DD is !!  (catwoman, now that you seem to have chosen for Meltem..)

 Is this all name? My spirit is really broken but your spirit is good, if you love me you would help. But you are not around, you only write message, I have 5 days left, the one who is having hard time is me!

Im not sure about it, the last part seems incomplete or something.

 Well it would, if not most news about Pamuk is followed by how some Turks see him

Pedaliza, a warning about your use of language. Please refrain from speaking in Turkish in the forums where English is the language of conduct. Other members would maybe like to follow your ´conversation´ as well, so please keep it in English. You can ´practice´ your Turkish in forums that are meant for the usage of Turkish.

The thread has been locked now, but in further threads I ask you to do this.

Yes we learnt about this elektronik muhtýrasý, it took me ages to understand what the word meant :S 

 Correct

Only, its the other way around. Arkadaþ is a normal friend and a dost is a very close friend. You can have many arkadaþ, but most people only have a handful of dost

Actually I dont totally agree. It is so frequently used, that you get used to different usages easily. It may be hard to use it for yourself in your own produced sentences at first, but you get acquainted with certains forms of it really fast and start adopting them in your own speech quickly too. 

 ´And to me there is no bad thing about being in contact with the political parties and civillian societies...´   - This is what you said literally. All Aenigma and I said, is that we think it is bad if ARMY is involved politically in the governing of the country. I did not say that this is the case in TR, I said this statement as a consequence of what you think. And I said I think that is a bad consequence.

And I find your second paragraph very patronising. How do you know I do not watch Turkish television?  I did not ´mislead´ your words or misunderstand what you said (as a matter of fact, I said I agree with you till an extent that I think it should be a transition-phase and not a common base for governing).

And you contradict yourself: you say ´army has not a move in politics´ but you also say ´All the powers that has something to do with governing a country... has to be in touch with eachother for a better result´. Which means that, if army has to talk with government, it does have a move in politics.

I agree that all the powers that have something to do with governing a country have to be in touch with eachother. I jsut dont believe that the army should be one of those powers.

Next time I´d appreciate if you read my words more carefully (then you would see I partially agree with you and never said that army has direct influence on politics, and you would see I see this as a solution, not as a ´fire of misunderstanding´ ), instead of ´advicing´ me I should watch more Turkish news and accusing me of eagerness to burn the jungle.

 Sounds like an immediate need for a change in the constitution!!

 I agree with Aenigma.

But if it is too hard for Turkey to switch from system quickly, I don´t think it is bad that army goes in conversation with the political parties about the sollution. This might be a good transfer-phase for a time when the army is no longer the second government (if not the first).