General/Off-topic |
|
|
|
Muslim Athlete Disqualified Over Uniform
|
50. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 11:04 pm |
Quoting azade: Quoting teaschip1: Quoting azade: Running a stop sign is a very serious matter, in my native country it costs you your license. You initially had a point but maybe you should work on your comparisons. Colours may break a rule but it's hardly the same thing as causing potential danger to people in traffic.
I hope the girl shows up in the right colours next time so she can prove what she can do, "even" as a hijabi. |
Of course I wasn't comparing apples to apples anyone could see that. I don't think any comparison would appease you Azade. |
Make a proper comparison then instead of one that has very little to do with the subject because it did exactly sound like you were saying running a stop sign and showing up in wrong colours in a competition are the same thing. |
I assumed you were familiar with the term shared abstraction. It's when someone uses an analogy that doesn't necessarily have a direct relation..but an idea, a pattern an attribute or effect. And look closer, I never said they were the SAME thing.
I wonder if the girl will now claim she was color blind too...
|
|
51. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 11:08 pm |
Quoting teaschip1: I assumed you were familiar with the term shared abstraction. It's when someone uses an analogy that doesn't necessarily have a direct relation..but an idea, a pattern an attribute or effect. And look closer, I never said they were the SAME thing. |
Teas... I think you need a lecture from qdemir on generalizations vs distinctions...
|
|
52. |
18 Jan 2008 Fri 11:17 pm |
Quoting catwoman: Quoting teaschip1: I assumed you were familiar with the term shared abstraction. It's when someone uses an analogy that doesn't necessarily have a direct relation..but an idea, a pattern an attribute or effect. And look closer, I never said they were the SAME thing. |
Teas... I think you need a lecture from qdemir on generalizations vs distinctions...  |
I think I just need to speak in layman's terms, instead.
|
|
53. |
19 Jan 2008 Sat 02:01 am |
Im sorry but the haşema looks like what I used to wear as a kid when it was RAİNİNG!
As for Alameda, I wonder what is stylish and elegant about them. Some of them can be claled stylish because htey seem to try to follow 'trends', but they are far from elegant and I think that is about the point!!
To feel uncomfortable to wear something that shows your flesh because of possible scrutiny, is just turning the world upside down. It is too ridiculous for words that a woman should feel uncomfortable in the presence of a man, that it makes her WANT to dress something like that. Tastes differ, but Im sure you agree with me that most of them look like you are in rainy Holland trying to stay dry on your bike!!
Its one thing that a woman covers her hair, its another that she goes to the beach dressed entirely.
Actually, if I were to be on a beach where women dress like this, they would make ME feel uncomfortable. I would probably feel as if they are looking at me like a western w**** asking to get raped. In fact, I am only enjoying the sunshine (that humans actually need) and the salt of the sea on my body.
If a woman dresses this willingly, she keeps a system where the man has the power over the woman going. If a woman is, maybe without realising it, forced into wearing these, I can only feel sorry for her.
And just for the record: Im a very modest dresser and you would never catch me wearing clothes that show too much of 'private skin'. But this is not a case of modesty and shyness, it goes much deeper into the roots of a way of thinking, that one should stay far away from.
|
|
54. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 04:40 pm |
Quoting Deli_kizin: Actually, if I were to be on a beach where women dress like this, they would make ME feel uncomfortable. I would probably feel as if they are looking at me like a western w**** asking to get raped. In fact, I am only enjoying the sunshine (that humans actually need) and the salt of the sea on my body.
If a woman dresses this willingly, she keeps a system where the man has the power over the woman going. If a woman is, maybe without realising it, forced into wearing these, I can only feel sorry for her.
And just for the record: Im a very modest dresser and you would never catch me wearing clothes that show too much of 'private skin'. But this is not a case of modesty and shyness, it goes much deeper into the roots of a way of thinking, that one should stay far away from. |
This is very very true DK. Why muslim men assume that you are on the beach "displaying yourself" - are they completely sick? Out of interest do muslim women who completely cover themselves suffer any physical ill-health due to lack of sunshine - health experts recommend at least 15 minutes per day. As far as I am aware you would suffer lack of vitamin D ...
Covering yourself does not stop sick men thinking sick things - they just find other things to get sapik about! In Victorian times when UK women word long dresses, the accident sight of an ankle was enough to excite them!
|
|
55. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 05:19 pm |
Just as an extra info:
Couple of years ago I was in Sile/Istanbul with my parents on the beach. And we saw several women wearing those head to toe covering things. And the men with them were wearing very long swimming trunks. They were trying to enjoy themselves.
My first thought was 'oh well, they have right to be there and enjoy themselves as like any other citizens'. But bizaarly my mother, who is a quite devoted muslim, did not take the same view. Her reaction was :'What is this? if you are that muslim what are you doing here?'. She also said that (in her simplistic turkish way) 'they are trying to say that all these girls wearing normal swimming costumes on this beach are all prostitutes'.
That was what her opinion was about the subject!!
|
|
56. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 06:21 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: Just as an extra info:
Couple of years ago I was in Sile/Istanbul with my parents on the beach. And we saw several women wearing those head to toe covering things. And the men with them were wearing very long swimming trunks. They were trying to enjoy themselves.
My first thought was 'oh well, they have right to be there and enjoy themselves as like any other citizens'. But bizaarly my mother, who is a quite devoted muslim, did not take the same view. Her reaction was :'What is this? if you are that muslim what are you doing here?'. She also said that (in her simplistic turkish way) 'they are trying to say that all these girls wearing normal swimming costumes on this beach are all prostitutes'.
That was what her opinion was about the subject!!
|
i think your mother has to be aware of who has different life style they minimum have to same right to use beachs minimum as much as her right,but seems she has effected from extrem secular discussions while judding em by don't ask any question to them??really very sad
|
|
57. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 06:36 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: Just as an extra info:
Couple of years ago I was in Sile/Istanbul with my parents on the beach. And we saw several women wearing those head to toe covering things. And the men with them were wearing very long swimming trunks. They were trying to enjoy themselves.
My first thought was 'oh well, they have right to be there and enjoy themselves as like any other citizens'. But bizaarly my mother, who is a quite devoted muslim, did not take the same view. Her reaction was :'What is this? if you are that muslim what are you doing here?'. She also said that (in her simplistic turkish way) 'they are trying to say that all these girls wearing normal swimming costumes on this beach are all prostitutes'.
That was what her opinion was about the subject!!
|
If that is your mother's opinion, then what was SHE doing on the beach?
|
|
58. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 06:37 pm |
+10000000!!!!
|
|
59. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 07:03 pm |
friends we talking about a main human right or freedom,how can we judge other one's prefer while this choice doesn't give any harm to social order????if we say nooooo you can't do that then this beahviour doesn't give to same right to other side??anyone can imagine this position can creat bigger problems???
|
|
60. |
20 Jan 2008 Sun 07:18 pm |
Quoting MrX67: friends we talking about a main human right or freedom,how can we judge other one's prefer while this choice doesn't give any harm to social order???? |
I clearly understand your point of view based upon freedom and religious preferences, and yes they should be free to anybody. The problem here is that this whole idea STEMS from a PROBLEM in SOCİAL ORDER. Maybe the women wearing these indeed do this willingly, freely, because they think it is right for their religion. However, they IDEA in the religion that makes women do this, is the RESULT of distorted ideas about MEN and WOMAN.
So behavior like this, simply cant be put down to freedom, because the ideas behind it, are right against that same freedom you try to defend!
|
|
|