Well, we all have our views, don´t we? There are many Armenians in the US, particularly in the NY and CA areas, both areas I´ve spent most my life. It was was presented to me as a fait accompli. As to your suspicions, I don´t give a damn about your suspicions, in fact I have my own suspicions about you.
In the many claims and discussions from those who claim genocide, regarding "Armenian Genocide" I have yet to hear mention of the Hunchak group, officialy started in 1887 whose stated aims were:
The Hunchakian program advocated revolution as the only means of reaching the immediate objective. The arena of revolutionary activity was designed as Turkish Armenia. The Party believed that the existing social organisation in Turkish Armenia could be changed by violence against the Turkish government and described the following methods. Propaganda, Agitation, Terror, Organisation, and Peasant and Worker Activities.
Propaganda was to be directed to the people to educate them toward two goals: The basic reasons and the proper time for revolution against the government; The social order that was to be established after the successful revolution.
Agitation and Terror were needed to "elevate the spirit of the people". Demonstrations against the government, refusal to pay taxes, demands for reforms, and hatred of the aristocracy were part of the party´s agitation campaign. Terror was to be used as a method of protecting the people and winning their confidence in the Hunchak program.
This is from their own website. I did not make any of it up. Not only that, a significant amount of Armenians during WWI took up arms against their own countrymen. In any country that is considered treason.
In my opinion, war itself is genocide, after all, what is it but the organized effort to defeat another group? However in the term "Genocide" is a legal term, with legal consequences. In addition it sets up a demonization of another people, that is Turks, whose ill treatment can then be more easily justified.
This is not an area of study I´ve gotten into by choice, but by having conversations thrust upon me by others, who have made fantastic claims, I felt compelled to followed up on the matter. In doing so, I´ve found much contradictory evidence that disputes the claims of genocide against the Armenians. WWI was a tragic period in human history, many millions died tragic deaths. My own grandfather was a child soldier during WWI, he never recovered as he suffered from witnessing the barbarism, the gasses both nerve and mustard, he died young, but also suffered "shell shock" where he would at times revert to thinking he was in the trenches again.
The bottom line is, war is ugly,hideous! I am against it, and anything that helps to start, or perpetuate it.
I am a bit suspicious of your claim about being knowledable of the matter.
A few Armenians saying ´they want Anatolia´ is NOT a security threat to Turkey. Or in that respect they are not more believable than some right wing Greeks who think the west of Turkey must be part of part Greece, or some right wing Turks who think we should reach to Ottomani borders at some stage.
The real question is "those Armenians and those Greeks are posing a danger to Turkey´s integrity?".
My answer is "I dont think so". If you ask Turks in generic, I dont think Turkish people think there is such a danger.
However, the entire incident of 1915 was about "the wealth changing hands" as much as "Ittihat ve terakki leaders´ murderous, instinctive, darwinist decision of wiping Anatolia from non-muslim members".
I am not sure but I think, people who benefited this wealth exchange is resisting the most about this subject being mentioned.
But the truth is there, even if we dont like it.
Edited (4/5/2014) by alameda
|