School bans Muslim mother from parents´ evening for wearing veil A mother was barred from a parents´ evening at her son´s school as she was wearing a veil. The 34-year-old was turned away on security and safety grounds after arriving in clothes which covered every part of her body except her eyes. The incident in Blackburn follows a furore over comments by the area´s MP Jack Straw about women who cover their faces. Mr Straw, now Justice Secretary, said in 2006 that veils could make community relations harder as they were a ´visible statement of separation and difference´. In the latest controversy last week, the mother of one was furious after being told that visitors´ faces should be visible at all times.
More: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1167037/School-bans-Muslim-mother-parents-evening-wearing-veil.html
***********
Rightly or not? Can a school barr parents because of safety reasons?
I guess the answer isn´t simple, as usual.
I am a teacher in Blackburn, where this incident happened. I saw the headline on the billboard outside a shop. My first reaction was that the ban wasn´t necessary. The reason I thought this was because I work in a primary school and as such, staff have daily contact with parents as they collect them from school. In such a situation, I would say a ban would not be necessary because we would be very familiar with all parents and thus we would recognise her, even fully covered.
In most primary schools, parents´ evening is conducted within the classroom, whereas in High Schools (which is what the school in question is) parents´ evening is generally conducted in the main hall. All staff are seated around the edge of the hall, at a table, and chairs for waiting parents are in the centre. It is a very crowded situation. Also, high school staff do not come into contact with parents very often. I remember going to my daughter´s parents evenings and some of the staff had trouble recalling who my daughter was, never mind who I was!!! (And this was at a relatively small school of 600 . . . many high schools are double that size).
So in such a high school situation I would say the staff are in the same position as Jack Straw believed he was, vulnerable if they can´t even see whether the person is male or female. A while ago a suspected terrorist escaped the country by posing as a fully covered Muslim woman . . . I don´t remember the exact details, but the incident has caused people to be cautious perhaps.
What I would say to Jack Straw and this school is . . . you don´t know really anyone who walks through your door, covered or not . . . anyone could be a danger. Look at recent news articles where people, even students, have returned to their schools and killed.
Maybe Members of Parliament, when they are conducting their constituency clinics, andhigh schools, when they are conducting their parents´ evenings, should have general security measures in place, for all parents. Rather like airports? (tongue in cheek)
I think there is a degree of compromise needed here. If a woman chooses to fully cover herself, then she must expect to meet some difficult situations with regard to security. So, is it acceptable for schools to ensure there is a room, staffed by women, who can check out the face of the covered Muslimas? To do this they would have to have the photo of every parent on record and, as far as I know this is not procedure. Or perhaps the child could have accompanied his/her parent?
It is one of those situations that does not have a clear cut answer, but it definitely does divide opinion, especially when reported by the Daily Mail .
If the decision has been made for security reasons, then I think a whole battery of security measures would need to be implemented because danger comes from all walks of life these days.
No veil? ok she can enter . . . What about the stock of ammunition she may have under her clothing? What about the knife any parent may have secreted about his person? What about the parent who had a very bad experience of school and harbours a grudge? In high schools, the ist of reasons for security would be endless. High school teachers do not know the parents so well and may have never even met them.
The sad thing is, I have heard that the government is planning to close down some high schools across the country and create new, even larger institutions. Logistical nightmares.
Without knowing the full details, I wou;d say the school hasn´t done enough to accommodate the needs of the parent or the child. Nowadays, schools have policies for everything and there should be a policy in place in this instance, but not just to state who they will ban, but how they can best accommodate the needs of all parents/children. The buzz word of Blackburn with Darwen Education Authority is ´inclusion´, as it is throughout the country. I don´t see how this incident illustrates inclusion. I wouldn´t say that certain sectors of society need special treatment. If security is of such importance then perhaps measures should be all inclusive, with all parents subjected to some form of security measure at the entrance (for reasons I have already stated).
We are living in different times I guess.
|