I would like you to focus on the word "consent" and also the way society is described as common work of people. This is the basis of all modern-day nations. Laws are made around the principle of people´s consent to coercion by government for the benefit and welfare of society. There are also regimes not fitting into this definition e.g. dictatorships, olligarchies and other oppressive regimes where people´s choices are ignored. In other words, we must respect the freedom of choice.
Hitler considered his race superior to others. He scorned the Jews and wanted to eradicate them from Europe. He considered them as subhuman creatures contaminating the noble German race and sucking their blood through their collective organizations. His view represents the epitome of the xenophobic European conservatism which is itself based on the Greek notion that viewed other races as barbarians. In between there were episodes of slavery, colonism, cultural imperialism, sectarian wars, crusades, religious bigotry and the cold war era. If you draw a line through them, you will find those were the products of the same standpoint: us and them.
On the Eastern front too, there are nationalist movements, their leaders, grey wolves, pan-Turanists and jihad fighters to name just a few.
The driving force behind them are the stereotypes I mentioned.
Interesting line of reasoning. So are you suggesting that as people we should respect those practices in cultures that are abhorrent as well? For example stoning women for being raped? What if a culture has a practice of sacrificing a virgin on the first Monday of every month to some other version of imaginary god? What if a child is being made to walk to dead carcasses of animals to prove she´s an incarnation of some Indian god (true story)? Should we respect that too? Are we to say, oh it´s just their culture, it´s done with their consent, so that´s ok?
I´m sorry Vineyards but I cannot agree with you here. Yes, we should respect other cultures and people´s choices to live a certain way. But to a point. When those choices violate human right and its dignity, as human beings we should speak out against it. People are not objects in an ethnographic museum for us to marvel at how "they do it", they are human beings who suffer. Or is suffering ok as long as it´s "them"? I think we have a moral obligation to speak out against abuse, no matter how culturally sanctioned it is.
Edited (9/5/2009) by vineyards
|