A citizen of China is called Chinese, a citizen of Canada is called Canadian....obvoously, a citizen of Turkey would be called a Turk.....need I go on? I asked what term you prefer? Of course renaming the country would be required, is that do you want?
People keep having problems because some people agitate problems. I´ve noticed in areas, with strategic territory or valuable resources, people seem to be turned against one another. It isns´t that difficult as at his most base nature, humans are tribal, like various animals, sheep, goats, oxen, or flocks of birds.
I am not Turkish, thus don´t have a pony in this race, I am just a history buff who has found the Levant interesting historic area. That is why when you go on about racism, see the absurdity of that comment. Anatolia & Thrace are some of the oldest most traveled crossroads of the world. Humans have been blending there for many thousands of years.
To try to separate a group, like claiming this area is the homeland of XXX or ZZZ is inaccurate. Study a little archology.
“Naturally the common people don´t want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” Hermann Goering
As for the rest of your rant, I have studied those issues. You mention the Armenians....
I notice you never mention the Hunchacks, who were established in 1887....."and what was their strategy?
Taken from the Hunchak.org website. ...I´m not linking to it due to malware on the site.
"III. The Hunchakian program advocated revolution as the only means of reaching the immediate objective. The arena of revolutionary activity was designed as Turkish Armenia. The Party believed that the existing social organisation in Turkish Armenia could be changed by violence against the Turkish government and described the following methods. Propaganda, Agitation, Terror, Organisation, and Peasant and Worker Activities.
Propaganda was to be directed to the people to educate them toward two goals: The basic reasons and the proper time for revolution against the government; The social order that was to be established after the successful revolution.
Agitation and Terror were needed to "elevate the spirit of the people". Demonstrations against the government, refusal to pay taxes, demands for reforms, and hatred of the aristocracy were part of the party´s agitation campaign. Terror was to be used as a method of protecting the people and winning their confidence in the Hunchak program."
The fact of the matter is there are always a variety of different ethnic groups in an area, all humans are related, we are cousins.
Fixed borders are a recent phenomenon, formerly people were more mobile and crossed, stayed here a while then went there. We are similar to the birds and other creatures.
We wont need to change the name of the country. We should just learn how to live together and that will be all..
Apart from anything else, say a Turk like me accepted this racist oath: Closed my eyes, closed my ears etc. But what about the others. Specially the Kurds!! They dont want it naturally.. And that is their basic human rights. Why would a Kurdish kid should be forced to say that every morning? Just to please a few nationalists? Why are we NOT able to accept a Kurd as a Kurd?
That is where nationalism is coming into equation. The nationalism, which you are talking as if everybody has to have it, as you see here is making people to see others enemy. They think anybody who does not want to say this oath is their enemy. This ideology could divide Turkey.
( 
