News articles, events, announcements |
Thread locked by a moderator or admin. |
|
|
IRAN-NUCLEAR WEAPONS-BUSH
|
1. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 11:56 am |
What is the truth? Should we redecorate our bomb shelter?
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN0343899920071203
|
|
2. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 12:07 pm |
yeah,with Xmas ornaments and Santa Claus at least that would be something to celebrate if the article passes the truth
|
|
3. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 12:48 pm |
Alfie is known for his "special" sources of information, not available for regular mortals.
|
|
4. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 01:28 pm |
Iran does not have the right to develop nuclear program but Israel has this right,that's only in American law !!!acep
we all know that Israiel owns most stocks and installations of weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East region, and there are most of the headquarters of Israel's ability nuclear weapons and chemical and biological . Israel intends to build another nuclear reactor off, the report says the Center for Strategic Studies in London: that Israel has research and manufacturing capabilities, for the production of mustard and nerve gas in (Nistona) at a distance of 12 miles south of Tel Aviv :-S
|
|
5. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 06:48 pm |
Quoting elham: Iran does not have the right to develop nuclear program but Israel has this right,that's only in American law !!!acep
we all know that Israiel owns most stocks and installations of weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East region, and there are most of the headquarters of Israel's ability nuclear weapons and chemical and biological . Israel intends to build another nuclear reactor off, the report says the Center for Strategic Studies in London: that Israel has research and manufacturing capabilities, for the production of mustard and nerve gas in (Nistona) at a distance of 12 miles south of Tel Aviv :-S
|
theres a difference between israel and iran.
israel is a tiny country constantly threatened by all the neighbours, having no ally or no supporter in case of an attack it has built up all shelters for the defence. being aware of such weapons that israel possesses, the neighbours wouldnt dare to start attacks.
as for iran, i have no idea why this country is allowed to, esp considering that theres an insane man ruling the country.
and whos enemy for iran?
elham, your knowledge on politics is very narrow due to the narrow mass media you have.
|
|
6. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 07:02 pm |
Quoting femme_fatal: Quoting elham: Iran does not have the right to develop nuclear program but Israel has this right,that's only in American law !!!acep
we all know that Israiel owns most stocks and installations of weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East region, and there are most of the headquarters of Israel's ability nuclear weapons and chemical and biological . Israel intends to build another nuclear reactor off, the report says the Center for Strategic Studies in London: that Israel has research and manufacturing capabilities, for the production of mustard and nerve gas in (Nistona) at a distance of 12 miles south of Tel Aviv :-S
|
theres a difference between israel and iran.
israel is a tiny country constantly threatened by all the neighbours, having no ally or no supporter in case of an attack it has built up all shelters for the defence. being aware of such weapons that israel possesses, the neighbours wouldnt dare to start attacks.
as for iran, i have no idea why this country is allowed to, esp considering that theres an insane man ruling the country.
and whos enemy for iran?
elham, your knowledge on politics is very narrow due to the narrow mass media you have. |
I completely disagree with you..
While usa,uk,france,..., israil have nuclear weapons, you cant turn around and say 'no you cant have it' to Iran.
Well, about insane man, I agree but what about Bush? is he sane? and he is allowed to play with all those weapons..yes?
Quote: having no ally or no supporter in case of an attack |
You are joking, right?
I can understand and support the idea of getting rid of all nuclear weapons.
But I can not understand the logic 'ah..israel is a tiny country, she needs them..But iran does not'
This is pure hypocrisy!
|
|
7. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 07:20 pm |
dear handsome,
i know you are brainwashed with a storm of anti bush or anti israel propaganda. what you speak is very naive.
in order to speak on issue of israel contra the neighbourhood you have to study about israel and its long history.
as for me i trust usa or france or israel, i believe they wouldnt attack my country.
as for iran... theres no base to trust.
so its about north korea.
|
|
8. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 07:24 pm |
and yes, israel has no support. ask any israeli.
the only supporter usa, is not favorable to israel today.
eu has stopped supporting israel a half century ago. when they estimated the business, it turned out that oil is dearer than the jews.
|
|
9. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 07:35 pm |
Quoting femme_fatal: dear handsome,
i know you are brainwashed with a storm of anti bush or anti israel propaganda. what you speak is very naive.
in order to speak on issue of israel contra the neighbourhood you have to study about israel and its long history.
as for me i trust usa or france or israel, i believe they wouldnt attack my country.
as for iran... theres no base to trust.
so its about north korea.
|
You are marvelous femme..
I quite like know what you know about Israel and its long history. May be we should make it short and take it from the WW1. it will be easier for you to explain and easier for us to understand.
I can completely 'understand' your trust to usa and not iran:
Iran was the country used the first ever atomic bomb;Iran invaded vietnam; Iran invaded afghanistan; Iran invaded Iraq and got nearly a million poeple killed!
Of course israel is another trust worthy country as they always complied with UN resolutions; they never attacked any country; they dont illegally occupy anywhere in the world!
Please reverse brain wash me!!
|
|
10. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 07:40 pm |
Quoting catwoman: Alfie is known for his "special" sources of information, not available for regular mortals. |
AlphA did not find an obscure report, Reuters is a very mainstream news channel.
Just put National Intelligence Estimate Iran in Google and you will find numerous reports.
Iran Report Sends Bush's War Rhetoric Out to Pasture
Of course, you are aware of President Bush's News Conference on the matter yesterday are you not?
|
|
11. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 07:58 pm |
Quoting thehandsom:
You are marvelous femme..
|
the same goes to you
Quoting thehandsom:
I quite like know what you know about Israel and its long history. May be we should make it short and take it from the WW1. it will be easier for you to explain and easier for us to understand.
|
yes, its better to start with WWI. tho things were arisen before the war. and its not pinky as it is drawn by media, where the GREAT BRITAIN gives the land to poor jews. nobody knows about british concentrated camps for jews in palestine.
Quoting thehandsom:
I can completely 'understand' your trust to usa and not iran:
|
me too
Quoting thehandsom:
Iran was the country used the first ever atomic bomb;Iran invaded vietnam; Iran invaded afghanistan; Iran invaded Iraq and got nearly a million poeple killed!
|
ok, wow, im impressed by your knowledge about atomic bombs.
the vietnam was not a destination place to occupy or invade, it wasnt usa's goal invade vietnam. it was a shade of a cold war between USA and CCCP. it was a political game where the victim was vietnam.
the same applies to afghanistan.
it is sooooo strange, today nobody blames CCCP but all in chorus blame USA
as for iran-iraq. tell me if there was peace between middle eastern countries at all?
saddam wanted weapon to go against iran, usa supported, not only usa, note, also soviet union.
another shade of cold war.
Quoting thehandsom:
Of course israel is another trust worthy country as they always complied with UN resolutions; they never attacked any country; they dont illegally occupy anywhere in the world!
|
israel never threatened any country, all it does is a defence. it has no choice. imagine yourself living in a country where every neighbour wants to crush you into dust and throw away into the sea. watch palestinian animated cartoons where they brainwash every child to prepare for jihad or to become shahids. where they show jews as monkeys and christians as pigs. where a little child says that to be shahid is the sweetest thing.
jews dont occupy illegally any place unlike ottomans who occupied the place for 400 years.
Quoting thehandsom:
Please reverse brain wash me!!
|
i might be too late to mend a corrupt mind
|
|
12. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 08:39 pm |
Quoting femme_fatal: Quoting elham: Iran does not have the right to develop nuclear program but Israel has this right,that's only in American law !!!acep
we all know that Israiel owns most stocks and installations of weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East region, and there are most of the headquarters of Israel's ability nuclear weapons and chemical and biological . Israel intends to build another nuclear reactor off, the report says the Center for Strategic Studies in London: that Israel has research and manufacturing capabilities, for the production of mustard and nerve gas in (Nistona) at a distance of 12 miles south of Tel Aviv :-S
|
theres a difference between israel and iran.
israel is a tiny country constantly
|
Israel is a spoiled child can not refuse its request by USA ,this is the important reason only
isn't it?,my friend femme a broad mind
|
|
13. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 08:45 pm |
Quoting elham:
Israel is a spoiled child can not refuse its request by USA ,this is the important reason only
isn't it?,my friend femme a broad mind
|
if you could make it clearer, pls?
i know your english gets better suddenly when you copy and paste from "anti-anti all" web pages.
i couldnt understand your point.
thanks
|
|
14. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 08:55 pm |
Quoting femme_fatal:
i know your english gets better suddenly when you copy and paste from "anti-anti all" web pages.
i couldnt understand your point.
thanks
|
my dear femme , can you help me to search "anti-anti all" web pages, i didnt find it
it is easy to make you nervous
|
|
15. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 09:04 pm |
Quoting elham: Quoting femme_fatal:
i know your english gets better suddenly when you copy and paste from "anti-anti all" web pages.
i couldnt understand your point.
thanks
|
my dear femme , can you help me to search "anti-anti all" web pages, i didnt find it
it is easy to make you nervous |
are you going to make your point more clear or only thing you can do is play on my nerves?
elham, pls, dont fool me, ok?
why do you suddenly speak english as if you were a ntive speaker and suddenly you when you have nothing to paste (or probably quote from other sources, thus stealing other peoples statements) you turn to a plain middle easterner?
do you think we have no eyes?
im 100% sure you do not have a strong basement for you own political viewpoints. all you do is repeat after your political leaders that occupy and censor your mass media.
|
|
17. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 09:26 pm |
Quote:
are you going to make your point more clear or only thing you can do is play on my nerves?
elham, pls, dont fool me, ok?
why do you suddenly speak english as if you were a ntive speaker and suddenly you when you have nothing to paste (or probably quote from other sources, thus stealing other peoples statements) you turn to a plain middle easterner?
do you think we have no eyes?
im 100% sure you do not have a strong basement for you own political viewpoints. all you do is repeat after your political leaders that occupy and censor your mass media. |
i put my viewpoints, it need not science,but the truth is, when you didn't like my opinion , say nonsense
|
|
18. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 10:42 pm |
Iran's regime is a source of extremism and in the region and around the globe. It has defied the international community with its support for terrorism and cultivation of extremist forces.
Its leaders have repeatedly called for Israel's demise and have propagated base anti-Semitism, including the denial of the Holocaust. There is consensus in the international community that nuclear weapons in the hands of this increasingly radical and reckless regime would lead to a dangerous geo-strategic shift in the Middle East potentially leading to a nuclear arms race in the region, Iran's aggressive and destructive foreign policy, represents a direct threat to Israel and other countries in the region.
You think Bush is crazy, God help us if President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad gets a hold of nuclear weapons.
Femme, you really amaze me sometimes. I give you much credit for your logical insight.
|
|
19. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 10:48 pm |
Quote:
Its leaders have repeatedly called for Israel's demise and have propagated base anti-Semitism, including the denial of the Holocaust.
|
I believe that the lastest rhetoric was to "blow Isreal off the face of the earth"....something like that.
|
|
20. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 11:39 pm |
Can anyone here explain what lands are included in Judaic belief "The promised land"?
I will get very angry if the so called "promised land" includes a part of Turkia !
I dont think even Israel would want mess with AlphaF, otherwise I shall have to develop my own nuclear weapons.
|
|
21. |
05 Dec 2007 Wed 11:59 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: I dont think even Israel would want mess with AlphaF, |
I am happy to be braver than Israel then.
|
|
22. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 12:02 am |
Quoting AlphaF: Can anyone here explain what lands are included in Judaic belief "The promised land"? |
It actually includes your home... Let's see if they notice you're in there before they bomb it.
|
|
23. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 12:05 am |
You both got the point Ladies !
It is not easy to defend that little peaceful country called Israel.
|
|
24. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 12:06 am |
Quoting AlphaF: You both got the point Ladies !
It is not easy to defend that little peaceful country called Israel. |
I have never defended Israel.
|
|
25. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 12:08 am |
Quoting AlphaF: You both got the point Ladies ! |
When did I get mental? "getting Alfie" is not a good sign! Imdaaaaaaaat!!!!!
|
|
26. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 12:10 am |
Did you notice that you didn't already have an opinion, Catwoman, you just "got his point"
Arrogance is a wonderful thing!!
|
|
27. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 12:11 am |
I think Aenigma is the brighter of the two....She got the point, alright !
|
|
28. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 12:12 am |
Quoting AlphaF: I think Aenigma is the brighter of the two....She got the point, alright ! |
It's such a beautiful snowy day today, I always love the first day of winter!
|
|
29. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 12:12 am |
Maybe one day YOU will get the point Alpha
|
|
30. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 12:13 am |
Quoting AEnigma III: Did you notice that you didn't already have an opinion, Catwoman, you just "got his point" |
No, I didn't "get his point"!! I promise, I was just kidding...
|
|
31. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 12:14 am |
I already have a point..Do you? ))))))))))))))))
|
|
32. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 12:14 am |
Quoting AEnigma III: Maybe one day YOU will get the point Alpha |
He's too old for that, no imagination at this point.
|
|
34. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 12:44 am |
It's really annoying to admit it, but I completely agree with you Handsom
Try to ensure it doesn't happen again!
|
|
35. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 12:46 am |
Quoting AEnigma III: It's really annoying to admit it, but I completely agree with you Handsom
Try to ensure it doesn't happen again! |
But it WILL happen again, it will always be happening... until God gives us better proof that there is heaven.
Why are we friends with Saudi Arabia?
|
|
36. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 01:31 am |
check the Judaic books...That is what worries me !
|
|
37. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 01:35 am |
OMG! What an amazing clip - I missed it earlier! Thanks Catwoman
|
|
38. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 01:36 am |
Quoting AlphaF: check the Judaic books...That is what worries me ! |
I CHECKED)))are you ready to wander for many years across a desert?
|
|
40. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 01:58 am |
Exactly Alameda .. LET us all cut the crap and understand what Israil really is !
|
|
41. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 02:07 am |
Israeli God knows)))how dare you????
|
|
42. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 02:15 am |
I would not be sure Israeli god approves Israel.
Some really religious Jews are actually against the current STATE of Israel.
They figure the foundation of the sovereign state of Israel should have waited the arrival of Mesiah (whose whole purpose is to set up the Israeli state, anyway) and ask who the hell are the infidels that did not wait for Mesiah to arrive.
|
|
44. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 07:19 am |
Quoting AlphaF: Exactly Alameda .. LET us all cut the crap and understand what Israil really is ! |
This is not a simple issue AlphaF. Just what is Israel?
From my observation, Israel is a country made up of a greatly traumatized population. They have had a great damage done to their community for a long time. They underwent multiple attempts to exterminate them as a people, but they survived.
The situation of the Jews requires a great deal of compassion and understanding. Israel exists now, and has for several generations. They have a right to exist and prosper.
One has to admire the Jews ability to maintain themselves as a people for over 2,000 years without a country. They made sure they were educated and they have a unique ability to look out for one another. Can anyone blame them for this?
The problem is: what about the indigenous people? (the Palestinians) The settlers with their land confiscation expansionist policies, and others who keep stirring the pot.
There are many sane Israeli groups who want to make peace and develop a two or one state solution.
The Palestinians, in the words of a Palestinian friend of mine "have not missed the chance to make mistakes" One of their first errors was in joining with the British to fight against the Ottoman Empire based on promises made. Suicide bombers are another big mistake.
The Zionists, Instead of just "trusting" the British, they worked hard to get what they felt they needed, and they were successful.
I'm afraid the current policy of the "settlers" will in the end be very detrimental to the State of Israel.
Unfortunately, the Palestinians are being driven to madness. Being bitter and resentful will not help. It does not matter if one is right or not, if one works against ones objective by things like suicide bombing. The right is lost in that case.
I sympathize greatly for the people of Palestine, but they do need to develop better tactics and a real workable plan. The best thing for the Israelis would be to stop with the Wall, learn to live with their brothers in peace.....
Aahhh, I can dream and hope. I have hope for a better future, I have hope for peace.
|
|
45. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 08:10 am |
It is not only the U.S.A and Israel that do not want Iran to have nuclear weapons. Do you really think Iraq and Turkey would feel comfortable with Iran having such weapons at their disposal? Especially since The leader of Iran is blinded by his religion.
I sit back and laugh when the leader of Iran puffs his chest out, He should ask Muammar Quadafi, Manuel Noriega, and Saddam Hussein what it is like to threaten the U.S.A.
We did not Take over Libya,We did not take over panama, and we have not taken over Iraq, The Iraqi government is slowly showing the world how much better life is without a butcher like saddam hussein.Make no mistake about it we will not and cannot tolerate radical leaders of ANY religion.
So for those who believe that the U.S.A. is anti Islam you are extremly wrong, The U.S.A embraces muslims as it does believers of all faiths.
|
|
46. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 08:44 am |
I agree with most of your post Alameda !
Surprised? )))))))))))))
Good news is, as indicated by NIE report I posted,
resistance is booming against the current mighty NeoCon lobby, both within the Democrats as well as Republicans. A strong group of Americans are now fed up with the "spoiled child" act of Israel and the unlimited backing they get from USA. People have started asking if USA is in existence for Americans or for Israel.
A real peaceful solution for Palestinians still seems very far away, if not totally impossible. The real issue is the boundaries of the "PROMISED LAND".
|
|
47. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 09:04 am |
Quoting AlphaF: I agree with most of your post Alameda !
Surprised? ))))))))))))) |
Not really AlphF, You seem to be a thoughtful, reasonable and educated person. It IS a complicated mess, but then there could be a breakthrough in a flash....let's hope.
I suppose you have read Edward Said's work? Uri Avnery, Gush Shalom?
|
|
48. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 09:06 am |
Quoting AlphaF: I agree with most of your post Alameda !
Surprised? )))))))))))))
Good news is, as indicated by NIE report I posted,
resistance is booming against the current mighty NeoCon lobby, both within the Democrats as well as Republicans. A strong group of Americans are now fed up with the "spoiled child" act of Israel and the unlimited backing they get from USA. People have started asking if USA is in existence for Americans or for Israel.
A real peaceful solution for Palestinians still seems very far away, if not totally impossible. The real issue is the boundaries of the "PROMISED LAND".
|
Agreed....although I do think it is actually more complicated than that. It could be that Israel is being "used". Certainly the Christian Zionists do not have lovely end pictured for the Jews in Israel
In fact if you read some of the early proposals the function of Israel was exactly to function as a part of the "Empire". Let's not forget, it was greatly assisted by England in the start. It's too late to dig out that part, in all those documents, but it's there.
|
|
49. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 09:21 am |
That is also correct...But it is a course for the Master's program, not for our undergraduates. )))))))))))
|
|
50. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 10:42 am |
Quoting excalibur89: It is not only the U.S.A and Israel that do not want Iran to have nuclear weapons. Do you really think Iraq and Turkey would feel comfortable with Iran having such weapons at their disposal? Especially since The leader of Iran is blinded by his religion.
I sit back and laugh when the leader of Iran puffs his chest out, He should ask Muammar Quadafi, Manuel Noriega, and Saddam Hussein what it is like to threaten the U.S.A.
We did not Take over Libya,We did not take over panama, and we have not taken over Iraq, The Iraqi government is slowly showing the world how much better life is without a butcher like saddam hussein.Make no mistake about it we will not and cannot tolerate radical leaders of ANY religion.
So for those who believe that the U.S.A. is anti Islam you are extremly wrong, The U.S.A embraces muslims as it does believers of all faiths.
|
This is interesting and quite arrogant!!
Who do you think you are to say that 'make no mistake'?
It is quite bulliesh!!
You just happen to be having many many weapons (of mass destructions) at this moment in history. And your arrogance (USA's arrogance) is NOT coming from you are more just or more right or anything.
What gives you right to talk about with such an arrogance is just your deadly weapons. That is all.
And History will judge it that way.
"The Iraqi government is slowly showing the world how much better life is without a butcher like saddam hussein."
What can you show in Iraq? almost one in every 20 people got killed because of you! One in every 5 people got displaced from their homes because of USA!
You call this a success? You are joking!! Right?
And about Iran. I hope you do not make a mistake over her. You will not be dealing with a country created 80-90 years ago..You will be dealing with people having history of 1000 years of persia.
You wont succeed. AND YOUR GOVERNMENT KNOWS IT!!
|
|
51. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 10:47 am |
American success in Iraq should not be measured by current welfare of Iraqi people.
US goal was to divide up Iraq into pieces and the mission is accomplished. Sad to say, but US seems currently on target.
But the game is not over yet.
|
|
52. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 11:08 am |
Quoting alameda: Not really AlphF, You seem to be a thoughtful, reasonable and educated person. |
Oh God!
Somebody just shoot me....
|
|
53. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 11:27 am |
My popularity ratings are rapidly increasing...Makes sense, no?
|
|
54. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 11:49 am |
Quoting AlphaF: My popularity ratings are rapidly increasing...Makes sense, no? |
Alpha, do you have some other web sites to enlighten with your wisdom, or did they kick you out already?
|
|
55. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 11:55 am |
Catwoman, I honestly think your attidude will soon leave you out of all discussions here...People do not like insults here, and you dont have a single intellectual clue, do you?
|
|
56. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 11:57 am |
Somehow, you are alive and well though - does racism and mysogynism work better then?
|
|
57. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 12:51 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: American success in Iraq should not be measured by current welfare of Iraqi people.
US goal was to divide up Iraq into pieces and the mission is accomplished. Sad to say, but US seems currently on target.
But the game is not over yet.
|
sorry, Alpha,im disagree with you,
America has never succeed in Iraq.
Iraq understood the dirty game of USA for dividing Iraq
I do not know why you insist that Iraq is divided now, as you PM me time ago
you 'll say me ,what about,Kurdistan, Sunni, Shiite,
i say you and otheres, this only in channels tendentious which show the false news
|
|
58. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 01:17 pm |
Forgive my views elham, I did not want to offend you in any way, please dont bother to wake up !....good luck with the democracy Americans brought to your country.
|
|
59. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 01:39 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: Forgive my views elham, I did not want to offend you in any way, please dont bother to wake up !....good luck with the democracy Americans brought to your country. |
democracy Americans
we don't want democracy like it realy, which made us lose dear people
|
|
60. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 04:28 pm |
|
|
61. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 04:40 pm |
Quoting excalibur89: It is not only the U.S.A and Israel that do not want Iran to have nuclear weapons. Do you really think Iraq and Turkey would feel comfortable with Iran having such weapons at their disposal? Especially since The leader of Iran is blinded by his religion.
I sit back and laugh when the leader of Iran puffs his chest out, He should ask Muammar Quadafi, Manuel Noriega, and Saddam Hussein what it is like to threaten the U.S.A.
We did not Take over Libya,We did not take over panama, and we have not taken over Iraq, The Iraqi government is slowly showing the world how much better life is without a butcher like saddam hussein.Make no mistake about it we will not and cannot tolerate radical leaders of ANY religion.
So for those who believe that the U.S.A. is anti Islam you are extremly wrong, The U.S.A embraces muslims as it does believers of all faiths.
|
Welcome to Turkish Class, I already like you.
|
|
62. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 04:43 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: Catwoman, I honestly think your attidude will soon leave you out of all discussions here...People do not like insults here, and you dont have a single intellectual clue, do you? |
I was starting to think the same thing Omega, but not about catwoman...maybe you also need to reflect...
|
|
63. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 05:44 pm |
Quoting teaschip1: Quoting AlphaF: Catwoman, I honestly think your attidude will soon leave you out of all discussions here...People do not like insults here, and you dont have a single intellectual clue, do you? |
I was starting to think the same thing Omega, but not about catwoman...maybe you also need to reflect... |
The belief that you are the only intelligent and worthy person to discuss issues is a sign of dellusional thinking...I think there is medicine for it.
|
|
64. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 08:29 pm |
Quoting Elisabeth: .......The belief that you are the only intelligent and worthy person to discuss issues is a sign of dellusional thinking...I think there is medicine for it. |
Mmmm Elisabeth, exactly to whom were you addressing your comment AlphaF or catwoman? It is confusing.
I think if people include some source material, it's a good idea. Also, if the source material is as neutral as possible, it's even better. At least, that's what I always try to do.
|
|
65. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 08:36 pm |
Quoting alameda: Quoting Elisabeth: .......The belief that you are the only intelligent and worthy person to discuss issues is a sign of dellusional thinking...I think there is medicine for it. |
Mmmm Elisabeth, exactly to whom were you addressing your comment AlphaF or catwoman? It is confusing.
I think if people include some source material, it's a good idea. Also, if the source material is as neutral as possible, it's even better. At least, that's what I always try to do. |
It was for Alpha, but it was a joke...I have no source material...I write my own jokes...apparently to my detriment, in some cases.
|
|
66. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 08:53 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: You have an amazing historical knowledge and an 'interesting way of interpretation of history' femme..
|
OMG look what you ve written?!
Quoting thehandsom:
First of all vietnam.. Of course the reason was the cold war.
|
yet again, handsome i send you back to read the origins of this indochina war. who supported north and who supported south.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War
Quoting thehandsom:
But who killed over 2.000.000 (2 MILLION) civilians (with napalms and etc)?
|
nice try with numbers, but im here to correct you.
~900,000 to 4,000,000 killed: According to the Vietnam's Ministry of Labor, War Invalids and Social Affairs released figures on April 3, 1995, 2 million civilians in the north and 2 million in the south were killed between 1954 and 1975.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War_casualties#Vietnamese_civilians
seems like they havent agreed on numbers of casulties in that chaotic war.
this was the war between vietnamise themselves, initially.
this is not how you describe, that all the civillians were killed by US soldiers. knowing the mentality of the easterners, they easily sacrifice civilians, the ideology is above the human beings. so, let us not try to color things white and black.
Quoting thehandsom:
What can be a good excuse to kill civilians?
|
are you talking about the wars? show me any war that didnt take the lives of civilians.
and i will tell you that turks didnt have to have a war or declare the war to exterminate the armenians, oops sorry, civilians quietly at home in a peacful march.
Quoting thehandsom:
Was it CCCP?
When Afghanistan was occupied after 9/11 was there a cold war? what was the excuse this time? I think over 10.000 people got killed (nobody counts the dead anyway)
|
is this the actual number of those killed by allied coalition? you mean the talibs are peaceful sheep laid on a green grass?
i seem to read the statement from iraqbodycount?
Quoting thehandsom:
What about Iraq? simply just wrong intelligence? as simple as that? 1.000.000 people got killed there and 4 million refugees!!
|
what exactly do you know about the war? a million was killed as simple as you state from the bullets of allied soldiers?
what about suicide bombers? they sneak into crowd even into the mosques (oh, holy muslims) to blow up as many as they can and of course, whos to blame? USA! the WEST! israel!
what makes me really angry? the thing that nobody takes into account that most of the civilian casualties are the rseults of trained terrorists sent to iraq from all over the world. nobody gets angry with terrorists who kidnap and behead the innocent volunteers or journalists and blow up many crowds(countless losses), for this they have a short memory, but they keep moaning about abu graib jail incidents.
Quoting thehandsom:
About Israel..
Do you have an idea how many palestinian people got killed since 2000?
Look at the table:
Can you see the number of children killed since 2000?
119 israeli children to 971 palestinian
can you see the number of civilians killed there?
704 israeli to 2043 palestinian.
|
wow! what a colorful chart! i kinda doubt about the site you source from.
i will try to find another web site for this.
Quoting thehandsom:
'israel never threatened any country, all it does is a defence. it has no choice'.
Do you really call this defence?
Who invaded Labenon? where are those settlers are occupying?
is Westbank part of israel? Are they legal?
|
your arguments are as shallow as the bits and pieces from mass media.
Quoting thehandsom:
Do you know how many UN resolutions Israel did not comply?
List is here
Do you know how many UN resolutions Iraq did not comply?
|
tell me how many?
an of course, palestine have agreed on all resolutions and multiplied terror orgs to comply the agreements sending the doves of peace to israel.
Quoting thehandsom:
'jews dont occupy illegally any place unlike ottomans who occupied the place for 400 years.'
Are you REALLY suggesting that creation of israel was legal?
Even BRITISH accepts it was a historical mistake!!
|
i understand you try to impress me, but
i tell you a thing, theres no such a thing as a historical mistake. we can say of a political mistake, military mistake. whatever happent in the history is a history.
here, read some history:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Israeli-Palestinian_conflict
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel
Quoting thehandsom:
So Ottoman occupation was illegal but israel's is not? haha..
|
hahaha let me laugh with you
israel's settlement was on all grounds legal, first mandated by great britain empire, second confirmed by UN. unlike ottoman occupation
Quoting thehandsom:
Well, with the same logic, america was occupied illegally too, so as australia..
|
i have no further questions!
however, we think its super to live in america and australia today. all of us know the stories and admit the faults.
|
|
67. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 09:41 pm |
You keep me coming back to TC, Femme. Much wiser than some of the Oldbegs here.
|
|
68. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 09:59 pm |
Well written Handsome.
|
|
69. |
06 Dec 2007 Thu 10:51 pm |
"hahaha let me laugh with you israel's settlement was on all grounds legal, first mandated by great britain empire, second confirmed by UN. unlike ottoman occupation"
Who granted Great Britain the authority? Was it not "Might makes Right" ? What about the indiginous people? Do they not have rights too?
Anyway, is there really anything to be gained by going over the historic "right" of the creation of countries now in existance. The fact is, there is an Israel now, and there are still indiginous people who have not resolved their issues.
The continued confiscation of property, resources and the murder of Palestinians via extrajudicial execution is an abomnible practice that does nothing to foster the credibility and honour of the Israili people.
Israel's 'assassination policy'
Also in the link to the Grand Mufti...just who put him in place? He was after all the choice of Great Britain.
|
|
70. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 01:05 am |
femme, I hope you are not a history teacher or a teacher tries to teach logic to students
Ok Ok
I will try to simplfy it for you (because I am getting quite dissapointed here)
Where is Vietnam? (in asia)
where is USA (in north america)?
What is the distance between USA and vietnam? (thousands of miles)
what do you call a country leaves from its own soil and lands on another country's soil with its army? (it is called invaders)
A simple logic here femme!! USA in that conflict is called the 'invading country'.
And the result of invasion is huge number of civilian dead. Millions of civilian deads.
You can not just say 'ah the real reason many died is eastern mentality' and get away with it!!
Even if you tell this to your childeren in a simply way, they will ask you ' ama ama mom, dont you think if USA army did not invade there would not be millions of civilians dead?'
I am sure when they learn how much napalm was used in that war and how many civilians burnt alive, they will ask more different questions!!
when it comes to Iraq war:
where is IRAQ? (in middle east)
where is USA ? (see above! )
what is the distance between usa and iraq (again thousand of miles)
Was Iraq a thread to europe or usa (not really, never!!)
what happened there usa? army invaded iraq.(then of course removed the army, removed the government)
The result of the invasion?( so far) 1 million dead.4 million displaced.
You can not say femme 'trained terrorists bombing everywhere, they are responsible' and get away with it.
Your childeren will turn around ask 'ama ama, if the usa army did not invade, there would not be 1 million dead and 4 million displaced'
And again, I am sure when they learn in depth, they will ask 'ama ama, is it true that shooting is not the only way to kill people? is it true that even before the invasion sunctions killed 500.000 iraqi childeren every year?'
About Israel:
Actually, the number of childeren and civilians got killed speak for themselves.
119 israeli to 971 palestinians (childeren)
700 israeli to 2000 plastinians (civilians)
And you are the first person calling westbank settlers legal (even Ariel Sharon could not say it. )
ve ve
legality of Israel, mandated by great britan etc (I was reading this really funny book from yalcin peksen and laughing a lot..I wont be reading it tonight..I had enough laugh )
|
|
71. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 02:01 am |
I agree that all the things thehandsom pointed here are true and evil, however, I don't agree that the US is the only country that is guilty of corruption and hypocricy. In fact all the Europeans who so gladly blame everything on the US are just as creepy as the US is.
|
|
73. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 10:23 am |
My turkish friend "thehandsome" seems intent on expressing his anti american views, can you express those views in Iran? or in Iraq when Saddam was in power? I'm sure feedom of speech is quite popular with the Taliban "NOT!" North Korea would be a fun place to express your views. To criticize those areas from within their own borders would most definitely result in some sort of physical discomfort!Yet you can come to the U.S.A. and curse the government aloud, even burn it's flag which is protected by the U.S. constitution then go have lunch when you are all done expressing your views.Join a protest in China and see how fast your day gets ruined.I am assuming you are in Turkey, Dont hate the U.S.A too much, If it werent for the U.S. military presence in Turkey all these years you just might be speaking russian right now.
|
|
74. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 11:06 am |
i am iranian.. i love iran.. i will die for iran.. although i am a girl..but if there is war i dont mind going to military and fighting for my beautiful country which has beautiful culture.. beautiful people.. and and and.. but
unfortunately.. all that beauty i covered with dark.. and black.
i hate our government.. my life wish is to see it change.
in addition i love turkey. i love turks..because we have very similar culture..
no body can mess with turks or persians..
|
|
75. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 12:19 pm |
Quoting excalibur89: My turkish friend "thehandsome" seems intent on expressing his anti american views, can you express those views in Iran? or in Iraq when Saddam was in power? I'm sure feedom of speech is quite popular with the Taliban "NOT!" North Korea would be a fun place to express your views. To criticize those areas from within their own borders would most definitely result in some sort of physical discomfort!Yet you can come to the U.S.A. and curse the government aloud, even burn it's flag which is protected by the U.S. constitution then go have lunch when you are all done expressing your views.Join a protest in China and see how fast your day gets ruined.I am assuming you are in Turkey, Dont hate the U.S.A too much, If it werent for the U.S. military presence in Turkey all these years you just might be speaking russian right now. |
freedom of speech? :-S
If I was speaking of Russian right now, it was going to be MY PROBLEM. Not yours!
|
|
76. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 12:35 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: femme, I hope you are not a history teacher or a teacher tries to teach logic to students
Ok Ok
I will try to simplfy it for you (because I am getting quite dissapointed here)
Where is Vietnam? (in asia)
where is USA (in north america)?
What is the distance between USA and vietnam? (thousands of miles)
what do you call a country leaves from its own soil and lands on another country's soil with its army? (it is called invaders)
A simple logic here femme!! USA in that conflict is called the 'invading country'.
And the result of invasion is huge number of civilian dead. Millions of civilian deads.
You can not just say 'ah the real reason many died is eastern mentality' and get away with it!!
Even if you tell this to your childeren in a simply way, they will ask you ' ama ama mom, dont you think if USA army did not invade there would not be millions of civilians dead?'
I am sure when they learn how much napalm was used in that war and how many civilians burnt alive, they will ask more different questions!!
when it comes to Iraq war:
where is IRAQ? (in middle east)
where is USA ? (see above! )
what is the distance between usa and iraq (again thousand of miles)
Was Iraq a thread to europe or usa (not really, never!!)
what happened there usa? army invaded iraq.(then of course removed the army, removed the government)
The result of the invasion?( so far) 1 million dead.4 million displaced.
You can not say femme 'trained terrorists bombing everywhere, they are responsible' and get away with it.
Your childeren will turn around ask 'ama ama, if the usa army did not invade, there would not be 1 million dead and 4 million displaced'
And again, I am sure when they learn in depth, they will ask 'ama ama, is it true that shooting is not the only way to kill people? is it true that even before the invasion sunctions killed 500.000 iraqi childeren every year?'
About Israel:
Actually, the number of childeren and civilians got killed speak for themselves.
119 israeli to 971 palestinians (childeren)
700 israeli to 2000 plastinians (civilians)
And you are the first person calling westbank settlers legal (even Ariel Sharon could not say it. )
ve ve
legality of Israel, mandated by great britan etc (I was reading this really funny book from yalcin peksen and laughing a lot..I wont be reading it tonight..I had enough laugh )
|
I tend to agree with the above too, and if the USA had really wanted to kill Saddam, then why did they not use their intellegence in the first Iraq war? The only reason for the invasion of Iraq the first time, was to protect the oil in Kuwait.
|
|
77. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 12:50 pm |
thehandsome
You say if the the russians invaded it would be "your problem", you are missing the point. The U.S. doesnt want it to be your problem.We dont mind taking on the responsibility to see that countries do not get overtaken by conquering governments. We have not invaded and taken control of lands. We have not and will not do what the ottoman empire,persian empire,roman empire and the british empire's have done in past history. Your obvious dislike for the U.S. is blurring your judgement. Ataturk embraced the west and so should you.
|
|
78. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 01:07 pm |
Quoting excalibur89: My turkish friend "thehandsome" seems intent on expressing his anti american views, can you express those views in Iran? or in Iraq when Saddam was in power? I'm sure feedom of speech is quite popular with the Taliban "NOT!" North Korea would be a fun place to express your views. To criticize those areas from within their own borders would most definitely result in some sort of physical discomfort!Yet you can come to the U.S.A. and curse the government aloud, even burn it's flag which is protected by the U.S. constitution then go have lunch when you are all done expressing your views.Join a protest in China and see how fast your day gets ruined.I am assuming you are in Turkey, Dont hate the U.S.A too much, If it werent for the U.S. military presence in Turkey all these years you just might be speaking russian right now. |
This is total crap. US presence in Turkia was never for Turkish interests nor protection. Slimy spying operations from US bases in Turkia, without knowledge of Turkia (betraying Turkia's trust to a so called ally) eventually led to U2 crisis,
The US financial help to Turkia was spent on keeping an army of million strong Turks, only to be sacrificed in the first few days of a possible Russian attack. The cost of keeping this force was probably less than 1/10 of the cost of keeping an American army of the same size and half the strength.
|
|
79. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 01:08 pm |
Quoting excalibur89: thehandsome
You say if the the russians invaded it would be "your problem", you are missing the point. The U.S. doesnt want it to be your problem.We dont mind taking on the responsibility to see that countries do not get overtaken by conquering governments. We have not invaded and taken control of lands. We have not and will not do what the ottoman empire,persian empire,roman empire and the british empire's have done in past history. Your obvious dislike for the U.S. is blurring your judgement. Ataturk embraced the west and so should you. |
haha.
I think somebody really is missing the point.
It is not USA's problem. We want to deal with our own problem. We dont want your help.
Nobody wants your help!!
Why do you keep insisting helping?
ve ve
Dont worry about what Turks embrace. Ataturk did not mean what you think he meant.
|
|
80. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 01:14 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: Quoting excalibur89: My turkish friend "thehandsome" seems intent on expressing his anti american views, can you express those views in Iran? or in Iraq when Saddam was in power? I'm sure feedom of speech is quite popular with the Taliban "NOT!" North Korea would be a fun place to express your views. To criticize those areas from within their own borders would most definitely result in some sort of physical discomfort!Yet you can come to the U.S.A. and curse the government aloud, even burn it's flag which is protected by the U.S. constitution then go have lunch when you are all done expressing your views.Join a protest in China and see how fast your day gets ruined.I am assuming you are in Turkey, Dont hate the U.S.A too much, If it werent for the U.S. military presence in Turkey all these years you just might be speaking russian right now. |
This total crap. US presence in Turkia was never for Turkish interests nor protection. Slimy spying operations from US bases in Turkia, without knowledge of Turkia (betraying Turkia's trust to a so called ally) eventually lead to U2 crisis,
The US financial help to Turkia was spent on keeping an army of million strong Turks, only to be sacrificed in the first few days of a possible Russian attack. The cost of keeping this force was probably less than 1/10 of the cost of keeping an American army of the same size. |
doesnt matter why we were there, it kept the russians away.
We didnt force the turks to let us stay there.the turks are smart enough to know that our presence is a great deterent.
|
|
81. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 01:19 pm |
Check your own history. US forces were no great deterrents in Korean WAR.
Few more similar idiotic remarks from our allies, they will have to move their bases out, in two days.
|
|
82. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 01:21 pm |
Is that why there is a south korea today? If we were as blood thirsty as you think we would have taken the north.
|
|
83. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 01:30 pm |
Quoting excalibur89: Is that why there is a south korea today? If we were as blood thirsty as you think we would have taken the north. |
Read my revised post above.
|
|
84. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 01:35 pm |
South Korea said that it has completed the takeover of 14 US military bases where environmental clean up work is complete.
Under an agreement reached in July last year, South Korea will take over the land occupied by 15 US military bases. The only base yet to be returned is Kooni Range in Maehyangri, southwest of Seoul.
According to the Land Partnership Plan between the two countries, the US will return 59 bases to South Korea by 2011. Of them, 29 bases have undergone environmental surveys.
About 29,000 US troops are currently stationed in South Korea. The US plans to reduce the number to 25,000 by 2008.
THE USA IS NO LONGER NEEDED. A JOB WELL DONE BY UNCLE SAM I SAY. YOU READ THINGS ONE WAY, AND I SEE THEM ANOTHER.
|
|
85. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 01:43 pm |
you really must stop getting your information from al jazeera.
|
|
86. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 01:44 pm |
Both North Koreans and South Koreans are now seriously negotiating a reunion.
They have finally realised, that both sides have been royally screwed. Half a century lost for nothing !
|
|
88. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 02:11 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: femme, I hope you are not a history teacher or a teacher tries to teach logic to students
Ok Ok
I will try to simplfy it for you (because I am getting quite dissapointed here)
|
i wont comment this.
Quoting thehandsom:
Where is Vietnam? (in asia)
where is USA (in north america)?
What is the distance between USA and vietnam? (thousands of miles)
what do you call a country leaves from its own soil and lands on another country's soil with its army? (it is called invaders)
A simple logic here femme!! USA in that conflict is called the 'invading country'.
|
you are disappointing me, man. i thought you came into discussion because you have some basic knowledge on wars history or even the definition of the war.
im impressed by your knowledge on geography.
and tell me what does the distance have to do with the military intervention?
so, are you telling me that turks that took part in korean war were there to invade? what did turks do far away from home?
to you dear logics, USA invaded vietnam, so now vietnam is the part of USA? so what was the purpose of this 'invasion'?
did you read the links i gave to you?
Quoting thehandsom:
And the result of invasion is huge number of civilian dead. Millions of civilian deads.
|
there was no war in soviet union during years 30-39, yet 1,5 - 3 million kazakhs (im not mentioning here other nationalities) died out of hunger and another million died in death camps.
and yet one more time i advise to learn the definitions of military actions.
and im asking you again for any war that took place without civilian casualties.
Quoting thehandsom:
You can not just say 'ah the real reason many died is eastern mentality' and get away with it!!
|
i suggest you learn a bit about vietnam war (actually the whole indochina wars) how and what they did to their own civilians, how they used them as bites, how they shielded themselves with children and women, or how they cut ears of their children in order to show them as the ears of enemies etc etc.
Quoting thehandsom:
Even if you tell this to your childeren in a simply way, they will ask you ' ama ama mom, dont you think if USA army did not invade there would not be millions of civilians dead?'
I am sure when they learn how much napalm was used in that war and how many civilians burnt alive, they will ask more different questions!!
|
im not commenting this.
Quoting thehandsom:
when it comes to Iraq war:
where is IRAQ? (in middle east)
where is USA ? (see above! )
what is the distance between usa and iraq (again thousand of miles)
|
as above
Quoting thehandsom:
Was Iraq a thread to europe or usa (not really, never!!)
|
there were always speculations he had the bio-chemical weapons (actually he had and used on about 300 000 kurds)
and saddam was indeed a threat to the world (stating here he was insane and extremely cruel), therefore UN inspectors were sent to iraq many times to check the situation whom saddam would often kick out of iraq.
Quoting thehandsom:
what happened there usa? army invaded iraq.(then of course removed the army, removed the government)
The result of the invasion?( so far) 1 million dead.4 million displaced.
|
actually, this war was called a war on terrorism, and speculated nuclear bombs saddam supposedly had (lately re-changed into the intervention to bring the democracy to iraq).
all the aims arent reasonable to me.
1. there were no terrorists in iraq (the logics say that saddam being himself a domestic terrorist would not tolerate any other terrorist groups led by osama).
2. we knew now he didnt possess a nuclear weapon.
3. democracy cant be imported. there will be no democracy in the middle east within 500-1000 years so far.
oh, i see today you ve changed your mind and say that 1mln victims are the result of the war, not the victims of allied bullets.
thanks.
and i dont support this war, and any war at all.
Quoting thehandsom:
You can not say femme 'trained terrorists bombing everywhere, they are responsible' and get away with it.
|
why cant i? if there was no terrorist resistance there would be less civilian casualties.
i know many died by aircraft bombings, there were mistakes after mistakes, we all heard about them, and we were all shocked, bombed weddings, funerals. the US army even by mistake attacked british troops, other allied armies. which also was known and took place in the vietnam war, japanese war.
Quoting thehandsom:
Your childeren will turn around ask 'ama ama, if the usa army did not invade, there would not be 1 million dead and 4 million displaced'
And again, I am sure when they learn in depth, they will ask 'ama ama, is it true that shooting is not the only way to kill people? is it true that even before the invasion sunctions killed 500.000 iraqi childeren every year?'
|
no comment
Quoting thehandsom:
About Israel:
Actually, the number of childeren and civilians got killed speak for themselves.
119 israeli to 971 palestinians (childeren)
700 israeli to 2000 plastinians (civilians)
|
look, handsome, you are trying to show how evil are US and israel armies and how innocent are all those terrorists that disturb the peace.
let me tell you one thing, again, back to the eastern mentality, they use women and children as a shield.
why do those mentally sick parents send their little children against armed tanks? why dont they keep them safe away from the conflict areas, like do jews?
why does hezbollah keep ammunitions at schools? why dont they evacuate civilians from the buildings before the warnings given to the lebanese gov?
i could tell you more things.
the thing is that, they never fight soldier against soldier. they hide nehind their 'half human' women and children. isnt there professional army in any of those middle eastern countries? no, they send young women (prostitutes in the past to purify their souls by killing infidels) to blow off in the crowd.
in one word they are cowards, they use their civilians (unlike jews) they have no professional armies, they never accepted the state of israel, and they will never stop being cowards training more terrorists out of poor students, former prostitutes and naive brainwashed youngs from the west.
Quoting thehandsom:
And you are the first person calling westbank settlers legal (even Ariel Sharon could not say it. )
ve ve
|
i wasnt talking about westbank settlement when i mentioned the legality of the israeli state, you knew it perfectly and you are playing with me (typical to an easterner when out of arguements).
you havent read the links i gave you yesterday
Quoting thehandsom:
legality of Israel, mandated by great britan etc (I was reading this really funny book from yalcin peksen and laughing a lot..I wont be reading it tonight..I had enough laugh )
|
dont wanna comment on this (you are running out of arguments)
and i dont know the man, hes obviously not a significant authority in the aspect of international sources.
|
|
89. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 02:16 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: Both North Koreans and South Koreans are now seriously negotiating a reunion.
They have finally realised, that both sides have been royally screwed. Half a century lost for nothing ! |
wow!
what a news! we cant let them be re-united today! we should stop them!
so what holds them to embrace each other, omega?
maybe its evil USA again?
|
|
90. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 02:42 pm |
Evil USA sure tries...But,
1. People know better now,
2, There is also a good USA
|
|
91. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 04:44 pm |
Quoting AlphaF: Evil USA sure tries...But,
1. People know better now,
2, There is also a good USA |
Alpha...we are ALL BED, VERY BED!! Just ask Femme...she will confirm it.
|
|
92. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 07:59 pm |
Quoting excalibur89: thehandsome
You say if the the russians invaded it would be "your problem", you are missing the point. The U.S. doesnt want it to be your problem.We dont mind taking on the responsibility to see that countries do not get overtaken by conquering governments. We have not invaded and taken control of lands. We have not and will not do what the ottoman empire,persian empire,roman empire and the british empire's have done in past history. Your obvious dislike for the U.S. is blurring your judgement. Ataturk embraced the west and so should you. |
Come on! This is ridiculous! What would you say/do if I went to your house, changed everything around so that things are done the right way and established a "base" there to keep an eye on you so that you do things the way I think is right for you! You can't possibly think that the US is the mother Theresa of the world and wants to protect everybody from evil. If the US was so sensitive to people's suffering, they wouldn't allow millions of people to be without homes or healthcare in their own country - for a start. First of all, mind your own business as you would want others to mind theirs! Second of all, open your eyes and cut this naive story.
The US was fighting the Soviets because they didn't want Soviets to take over the world, they wanted themselves to be the dominant power. It is obvious that communism is evil and a total failure, but that wouldn't stop them from invading other countries as military is the one thing that communism does have. So it's surely a great thing that the US stopped the spread of communism. However, don't tell me that they did it for the love of Korea or Turkey. On top of that, some of the tactics they used, like radicalizing muslims are backfiring now and are somewhat shady!
Apart from fighting Soviets, the US does things around the world in order to gain access to resources, that is really a no-brainer. Every other nation under the sun wants to do the exact same thing. We have good examples from the past what happened when the Turks had power, or the British, or (god curse) the Germans. What did they do? Invade other countries to exploit their resources!!!!!!! What I find most hypocritical in the criticism of the US is that those same Turkish people are proud of Ottomans and exploit whoever is weaker whenever they can! Same with Europe - the Brits supported their government's colonialism when they used to be a superpower, but they hate the US for doing what they had supported when it was them...
|
|
93. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 08:28 pm |
Ataturk did not embrace WEST, he embraced civilisation: There is a difference.
|
|
94. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 08:35 pm |
|
|
95. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 08:38 pm |
Quoting catwoman: Quoting excalibur89: thehandsome
You say if the the russians invaded it would be "your problem", you are missing the point. The U.S. doesnt want it to be your problem.We dont mind taking on the responsibility to see that countries do not get overtaken by conquering governments. We have not invaded and taken control of lands. We have not and will not do what the ottoman empire,persian empire,roman empire and the british empire's have done in past history. Your obvious dislike for the U.S. is blurring your judgement. Ataturk embraced the west and so should you. |
Come on! This is ridiculous! What would you say/do if I went to your house, changed everything around so that things are done the right way and established a "base" there to keep an eye on you so that you do things the way I think is right for you! You can't possibly think that the US is the mother Theresa of the world and wants to protect everybody from evil. If the US was so sensitive to people's suffering, they wouldn't allow millions of people to be without homes or healthcare in their own country - for a start. First of all, mind your own business as you would want others to mind theirs! Second of all, open your eyes and cut this naive story.
The US was fighting the Soviets because they didn't want Soviets to take over the world, they wanted themselves to be the dominant power. It is obvious that communism is evil and a total failure, but that wouldn't stop them from invading other countries as military is the one thing that communism does have. So it's surely a great thing that the US stopped the spread of communism. However, don't tell me that they did it for the love of Korea or Turkey. On top of that, some of the tactics they used, like radicalizing muslims are backfiring now and are somewhat shady!
Apart from fighting Soviets, the US does things around the world in order to gain access to resources, that is really a no-brainer. Every other nation under the sun wants to do the exact same thing. We have good examples from the past what happened when the Turks had power, or the British, or (god curse) the Germans. What did they do? Invade other countries to exploit their resources!!!!!!! What I find most hypocritical in the criticism of the US is that those same Turkish people are proud of Ottomans and exploit whoever is weaker whenever they can! Same with Europe - the Brits supported their government's colonialism when they used to be a superpower, but they hate the US for doing what they had supported when it was them... |
|
|
96. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 08:54 pm |
Quoting excalibur89: you really must stop getting your information from al jazeera. |
You might try expanding your reading to include sources like:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/
http://www.spiegel.de/international/
http://www.haaretz.com/
http://www.iht.com/
http://www.atimes.com/
http://www.csmonitor.com/
and yes....
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/55ABE840-AC30-41D2-BDC9-06BBE2A36665.htm
http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/index.htm
This is just a start...you will find many here read material from a variety of resources in order to form our own opinions.
|
|
97. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 09:14 pm |
|
|
98. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 09:25 pm |
Quoting Roswitha: Alameda is right, expand your mind, read The Guardian, The Independent, and liberal newspaper Ha'retz often very critical of Isreal, DER SPIEGEL, Washington Post, Frankfurter Allgemeine, DIE ZEIT, DIE WELT, forget the Wall Stree Journal (very biased when it comes to Muslim topics) |
Some of these newspapers are very very liberal. I would not concider reading anything generated by news media as expanding your mind.
|
|
99. |
07 Dec 2007 Fri 09:27 pm |
|
|
100. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 05:44 am |
Quoting catwoman: Quoting excalibur89: thehandsome
You say if the the russians invaded it would be "your problem", you are missing the point. The U.S. doesnt want it to be your problem.We dont mind taking on the responsibility to see that countries do not get overtaken by conquering governments. We have not invaded and taken control of lands. We have not and will not do what the ottoman empire,persian empire,roman empire and the british empire's have done in past history. Your obvious dislike for the U.S. is blurring your judgement. Ataturk embraced the west and so should you. |
Come on! This is ridiculous! What would you say/do if I went to your house, changed everything around so that things are done the right way and established a "base" there to keep an eye on you so that you do things the way I think is right for you! You can't possibly think that the US is the mother Theresa of the world and wants to protect everybody from evil. If the US was so sensitive to people's suffering, they wouldn't allow millions of people to be without homes or healthcare in their own country - for a start. First of all, mind your own business as you would want others to mind theirs! Second of all, open your eyes and cut this naive story.
The US was fighting the Soviets because they didn't want Soviets to take over the world, they wanted themselves to be the dominant power. It is obvious that communism is evil and a total failure, but that wouldn't stop them from invading other countries as military is the one thing that communism does have. So it's surely a great thing that the US stopped the spread of communism. However, don't tell me that they did it for the love of Korea or Turkey. On top of that, some of the tactics they used, like radicalizing muslims are backfiring now and are somewhat shady!
Apart from fighting Soviets, the US does things around the world in order to gain access to resources, that is really a no-brainer. Every other nation under the sun wants to do the exact same thing. We have good examples from the past what happened when the Turks had power, or the British, or (god curse) the Germans. What did they do? Invade other countries to exploit their resources!!!!!!! What I find most hypocritical in the criticism of the US is that those same Turkish people are proud of Ottomans and exploit whoever is weaker whenever they can! Same with Europe - the Brits supported their government's colonialism when they used to be a superpower, but they hate the US for doing what they had supported when it was them... |
If you really believe your statements above catwoman, you could say that about anything. Why have order or polices, let's throw moral and ethics out the door. Who is anyone to tell us how to live and keep our households. Why protest against men who are abusive to their wifes.. It's not our business. Tell me when it's right to interfere or not with other countries? When they need aid, trade but not diplomacy...Maybe when it has an impact on us...well of course that is pretty logical.
I just wonder if it wasn't for President Reagan, just how the Germans would be living now a days. The U.S. has done many positive things and I believe they out way the negative. When having to make difficult decisions at any level also comes the consequences of public outcry and disagreement. It's no popularity contest with the U.S. and yet we suffer and accept the consequences that come with it.
One thing I do agree with you is the hypocrisy of other countries who have invaded other countries for their personal gain, but have selective memory of their past.
Mother Theresa has a nice tune...
|
|
101. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 05:46 am |
Quoting Elisabeth: Quoting Roswitha: Alameda is right, expand your mind, read The Guardian, The Independent, and liberal newspaper Ha'retz often very critical of Isreal, DER SPIEGEL, Washington Post, Frankfurter Allgemeine, DIE ZEIT, DIE WELT, forget the Wall Stree Journal (very biased when it comes to Muslim topics) |
Some of these newspapers are very very liberal. I would not concider reading anything generated by news media as expanding your mind. |
I agree Elisabeth, very liberal...
|
|
102. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 07:50 am |
Thehandsome uses a jewish poet for his defence! (alan ginsberg). that is beautiful.Will you be wearing a "I support alan ginsberg" shirt while you are protesting for a free palestine? you will definitely make the front page of the newspaper, haha
|
|
103. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 08:23 am |
should i mention that he was gay? you are really scraping the bottom of the barrell.
|
|
104. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 09:11 am |
Quoting teaschip1:
I agree Elisabeth, very liberal... |
Liberal= open minded, generous, progressive, tolerant
Antonym = closed minded, stingy, narrow minded, intolerant
|
|
105. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 09:51 am |
Quoting Elisabeth: Some of these newspapers are very very liberal. I would not concider reading anything generated by news media as expanding your mind. |
Ummm Elizabeth....do you seriously think these news sources are "very very" liberal? The British Broadcasting Corporation, Der Spiegel, Haaretz, International Herald Tribune, Asia Times, Christian Science Monitor....?
I try to get information from a broad spectrum of sources and include publications such as Al Jazeerea, Al Ahram, Todays Zaman, Hurriyet and Gulf News and the Jerusalem Post
It does get tedious reading all these...and I don't read them all everyday, but I try to read them all at least once a week.
I don't read them to "expand" my mind per say, but rather to get an idea of what is happening in the world, and gauge different perspectives.
|
|
106. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 12:51 pm |
Quoting excalibur89: Thehandsome uses a jewish poet for his defence! (alan ginsberg). that is beautiful.Will you be wearing a "I support alan ginsberg" shirt while you are protesting for a free palestine? you will definitely make the front page of the newspaper, haha |
haha
It was not for a defence! It was a "GIFT" for you.
Did not like it?
I can send you Rambo movies if you like.
|
|
107. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 12:52 pm |
Quoting excalibur89: should i mention that he was gay? you are really scraping the bottom of the barrell. |
I did not know he was gay.
It DOES matter for you, I guess!
|
|
108. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 01:13 pm |
Quoting teaschip1:
If you really believe your statements above catwoman, you could say that about anything. Why have order or polices, let's throw moral and ethics out the door. Who is anyone to tell us how to live and keep our households. Why protest against men who are abusive to their wifes.. It's not our business. Tell me when it's right to interfere or not with other countries? When they need aid, trade but not diplomacy...Maybe when it has an impact on us...well of course that is pretty logical.
I just wonder if it wasn't for President Reagan, just how the Germans would be living now a days. The U.S. has done many positive things and I believe they out way the negative. When having to make difficult decisions at any level also comes the consequences of public outcry and disagreement. It's no popularity contest with the U.S. and yet we suffer and accept the consequences that come with it.
One thing I do agree with you is the hypocrisy of other countries who have invaded other countries for their personal gain, but have selective memory of their past.
Mother Theresa has a nice tune... |
It is amazing!!
YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO INTERFERE!!!
Dont you see that?!!!!
Whenever and whereever you go with your army, your country is commiting WAR CRIMES and crimes against humanity.
And you are telling us 'THIS is making difficul decisions and consquences'. Phew!!!
|
|
109. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 02:29 pm |
The Ottoman Empire never committed war crimes and your beloved country is all about human rights too.
I love it when Turkey would like us to interfer with Northern Iraq and the PKK, they love no problems. It's called CONVENIENCE, handsome. Why does your government insist that the U.S. share real time intelligence with you, if they are so against help from the U.S.
We have every RIGHT to make descisions on behalf of our country, if it has an impact on us. That would be just as shallow to say TURKEY has no right to go after the PKK.
|
|
110. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 02:34 pm |
Quoting excalibur89: Thehandsome uses a jewish poet for his defence! (alan ginsberg). that is beautiful.Will you be wearing a "I support alan ginsberg" shirt while you are protesting for a free palestine? you will definitely make the front page of the newspaper, haha |
Yes, him and Alpha will be at the front line.
|
|
111. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 03:07 pm |
Quoting teaschip1: The Ottoman Empire never committed war crimes and your beloved country is all about human rights too.
I love it when Turkey would like us to interfer with Northern Iraq and the PKK, they love no problems. It's called CONVENIENCE, handsome. Why does your government insist that the U.S. share real time intelligence with you, if they are so against help from the U.S.
We have every RIGHT to make descisions on behalf of our country, if it has an impact on us. That would be just as shallow to say TURKEY has no right to go after the PKK. |
I never ever said that Ottomans DID NOT commit war crimes. And I am quite ashamed of my country's human rights records.
Iraq is not your country..Share the intelligance or not..I dont care. I always said Turkey should not invade Northern Iraq.
Yes. You made your decision about Iraq, because of the OIL. Everybody knows that Iraq was not a threat to USA.
Are you suggesting that because you need oil and oil has huge impact on you(r economy), so you have right to invade a country and get 1.000.000 million people killed?
As I said before: this is day time oil robbery.
|
|
112. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 03:16 pm |
What intelligence does US have, to share?
|
|
113. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 03:22 pm |
Quoting thehandsom:
YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO INTERFERE!!!
|
who said so?
Quoting thehandsom:
Whenever and whereever you go with your army, your country is commiting WAR CRIMES and crimes against humanity.
|
do you often fantasise?
Quoting thehandsom:
And you are telling us 'THIS is making difficul decisions and consquences'. Phew!!!
|
TPU! you possibly are the only person that doesnt produce/bear the consequences.
TPU!
|
|
114. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 03:30 pm |
|
|
115. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 03:34 pm |
Quoting thehandsom:
I never ever said that Ottomans DID NOT commit war crimes. And I am quite ashamed of my country's human rights records.
|
yes, correct, 'im not that much loud about those issues, as im when its related to US and the west!'
Quoting thehandsom:
Iraq is not your country..Share the intelligance or not..I dont care. I always said Turkey should not invade Northern Iraq.
|
invasion! i can see how tomorrow iraq is going to be 51 state of USA.
Quoting thehandsom:
Yes. You made your decision about Iraq, because of the OIL. Everybody knows that Iraq was not a threat to USA.
Are you suggesting that because you need oil and oil has huge impact on you(r economy), so you have right to invade a country and get 1.000.000 million people killed?
As I said before: this is day time oil robbery.
|
'because of OIL' is a very cheap and shallow statement i always hear!
1. iraq is not the only OILY country. the saudi is much richer with oil, then why not 'invade' saudi or all the other oily countries? USA has enough powerful military to do so.
2. if USA needs oil it could have had it long ago, it could have occupied the whole area a half century ago.
3. USA has alerady has a potential influence on the OIL market, in other words it has the most of consessions and the market under the control.
pls, read about a bit of oil and its history, i recommend the book THE PRIZE of daniel yergin, the authority in this sphere.
|
|
116. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 03:36 pm |
Femme did you marry a bed amerikan
Did you convert to the amerikan dream?
|
|
117. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 03:37 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: Femme did you marry a bed amerikan
Did you convert to the amerikan dream? |
i married a common sense and converted to the reality!
|
|
118. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 03:41 pm |
Quoting femme_fatal: Quoting thehandsom:
I never ever said that Ottomans DID NOT commit war crimes. And I am quite ashamed of my country's human rights records.
|
yes, correct, 'im not that much loud about those issues, as im when its related to US and the west!'
Quoting thehandsom:
Iraq is not your country..Share the intelligance or not..I dont care. I always said Turkey should not invade Northern Iraq.
|
invasion! i can see how tomorrow iraq is going to be 51 state of USA.
Quoting thehandsom:
Yes. You made your decision about Iraq, because of the OIL. Everybody knows that Iraq was not a threat to USA.
Are you suggesting that because you need oil and oil has huge impact on you(r economy), so you have right to invade a country and get 1.000.000 million people killed?
As I said before: this is day time oil robbery.
|
'because of OIL' is a very cheap and shallow statement i always hear!
1. iraq is not the only OILY country. the saudi is much richer with oil, then why not 'invade' saudi or all the other oily countries? USA has enough powerful military to do so.
2. if USA needs oil it could have had it long ago, it could have occupied the whole area a half century ago.
3. USA has alerady has a potential influence on the OIL market, in other words it has the most of consessions and the market under the control.
pls, read about a bit of oil and its history, i recommend the book THE PRIZE of daniel yergin, the authority in this sphere.
|
You are cracking me here again femme..
Does USA need to invade Saudi for oil?
USA NEED oil today and tomorrow.
And when do you call an invasion 'an invasion' then?
haha
|
|
119. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 03:42 pm |
Quoting femme_fatal: Quoting AEnigma III: Femme did you marry a bed amerikan
Did you convert to the amerikan dream? |
i married a common sense and converted to the reality! |
You are dellusional femme!!
|
|
120. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 03:42 pm |
No chance of a Femme-Handsom wedding this year then
|
|
121. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 03:44 pm |
handsome, you are not serious! you are making fun, while i have a serious attitude to you.
i suggest you read a little bit more about wars and their origins, and of course about OIL before entering the discussion.
if you have nothing serious to say to me, go and have fun with exsalibur or teaschip.
EOT
|
|
122. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 03:47 pm |
Quoting AEnigma III: No chance of a Femme-Handsom wedding this year then |
Of course not..
I could not do it to Sui anyway!!
|
|
123. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 04:02 pm |
Quoting femme_fatal: handsome, you are not serious! you are making fun, while i have a serious attitude to you.
i suggest you read a little bit more about wars and their origins, and of course about OIL before entering the discussion.
if you have nothing serious to say to me, go and have fun with exsalibur or teaschip.
EOT |
I did not want to upset you to be honest. If I did, apologies!!
But femme,
I am giving you the death tolls, I am giving you the numbers, I am giving you the number of childeren got killed (children like yours, like mine) and you are always coming back with the way Bush would defend himself or you are coming back with the spirit of Ariel Sharon (another war criminal!!).
And you are still try to defend the undefendeable!!
Again apologies if I did upset you!!
|
|
124. |
08 Dec 2007 Sat 04:24 pm |
Quoting thehandsom: Quoting femme_fatal: Quoting AEnigma III: Femme did you marry a bed amerikan
Did you convert to the amerikan dream? |
i married a common sense and converted to the reality! |
You are dellusional femme!! |
then here some illusions
http://www.aish.com/jewishissues/mediaobjectivity/Photo_Fraud_in_Lebanon.asp
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=canTCmXEMk8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sendPypV784
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFBMJF6heC0
|
|
|
(124 Messages in 13 pages - View all)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... >>
|
Thread locked by a moderator or admin. |
|
|