opinion was about the subject!!
|
If that is your mother's opinion, then what was SHE doing on the beach?  |
Well she was with me and my family..She was sitting on the towels. That is all.. and it is a very common thing..it happens..
|
|
62. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 07:27 pm |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Quoting MrX67: friends we talking about a main human right or freedom,how can we judge other one's prefer while this choice doesn't give any harm to social order???? |
I clearly understand your point of view based upon freedom and religious preferences, and yes they should be free to anybody. The problem here is that this whole idea STEMS from a PROBLEM in SOCİAL ORDER. Maybe the women wearing these indeed do this willingly, freely, because they think it is right for their religion. However, they IDEA in the religion that makes women do this, is the RESULT of distorted ideas about MEN and WOMAN.
So behavior like this, simply cant be put down to freedom, because the ideas behind it, are right against that same freedom you try to defend! |
İ think theres no place in any law system to put limits on some main human rights with social and political phobias...law rules written only with objective criterions for keep all diversities side by side in a social order..
|
|
63. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 07:29 pm |
Quoting MrX67: İ think theres no place in any law system to put limits on some main human rights with social and political phobias...law rules written only with objective criterions for keep all diversities side by side in a social order.. |
İ think you didnt understand my post well.. Anyway I think you are too religious and I am too feminist (eventhough I am not really ) to agree upon this topic.. And just for the record, I have no social or political phobia whatsoever , Im just not a strong supporter of oppressing women!!
|
|
64. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 07:30 pm |
Quoting MrX67: Quoting thehandsom: Just as an extra info:
Couple of years ago I was in Sile/Istanbul with my parents on the beach. And we saw several women wearing those head to toe covering things. And the men with them were wearing very long swimming trunks. They were trying to enjoy themselves.
My first thought was 'oh well, they have right to be there and enjoy themselves as like any other citizens'. But bizaarly my mother, who is a quite devoted muslim, did not take the same view. Her reaction was :'What is this? if you are that muslim what are you doing here?'. She also said that (in her simplistic turkish way) 'they are trying to say that all these girls wearing normal swimming costumes on this beach are all prostitutes'.
That was what her opinion was about the subject!!
|
i think your mother has to be aware of who has different life style they minimum have to same right to use beachs minimum as much as her right,but seems she has effected from extrem secular discussions while judding em by don't ask any question to them??really very sad |
I think my mother knows them very well. That is the reason why she talked like that.
Her daughter/my sister goes to the beach in swimming costume.
AND SHE KNOWS THAT WHAT THEY THINK ABOUT HER.
That is what makes her angry.
She knows that it is not about islam or freedom. she knows that they want sheria by heart. She knows that they are faking the freedom cries for their ultimate goal which is sheria.
It is the common people's generic idea btw in Turkey.
|
|
65. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 07:32 pm |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Quoting MrX67: İ think theres no place in any law system to put limits on some main human rights with social and political phobias...law rules written only with objective criterions for keep all diversities side by side in a social order.. |
İ think you didnt understand my post well.. Anyway I think you are too religious and I am too feminist (eventhough I am not really ) to agree upon this topic.. And just for the record, I have no social or political phobia whatsoever , Im just not a strong supporter of oppressing women!! |
i think you didn't understand my mean correctly to,neither i'm too religious nor i'm a female enemy,may be i'm more then you about women rights,but i'm always against to all political and social prejudicies,especially on main human rights..
|
|
66. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 07:35 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: Quoting MrX67: Quoting thehandsom: Just as an extra info:
Couple of years ago I was in Sile/Istanbul with my parents on the beach. And we saw several women wearing those head to toe covering things. And the men with them were wearing very long swimming trunks. They were trying to enjoy themselves.
My first thought was 'oh well, they have right to be there and enjoy themselves as like any other citizens'. But bizaarly my mother, who is a quite devoted muslim, did not take the same view. Her reaction was :'What is this? if you are that muslim what are you doing here?'. She also said that (in her simplistic turkish way) 'they are trying to say that all these girls wearing normal swimming costumes on this beach are all prostitutes'.
That was what her opinion was about the subject!!
|
i think your mother has to be aware of who has different life style they minimum have to same right to use beachs minimum as much as her right,but seems she has effected from extrem secular discussions while judding em by don't ask any question to them??really very sad |
I think my mother knows them very well. That is the reason why she talked like that.
Her daughter/my sister goes to the beach in swimming costume.
AND SHE KNOWS THAT WHAT THEY THINK ABOUT HER.
That is what makes her angry.
She knows that it is not about islam or freedom. she knows that they want sheria by heart. She knows that they are faking the freedom cries for their ultimate goal which is sheria.
It is the common people's generic idea btw in Turkey.
|
pity so many people like you never aware of the realities their own society or country??
|
|
67. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 07:41 pm |
Quoting MrX67: Quoting thehandsom: Quoting MrX67: Quoting thehandsom: Just as an extra info:
Couple of years ago I was in Sile/Istanbul with my parents on the beach. And we saw several women wearing those head to toe covering things. And the men with them were wearing very long swimming trunks. They were trying to enjoy themselves.
My first thought was 'oh well, they have right to be there and enjoy themselves as like any other citizens'. But bizaarly my mother, who is a quite devoted muslim, did not take the same view. Her reaction was :'What is this? if you are that muslim what are you doing here?'. She also said that (in her simplistic turkish way) 'they are trying to say that all these girls wearing normal swimming costumes on this beach are all prostitutes'.
That was what her opinion was about the subject!!
|
i think your mother has to be aware of who has different life style they minimum have to same right to use beachs minimum as much as her right,but seems she has effected from extrem secular discussions while judding em by don't ask any question to them??really very sad |
I think my mother knows them very well. That is the reason why she talked like that.
Her daughter/my sister goes to the beach in swimming costume.
AND SHE KNOWS THAT WHAT THEY THINK ABOUT HER.
That is what makes her angry.
She knows that it is not about islam or freedom. she knows that they want sheria by heart. She knows that they are faking the freedom cries for their ultimate goal which is sheria.
It is the common people's generic idea btw in Turkey.
|
pity so many people like you never aware of the realities their own society or country?? |
There is only one way out of this unfortunately.
I think, somehow, the islamists make the public believe that they DENOUNCE THE SHERIA.
They should say it publicly and make everybody believe they are not after sheria.
Dont you agree?
And I am hoping that you are against the backward, anti democratic, dogmatic Seria which was abolished by Ataturk.
|
|
68. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 08:08 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: which was abolished by Ataturk.
|
To quote Atatürk on his thoughts about women-clothing:
(I translated it to English for other members to also understand)
Especially in smaller and bigger cities I saw that our women friends have their faces and eyes closed with thick cloth and very carefully. In this hot season especially I can guess how disturbing and painful this style must be for themselves. Male friends, this is kind of the result of our selfishness. Its necessary to be very pure and careful. However my respected friends, our women too, are understanding and wellthinking human beings like us.... They should show their faces to the world. May they see the world carefully with their eyes. There is nothing scary in that!
özellikle kasaba ve şehirlerde kadın arkadaşlarımızın yüzlerini ve gözlerini çok kalın ve dikkatle kapatmakta olduklarını gördüm. Özellikle bu sıcak mevsimde bu tarz kendileri için mutlaka acı ve rahatsızlık verici olduğunu tahmin ediyorum. Erkek arkadaşlar, bu biraz bizim bencilliğimiz eseridir. Çok temiz ve dikkatli olduğumuzun gereğidir. Fakat saygıdeğer arkadaşlar, kadınlarımız da, bizim gibi anlayan ve düşÃ¼nen insanlardır
". Onlara ahlâkın kutsal şeylerini aşılamak, millî ahlâkımızı anlatmak ve onların beyinlerini nur ile, temizlikle donatmak esası üzerinde bulunduktan sonra fazla bencilliğe gerek kalmaz. Onlar yüzlerini dünyaya göstersinler. Ve gözleriyle dünyayı dikkatle görebilsinler. Bunda korkulacak bir şey yoktur.
I left the bold sentence out, couldnt manage to translte fine enough. By the way, his speech is in çağdaş türkçe, ofcourse it wasnt like that when he spoke it
|
|
69. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 11:18 pm |
Quoting MrX67: pity so many people like you never aware of the realities their own society or country?? |
MrX, what exactly makes YOU an expert on the "realities in your own society"? Why don't you prove that your version of reality is more right then handsom's. You are only making claims that have no reflection in reality.
|
|
70. |
21 Jan 2008 Mon 05:12 pm |
Quoting catwoman: Quoting MrX67: pity so many people like you never aware of the realities their own society or country?? |
MrX, what exactly makes YOU an expert on the "realities in your own society"? Why don't you prove that your version of reality is more right then handsom's. You are only making claims that have no reflection in reality. |
i'm guess you thinking all the women and girls who covering their heads or wearing a bit different doin that with only society's,family's or men's pressure and they r all slaves of the out pressures and noone of em doesn't have any personality or identity????and i'm asking if others using their freedoms on many things freely why this ones can't use their very simple and main freedoms,and which one of us have any right for judge their own choises and how we can judge what happeing in their brains??is it really fair???...
|
|
71. |
21 Jan 2008 Mon 05:20 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: Quoting MrX67: Quoting thehandsom: Quoting MrX67: Quoting thehandsom: Just as an extra info:
Couple of years ago I was in Sile/Istanbul with my parents on the beach. And we saw several women wearing those head to toe covering things. And the men with them were wearing very long swimming trunks. They were trying to enjoy themselves.
My first thought was 'oh well, they have right to be there and enjoy themselves as like any other citizens'. But bizaarly my mother, who is a quite devoted muslim, did not take the same view. Her reaction was :'What is this? if you are that muslim what are you doing here?'. She also said that (in her simplistic turkish way) 'they are trying to say that all these girls wearing normal swimming costumes on this beach are all prostitutes'.
That was what her opinion was about the subject!!
|
i think your mother has to be aware of who has different life style they minimum have to same right to use beachs minimum as much as her right,but seems she has effected from extrem secular discussions while judding em by don't ask any question to them??really very sad |
I think my mother knows them very well. That is the reason why she talked like that.
Her daughter/my sister goes to the beach in swimming costume.
AND SHE KNOWS THAT WHAT THEY THINK ABOUT HER.
That is what makes her angry.
She knows that it is not about islam or freedom. she knows that they want sheria by heart. She knows that they are faking the freedom cries for their ultimate goal which is sheria.
It is the common people's generic idea btw in Turkey.
|
pity so many people like you never aware of the realities their own society or country?? |
There is only one way out of this unfortunately.
I think, somehow, the islamists make the public believe that they DENOUNCE THE SHERIA.
They should say it publicly and make everybody believe they are not after sheria.
Dont you agree?
And I am hoping that you are against the backward, anti democratic, dogmatic Seria which was abolished by Ataturk.
|
Sheria is one of the biggest political&social phobia in Turkey and we all know that clearly thats impossible and except only a few extrems biggest part of Turkish people like to live in real secularism,thats all..oposite thoughts blaming head scarf with to be a political symbol but thats really not easy to understand that they doin a sharp policy with the same clothe pieces to,really sad
|
|
72. |
21 Jan 2008 Mon 06:53 pm |
Quoting MrX67: Quoting thehandsom:
There is only one way out of this unfortunately.
I think, somehow, the islamists make the public believe that they DENOUNCE THE SHERIA.
They should say it publicly and make everybody believe they are not after sheria.
Dont you agree?
And I am hoping that you are against the backward, anti democratic, dogmatic Seria which was abolished by Ataturk.
|
Sheria is one of the biggest political&social phobia in Turkey and we all know that clearly thats impossible and except only a few extrems biggest part of Turkish people like to live in real secularism,thats all..oposite thoughts blaming head scarf with to be a political symbol but thats really not easy to understand that they doin a sharp policy with the same clothe pieces to,really sad |
Of course sheria will be a phobia in Turkey or anywhere in the world.
It is one of the most primitive way the people can rule themselves.
Dont you agree with that?
However, I am still insisting that unless islamists publicly denounce sheria and make everybody believe they are not after sheria, this struggle will continue.
Dont you agree?
I have never heard of any islamists denouncing it or saying clearly : "WE ARE AGAINST SHERIA".
Have you?
|
|
73. |
21 Jan 2008 Mon 08:35 pm |
is thehandsom who always defends freedom of speech defending "headscarf ban" now?
|
|
74. |
21 Jan 2008 Mon 10:54 pm |
Quoting ciko: is thehandsom who always defends freedom of speech defending "headscarf ban" now? |
Not really..
I think, I made myself clear on 'headscarf ban'. It should be allowed everywhere except the government departments.
Because states provides services and the service a states provides should be impartial. A typical example: a Turban wearing judge will create an effect that she may not be impartial in a case between a jew and a muslim. And this will shadow the impartiality of the state.
Because states CAN NOT HAVE religions in secular systems.
Apart from that I dont give a damn thing if somebody wears hasema or nothing at all on the beach.
However, all I was trying to say above was islamists should clear themselves from SHERIA. (can they?)
I have yet to see an islamist denouncing sheria.
|
|
75. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 01:12 am |
what makes me angry is that a headscarved woman cant work in government department but a man who has same ideas can do anything in the same places..a radical islamist man can be a judge! is this fair?
|
|
76. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 01:15 am |
Quoting ciko: what makes me angry is that a headscarved woman cant work in government department but a man who has same ideas can do anything in the same places..a radical islamist man can be a judge! is this fair? |
The fact is that if you are a radical islamist you should move to the UK. We have them all here - taking instruction by videocam straight from Saudi Arabia!!! They enjoy great status here and can work wherever they like and wear whatever they want, despite preaching that all non-muslims should be killed !!!
A recent BBC documentary went inside the largest and most popular mosque in Birmingham and found only hatred, anti-western propaganda and instruction that "all westerners were evil and should be killed"
I love our country!.....NOT
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=dEDVSLIkd5w
|
|
77. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 12:57 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting ciko: what makes me angry is that a headscarved woman cant work in government department but a man who has same ideas can do anything in the same places..a radical islamist man can be a judge! is this fair? |
The fact is that if you are a radical islamist you should move to the UK. We have them all here - taking instruction by videocam straight from Saudi Arabia!!! They enjoy great status here and can work wherever they like and wear whatever they want, despite preaching that all non-muslims should be killed !!!
A recent BBC documentary went inside the largest and most popular mosque in Birmingham and found only hatred, anti-western propaganda and instruction that "all westerners were evil and should be killed"
I love our country!.....NOT
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=dEDVSLIkd5w
|
i think you put everyone in to same pot,and you are supporting to limits for all just for some exceptions,thats a strange democracy undertanding really??sure we all against to all sort radicals,but we all have to be hand by hand by keeping main democratical rights for don't give political supplies to all who against to real democracy(racists,extrem nationalists,radical religiouses etc....)
|
|
78. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 01:51 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: Quoting ciko: is thehandsom who always defends freedom of speech defending "headscarf ban" now? |
Not really..
I think, I made myself clear on 'headscarf ban'. It should be allowed everywhere except the government departments.
Because states provides services and the service a states provides should be impartial. A typical example: a Turban wearing judge will create an effect that she may not be impartial in a case between a jew and a muslim. And this will shadow the impartiality of the state.
Because states CAN NOT HAVE religions in secular systems.
Apart from that I dont give a damn thing if somebody wears hasema or nothing at all on the beach.
However, all I was trying to say above was islamists should clear themselves from SHERIA. (can they?)
I have yet to see an islamist denouncing sheria.
|
i'm just trying to be humanist and i'm with everything what makes happier humans,sure unless give any harm to social peace and others freedoms or rights..
|
|
79. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 02:07 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting ciko: what makes me angry is that a headscarved woman cant work in government department but a man who has same ideas can do anything in the same places..a radical islamist man can be a judge! is this fair? |
The fact is that if you are a radical islamist you should move to the UK. We have them all here - taking instruction by videocam straight from Saudi Arabia!!! They enjoy great status here and can work wherever they like and wear whatever they want, despite preaching that all non-muslims should be killed !!!
A recent BBC documentary went inside the largest and most popular mosque in Birmingham and found only hatred, anti-western propaganda and instruction that "all westerners were evil and should be killed"
I love our country!.....NOT
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=dEDVSLIkd5w
|
you're link doesn't open here in Turkey - anyone else able to open it in Turkey ???
|
|
80. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 02:08 pm |
Quoting Cacık: you're link doesn't open here in Turkey - anyone else able to open it in Turkey ???
|
Still banned eh?
|
|
81. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 02:09 pm |
Quote: i think you put everyone in to same pot,and you are supporting to limits for all just for some exceptions,thats a strange democracy undertanding really??sure we all against to all sort radicals,but we all have to be hand by hand by keeping main democratical rights for don't give political supplies to all who against to real democracy(racists,extrem nationalists,radical religiouses etc....) |
I think the point is that these radicals are becoming the "norm" in the UK.
|
|
82. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 02:20 pm |
The whole of youtube looks like it has been banned in Turkey - whatever next - this is ridiculous !
|
|
83. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 02:24 pm |
welcome to turkey
|
|
84. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 02:31 pm |
Quoting ciko: welcome to turkey |
you know Ciko, I've been here fo years and years and yet still get a shock every week ! I find myself saying "Gunaydın" all the time !!!
|
|
85. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 03:49 pm |
This will be something you never get used to I guess!! Some people ask me if I will apply for Turkish citizenship once I get married. Never say never but for me it feels as if I would give up some part of my freedom!!
I love Turkey, but sometimes I get so desperate about these kind of thingss
Thehandsom, I think it's a loss for your country that you are not there anymore!
|
|
86. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 03:57 pm |
MrX67, can you please answer these questions as being just a question. Im not referring to anything (I didnt intend to) so that also means Im not attacking anything. No peacefully-, islam-, or freedom-related answer, just a to-the-point answer on each question please!
If you are a woman and believe in something, that says man is worth more than woman, should we say 'Its your right to believe that a man is worth more than a woman' or should we try and protect you from yourself?
If someone believes in something, should we just stay away and say 'freedom', or should we try to explain that the TEMELLERİ of what that person believes, are wrong?
If someone believes in something, KNOWİNG that what he/she believes in is wrong, should we say 'freedom' or feel sorry for that person?
Quoting MrX67: [i'm guess you thinking all the women and girls who covering their heads or wearing a bit different doin that with only society's,family's or men's pressure and they r all slaves of the out pressures and noone of em doesn't have any personality or identity? |
|
|
87. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 04:34 pm |
Quoting Deli_kizin: MrX67, can you please answer these questions as being just a question. Im not referring to anything (I didnt intend to) so that also means Im not attacking anything. No peacefully-, islam-, or freedom-related answer, just a to-the-point answer on each question please!
If you are a woman and believe in something, that says man is worth more than woman, should we say 'Its your right to believe that a man is worth more than a woman' or should we try and protect you from yourself?
If someone believes in something, should we just stay away and say 'freedom', or should we try to explain that the TEMELLERİ of what that person believes, are wrong?
If someone believes in something, KNOWİNG that what he/she believes in is wrong, should we say 'freedom' or feel sorry for that person?
Quoting MrX67: [i'm guess you thinking all the women and girls who covering their heads or wearing a bit different doin that with only society's,family's or men's pressure and they r all slaves of the out pressures and noone of em doesn't have any personality or identity? |
|
i can understand your worries DK,but you asking this questions with ur own life perspective and seems theres no place in ur perspective to differences or diversities.Sure you can think, speak even you can make critises about everythings whats not true or wrong for you,thats ur 0ne of main right,but don't forget others have same right abouth that to.And when we speaking about a freedom or human right,we have to talk with more objective criterions not only with our private worries.And the most objective criterion is social peace or order on human rights.And not easy to understand that while you defending ur freedoms or rights how you can close ur ears or eyes to others who thinking or living different then you,unless they don't give any harm on ur rights?i think ur worries come from about ur feminist perspective,but don't forget that please there r planty women on earth who looking at life with different glases then urs.İ think everything will be finer and easier when we been aware of bikini (sorry for this extrem sample) and head scarf both for women and we have to be respectfull as same as both of this choises.i'm replaying one time more,i'm against to all pressures especially which on women,and they r the equals of men on each corner of social life.But we haven't forget to prejudicies the biggest barrier for freedoms....
|
|
88. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 06:11 pm |
Let's see if I can follow, Teas....SPORTS is a competition dictated by rules of a game? Correct? Lets assume for a moment you say yes....HUMMM...RULES....a set of expectations that must be followed in order to play the game.....UNIFORM...a required state of dress usually denoting that you belong to a certain team. There are usually RULES about UNIFORMS.
Religion....in the West participation is voluntary....in other words....NOT PART OF THE RULES.
I really could care less if people who don't want to follow the rules don't get to play the game.
|
|
89. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 07:05 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: .............The fact is that if you are a radical islamist you should move to the UK. We have them all here - taking instruction by videocam straight from Saudi Arabia!!! They enjoy great status here and can work wherever they like and wear whatever they want, despite preaching that all non-muslims should be killed !!!
A recent BBC documentary went inside the largest and most popular mosque in Birmingham and found only hatred, anti-western propaganda and instruction that "all westerners were evil and should be killed"
I love our country!.....NOT |
Yeeeeeks...that is horrible! I did not watch the whole thing...too depressing. Very disturbing indeed. I have been to a variety of mosques around the USA and have not found that type of thing. It is wrong and unIslamic in the extreem. The addiction to oil and the consequent oil money has done a lot to spread Wahhabism, which is a very intolerant version of Islam.
Wahhabi
"The appeal of Wahhabism to Muslims has been described as stemming from Arab nationalism, which was attracted by the Wahhabi attack on the Ottoman Empire; reformism, which was attracted to a return to al-salaf al-salih; their control of the two holy cities of Mecca and Medina, which gave Wahhabis great influence on Muslim culture and thinking; and the discovery of Persian Gulf oil fields, which after 1975 allowed Wahhabis to promote their interpretations of Islam using billions from oil export revenue."
Wahhabism is decended from the school of Ibn Taymiyyah
which is the school that legalized killing of other Muslims.
"In the Mamluk's war against the Mongols (or Tartars), he issued a fatwa declaring the Mongols non-Muslims, and jihad upon them not only permissible, but obligatory. He based this ruling on the grounds that although the Mongols had converted to Sunni Islam they ruled using 'man made laws' (their traditional Yassa code) rather than Islamic law or Shari'ah, and thus were living in a state of jahiliyya, or pre-Islamic pagan ignorance.`Every group of Muslims that transgresses Islamic law ... must be combated, even when they continue to profess the credo.` "
|
|
90. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 08:19 pm |
Quoting alameda: It is wrong and unIslamic in the extreem. |
Frankly, I am a bit sick of hearing this. Extreme muslims make up the largest percentage of the Islamic world - you only have to look to Islamic States, let alone immigrants in the west. Yet we are constantly told they are all "extreme" and not representative of Islam.
On the other side of the coin, the less extreme muslims of Turkey, for example, are regarded with distain by those states.
Who are we to believe when talking about what is the true Islam?
|
|
91. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 08:29 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting alameda: It is wrong and unIslamic in the extreem. |
Frankly, I am a bit sick of hearing this. Extreme muslims make up the largest percentage of the Islamic world - you only have to look to Islamic States, let alone immigrants in the west. Yet we are constantly told they are all "extreme" and not representative of Islam.
On the other side of the coin, the less extreme muslims of Turkey, for example, are regarded with distain by those states.
Who are we to believe when talking about what is the true Islam?  |
Goodness ive heard it all now, its just not the case that the majority of the so called 'Islamic world' are extremists!!! It is the case that most of the people in the Islamic World (hate using this phrase,there is only one world!)are just like you and I. Going about their everyday business and getting on with life. If you want to know what is the true Islam you should not listen to exremists who are using a corrupted version of this beautiful religion. I can assure you it is only ignorant people that do not wish to understand the big picture and see the beauty in Islam that use such insulting language towards it.
|
|
92. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 08:38 pm |
Quote: I can assure you it is only ignorant people that do not wish to understand the big picture and see the beauty in Islam that use such insulting language towards it. |
I feel so much better now...I have been reassured!
Sera...I have lived with a muslim man for a few years, been to a few Islamic countries, and have seen enough to know that a vast amount of these people have no idea that there religion is about peace...sorry, I don't have statistics but I was talking about personal experience. Many American muslims are afraid of these extremists, because they KNOW what it is like in the mosques and seen it first hand. Perhaps there are two Islams...an extreme version and a version that is all love, peace and daisy chains?
|
|
93. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 08:47 pm |
Quoting SERA_2005: I can assure you it is only ignorant people that do not wish to understand the big picture and see the beauty in Islam that use such insulting language towards it. |
My definition of "extreme" did not mean terrorists Sera. You are very naive if you think that Turkish muslims are anything like muslims in Islamic states.
Did you watch the BBC Dispatches video of what our biggest mosque in Birmingham preach? Are you really so naive STILL? Frankly, if I am deleted for discussing such a thing, I really don't give a damn!
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=dEDVSLIkd5w
|
|
94. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 08:53 pm |
Quoting SERA_2005: I can assure you it is only ignorant people that do not wish to understand the big picture and see the beauty in Islam that use such insulting language towards it. |
Please can you tell me where I use "insulting language towards" Islam?
|
|
95. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 08:59 pm |
I have seen it all now!! My UK bank offers the following bank account for muslims!!! I wonder if I can get a Christian Bank Account in Saudi? An Agnostic one in Iran?
Of course no! I am a second class citizen in THEIR countries with fewer rights and no respect.
http://www.lloydstsb.com/current_accounts/islamic_account.asp
|
|
96. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 09:11 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: I have seen it all now!! My UK bank offers the following bank account for muslims!!! I wonder if I can get a Christian Bank Account in Saudi? An Agnostic one in Iran?
Of course no! I am a second class citizen in THEIR countries with fewer rights and no respect.
http://www.lloydstsb.com/current_accounts/islamic_account.asp
|
hehehe...so everyone else can bank unethically? Sorry but I think we could come up with some hilarious slogans for your bank:
"We steal money for the Christians...and launder it for the Muslims" hahahahhahaha
|
|
97. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 09:27 pm |
Quoting Elisabeth: hehehe...so everyone else can bank unethically? |
Well if this "ethical" account means that I will not be charged £20 a day for an "unapproved" accidental overdraft of £6.50, then I will definitely consider converting to Islam
|
|
98. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 09:48 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting alameda: It is wrong and unIslamic in the extreem. |
Frankly, I am a bit sick of hearing this. Extreme muslims make up the largest percentage of the Islamic world - you only have to look to Islamic States, let alone immigrants in the west. Yet we are constantly told they are all "extreme" and not representative of Islam.
On the other side of the coin, the less extreme muslims of Turkey, for example, are regarded with distain by those states.
Who are we to believe when talking about what is the true Islam?  |
Dear AEnigma, I know it is confusing. Unfortunately often spiritual paths become entwined with power structures.
In Christianity this was seen almost the instant it became the official church of Constantine. The burning of heretics rapidly ensued, later with the rise of the Roman Catholic church, we see Roman Catholic inquisitions, then there were the Protestant/Catholic wars, the Orthodox/Catholic split and on and on. These are but a few examples....I'm sure I need not list more?
Do you think the fact that whole Native American peoples were wiped out was due to the teachings of Christ?
Those who truly seek to follow a spiritual path are, it seems, in the minority. Throughout history the attempt at hijacking religions has been done.
In the Islamic world is not immune. As I said in my previous message, the rise of radical Islam coincides with the rise in oil wealth in the country that is home of radical Islam. Much of that money was used to fund radical mosques, provide them with teaching materials.
|
|
99. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 09:48 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting alameda: It is wrong and unIslamic in the extreem. |
Frankly, I am a bit sick of hearing this. Extreme muslims make up the largest percentage of the Islamic world - you only have to look to Islamic States, let alone immigrants in the west. Yet we are constantly told they are all "extreme" and not representative of Islam.
On the other side of the coin, the less extreme muslims of Turkey, for example, are regarded with distain by those states.
Who are we to believe when talking about what is the true Islam?  |
Many muslims learn early on to parrot the phrase "this is not true islam" when they are accused of wrong doings in the name of their religion. So, alameda is simply parroting what she was taught along with memorizing the koran in arabic.
|
|
100. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 09:52 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: I have seen it all now!! My UK bank offers the following bank account for muslims!!! I wonder if I can get a Christian Bank Account in Saudi? An Agnostic one in Iran?
Of course no! I am a second class citizen in THEIR countries with fewer rights and no respect.
http://www.lloydstsb.com/current_accounts/islamic_account.asp
|
Wow, and did you see the children's fund.. The only Child Trust Fund account that respects Islamic law. Who sits on the Board of Directors at your Bank? Come on, don't you want to donate your extra pounds to this Trust Fund... Just think of all the children you can help..
|
|
101. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 09:59 pm |
Quoting alameda: Dear AEnigma, I know it is confusing. Unfortunately often spiritual paths become entwined with power structures.
In Christianity this was seen almost the instant it became the official church of Constantine. The burning of heretics rapidly ensued, later with the rise of the Roman Catholic church, we see Roman Catholic inquisitions, then there were the Protestant/Catholic wars, the Orthodox/Catholic split and on and on. These are but a few examples....I'm sure I need not list more?
Do you think the fact that whole Native American peoples were wiped out was due to the teachings of Christ?
Those who truly seek to follow a spiritual path are, it seems, in the minority. Throughout history the attempt at hijacking religions has been done.
In the Islamic world is not immune. As I said in my previous message, the rise of radical Islam coincides with the rise in oil wealth in the country that is home of radical Islam. Much of that money was used to fund radical mosques, provide them with teaching materials.
|
Dear Alameda
As you know I feel the same about ALL religions, so quoting Christian wrong-doing is wasted on me. You have no need to give me a brief history lesson on theology or Christian history - it is a pet subject of mine
The fact is, in PRESENT DAY I am not personally affected by Christians telling me I am a second class citizen because I am not Christian, that my country should become a Christian State or that Christian Terrorists are better people than muslims. I also do not receive death threats if I make a cartoon of Jesus or publically denounce Christians (thank goodness - or the Monty Python crew would have been immediately hanged for "The Life of Brian!!!"
The more I learn about religion, the more I realise what a man-made concept it is.
|
|
102. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 10:02 pm |
Quoting alameda: Dear AEnigma, I know it is confusing. Unfortunately often spiritual paths become entwined with power structures.
In Christianity this was seen almost the instant it became the official church of Constantine. The burning of heretics rapidly ensued, later with the rise of the Roman Catholic church, we see Roman Catholic inquisitions, then there were the Protestant/Catholic wars, the Orthodox/Catholic split and on and on. These are but a few examples....I'm sure I need not list more?
Do you think the fact that whole Native American peoples were wiped out was due to the teachings of Christ?
Those who truly seek to follow a spiritual path are, it seems, in the minority. Throughout history the attempt at hijacking religions has been done.
In the Islamic world is not immune. As I said in my previous message, the rise of radical Islam coincides with the rise in oil wealth in the country that is home of radical Islam. Much of that money was used to fund radical mosques, provide them with teaching materials.
|
So you're basically not getting it alameda. Oh well, didn't expect you to anyway.
People like you is exactly what's so evil about islam. They take NO RESPONSIBILITY!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
103. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 10:05 pm |
Quote: or the Monty Python crew would have been immediately hanged for "The Life of Brian!!!"
|
Can we agree not to joke about this? The thought of anyone hanging John Cleese is making me cry!! Just because your standard of living is higher than mine doesn't mean you can joke about this...its not funny....isn't there a rule against this? I didn't expect the Spanish Inquistion!
|
|
104. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 10:05 pm |
Quoting alameda: Those who truly seek to follow a spiritual path are, it seems, in the minority. Throughout history the attempt at hijacking religions has been done. |
This I do agree with!! Except...."hijacking" religion (which, if we are honest, are mostly based on the word of a single man, and whether or not we believe in his story that he spoke to God/Allah) is open to debate, as ALL these divisions will tell you convincingly that THEY are the TRUE followers and THEIR version of their religion is the true one.
As religion is geographical and mostly dependent on what you were taught from your parents and culture, then your concept of faith is determined not by truth, Allah, God, or knowledge - but merely by the accident of birth!!!!!
|
|
105. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 10:56 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: Quoting SERA_2005: I can assure you it is only ignorant people that do not wish to understand the big picture and see the beauty in Islam that use such insulting language towards it. |
My definition of "extreme" did not mean terrorists Sera. You are very naive if you think that Turkish muslims are anything like muslims in Islamic states.
Did you watch the BBC Dispatches video of what our biggest mosque in Birmingham preach? Are you really so naive STILL? Frankly, if I am deleted for discussing such a thing, I really don't give a damn!
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=dEDVSLIkd5w |
I don't move in your TC circle but as far as I know nobody wants to see you deleted, self included. Having said that I asked the moderators to lock this thread because of the youtube link you posted. I think I'm right in saying that the Despatches programme is a CH4 production and not that of the BBC. Also, you only gave one side of the coin. I am not commenting on the protagonists' views,merely showing how editing MIGHT skew facts. This happens a great deal in the media (print and screen). Sadly, we cannot believe everything we hear or read. Queen Elizabeth II was recently a victim of programme editing and I think the complaint was upheld. In order to provide some balance, this is an article from The Guardian about the Dispatches programme:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/aug/08/broadcasting.race
and one from The Times:
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/tv_and_radio/article2224728.ece
Guardian Article : Evidence of Extremism in Mosques "Fabricated"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/religion/Story/0,,2226704,00.html
There is so much media coverage about Islam, the arguments on this site could go on ad infinitum. If we care to follow site rules, people won't get so hot under the collar and end up posting inflammatory material.
So, I don't think you'll be deleted and if so . . . well it's easy to get back and look on the bright side, you'll be able to change your user name eg.
"ME . . . again!!!".
Oooooooooooops , I posted material too. Hmmm . . . just in case I thought of an anagram for myself too, but there was a rude word in it so I better not post here
|
|
106. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 11:04 pm |
Dear Peace Train, thanks for bringing my attention to the youtube link Aenigma posted, since I haven't checked it out earlier. Anyways, my comment is - you have your argument and other people have theirs, I don't see any reason to trust your sources any more than Aenigma's. In any case, nobody's opinions are shaped by reading one article or by watching one video, I think there's plenty of real life examples for people to see what's going on.
However, you're right that this is not the right place for this sort of debates, so I'm done here.
|
|
107. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 11:21 pm |
Dearest Peacetrain,
Thank you so much for revealing the untruths in the video I posted. Apparently they were all actors and the speaker was held at gun-point to utter those words. (I hear the crowd scenes are up for an OSCAR ). It was not filmed in the largest mosque in Birmingham at all, but at Universal Studies!
People who complain of "bad editing" are ones with something to hide. You can "edit" some speakers all you like and find nothing which says words like the speaker in this video.
Thank you for your application to have this thread locked. Erdem needs vigilant members like yourself to assist him in eradicating any violation of Turkishness.
AEnigma xxxxx
(Is Channel 4 considered lesser? As far as I am aware they are subject to the same broadcasting laws as the BBC - and have won many awards for their programming)
|
|
108. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 11:27 pm |
Is Peace Train advocating the banning of YouTube as well, so we do not have to see such things?
|
|
109. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 11:37 pm |
Quoting catwoman: Dear Peace Train, thanks for bringing my attention to the youtube link Aenigma posted, since I haven't checked it out earlier. Anyways, my comment is - you have your argument and other people have theirs, I don't see any reason to trust your sources any more than Aenigma's. In any case, nobody's opinions are shaped by reading one article or by watching one video, I think there's plenty of real life examples for people to see what's going on.
However, you're right that this is not the right place for this sort of debates, so I'm done here. |
Dear Catwoman
Thank you for your fair comment.
Perhaps I didn't make myself clear (I edited a few times). I think I pointed out that I wasn't arguing or giving a view on the protagonists involved. I didn't say whether I agreed or disagreed with the links I provided, or trusted them. My point was that it's never good to provide only one viewpoint so I was merely providing another to show how media coverage is so biased towards the author's/producer's view or intention. I think I mentioned it is easy to find any article to perpetuate arguments for or against.
btw At the end of the links I put the statement "People can make their own minds up" but I deleted it in error.
You are right about people's experiences being important too and I think I myself have related my own experiences in the past.
I have no objection to debating most of the subject matter on this site but it gets a little boring when it degenerates into the same old topics (of which there are a few)and often not even related to Turkey. Perhaps it's time the site owners made some concessions and set up a political forum or a religious forum, so people can go to these sites for their needs. There is nothing worse than reading a thread about one subject only to find that it has evolved into something completely different. Usually a personal war of words. No doubt someone will have something more to say.
Anyway, thanks again. I'm done too
|
|
110. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 11:46 pm |
Quoting peace train: btw At the end of the links I put the statement "People can make their own minds up" but I deleted it in error. |
Dear Peace Train,
Off topic means OFF TOPIC! It does not have to be about Turkey.
AEnigma
PS. I meant to write "your posts are so self-righteous and dull that I think you have finally succeeded in driving me away!"....but I deleted it in error!
|
|
112. |
22 Jan 2008 Tue 11:54 pm |
Actually, from reading your links it appears that the MAIN objection to the film was that it would "stir racial hatred" which is rather rich considering the speakers in the film are doing exactly that!
Editing is always a nice excuse peace train. Please don't try to tell me that any amount of editing could put false words into that speakers mouth, or the words from the Saudi Arabian video link. You could film me talking for 24 hours a day (a horror in itself!) and NEVER be able to put such words into my mouth by clever editing
Your point was NOT that "we need to be careful about what is posted" and to put forward to opposite view. If that was true, you would not have asked this thread to be locked on the basis of my link.
You are, like the UK establishment, carrying out Political Correctness in the extreme towards people who have no respect for YOU until you convert to Islam.
|
|
113. |
23 Jan 2008 Wed 12:11 am |
Quoting catwoman: .....
So you're basically not getting it alameda. Oh well, didn't expect you to anyway.
People like you is exactly what's so evil about islam. They take NO RESPONSIBILITY!!!!!!!!!!! |
Just how do you see that? Do you have any suggestions as to how to remedy this situation? Is not an understanding of the chain of events that led to it not in order?
I find it very disturbing that you think I am evil? I have not said I in any way support or condone these radical mosques. Rather, I have tried to explain the chain of events that have led to the current situation.
I have never said anyone should be forced to adopt any religion. To do so would be counterproductive. Each must find their own path.
|
|
114. |
23 Jan 2008 Wed 03:48 am |
Quoting MrX67: bikini (sorry for this extrem sample) |
Funny that you call this extreme!!!
Anyway you didnt answer my questions at all, you just gave a general love-peace view.
You are not open to other ideas either otherwise you would haveanswered my question. I am not referring to anything,just tyring to establish your thoughts, which you clearly dont want to share.
Glad you think we are equal to men though!!
|
|
115. |
23 Jan 2008 Wed 11:16 am |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Quoting MrX67: bikini (sorry for this extrem sample) |
Funny that you call this extreme!!!
Anyway you didnt answer my questions at all, you just gave a general love-peace view.
You are not open to other ideas either otherwise you would haveanswered my question. I am not referring to anything,just tyring to establish your thoughts, which you clearly dont want to share.
Glad you think we are equal to men though!! |
i think i anwered ur all questions detailed,but seems you decided to think with ur prejudiced freedom&human rights thoughts??and now a bit more clear then 1-Secularism is the best system for keep all different beliefs in peace 2-To manage a country or people with religion rules impossible or not productive 3-Law rules have to be objective and its fountain must be sciencentific searchs ,and never place for any phobias on law rules 4-women have to same rights as the men since birth till to end 5-life doesn't tell same things to everyone depend their economical,social,cultural,traditional etc... positions and we have to be respectfull to all this diversities unless they don't give any harm to social order or peace 6-religion ,race,nationality,gender never a privilage reason in a real democracy 7-we all have to support all sort freedoms in law borders 8-Each culture has their own specialities ,we can crtisie all diveristies but haven't forget each culture has hundereds years backround and not easy to change some wrongs with a few words..
|
|
116. |
24 Jan 2008 Thu 09:10 pm |
Quote:
Your point was NOT that "we need to be careful about what is posted" and to put forward to opposite view. If that was true, you would not have asked this thread to be locked on the basis of my link.
You are, like the UK establishment, carrying out Political Correctness in the extreme towards people who have no respect for YOU until you convert to Islam. |
AEnigma,
You may accuse me of anything you like, if it pleases you. I know what I meant and I'm only sorry you didn't understand my point. I WAS telling the truth and I am NOT an advocate of extreme PC. Even CH4 allowed both sides a chance to speak when they reported the investigation on their news programme. Giving two sides enables people to make their own minds up, especially people who do not know the UK, which many people on this site don't. I don't think that is extreme PC.
I do NOT agree with incitement of racial hatred under any circumstances.
My own personal experience is that my circle of friends are Muslim and non Muslim and we frequently socialise together and have the utmost respect for each other. Nobody is trying to convert anybody.
My place of work is a multi ethnic state primary school and we regularly have Muslim parents choosing to send their children to our school from schools where there are no non Muslims. They make the move because they want their children to grow up in a multicultural environment where mutual understanding and respect is cultivated. Of course I know that this is not happening all over the country, but it's happening in many places.
|
|
117. |
24 Jan 2008 Thu 10:19 pm |
Quoting peace train: AEnigma,
You may accuse me of anything you like, if it pleases you. I know what I meant and I'm only sorry you didn't understand my point. I WAS telling the truth and I am NOT an advocate of extreme PC. Even CH4 allowed both sides a chance to speak when they reported the investigation on their news programme. Giving two sides enables people to make their own minds up, especially people who do not know the UK, which many people on this site don't. I don't think that is extreme PC.
I do NOT agree with incitement of racial hatred under any circumstances.
My own personal experience is that my circle of friends are Muslim and non Muslim and we frequently socialise together and have the utmost respect for each other. Nobody is trying to convert anybody.
My place of work is a multi ethnic state primary school and we regularly have Muslim parents choosing to send their children to our school from schools where there are no non Muslims. They make the move because they want their children to grow up in a multicultural environment where mutual understanding and respect is cultivated. Of course I know that this is not happening all over the country, but it's happening in many places.
|
Peace Train I am completely unable to respond properly to your post, sorry - I just can't enter into dialogue with you
You completely misunderstand my point, and you are in denial about how the MAJORITY of muslims in the UK live (i.e. a completely separate life with contempt for "westereners").Of course you have muslim friends who are not like that - so do I. I am talking about the majority here.
|
|
|