Welcome
Login:   Pass:     Register - Forgot Password - Resend Activation

Turkish Class Forums / Turkish Politics

Turkish Politics

Add reply to this discussion
Why most 'educated' Turks are more close-minded!!
(104 Messages in 11 pages - View all)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...  >>
1.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 17 May 2008 Sat 01:48 pm

How RIGHT he is!!

.............. These European-looking Turks are also quite militarist and nationalist according to Western standards.

.......................
It actually means indoctrination. In others words, the education system is not designed to raise individuals who believe in democracy, freedom, pluralism or critical thinking. It is rather designed to inculcate all students with the “state ideology.”
......................
Just spend some time in a Turkish primary or high school, and you will see what I mean. Students start and end every week by swearing an oath of allegiance to Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, around whom our state ideology has built a cult of personality. “O mighty Atatürk who has given us this day,” all students recite, “I swear that I will walk relentlessly on your path.” The oath ends with a collectivist promise of sacrifice: “Let my existence be a gift to Turkish existence!”

The education system, which constantly praises the “Turkish existence,” curiously says nothing about the existence of other ethnic identities in Turkey. The society is portrayed as a homogenous entity. The Kurds and other groups are never mentioned, and when you finish your education, you simply know nothing about them.
...............................

Actually the whole education system gives you the impression that everybody except the Kemalists are traitors.

............concepts such as democracy or individual freedom simply do not exist. You can’t blame Atatürk for that, because in his time, other ideas such as “statism” were popular and he naturally embraced them. Yet, times have changed, whereas the system stays untouched.

........... we all became free with the founding of the independent Turkish Republic in 1923. Whether that republic has granted us the citizens freedom was a question that was remarkably ignored. What really mattered was the freedom of our state from foreign powers. Our own freedom was not a value worth mentioning.

.................
That's why quite many Turks, who are otherwise smart and reasonable people, will go irrational when you start to question the national myths of nationalism or ultra-secularism.

Of course, there are also many people who have gone outside the box. There are, first of all, the self-declared liberals who have realized that the system is authoritarian and it needs to be liberalized. They are influential, but very tiny. Moreover, other elites, the Kemalist ones, see them as either naïve or treacherous.

............... Therefore, the only way out for Turkey remains what it has been since the times of Turgut Özal and the first period of the AKP: Liberal democracy promoted by the EU, articulated by the liberals, and supported by the conservatives. Even if the AKP is closed, this momentum will go on under another party. And the Kurds will be much better off if they jump onto this train instead of playing Che Guevara in the mountains of the southeast.

As the potential of the illiberal elite to accept liberal democracy, though, I am not very optimistic. As evidenced by their unbelievably reactionary stance, their minds are just too “educated” to breach.

Mustafa AKYOL


http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=104720

2.       catwoman
8933 posts
 17 May 2008 Sat 10:26 pm

Quoting thehandsom:


.............. These European-looking Turks are also quite militarist and nationalist according to Western standards.

.......................
It actually means indoctrination. In others words, the education system is not designed to raise individuals who believe in democracy, freedom, pluralism or critical thinking. It is rather designed to inculcate all students with the “state ideology.”
......................
Just spend some time in a Turkish primary or high school, and you will see what I mean. Students start and end every week by swearing an oath of allegiance to Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, around whom our state ideology has built a cult of personality. “O mighty Atatürk who has given us this day,” all students recite, “I swear that I will walk relentlessly on your path.” The oath ends with a collectivist promise of sacrifice: “Let my existence be a gift to Turkish existence!”

The education system, which constantly praises the “Turkish existence,” curiously says nothing about the existence of other ethnic identities in Turkey. The society is portrayed as a homogenous entity. The Kurds and other groups are never mentioned, and when you finish your education, you simply know nothing about them.
...............................

Actually the whole education system gives you the impression that everybody except the Kemalists are traitors.

............concepts such as democracy or individual freedom simply do not exist. You can’t blame Atatürk for that, because in his time, other ideas such as “statism” were popular and he naturally embraced them. Yet, times have changed, whereas the system stays untouched.

........... we all became free with the founding of the independent Turkish Republic in 1923. Whether that republic has granted us the citizens freedom was a question that was remarkably ignored. What really mattered was the freedom of our state from foreign powers. Our own freedom was not a value worth mentioning.

.................
That's why quite many Turks, who are otherwise smart and reasonable people, will go irrational when you start to question the national myths of nationalism or ultra-secularism.

Of course, there are also many people who have gone outside the box. There are, first of all, the self-declared liberals who have realized that the system is authoritarian and it needs to be liberalized. They are influential, but very tiny. Moreover, other elites, the Kemalist ones, see them as either naïve or treacherous.

............... Therefore, the only way out for Turkey remains what it has been since the times of Turgut Özal and the first period of the AKP: Liberal democracy promoted by the EU, articulated by the liberals, and supported by the conservatives. Even if the AKP is closed, this momentum will go on under another party. And the Kurds will be much better off if they jump onto this train instead of playing Che Guevara in the mountains of the southeast.

As the potential of the illiberal elite to accept liberal democracy, though, I am not very optimistic. As evidenced by their unbelievably reactionary stance, their minds are just too “educated” to breach.

Mustafa AKYOL


Such great thoughts and observations... I have had this thought on my mind for a long time! So many educated Turks that I know are still VERY nationalistic, uncritical, and have very homogenous ideas about everything related to Turkey! No critical thought, no variations of the story... They all think the same!!!! It is very true that if the "educated" Turks are so brainwashed then there is no hope for a liberal democracy in Turkey.

3.       armegon
1872 posts
 18 May 2008 Sun 03:06 am

Hmmm, nice reading from American product evangelist liberal islamist...
Way to go Mustafa Whitepath

4.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 18 May 2008 Sun 09:55 am

Quoting armegon:

Hmmm, nice reading from American product evangelist liberal islamist...
Way to go Mustafa Whitepath


But he is right on spot..Is he not? lol

5.       catwoman
8933 posts
 18 May 2008 Sun 10:01 am

Quoting thehandsom:

But he is right on spot..Is he not? lol


yes, he is.

6.       SuiGeneris
3922 posts
 18 May 2008 Sun 10:03 am

I am not offended by this title

7.       catwoman
8933 posts
 18 May 2008 Sun 10:08 am

Quoting SuiGeneris:

I am not offended by this title


Armegon is lol

8.       SuiGeneris
3922 posts
 18 May 2008 Sun 10:10 am

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting SuiGeneris:

I am not offended by this title


Armegon is lol



To be FRANK, though my name is not frank ,

I havent read the article yet! just commented about the title

9.       catwoman
8933 posts
 18 May 2008 Sun 10:19 am

anxiously awaiting your comments about the article

10.       armegon
1872 posts
 18 May 2008 Sun 01:18 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting thehandsom:

But he is right on spot..Is he not? lol


yes, he is.



Asked to me why you jumped like we said in Turkish “yırtık don misali”
Answer: No lol

11.       incişka
746 posts
 20 May 2008 Tue 02:08 am

good article I got a student who shouted out "Happy is the one who says I am Turk" every morning, but when in class came close to me and said "teacher, do u know indeed I'm Kurd, but I can speak only a few words". She said it in a way as if being a Kurd was something disgraceful. And I told her she is lucky to have the opportunity to learn Kurdish as well as Turkish. I suggested that she learned Kurdish from her parents. Well.. I dont know... :-S why cant everyone be just themselves? studnoe chustno!!

12.       catwoman
8933 posts
 20 May 2008 Tue 02:17 am

Quoting incişka:

good article I got a student who shouted out "Happy is the one who says I am Turk" every morning, but when in class came close to me and said "teacher, do u know indeed I'm Kurd, but I can speak only a few words". She said it in a way as if being a Kurd was something disgraceful. And I told her she is lucky to have the opportunity to learn Kurdish as well as Turkish. I suggested that she learned Kurdish from her parents. Well.. I dont know... :-S why cant everyone be just themselves? studnoe chustno!!


13.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 20 May 2008 Tue 02:19 am

Quoting incişka:

good article I got a student who shouted out "Happy is the one who says I am Turk" every morning, but when in class came close to me and said "teacher, do u know indeed I'm Kurd, but I can speak only a few words". She said it in a way as if being a Kurd was something disgraceful. And I told her she is lucky to have the opportunity to learn Kurdish as well as Turkish. I suggested that she learned Kurdish from her parents. Well.. I dont know... :-S why cant everyone be just themselves? studnoe chustno!!


why cant everyone be just themselves?
The answer is simple: Because of close-minded, nationalist/near racist people.
The sad thing is that many of them, still, are not aware where racism starts, where it ends, what it is and how racist they are..

14.       incişka
746 posts
 20 May 2008 Tue 02:22 am

dreaming of a world like in Aitmatov's "A day extends to be a century"... though knowing that it will always be a dream...

15.       armegon
1872 posts
 20 May 2008 Tue 02:48 am

Then most of the teachers and professors are also close-minded but Mustafa Whitepath, thehandsom and incişka are open-minded

16.       Deli_kizin
6376 posts
 20 May 2008 Tue 03:18 am

Quoting armegon:

Then most of the teachers and professors are also close-minded but Mustafa Whitepath, thehandsom and incişka are open-minded



Right on spot Armegon

17.       incişka
746 posts
 20 May 2008 Tue 03:19 am

Quoting armegon:

Then most of the teachers and professors are also close-minded but Mustafa Whitepath, thehandsom and incişka are open-minded


why need to say that?

18.       armegon
1872 posts
 20 May 2008 Tue 03:32 am

Difficult question, i thought they are educated and educating. Somehow you met by chance with open-minded ones...

19.       incişka
746 posts
 20 May 2008 Tue 03:43 am

Quoting armegon:

Difficult question, i thought they are educated and educating. Somehow you met by chance with open-minded ones...


who says my teachers were open-minded? Only 1 of them was. And he wasnt a formal school teacher at all!
Yes, they are educated in a way that some people wanted them to be educated. And they are continuing to educate ppl in the way they were educated. Clear?

20.       MrX67
2540 posts
 20 May 2008 Tue 12:50 pm

such a shame to make ugly policies based on unvolitional (ethnics,beliefs,nationalities etc..)criterions.And i think our great country's one of main problem that,we still trying to creat new policies for make stronger our democracy depend on ethnics or beliefs,while a real democracy's road pass on from a strong and just economical system.Only science,fabrics,production,more employ,productivity,justly shariing can make stronger our democracy by to be respectfull to all unvolitional div ersities under one flag and in the same borders...But pity false intellectuals using inncoent people's unvolitional diversities just for keep their chairs and just for their selfish political aims,we need more food,more friendship,more understanding,better education instead of to be be fish on fishooks of foxy politicans or false intellectuals.And i think everyone have to be aware of that ''Turkishness''only an upper culture and always possible to live in peace and side by side under of this upper culture by keeping our ethnical and belief diversities...

21.       incişka
746 posts
 20 May 2008 Tue 01:06 pm

Quoting MrX67:

such a shame to make ugly policies based on unvolitional (ethnics,beliefs,nationalities etc..)criterions.And i think our great country's one of main problem that,we still trying to creat new policies for make stronger our democracy depend on ethnics or beliefs,while a real democracy's road pass on from a strong and just economical system.Only science,fabrics,production,more employ,productivity,justly shariing can make stronger our democracy by to be respectfull to all unvolitional div ersities under one flag and in the same borders...But pity false intellectuals using inncoent people's unvolitional diversities just for keep their chairs and just for their selfish political aims,we need more food,more friendship,more understanding,better education instead of to be be fish on fishooks of foxy politicans or false intellectuals.And i think everyone have to be aware of that ''Turkishness''only an upper culture and always possible to live in peace and side by side under of this upper culture by keeping our ethnical and belief diversities...



I agree

22.       Lapinkulta
0 posts
 20 May 2008 Tue 08:18 pm

Quote:

Quote:



Mustafa AKYOL


Such great thoughts and observations... I have had this thought on my mind for a long time! So many educated Turks that I know are still VERY nationalistic, uncritical, and have very homogenous ideas about everything related to Turkey! No critical thought, no variations of the story... They all think the same!!!! It is very true that if the "educated" Turks are so brainwashed then there is no hope for a liberal democracy in Turkey.



good observations...and he described me with his article
Im happy to be like that..it is better than living under pressure of foreigneru want ppl that Turkish should serve uu cant tolerate educated Turks U cant tolerate uneducated turks as wellu want turkish man who got married with a foreign girl and live in her country

u understood what I meant sekerim

23.       Elisabeth
5732 posts
 20 May 2008 Tue 09:32 pm

Quote:

Quote:

Quoting Lapinkulta:



Mustafa AKYOL


Such great thoughts and observations... I have had this thought on my mind for a long time! So many educated Turks that I know are still VERY nationalistic, uncritical, and have very homogenous ideas about everything related to Turkey! No critical thought, no variations of the story... They all think the same!!!! It is very true that if the "educated" Turks are so brainwashed then there is no hope for a liberal democracy in Turkey.



good observations...and he described me with his article
Im happy to be like that..it is better than living under pressure of foreigneru want ppl that Turkish should serve uu cant tolerate educated Turks U cant tolerate uneducated turks as wellu want turkish man who got married with a foreign girl and live in her country

u understood what I meant sekerim



Applications for Dudus are being accepted on the TC Wedding Forum Lappy!! lol

24.       Lapinkulta
0 posts
 22 May 2008 Thu 08:30 am

Quote:

Quote:

Quoting Elisabeth:

Quoting Lapinkulta:



Mustafa AKYOL


Such great thoughts and observations... I have had this thought on my mind for a long time! So many educated Turks that I know are still VERY nationalistic, uncritical, and have very homogenous ideas about everything related to Turkey! No critical thought, no variations of the story... They all think the same!!!! It is very true that if the "educated" Turks are so brainwashed then there is no hope for a liberal democracy in Turkey.



good observations...and he described me with his article
Im happy to be like that..it is better than living under pressure of foreigneru want ppl that Turkish should serve uu cant tolerate educated Turks U cant tolerate uneducated turks as wellu want turkish man who got married with a foreign girl and live in her country

u understood what I meant sekerim



Applications for Dudus are being accepted on the TC Wedding Forum Lappy!! lol



Im sorry sekerim, Im not interested in DUDUs...invite other ppl as they are your companions

25.       Daydreamer
3743 posts
 22 May 2008 Thu 10:12 am

Interesting...actually all my Turkish friends are well-educated but none of them is a nationalist. Patriotic - of course, but never narrow-minded. And nothing like our whiny BSB

26.       Lapinkulta
0 posts
 22 May 2008 Thu 10:17 am

Quoting Daydreamer:

Interesting...actually all my Turkish friends are well-educated but none of them is a nationalist. Patriotic - of course, but never narrow-minded. And nothing like our whiny BSB



person who posted this thread and its supporters are so narrow minded, anti turk, racist, anti islamist, person who has at middle age mentality...

27.       lady in red
6947 posts
 22 May 2008 Thu 10:48 am

Quoting Lapinkulta:

Quoting Daydreamer:

Interesting...actually all my Turkish friends are well-educated but none of them is a nationalist. Patriotic - of course, but never narrow-minded. And nothing like our whiny BSB



person who posted this thread and its supporters are so narrow minded, anti turk, racist, anti islamist, person who has at middle age mentality...



And what would you say your mental age is şekerim?

28.       Lapinkulta
0 posts
 22 May 2008 Thu 10:55 am

Quoting lady in red:

Quoting Lapinkulta:

Quoting Daydreamer:

Interesting...actually all my Turkish friends are well-educated but none of them is a nationalist. Patriotic - of course, but never narrow-minded. And nothing like our whiny BSB



person who posted this thread and its supporters are so narrow minded, anti turk, racist, anti islamist, person who has at middle age mentality...



And what would you say your mental age is şekerim?



more than yours sekerim

29.       Daydreamer
3743 posts
 22 May 2008 Thu 11:17 am

Quoting Lapinkulta:



person who posted this thread and its supporters are so narrow minded, anti turk, racist, anti islamist, person who has at middle age mentality...



I don't find the person who posted this thread any of what you wrote. As for middle age mentality...I thought experience is something to value lol

30.       lady in red
6947 posts
 22 May 2008 Thu 11:18 am

Quoting Lapinkulta:

Quoting lady in red:

Quoting Lapinkulta:

Quoting Daydreamer:

Interesting...actually all my Turkish friends are well-educated but none of them is a nationalist. Patriotic - of course, but never narrow-minded. And nothing like our whiny BSB



person who posted this thread and its supporters are so narrow minded, anti turk, racist, anti islamist, person who has at middle age mentality...



And what would you say your mental age is şekerim?



more than yours sekerim



So - as I have a middle-age mentality (as a supporter of the person who posted this thread), that means you have an old-age mentality? Wow! That explains everything - you are SENILE!!

lol lol

But - conversely - what a childish 'my dad's bigger than your dad' type response to my last post.

31.       Lapinkulta
0 posts
 22 May 2008 Thu 11:56 pm

Quoting lady in red:

Quoting Lapinkulta:

Quoting lady in red:

Quoting Lapinkulta:

Quoting Daydreamer:

Interesting...actually all my Turkish friends are well-educated but none of them is a nationalist. Patriotic - of course, but never narrow-minded. And nothing like our whiny BSB



person who posted this thread and its supporters are so narrow minded, anti turk, racist, anti islamist, person who has at middle age mentality...



And what would you say your mental age is şekerim?



more than yours sekerim





So - as I have a middle-age mentality (as a supporter of the person who posted this thread), that means you have an old-age mentality? Wow! That explains everything - you are SENILE!!

lol lol

But - conversely - what a childish 'my dad's bigger than your dad' type response to my last post.




it seems that u are getting clever..welldone ,go on following up my posts, sekerim...

32.       lady in red
6947 posts
 23 May 2008 Fri 12:09 am

Quoting Lapinkulta:

Quoting lady in red:

Quoting Lapinkulta:

Quoting lady in red:

Quoting Lapinkulta:

Quoting Daydreamer:

Interesting...actually all my Turkish friends are well-educated but none of them is a nationalist. Patriotic - of course, but never narrow-minded. And nothing like our whiny BSB



person who posted this thread and its supporters are so narrow minded, anti turk, racist, anti islamist, person who has at middle age mentality...



And what would you say your mental age is şekerim?



more than yours sekerim





So - as I have a middle-age mentality (as a supporter of the person who posted this thread), that means you have an old-age mentality? Wow! That explains everything - you are SENILE!!

lol lol

But - conversely - what a childish 'my dad's bigger than your dad' type response to my last post.




it seems that u are getting clever..welldone ,go on following up my posts, sekerim...



I always WAS clever şekerım and you posts brighten up my life

33.       cynicmystic
567 posts
 12 Jun 2008 Thu 10:24 pm

I am neither sure from which country the individual who posted this article is nor do I particularly care about it. Unlike you, however, I will show the courtesy of sharing with others my background, which is Turkish. Had you done the same, we would know where you are from, as well.

Copy-pasting a rather "biased" article to start a "charged" topic without any of your own input or thoughts clearly shows that unless someone else puts it into writing, you do not seem to be able to do it for yourself. As a result, instead of responding to your own thoughts, the readers of your pathetic thread are forced to respond to an "article". Well, we might as well send a carbon copy of our replies to the publishing newspaper as well, wouldn't you say?

Since my reply is actually to an article, I hope you won't take what I say personally, and be offended.

Let's start with an analysis of the bombastic lingo in this article...

".............. These European-looking Turks are also quite militarist and nationalist according to Western standards."

What the hell are we supposed to understand from an idiotic statement like this? The look that has been falsely labelled as "European" is actually "Caucasian", which is surely not in the monopoly of Europeans exclusively. The Caucasian look belongs to Eurasia, and the Caucauses, the origin of the term itself, is ironically closer to Turkey than to any Western Europen country. If the European look is referring to the un-Islamic & fashionable outfits in Turkey, then, it must be said that there are more mullahs in London & Paris these days than there are in Turkey.

Another important issue is the criteria for the so-called "western standards" in regards to being "militaristic nationalists". Believe me that there are no such standards, and any bombastic author that makes such references in his writing is surely talking out of his ass. On a different tune, Europeans aren't impressing anyone in the world with their "European standards" anymore anyways. Those days have been over for quite a while.

Regarding the issue of indoctrination at Turkish schools, I am surprised by how one-sided his view is. Every country in the world that has an education system & a national identity indoctrinates their young ones. Yes, the level and intensity of indoctrination varies from country to country, but nevertheless, every country, even the "civilized" Western countries, indoctrinate their children in one form or the other. If the writer of the article, and the other clowns on this forum, who seem to support his views, are claiming that the situation in Turkey is exceptional, and much worse, then I would have to disagree with that.

As someone who had to go through the ritual of "swearing alliance & oath" in the mornings, on the contrary to the writer's claims, I didn't turn out to be a "militaristic Kemalist" bent on supressing other minorities and imposing Kemalist values. In fact, I dislike Kemalists, Nationalists, Patriots, Separatists, Pan-Turkists etc as much as I hate bible-thumping Evangelists, Zionists, Mullahs, and other war-mongering parasites.

For me, the ritual was actually of significant importance, not because it instilled in me a solid sense of "Turkishness & Kemalist values", but simply because it was the only opportunity during the week where all the students gathered in the courtyard. Hormones raging at that age, it was more of a social event where the guys would check out the girls stroll down the stairs, glimpsing at their legs, as each class congregated for the ceremony. As shameless as this may sound, it was a great opportunity to check out the girls that you had a crush on, while winking at the girls, who had a crush on you. Aside from checking out the legs, other very important social activities, such as the exchange of weekend gossip, plans for a soccer game with the rival class during lunch break etc would be discussed.

I never felt like being indoctrinated because, like many of my friends, I never took it seriously, or literally. In fact, had they just bothered to ask, I would have surely preferred to stay in the courtyard all day reciting the oath of alliance than go to classroom. Children in the USA, UK, Germany etc go through severe forms of indoctrination, not only at school, but outside as well through TV and religious activities. Not every corner of North America is as liberal & democratic as New York or LA. I find Americans to be extremely indoctrinated, for example. More so than Turks in fact. The same could be said for the English as well. Writing an article about how children are being brainwashed because of the morning oath is nothing but a cheap shot without much aim.

Let's quote another bombastic statement:

"The education system, which constantly praises the “Turkish existence,” curiously says nothing about the existence of other ethnic identities in Turkey."

The education system doesn't have to say jack about the existence of other ethnicities simply because it is obvious and right there in front of you each time you go for a walk or watch TV. The author would be surprised how many Turks are actually very well aware of the mixed heritage of their homeland and its people in comparison to some of their European & North American counterparts. We all notice the ethnic diversity as well as the non-ethnic diversity.

When I was a little kid, my family lived in the old Armenian quarters of Istanbul, where there was still a significant number of Armenians, who had stayed after WWI. Our right door neighbour was Armenian, and regularly, I would spend evenings at their home playing with their children, if my parents were working late. In the same way, my parents would do the same when they were out. Not only were we aware of each other's existence, but we interacted with each other as well. From a really young age, I also noticed that a lot of construction workers in Istanbul spoke a language that I couldn't understand. It didn't take long to figure out that it was Kurdish. Later on, I also noticed that a lot of the these workers were hired by wealthier Kurdish contractors, who had prospered in Western Turkey, and discriminated and looked down on these workers, as much as their Turkish upper-class Istanbulite friends. Again, later on, I also learned that not all Kurdish dialects spoken in Turkey are mutually intelligable. Zaza, for example, a Kurdish group in Turkey, cannot understand the Kurdish dialect of Kurmanchi, which is spoken by a much larger group of Kurds that live in Turkey, Iran & Iraq. On a trip to the Black Sea region, I couldn't help giggling at the way the locals talked. How there were non-Turkish dialects of Georgian origin still spoken in pockets of remote villages by the elders, or how the Laz originally came from Georgia and mixed with Pontic Greeks of Trebizond were right there in front of you. When we travelled to the Aegean region, the Greco/Anatolian ethnic elements were also visible. The point I am trying to make is that dramatic examples, such as incishka's about how a Kurdish student whispered to her/his ear, or the ones expressed in the article are not only inaccurate observations, but are also generalizations.

Yes, there is discrimination & suppression in Turkey in one form or the other just like everywhere else in the world. However, this discrimination is not exactly or predominantly ethnic. It is a lot more complicated than that. For example, wealthier Turks, usually of Istanbul, discriminate against the so-called "kro" Turks of the eastern provinces. They make fun of the way they talk, call them "peasents", and the very word "kro", which is a derivateive of the name of the Kurdish dialect, Kurmanchi, applies equally to anyone, whether Turkish or Kurdish, that doesn't meet superficial Istanbulite standards.

Among the so-called "peasents of the east", there is uniform resentment against the spoiled, and snobby city-dwellers & the plasticity of their culture. The pan-Turkists, who suffer from a minor case of delusion, want a unified Turkic empire across central Asia. They usually beat up innocent people, who fail to make the "Ulkucu" wolf sign with their hands during their traffic blockdes. The religious fundamentalist pundits come in all shapes and ethnicities ready to massacre all others, too, once given the opportunity. The lower-middle class is always ready to be duped by propaganda and flock out to the streets to protest this or that. Ethnicity hardly ever plays a role in most cases.

The wealthier western Kurds discrminate against other eastern Kurds that are part of the ashiret clan system. The ashiret leaders literally exert authority over thousands of their clan members through their own interpretation of their "tore". It is literally brutal. The political bears of Ankara prize themselves the most in bogus forms of Kemalism, thinking that they are the only ones in the whole country preoccupied with maintaining the unity of our homeland against all outside powers bent on demolishing us, the Republic of Turkey!!!

For many of these multi-ethnical & political posers, if they don't see a framed picture of Ataturk in your office, you are immediately labelled as a parasite to the Kemalist cause.

To keep this brief, the point is rather simple. The truth is that the people, who live in Turkey, regardless of their ethnic origins, are very gullible, and yet not so naive. It is easy to play with their emotions, and manipulate their thoughts, but they are absolutely not products of an educational system that has "brainwashed" them. This observation in the article is wrong.

People who live in Turkey are very well aware of the progress Turkey has made as well as its shortcomings. Nobody of any ethnic background is blind or dumb. On the contrary to the article, we aren't all brainwashed, at least not significantly more than our counterparts in other countries.

Thanks to bombastic news in the media, there is always a way to find a suitable victim to instigate a national paranoia in Turkey - particularly against Greece & Armenia, if not the PKK. You can always pump up the patriotic bravada with bogus media stories about a Greek invasion of a worthless set of islands, or the Armenian diaspora trying to discredit Turks abroad. Barzani was the latest one. It is unbelievable how easy it is to turn masses of normally ordinary people into flag-burning fanatics.

It is also ironic that the very same people not only burn the flags of the perceived-threat countries, but also burn the flags of foreign soccer teams after losing at the European Cup (always due to the ref). Even domestic teams may suffer being burned by the local fanatics. There is always a good reason to protest in Turkey, and ethnic difference is not at the top of the list.

I actually see a bigger problem in Turkish education system than the oath of alliance. Over the years, a significant number of rather annoying members of the English-speaking world have relocated to Turkey as ESL teachers at private schools. These backpacker-turned-ESL-instructors, who are often not qualified to teach ESL in their own contries, are very much welcomed by Turkish people, and are often admired a lot more than they actually deserve. Such foreigners often find out that they are paid quite well in Turkey, and can actually live a lot better in Istanbul (or Izmir & Ankara) than they ever could in their own countries with their intellectual capacities. It is often a matter of months before they find a Turkish girlfriend or boyfriend, get married and settle down. Once this happens, these backpacker-philosophers develop ideas about the problems of Turkey. They share their annoying & often ignorant views generously at dinner parties that they have been invited to by the parents of their private students, who pay them quite a bit of money to tutor their children. So, the side benefits are obvious. And, they gibber & gibber.

They tell us how there are violations of human rights, police brutality, the suppression of Kurds, domestic violence against women, corruption, Turkish mullahs, what Turkey needs to do to join the EU etc etc etc etc. They have a freaking idea about everything, and believe me when I tell you that they annoy the hell out of almost every other "educated" Turk that I know. To these ignorant clowns, the only reason why we, the "more educated Turks" may appear as "close-minded militaristic patriots" is perhaps because that is the image we portray on purpose. Along the same lines, when similar individuals post topics on message boards to psyche people up, we tend to write lengthy replies.

I think your thread is insincere my friend.

Quoting thehandsom:

How RIGHT he is!!

.............. These European-looking Turks are also quite militarist and nationalist according to Western standards.

.......................
It actually means indoctrination. In others words, the education system is not designed to raise individuals who believe in democracy, freedom, pluralism or critical thinking. It is rather designed to inculcate all students with the “state ideology.”
......................
Just spend some time in a Turkish primary or high school, and you will see what I mean. Students start and end every week by swearing an oath of allegiance to Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, around whom our state ideology has built a cult of personality. “O mighty Atatürk who has given us this day,” all students recite, “I swear that I will walk relentlessly on your path.” The oath ends with a collectivist promise of sacrifice: “Let my existence be a gift to Turkish existence!”

The education system, which constantly praises the “Turkish existence,” curiously says nothing about the existence of other ethnic identities in Turkey. The society is portrayed as a homogenous entity. The Kurds and other groups are never mentioned, and when you finish your education, you simply know nothing about them.
...............................

Actually the whole education system gives you the impression that everybody except the Kemalists are traitors.

............concepts such as democracy or individual freedom simply do not exist. You can’t blame Atatürk for that, because in his time, other ideas such as “statism” were popular and he naturally embraced them. Yet, times have changed, whereas the system stays untouched.

........... we all became free with the founding of the independent Turkish Republic in 1923. Whether that republic has granted us the citizens freedom was a question that was remarkably ignored. What really mattered was the freedom of our state from foreign powers. Our own freedom was not a value worth mentioning.

.................
That's why quite many Turks, who are otherwise smart and reasonable people, will go irrational when you start to question the national myths of nationalism or ultra-secularism.

Of course, there are also many people who have gone outside the box. There are, first of all, the self-declared liberals who have realized that the system is authoritarian and it needs to be liberalized. They are influential, but very tiny. Moreover, other elites, the Kemalist ones, see them as either naïve or treacherous.

............... Therefore, the only way out for Turkey remains what it has been since the times of Turgut Özal and the first period of the AKP: Liberal democracy promoted by the EU, articulated by the liberals, and supported by the conservatives. Even if the AKP is closed, this momentum will go on under another party. And the Kurds will be much better off if they jump onto this train instead of playing Che Guevara in the mountains of the southeast.

As the potential of the illiberal elite to accept liberal democracy, though, I am not very optimistic. As evidenced by their unbelievably reactionary stance, their minds are just too “educated” to breach.

Mustafa AKYOL


http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=104720

34.       catwoman
8933 posts
 12 Jun 2008 Thu 10:37 pm

Quoting cynicmystic:

Copy-pasting a rather "biased" article to start a "charged" topic without any of your own input or thoughts clearly shows that unless someone else puts it into writing, you do not seem to be able to do it for yourself. As a result, instead of responding to your own thoughts, the readers of your pathetic thread are forced to respond to an "article". Well, we might as well send a carbon copy of our replies to the publishing newspaper as well, wouldn't you say?


Thank you for showing us (or at least me) how much you can hate another person because you disagree with her/him about "ideas". How do you usually treat other people - 'human first'? or 'ideology fist'?
On top of that, your arguments are rather 'pathetic' - to use your own words. It is very normal to post an article we like or agree with. If you think the article is biased, you can write your reasons for it, since you didn't, I assume that you consider as biased whatever is not in line with your own ideology. Also, it is pretty unacceptable that you bash and disrespect a person simply because you disagree with him!

35.       cynicmystic
567 posts
 12 Jun 2008 Thu 11:33 pm

What are you talking about? I wrote exactly why I disagreed with the article more than anyone else has cared to do so.

What else am I supposed to write?

On the other hand, I am glad I touched a nerve, as I intended to do so. If you read my reply, I think it is very clear what I am reacting to.

Regarding the "hate" factor, I don't care enough to hate...

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting cynicmystic:

Copy-pasting a rather "biased" article to start a "charged" topic without any of your own input or thoughts clearly shows that unless someone else puts it into writing, you do not seem to be able to do it for yourself. As a result, instead of responding to your own thoughts, the readers of your pathetic thread are forced to respond to an "article". Well, we might as well send a carbon copy of our replies to the publishing newspaper as well, wouldn't you say?


Thank you for showing us (or at least me) how much you can hate another person because you disagree with her/him about "ideas". How do you usually treat other people - 'human first'? or 'ideology fist'?
On top of that, your arguments are rather 'pathetic' - to use your own words. It is very normal to post an article we like or agree with. If you think the article is biased, you can write your reasons for it, since you didn't, I assume that you consider as biased whatever is not in line with your own ideology. Also, it is pretty unacceptable that you bash and disrespect a person simply because you disagree with him!

36.       catwoman
8933 posts
 12 Jun 2008 Thu 11:38 pm

Quoting cynicmystic:

On the other hand, I am glad I touched a nerve, as I intended to do so. If you read my reply, I think it is very clear what I am reacting to.

Regarding the "hate" factor, I don't care enough to hate...


What nerve do you think you touched? Me saying that you bashed someone who hasn't said anything bad to you, only because you disagree with the article?

37.       cynicmystic
567 posts
 12 Jun 2008 Thu 11:52 pm

Haven't you noticed how rather "charged" topics are regularly posted by the same characters.

I agree with you. "thehandsom & incishka" are both fine examples of partiality, while possesing a keen sense of what constitutes being "open-minded". Mustafa Akyol, on the other hand, is a becaon of enlightment.

Quoting armegon:

Then most of the teachers and professors are also close-minded but Mustafa Whitepath, thehandsom and incişka are open-minded

38.       libralady
5152 posts
 12 Jun 2008 Thu 11:56 pm

Quoting cynicmystic:

Haven't you noticed how rather "charged" topics are regularly posted by the same characters.

I agree with you. "thehandsom & incishka" are both fine examples of partiality, while possesing a keen sense of what constitutes being "open-minded". Mustafa Akyol, on the other hand, is a becaon of enlightment.

Quoting armegon:

Then most of the teachers and professors are also close-minded but Mustafa Whitepath, thehandsom and incişka are open-minded



Post some of your own charged topics - tell us about Mustafa Akyol, as I for one have never heard of him! Who is he?

39.       cynicmystic
567 posts
 12 Jun 2008 Thu 11:59 pm

Brilliant.

Did you figure that out all by yourself?

You don't really think that I am going to get into a bogus back & forth post & reply with you, do you. I already spent over an hour and posted exactly what I think about the article, and the fellow who posted it. It is written in plain English.

The nerve I have touched is quite obvius to me. I feel for your pain, though, if it is not clear to you.

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting cynicmystic:

On the other hand, I am glad I touched a nerve, as I intended to do so. If you read my reply, I think it is very clear what I am reacting to.

Regarding the "hate" factor, I don't care enough to hate...


What nerve do you think you touched? Me saying that you bashed someone who hasn't said anything bad to you, only because you disagree with the article?

40.       catwoman
8933 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 12:20 am

Quoting cynicmystic:

Brilliant.

Did you figure that out all by yourself?

You don't really think that I am going to get into a bogus back & forth post & reply with you, do you. I already spent over an hour and posted exactly what I think about the article, and the fellow who posted it. It is written in plain English.

The nerve I have touched is quite obvius to me. I feel for your pain, though, if it is not clear to you.


41.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 12:24 am

Quoting cynicmystic:


You don't really think that I am going to get into a bogus back & forth post & reply with you, do you. I already spent over an hour and posted exactly what I think about the article, and the fellow who posted it. It is written in plain English.


Well..
It seems like there is a personal attack here!!
I am obliged to reply..lol
It is a promise!!!

42.       cynicmystic
567 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 12:31 am

No hurries...

Take your time to think about it.

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting cynicmystic:


You don't really think that I am going to get into a bogus back & forth post & reply with you, do you. I already spent over an hour and posted exactly what I think about the article, and the fellow who posted it. It is written in plain English.


Well..
It seems like there is a personal attack here!!
I am obliged to reply..lol
It is a promise!!!

43.       catwoman
8933 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 12:36 am

Quoting cynicmystic:

No hurries...

Take your time to think about it.


Thanks for your insightful input... very constructive, but who knows - maybe you didn't have enough time to think. :-S

44.       cynicmystic
567 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 12:42 am

Thanks for yours as well.

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting cynicmystic:

No hurries...

Take your time to think about it.


Thanks for your insightful input... very constructive, but who knows - maybe you didn't have enough time to think. :-S

45.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 12:43 am

There is not much to think about it really..
As soon as I am done with my domestics, I will start replying..
lol

Quoting cynicmystic:

No hurries...

Take your time to think about it.

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting cynicmystic:


You don't really think that I am going to get into a bogus back & forth post & reply with you, do you. I already spent over an hour and posted exactly what I think about the article, and the fellow who posted it. It is written in plain English.


Well..
It seems like there is a personal attack here!!
I am obliged to reply..lol
It is a promise!!!

46.       cynicmystic
567 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 12:44 am

Are you as handsom as your nick suggests?

Quoting thehandsom:

There is not much to think about it really..
As soon as I am done with my domestics, I will start replying..
lol

Quoting cynicmystic:

No hurries...

Take your time to think about it.

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting cynicmystic:


You don't really think that I am going to get into a bogus back & forth post & reply with you, do you. I already spent over an hour and posted exactly what I think about the article, and the fellow who posted it. It is written in plain English.


Well..
It seems like there is a personal attack here!!
I am obliged to reply..lol
It is a promise!!!

47.       alameda
3499 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 12:49 am

Quoting cynicmystic:

I am neither sure from which country the individual who posted this article is nor do I particularly care about it. Unlike you, however, I will show the courtesy of sharing with others my background, which is Turkish. Had you done the same, we would know where you are from, as well.

Copy-pasting a rather 'biased' article to start a 'charged' topic without any of your own input or thoughts clearly shows that unless someone else puts it into writing, you do not seem to be able to do it for yourself. As a result, instead of responding to your own thoughts, the readers of your pathetic thread are forced to respond to an 'article'. Well, we might as well send a carbon copy of our replies to the publishing newspaper as well, wouldn't you say?

Since my reply is actually to an article, I hope you won't take what I say personally, and be offended.

Let's start with an analysis of the bombastic lingo in this article...

'.............. These European-looking Turks are also quite militarist and nationalist according to Western standards.'

What the hell are we supposed to understand from an idiotic statement like this? The look that has been falsely labelled as 'European' is actually 'Caucasian', which is surely not in the monopoly of Europeans exclusively. The Caucasian look belongs to Eurasia, and the Caucauses, the origin of the term itself, is ironically closer to Turkey than to any Western Europen country. If the European look is referring to the un-Islamic & fashionable outfits in Turkey, then, it must be said that there are more mullahs in London & Paris these days than there are in Turkey.

Another important issue is the criteria for the so-called 'western standards' in regards to being 'militaristic nationalists'. Believe me that there are no such standards, and any bombastic author that makes such references in his writing is surely talking out of his ass. On a different tune, Europeans aren't impressing anyone in the world with their 'European standards' anymore anyways. Those days have been over for quite a while.

Regarding the issue of indoctrination at Turkish schools, I am surprised by how one-sided his view is. Every country in the world that has an education system & a national identity indoctrinates their young ones. Yes, the level and intensity of indoctrination varies from country to country, but nevertheless, every country, even the 'civilized' Western countries, indoctrinate their children in one form or the other. If the writer of the article, and the other clowns on this forum, who seem to support his views, are claiming that the situation in Turkey is exceptional, and much worse, then I would have to disagree with that.

As someone who had to go through the ritual of 'swearing alliance & oath' in the mornings, on the contrary to the writer's claims, I didn't turn out to be a 'militaristic Kemalist' bent on supressing other minorities and imposing Kemalist values. In fact, I dislike Kemalists, Nationalists, Patriots, Separatists, Pan-Turkists etc as much as I hate bible-thumping Evangelists, Zionists, Mullahs, and other war-mongering parasites.

For me, the ritual was actually of significant importance, not because it instilled in me a solid sense of 'Turkishness & Kemalist values', but simply because it was the only opportunity during the week where all the students gathered in the courtyard. Hormones raging at that age, it was more of a social event where the guys would check out the girls stroll down the stairs, glimpsing at their legs, as each class congregated for the ceremony. As shameless as this may sound, it was a great opportunity to check out the girls that you had a crush on, while winking at the girls, who had a crush on you. Aside from checking out the legs, other very important social activities, such as the exchange of weekend gossip, plans for a soccer game with the rival class during lunch break etc would be discussed.

I never felt like being indoctrinated because, like many of my friends, I never took it seriously, or literally. In fact, had they just bothered to ask, I would have surely preferred to stay in the courtyard all day reciting the oath of alliance than go to classroom. Children in the USA, UK, Germany etc go through severe forms of indoctrination, not only at school, but outside as well through TV and religious activities. Not every corner of North America is as liberal & democratic as New York or LA. I find Americans to be extremely indoctrinated, for example. More so than Turks in fact. The same could be said for the English as well. Writing an article about how children are being brainwashed because of the morning oath is nothing but a cheap shot without much aim.

Let's quote another bombastic statement:

'The education system, which constantly praises the “Turkish existence,” curiously says nothing about the existence of other ethnic identities in Turkey.'

The education system doesn't have to say jack about the existence of other ethnicities simply because it is obvious and right there in front of you each time you go for a walk or watch TV. The author would be surprised how many Turks are actually very well aware of the mixed heritage of their homeland and its people in comparison to some of their European & North American counterparts. We all notice the ethnic diversity as well as the non-ethnic diversity.

When I was a little kid, my family lived in the old Armenian quarters of Istanbul, where there was still a significant number of Armenians, who had stayed after WWI. Our right door neighbour was Armenian, and regularly, I would spend evenings at their home playing with their children, if my parents were working late. In the same way, my parents would do the same when they were out. Not only were we aware of each other's existence, but we interacted with each other as well. From a really young age, I also noticed that a lot of construction workers in Istanbul spoke a language that I couldn't understand. It didn't take long to figure out that it was Kurdish. Later on, I also noticed that a lot of the these workers were hired by wealthier Kurdish contractors, who had prospered in Western Turkey, and discriminated and looked down on these workers, as much as their Turkish upper-class Istanbulite friends. Again, later on, I also learned that not all Kurdish dialects spoken in Turkey are mutually intelligable. Zaza, for example, a Kurdish group in Turkey, cannot understand the Kurdish dialect of Kurmanchi, which is spoken by a much larger group of Kurds that live in Turkey, Iran & Iraq. On a trip to the Black Sea region, I couldn't help giggling at the way the locals talked. How there were non-Turkish dialects of Georgian origin still spoken in pockets of remote villages by the elders, or how the Laz originally came from Georgia and mixed with Pontic Greeks of Trebizond were right there in front of you. When we travelled to the Aegean region, the Greco/Anatolian ethnic elements were also visible. The point I am trying to make is that dramatic examples, such as incishka's about how a Kurdish student whispered to her/his ear, or the ones expressed in the article are not only inaccurate observations, but are also generalizations.

Yes, there is discrimination & suppression in Turkey in one form or the other just like everywhere else in the world. However, this discrimination is not exactly or predominantly ethnic. It is a lot more complicated than that. For example, wealthier Turks, usually of Istanbul, discriminate against the so-called 'kro' Turks of the eastern provinces. They make fun of the way they talk, call them 'peasents', and the very word 'kro', which is a derivateive of the name of the Kurdish dialect, Kurmanchi, applies equally to anyone, whether Turkish or Kurdish, that doesn't meet superficial Istanbulite standards.

Among the so-called 'peasents of the east', there is uniform resentment against the spoiled, and snobby city-dwellers & the plasticity of their culture. The pan-Turkists, who suffer from a minor case of delusion, want a unified Turkic empire across central Asia. They usually beat up innocent people, who fail to make the 'Ulkucu' wolf sign with their hands during their traffic blockdes. The religious fundamentalist pundits come in all shapes and ethnicities ready to massacre all others, too, once given the opportunity. The lower-middle class is always ready to be duped by propaganda and flock out to the streets to protest this or that. Ethnicity hardly ever plays a role in most cases.

The wealthier western Kurds discrminate against other eastern Kurds that are part of the ashiret clan system. The ashiret leaders literally exert authority over thousands of their clan members through their own interpretation of their 'tore'. It is literally brutal. The political bears of Ankara prize themselves the most in bogus forms of Kemalism, thinking that they are the only ones in the whole country preoccupied with maintaining the unity of our homeland against all outside powers bent on demolishing us, the Republic of Turkey!!!

For many of these multi-ethnical & political posers, if they don't see a framed picture of Ataturk in your office, you are immediately labelled as a parasite to the Kemalist cause.

To keep this brief, the point is rather simple. The truth is that the people, who live in Turkey, regardless of their ethnic origins, are very gullible, and yet not so naive. It is easy to play with their emotions, and manipulate their thoughts, but they are absolutely not products of an educational system that has 'brainwashed' them. This observation in the article is wrong.

People who live in Turkey are very well aware of the progress Turkey has made as well as its shortcomings. Nobody of any ethnic background is blind or dumb. On the contrary to the article, we aren't all brainwashed, at least not significantly more than our counterparts in other countries.

Thanks to bombastic news in the media, there is always a way to find a suitable victim to instigate a national paranoia in Turkey - particularly against Greece & Armenia, if not the PKK. You can always pump up the patriotic bravada with bogus media stories about a Greek invasion of a worthless set of islands, or the Armenian diaspora trying to discredit Turks abroad. Barzani was the latest one. It is unbelievable how easy it is to turn masses of normally ordinary people into flag-burning fanatics.

It is also ironic that the very same people not only burn the flags of the perceived-threat countries, but also burn the flags of foreign soccer teams after losing at the European Cup (always due to the ref). Even domestic teams may suffer being burned by the local fanatics. There is always a good reason to protest in Turkey, and ethnic difference is not at the top of the list.

I actually see a bigger problem in Turkish education system than the oath of alliance. Over the years, a significant number of rather annoying members of the English-speaking world have relocated to Turkey as ESL teachers at private schools. These backpacker-turned-ESL-instructors, who are often not qualified to teach ESL in their own contries, are very much welcomed by Turkish people, and are often admired a lot more than they actually deserve. Such foreigners often find out that they are paid quite well in Turkey, and can actually live a lot better in Istanbul (or Izmir & Ankara) than they ever could in their own countries with their intellectual capacities. It is often a matter of months before they find a Turkish girlfriend or boyfriend, get married and settle down. Once this happens, these backpacker-philosophers develop ideas about the problems of Turkey. They share their annoying & often ignorant views generously at dinner parties that they have been invited to by the parents of their private students, who pay them quite a bit of money to tutor their children. So, the side benefits are obvious. And, they gibber & gibber.

They tell us how there are violations of human rights, police brutality, the suppression of Kurds, domestic violence against women, corruption, Turkish mullahs, what Turkey needs to do to join the EU etc etc etc etc. They have a freaking idea about everything, and believe me when I tell you that they annoy the hell out of almost every other 'educated' Turk that I know. To these ignorant clowns, the only reason why we, the 'more educated Turks' may appear as 'close-minded militaristic patriots' is perhaps because that is the image we portray on purpose. Along the same lines, when similar individuals post topics on message boards to psyche people up, we tend to write lengthy replies.

I think your thread is insincere my friend.



Wow, great post. Thank you, you have given a lot of thought and taken time to actually write out your own original ideas....unlike some... Welcome to Turkish Class.....looking forward to more interesting reading....

48.       catwoman
8933 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 01:06 am

Quoting cynicmystic:

Are you as handsom as your nick suggests?


Are you interested? lol

Handsom... I suggest you answer this question, otherwise you are in danger to be accused that you are not revealing this information because you are dishonestly hiding your true looks!

49.       cynicmystic
567 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 01:07 am

Cheers for the warm welcome.

I may come off as a bit too direct or aggressive, but I often speak my mind.

Quoting alameda:

Quoting cynicmystic:

I am neither sure from which country the individual who posted this article is nor do I particularly care about it. Unlike you, however, I will show the courtesy of sharing with others my background, which is Turkish. Had you done the same, we would know where you are from, as well.

Copy-pasting a rather 'biased' article to start a 'charged' topic without any of your own input or thoughts clearly shows that unless someone else puts it into writing, you do not seem to be able to do it for yourself. As a result, instead of responding to your own thoughts, the readers of your pathetic thread are forced to respond to an 'article'. Well, we might as well send a carbon copy of our replies to the publishing newspaper as well, wouldn't you say?

Since my reply is actually to an article, I hope you won't take what I say personally, and be offended.

Let's start with an analysis of the bombastic lingo in this article...

'.............. These European-looking Turks are also quite militarist and nationalist according to Western standards.'

What the hell are we supposed to understand from an idiotic statement like this? The look that has been falsely labelled as 'European' is actually 'Caucasian', which is surely not in the monopoly of Europeans exclusively. The Caucasian look belongs to Eurasia, and the Caucauses, the origin of the term itself, is ironically closer to Turkey than to any Western Europen country. If the European look is referring to the un-Islamic & fashionable outfits in Turkey, then, it must be said that there are more mullahs in London & Paris these days than there are in Turkey.

Another important issue is the criteria for the so-called 'western standards' in regards to being 'militaristic nationalists'. Believe me that there are no such standards, and any bombastic author that makes such references in his writing is surely talking out of his ass. On a different tune, Europeans aren't impressing anyone in the world with their 'European standards' anymore anyways. Those days have been over for quite a while.

Regarding the issue of indoctrination at Turkish schools, I am surprised by how one-sided his view is. Every country in the world that has an education system & a national identity indoctrinates their young ones. Yes, the level and intensity of indoctrination varies from country to country, but nevertheless, every country, even the 'civilized' Western countries, indoctrinate their children in one form or the other. If the writer of the article, and the other clowns on this forum, who seem to support his views, are claiming that the situation in Turkey is exceptional, and much worse, then I would have to disagree with that.

As someone who had to go through the ritual of 'swearing alliance & oath' in the mornings, on the contrary to the writer's claims, I didn't turn out to be a 'militaristic Kemalist' bent on supressing other minorities and imposing Kemalist values. In fact, I dislike Kemalists, Nationalists, Patriots, Separatists, Pan-Turkists etc as much as I hate bible-thumping Evangelists, Zionists, Mullahs, and other war-mongering parasites.

For me, the ritual was actually of significant importance, not because it instilled in me a solid sense of 'Turkishness & Kemalist values', but simply because it was the only opportunity during the week where all the students gathered in the courtyard. Hormones raging at that age, it was more of a social event where the guys would check out the girls stroll down the stairs, glimpsing at their legs, as each class congregated for the ceremony. As shameless as this may sound, it was a great opportunity to check out the girls that you had a crush on, while winking at the girls, who had a crush on you. Aside from checking out the legs, other very important social activities, such as the exchange of weekend gossip, plans for a soccer game with the rival class during lunch break etc would be discussed.

I never felt like being indoctrinated because, like many of my friends, I never took it seriously, or literally. In fact, had they just bothered to ask, I would have surely preferred to stay in the courtyard all day reciting the oath of alliance than go to classroom. Children in the USA, UK, Germany etc go through severe forms of indoctrination, not only at school, but outside as well through TV and religious activities. Not every corner of North America is as liberal & democratic as New York or LA. I find Americans to be extremely indoctrinated, for example. More so than Turks in fact. The same could be said for the English as well. Writing an article about how children are being brainwashed because of the morning oath is nothing but a cheap shot without much aim.

Let's quote another bombastic statement:

'The education system, which constantly praises the “Turkish existence,” curiously says nothing about the existence of other ethnic identities in Turkey.'

The education system doesn't have to say jack about the existence of other ethnicities simply because it is obvious and right there in front of you each time you go for a walk or watch TV. The author would be surprised how many Turks are actually very well aware of the mixed heritage of their homeland and its people in comparison to some of their European & North American counterparts. We all notice the ethnic diversity as well as the non-ethnic diversity.

When I was a little kid, my family lived in the old Armenian quarters of Istanbul, where there was still a significant number of Armenians, who had stayed after WWI. Our right door neighbour was Armenian, and regularly, I would spend evenings at their home playing with their children, if my parents were working late. In the same way, my parents would do the same when they were out. Not only were we aware of each other's existence, but we interacted with each other as well. From a really young age, I also noticed that a lot of construction workers in Istanbul spoke a language that I couldn't understand. It didn't take long to figure out that it was Kurdish. Later on, I also noticed that a lot of the these workers were hired by wealthier Kurdish contractors, who had prospered in Western Turkey, and discriminated and looked down on these workers, as much as their Turkish upper-class Istanbulite friends. Again, later on, I also learned that not all Kurdish dialects spoken in Turkey are mutually intelligable. Zaza, for example, a Kurdish group in Turkey, cannot understand the Kurdish dialect of Kurmanchi, which is spoken by a much larger group of Kurds that live in Turkey, Iran & Iraq. On a trip to the Black Sea region, I couldn't help giggling at the way the locals talked. How there were non-Turkish dialects of Georgian origin still spoken in pockets of remote villages by the elders, or how the Laz originally came from Georgia and mixed with Pontic Greeks of Trebizond were right there in front of you. When we travelled to the Aegean region, the Greco/Anatolian ethnic elements were also visible. The point I am trying to make is that dramatic examples, such as incishka's about how a Kurdish student whispered to her/his ear, or the ones expressed in the article are not only inaccurate observations, but are also generalizations.

Yes, there is discrimination & suppression in Turkey in one form or the other just like everywhere else in the world. However, this discrimination is not exactly or predominantly ethnic. It is a lot more complicated than that. For example, wealthier Turks, usually of Istanbul, discriminate against the so-called 'kro' Turks of the eastern provinces. They make fun of the way they talk, call them 'peasents', and the very word 'kro', which is a derivateive of the name of the Kurdish dialect, Kurmanchi, applies equally to anyone, whether Turkish or Kurdish, that doesn't meet superficial Istanbulite standards.

Among the so-called 'peasents of the east', there is uniform resentment against the spoiled, and snobby city-dwellers & the plasticity of their culture. The pan-Turkists, who suffer from a minor case of delusion, want a unified Turkic empire across central Asia. They usually beat up innocent people, who fail to make the 'Ulkucu' wolf sign with their hands during their traffic blockdes. The religious fundamentalist pundits come in all shapes and ethnicities ready to massacre all others, too, once given the opportunity. The lower-middle class is always ready to be duped by propaganda and flock out to the streets to protest this or that. Ethnicity hardly ever plays a role in most cases.

The wealthier western Kurds discrminate against other eastern Kurds that are part of the ashiret clan system. The ashiret leaders literally exert authority over thousands of their clan members through their own interpretation of their 'tore'. It is literally brutal. The political bears of Ankara prize themselves the most in bogus forms of Kemalism, thinking that they are the only ones in the whole country preoccupied with maintaining the unity of our homeland against all outside powers bent on demolishing us, the Republic of Turkey!!!

For many of these multi-ethnical & political posers, if they don't see a framed picture of Ataturk in your office, you are immediately labelled as a parasite to the Kemalist cause.

To keep this brief, the point is rather simple. The truth is that the people, who live in Turkey, regardless of their ethnic origins, are very gullible, and yet not so naive. It is easy to play with their emotions, and manipulate their thoughts, but they are absolutely not products of an educational system that has 'brainwashed' them. This observation in the article is wrong.

People who live in Turkey are very well aware of the progress Turkey has made as well as its shortcomings. Nobody of any ethnic background is blind or dumb. On the contrary to the article, we aren't all brainwashed, at least not significantly more than our counterparts in other countries.

Thanks to bombastic news in the media, there is always a way to find a suitable victim to instigate a national paranoia in Turkey - particularly against Greece & Armenia, if not the PKK. You can always pump up the patriotic bravada with bogus media stories about a Greek invasion of a worthless set of islands, or the Armenian diaspora trying to discredit Turks abroad. Barzani was the latest one. It is unbelievable how easy it is to turn masses of normally ordinary people into flag-burning fanatics.

It is also ironic that the very same people not only burn the flags of the perceived-threat countries, but also burn the flags of foreign soccer teams after losing at the European Cup (always due to the ref). Even domestic teams may suffer being burned by the local fanatics. There is always a good reason to protest in Turkey, and ethnic difference is not at the top of the list.

I actually see a bigger problem in Turkish education system than the oath of alliance. Over the years, a significant number of rather annoying members of the English-speaking world have relocated to Turkey as ESL teachers at private schools. These backpacker-turned-ESL-instructors, who are often not qualified to teach ESL in their own contries, are very much welcomed by Turkish people, and are often admired a lot more than they actually deserve. Such foreigners often find out that they are paid quite well in Turkey, and can actually live a lot better in Istanbul (or Izmir & Ankara) than they ever could in their own countries with their intellectual capacities. It is often a matter of months before they find a Turkish girlfriend or boyfriend, get married and settle down. Once this happens, these backpacker-philosophers develop ideas about the problems of Turkey. They share their annoying & often ignorant views generously at dinner parties that they have been invited to by the parents of their private students, who pay them quite a bit of money to tutor their children. So, the side benefits are obvious. And, they gibber & gibber.

They tell us how there are violations of human rights, police brutality, the suppression of Kurds, domestic violence against women, corruption, Turkish mullahs, what Turkey needs to do to join the EU etc etc etc etc. They have a freaking idea about everything, and believe me when I tell you that they annoy the hell out of almost every other 'educated' Turk that I know. To these ignorant clowns, the only reason why we, the 'more educated Turks' may appear as 'close-minded militaristic patriots' is perhaps because that is the image we portray on purpose. Along the same lines, when similar individuals post topics on message boards to psyche people up, we tend to write lengthy replies.

I think your thread is insincere my friend.



Wow, great post. Thank you, you have given a lot of thought and taken time to actually write out your own original ideas....unlike some... Welcome to Turkish Class.....looking forward to more interesting reading....

50.       catwoman
8933 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 01:10 am

Quoting cynicmystic:

Cheers for the warm welcome.

I may come off as a bit too direct or aggressive, but I often speak my mind.


So is being aggressive forgiven once a person 'speaks her/his mind'? And.. why are you bashing others for speaking theirs?

Your aggressive introduction put me off from reading your post, it made me think that you are biased and emotionally attached to a certain point of view - which prevents you from being objective.

But I have now read your post and you have some good points.

51.       cynicmystic
567 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 01:18 am

Because I am under the impression that handsom starts these rather "charged" topics with a bit of an "agenda", and in my opinion, deserves a rather straight-forward in-your-face response, just like the one I took the time to make.

I may be wrong about this. I may be not. Nevertheles, I did take the time to post my honest opinion. If my opinion bashed you in any way, that is perhaps you sound very bashable.

On a forum like this, of course you should be ready for replies like mine, when you start such threads. What is the problem, am I too direct? What you call "bashing" is the same "bashing" that this article does.

I don't wear masks like most people. And, it gives me joy to see how it annoys others, who do.

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting cynicmystic:

Cheers for the warm welcome.

I may come off as a bit too direct or aggressive, but I often speak my mind.


So is being aggressive forgiven once a person 'speaks her/his mind'? And.. why are you bashing others for speaking theirs?

52.       cynicmystic
567 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 01:21 am

Obviously, for the next time, you should read the post first before replying to what someone else wrote.

Thanks, though, I really appreciate your acknowledgement of my "good points".

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting cynicmystic:

Cheers for the warm welcome.

I may come off as a bit too direct or aggressive, but I often speak my mind.


So is being aggressive forgiven once a person 'speaks her/his mind'? And.. why are you bashing others for speaking theirs?

Your aggressive introduction put me off from reading your post, it made me think that you are biased and emotionally attached to a certain point of view - which prevents you from being objective.

But I have now read your post and you have some good points.

53.       Deli_kizin
6376 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 01:22 am

Please do not quote such long post inside eachother. Only quote what you really respond to, and delete all the quotes inside that you don't need.

54.       girleegirl
5065 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 01:47 am

Thank you DK!!!
Man, that makes me crazy!!!

55.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 01:47 am

I must admit I am having one of the seven deadly sins about your writing style. But, the writing style is not everything of course, unless the writing itself is filled up with real substance, which seems to be the lucking element in your post.

Quoting cynicmystic:


I am neither sure from which country the individual who posted this article is nor do I particularly care about it. Unlike you, however, I will show the courtesy of sharing with others my background, which is Turkish. Had you done the same, we would know where you are from, as well.



lol
Where I am from seems to be a rather hot and pathetic topic which keeps coming back again and again, like the meals you cook, cant finish, put it into fridge and bring it back to the table night after night on a little plate . ie 'kuru fasulye'. (Talking about poor Africans who could not even find it may help!)
I am as Turk as anybody can be a Turk. I guess you have not been following the topics. Almost anybody who follows the discussions, knows my nationality which has never been a secret kept in Pandora's box.
I was born in trachea part of Turkey but I grew up in Istanbul where I had my most glorious and happiest years up to date. Although I am aware the amazing fact that you don't care where I am from, I wanted to write it to stop this bizarre speculation as if I am afraid to say 'where I am from' and at the same time, in case you get curious about it in the future!!.


Quoting cynicmystic:


Copy-pasting a rather "biased" article to start a "charged" topic without any of your own input or thoughts clearly shows that unless someone else puts it into writing, you do not seem to be able to do it for yourself. As a result, instead of responding to your own thoughts, the readers of your pathetic thread are forced to respond to an "article". Well, we might as well send a carbon copy of our replies to the publishing newspaper as well, wouldn't you say?




What makes you think that I don't seem to be able to put my ideas into writing? how did you get that idea? It was simply a post regarding an article I wanted to share here which is done by almost everybody else.
It is not a pathetic thread with some shallow contents in it and you know it

Quoting cynicmystic:


Let's start with an analysis of the bombastic lingo in this article...

".............. These European-looking Turks are also quite militarist and nationalist according to Western standards."

What the hell are we supposed to understand from an idiotic statement like this? ...



I think, you missed the point about 'European-looking' phrase up there as the writer would not classify Turks with nationalistic views and label them European looking and tag the other Turks who seems to think 'nationalism is not a god given element to Turks', as non European-looking. I think it is nothing to do with the appearance it is more like the life style, education etc.

Quoting cynicmystic:


Another important issue is the criteria for the so-called "western standards" in regards to being "militaristic nationalists". Believe me that there are no such standards, and any bombastic author that makes such references in his writing is surely talking out of his ass. On a different tune, Europeans aren't impressing anyone in the world with their "European standards" anymore anyways. Those days have been over for quite a while.



I think you are deluding yourself with the point of view, which makes me think, somehow, coming from an inferior complex.
I don't want to sound to be very enthusiastic about the west but weather you accept or not there is a concept called 'western/European standards' and people think they exist!! Europens are not impressing anyone in the world is a one of the most brilliant thoughts I have heard of for ages. What do you think it would have happened If those'non impressive Europeans' lifted border restrictions to the others which by your account nations having impressive 'militaristic nationalist' standards. ( There was a survey about Turkish youth and one of the most striking result of it was serious chunk of Turkish youth want to live in Europe)

Quoting cynicmystic:


Regarding the issue of indoctrination at Turkish schools, I am surprised by how one-sided his view is. Every country in the world that has an education system & a national identity indoctrinates their young ones. Yes, the level and intensity of indoctrination varies from country to country, but nevertheless, every country, even the "civilized" Western countries, indoctrinate their children in one form or the other. If the writer of the article, and the other clowns on this forum, who seem to support his views, are claiming that the situation in Turkey is exceptional, and much worse, then I would have to disagree with that.



Well, what can I say for the above paragraph? Not much really! It seems like you are a great example of the indoctrination which all of us have been distilled . I don't think every country indoctrinates their youngsters with the poems like -I gave this before- "Atalarim gökten yere indirmisler ayyildizi/Bir buluta sarmislar ki, rengi safaktan kirmizi" (a simplistic translation of it would be "my ancestors brought down the crescent and the star, from sky to earth/they wrapped them into a cloud redder than dawn") or song like 'kahraman irkima sizmis ihanet/dusmanlarin dost degil hepsi de namert'

Quoting cynicmystic:



As someone who had to go through the ritual of "swearing alliance & oath" in the mornings, on the contrary to the writer's claims, I didn't turn out to be a "militaristic Kemalist" bent on suppressing other minorities and imposing Kemalist values. ....
Writing an article about how children are being brainwashed because of the morning oath is nothing but a cheap shot without much aim.



Offf..Again..you are not getting the point.. '"swearing alliance & oath" in the mornings' is just a tiny example of the whole indoctrination.

Quoting cynicmystic:


Let's quote another bombastic statement:
.....ones expressed in the article are not only inaccurate observations, but are also generalizations.



Before labeling Inciska about inaccurate observation and generalisation, I will advice you read bit more about our 'recent' history. The country we are living right now is almost ethnically cleansed for one way or another about 100 years ago. You seem to forget what we have done to Kurds/Armenians/Greeks and what we are still doing to the kurds which seems to the only crowded ethnic group. (thanks for the info about laz/languages etc). And the real problem is that you are not allowed to talk about it

Quoting cynicmystic:


...
Yes, there is discrimination & suppression in Turkey in one form or the other just like everywhere else in the world. However, this discrimination is not exactly or predominantly ethnic. It is a lot more complicated than that.
..



Please read the thread about 'sark islahat plani' regarding discrimination which has been systematic through out our young republic's life. Telling that the discrimination is not predominantly ethnic is a bit naive and not reflecting the reality (and somehow I have this gut feeling that you know this too!!)

Quoting cynicmystic:


........
I think your thread is insincere my friend.



I think your entire reaction is coming from the urge which happens to be almost every Turk is having:
The urge to feel representing Turkey when they see two foreigners being critical about Turkey. haha
This is an urge coming from the education which taught us there is 'us' and 'them' only.
The reality is almost all of us know what problems we have in Turkey.
The problem here is : if you have guts to be brave and tell the truth or not.
That is the difference between you and me Mystic.

56.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 02:01 am

Quoting cynicmystic:

Because I am under the impression that handsom starts these rather "charged" topics with a bit of an "agenda", and in my opinion, deserves a rather straight-forward in-your-face response, just like the one I took the time to make.


Well done!! lol
Why dont you tell us the "agenda" I have and finish this misery of wondering about what "my agenda" is?

Adam25 liked this message
57.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 02:05 am

Quoting cynicmystic:

Are you as handsom as your nick suggests?


Naah..just kidding!!
Just a quicky : what is this sudden interest about me?

58.       cynicmystic
567 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 02:10 am

oh yeah? what are those European standards?

59.       cynicmystic
567 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 02:11 am

I really don't agree with you. Simple as that.

But, that is what makes these forums so much fun.

I think we will have a great time debating in the future.

60.       cynicmystic
567 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 02:13 am

I promise to tone down the attitude in my posts.

61.       Deli_kizin
6376 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 02:14 am

Quoting cynicmystic:

I promise to tone down the attitude in my posts.



62.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 02:17 am

Quoting cynicmystic:

I really don't agree with you. Simple as that.

But, that is what makes these forums so much fun.

I think we will have a great time debating in the future.


I always welcome to intelligent debates!

63.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 02:19 am

Quoting cynicmystic:

oh yeah? what are those European standards?


You are tempting me to give the EU standarts about cucumbers, which is rather hilariously detailed, as an example here..

64.       armegon
1872 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 04:36 am

Quoting cynicmystic:

Because I am under the impression that handsom starts these rather "charged" topics with a bit of an "agenda",


Quoting cynicmystic:

I think your thread is insincere my friend.


Thats what i share wholeheartedly .

65.       catwoman
8933 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 05:05 am

Quoting armegon:

Quoting cynicmystic:

Because I am under the impression that handsom starts these rather "charged" topics with a bit of an "agenda",


Quoting cynicmystic:

I think your thread is insincere my friend.


Thats what i share wholeheartedly .


This fear of someone having an agenda is pretty funny actually . What can thehandsom do with his 'agenda'? Bring down the Turkish republic? Start a terrorist organization? lol
What your response shows is that no dissidence from the state ideology is allowed, that's number one pillar of turkish nationalism. Kind of reminds me of Russia :-S where people who disagree with the state mysteriously disappear.
In a normal country, dissident ideas should not only be widely known, but also discussed with mutual respect without suspicion or hate. It is pretty sad actually that you are taught to hate each other in case you see someone who may threaten your government and the 'republic' ideology.

66.       armegon
1872 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 05:14 am

Quoting catwoman:

This fear of someone having an agenda is pretty funny actually . What can thehandsom do with his 'agenda'? Bring down the Turkish republic? Start a terrorist organization? lol


His agenda seems no different than the ones who take millions of euros from EU. Maybe it is his future target when grows up enough moderator . Whats ur target? To look like ur profile picture with short cutted hair called Difranco, i bet you cut your hair like that...

67.       catwoman
8933 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 07:21 am

Quoting armegon:

His agenda seems no different than the ones who take millions of euros from EU.


Explain that more please. I'm really curious what you think his 'agenda', other then just saying what he thinks, is.

68.       Daydreamer
3743 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 09:27 am

Quoting armegon:

Quoting cynicmystic:

Because I am under the impression that handsom starts these rather "charged" topics with a bit of an "agenda",


Quoting cynicmystic:

I think your thread is insincere my friend.


Thats what i share wholeheartedly .



So that's what it's all about - Handsom The Secret Agenda Agent

Guys, you're free to disagree with him and anyone you wish in the forum, but accusing people of having secret agendas is simply ridiculous and weakens the message of your posts.

If you meant agenda as an opinion, then we all have it. And the point of debating is to contrast different opinions and points of view. If Handsom's agenda is to corrupt Turkey's image then yours must be showing how wonderful, non-nationalistic, non-brainwashed, allowing everyone express their opinions in public your country is.

What I gather from discussions like yours is that the fear and hatred towards "the others" (those who dare to express their thoughts freely) is a proof of your nationalism. You just have to have enemies...How sad...

69.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 10:52 am

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting armegon:

His agenda seems no different than the ones who take millions of euros from EU.


Explain that more please. I'm really curious what you think his 'agenda', other then just saying what he thinks, is.


I keep asking about this agenda for a long time, but so far, I have failed to get an answer!!

But accusing of people having 'a secret agenda' is not one of the genious inventions of these friends.
The concept of 'foreign powers, dark forces, foreign elements, pressing of a button, secret agenda, seeds of discord etc' were invented long time ago in 70s and 80s.

*They are the ones trying to divide Turkey
*They are the ones made us lost the WWI when Germany lost
*They are the ones made Turks and Kurds enemy of each other while we were living peacefully.
*They caused the entire ermenian thing
*They are the ones who are trying to enter the unis with their turbans
*They are trying to convert our people to cristianity with those missionaries.
*They placed the entire left/right problem into Turkey years ago
*They are the people having a button somewhere in EU and USA and pressing on when Turkey does well.
*They have budgets and pay the enemy of Turks in other countries.
*They killed Ugur Mumcu, Hrant Dink etc
*They are behind the energy problem of Turkey and the death of labours in Tuzla Dockyard-It is a recent invention btw-

I am still expecting, somebody will come up with the idea that 'farting problem after eating too much kuru fasulye' is the result of 'dark forces' as well.

70.       AEnigmamagnadea
416 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 12:43 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting armegon:

His agenda seems no different than the ones who take millions of euros from EU.


Explain that more please. I'm really curious what you think his 'agenda', other then just saying what he thinks, is.


I keep asking about this agenda for a long time, but so far, I have failed to get an answer!!

But accusing of people having 'a secret agenda' is not one of the genious inventions of these friends.
The concept of 'foreign powers, dark forces, foreign elements, pressing of a button, secret agenda, seeds of discord etc' were invented long time ago in 70s and 80s.

*They are the ones trying to divide Turkey
*They are the ones made us lost the WWI when Germany lost
*They are the ones made Turks and Kurds enemy of each other while we were living peacefully.
*They caused the entire ermenian thing
*They are the ones who are trying to enter the unis with their turbans
*They are trying to convert our people to cristianity with those missionaries.
*They placed the entire left/right problem into Turkey years ago
*They are the people having a button somewhere in EU and USA and pressing on when Turkey does well.
*They have budgets and pay the enemy of Turks in other countries.
*They killed Ugur Mumcu, Hrant Dink etc
*They are behind the energy problem of Turkey and the death of labours in Tuzla Dockyard-It is a recent invention btw-

I am still expecting, somebody will come up with the idea that 'farting problem after eating too much kuru fasulye' is the result of 'dark forces' as well.



This is wny TC is still worth visiting! lol lol lol
Wonderful post H

71.       catwoman
8933 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 01:48 pm

Quoting Daydreamer:

Guys, you're free to disagree with him and anyone you wish in the forum, but accusing people of having secret agendas is simply ridiculous.


lol
... and paranoid that handsom and his extraterrestial army will wipe Turkey off the map, establish Handsomye instead and elevate himself to the ranks of Ataturk/god, the father of all Handsoms. You will have to sing hymns every morning to praise his greateness and your foremost duty will be to defend Handsomye from every foreigner, either with words or your own blood.

72.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 03:25 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting Daydreamer:

Guys, you're free to disagree with him and anyone you wish in the forum, but accusing people of having secret agendas is simply ridiculous.


lol
... and paranoid that handsom and his extraterrestial army will wipe Turkey off the map, establish Handsomye instead and elevate himself to the ranks of Ataturk/god, the father of all Handsoms. You will have to sing hymns every morning to praise his greateness and your foremost duty will be to defend Handsomye from every foreigner, either with words or your own blood.



Once I am in that position, do you think DD will answer all my pms and I will get an msn invitation from her?

73.       teaschip
3870 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 03:27 pm

Quoting AEnigmamagnadea:

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting armegon:

His agenda seems no different than the ones who take millions of euros from EU.


Explain that more please. I'm really curious what you think his 'agenda', other then just saying what he thinks, is.


I keep asking about this agenda for a long time, but so far, I have failed to get an answer!!

But accusing of people having 'a secret agenda' is not one of the genious inventions of these friends.
The concept of 'foreign powers, dark forces, foreign elements, pressing of a button, secret agenda, seeds of discord etc' were invented long time ago in 70s and 80s.

*They are the ones trying to divide Turkey
*They are the ones made us lost the WWI when Germany lost
*They are the ones made Turks and Kurds enemy of each other while we were living peacefully.
*They caused the entire ermenian thing
*They are the ones who are trying to enter the unis with their turbans
*They are trying to convert our people to cristianity with those missionaries.
*They placed the entire left/right problem into Turkey years ago
*They are the people having a button somewhere in EU and USA and pressing on when Turkey does well.
*They have budgets and pay the enemy of Turks in other countries.
*They killed Ugur Mumcu, Hrant Dink etc
*They are behind the energy problem of Turkey and the death of labours in Tuzla Dockyard-It is a recent invention btw-

I am still expecting, somebody will come up with the idea that 'farting problem after eating too much kuru fasulye' is the result of 'dark forces' as well.



This is wny TC is still worth visiting! lol lol lol
Wonderful post H



+10000000 Absolutely...

74.       catwoman
8933 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 04:46 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting Daydreamer:

Guys, you're free to disagree with him and anyone you wish in the forum, but accusing people of having secret agendas is simply ridiculous.


lol
... and paranoid that handsom and his extraterrestial army will wipe Turkey off the map, establish Handsomye instead and elevate himself to the ranks of Ataturk/god, the father of all Handsoms. You will have to sing hymns every morning to praise his greateness and your foremost duty will be to defend Handsomye from every foreigner, either with words or your own blood.



Once I am in that position, do you think DD will answer all my pms and I will get an msn invitation from her?


Will she have a choice? She would go to prison for three years for refusing your requests, thereby insulting your handsomness!

75.       AEnigmamagnadea
416 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 04:54 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting Daydreamer:

Guys, you're free to disagree with him and anyone you wish in the forum, but accusing people of having secret agendas is simply ridiculous.


lol
... and paranoid that handsom and his extraterrestial army will wipe Turkey off the map, establish Handsomye instead and elevate himself to the ranks of Ataturk/god, the father of all Handsoms. You will have to sing hymns every morning to praise his greateness and your foremost duty will be to defend Handsomye from every foreigner, either with words or your own blood.



Once I am in that position, do you think DD will answer all my pms and I will get an msn invitation from her?


Will she have a choice? She would go to prison for three years for refusing your requests, thereby insulting your handsomness!



Both of your stop this!
You are violating Rule 7008 of the Handsomye Code

76.       libralady
5152 posts
 13 Jun 2008 Fri 10:19 pm

I am a little upset here. I feel left out. Is it that I am insignificant in this one sided battle between Cynic wotsit and Catwoman over the virtues of Thehandsom and his new country? How can I be noticed in between the glorisouly LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG posts (Yawn!!)

All I ask is, who is Mustafa Akyol ................ please? And no, I refuse to google!

77.       cynicmystic
567 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 01:42 am

You ought to be kidding...

First, you post replies to people (that's me in this case) without even bothering to read what they have written (what I had written in this case.) Then, having realized how ridicuolous you must have sounded with your first post, you confess to not having read my post in the first place, go back to read it, and with your half-understanding, you still attempt to shove words down people's throats. Do you really expect people to take you seriously when you post responses without knowing what you are responding to, since you haven't bothered to read?

On the contrary to your comprehension, what my post shows is not dissidence against anyone who criticizes Turkey. I am under the impresion that you still haven't bothered to read the post.

Regarding your fine example of comparing Turkey to Russia, where dissidents disappear over night, I regret to say that I don't agree with that statement either. Anyone who has ever been to Russia & Turkey knows very well that Turkey has never been as oppressive as the Cold War Era Russia.

I also love the way you make all these phoney assumptions about how we have been taught to "hate" each other.

You sound like you have been taught to hate a lot more than we do.




Quoting catwoman:

Quoting armegon:

Quoting cynicmystic:

Because I am under the impression that handsom starts these rather "charged" topics with a bit of an "agenda",


Quoting cynicmystic:

I think your thread is insincere my friend.


Thats what i share wholeheartedly .


This fear of someone having an agenda is pretty funny actually . What can thehandsom do with his 'agenda'? Bring down the Turkish republic? Start a terrorist organization? lol
What your response shows is that no dissidence from the state ideology is allowed, that's number one pillar of turkish nationalism. Kind of reminds me of Russia :-S where people who disagree with the state mysteriously disappear.
In a normal country, dissident ideas should not only be widely known, but also discussed with mutual respect without suspicion or hate. It is pretty sad actually that you are taught to hate each other in case you see someone who may threaten your government and the 'republic' ideology.

78.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 03:16 am

Quoting cynicmystic:



Regarding your fine example of comparing Turkey to Russia, where dissidents disappear over night, I regret to say that I don't agree with that statement either. Anyone who has ever been to Russia & Turkey knows very well that Turkey has never been as oppressive as the Cold War Era Russia.


I agree with you, Turkey has never been as bad as Russia, but we are not very clean about the issue of 'people dissapearing suddenly'(or the oppression) either.
There have been thousands dissapeared in 1980s, 1990s.

If you are intrested, a Turkish link for you:
http://www.radikal.com.tr/ek_haber.php?ek=r2&haberno=1234

Whenever I remember dissapearences in Turkey, I always remember the mothers who were holding weekly vigil for the "disappeared" in Istanbul/Galatasaray.
At some stage, we even took those mothers, who just wanted to know what happened to their sons, to the courts.

And also an incident from me:
When I was at Uni, my friends and I were sitting in the garden and two men came and took one of my friends with them..
We did not see him for 6 months and when he was released he was a wreck



79.       cynicmystic
567 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 03:32 am

Sure that many has disappeared.

What I would like to ask you is this.

In other places, such as North America, Western Europe and China, haven't people been dissappearing as well. Authoritarianism is everywhere, and criticisizing Turkey as if it is the only country in the worlds suffering from this is pointless.

How do you feel about the UK deriving 1/3 of its income from international arm sales, which eventually leads to war & oppression? Do I need to mention Guantanamo Bay? The Brazilian shot to death in the London subway, the Polish guy tasered to death by the Canadian airport police, or the numerous cases of police brutality from Europe or north America. There people going missing all over the world. Whenever you challenge or pose a risk to the established status-quo, you are eliminated.

Talking about these problems as if they are political issues that can be resolved with the right kind of legislation is not only annoying, but is naive.

If you live in a glass house, don't cast stones at your neighbour! The social issues you highlight are happening all over the world. So, don't single out Turkey as an example. All of our governments are equally involved in everything at the upper levels.

Perhaps it is about time to wake up...

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting cynicmystic:




I agree with you, Turkey has never been as bad as Russia, but we are not very clean about the issue of 'people dissapearing suddenly'(or the oppression) either.
There have been thousands dissapeared in 1980s, 1990s.


80.       armegon
1872 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 03:43 am

Quoting catwoman:

Explain that more please. I'm really curious what you think his 'agenda', other then just saying what he thinks, is.


Ask Mr.thehandsom , im sure he knows what im putting forward moderator . Im too lazy to find some articles to post here at the moment.

Quoting Daydreamer:

Guys, you're free to disagree with him and anyone you wish in the forum, but accusing people of having secret agendas is simply ridiculous and weakens the message of your posts.


Yeah i am free to disagree but i am not accusing anyone, i just voiced what i sense and it has nothing to do weakening the message of my posts.

Quoting Daydreamer:

If Handsom's agenda is to corrupt Turkey's image then yours must be showing how wonderful, non-nationalistic, non-brainwashed, allowing everyone express their opinions in public your country is.


, simple thinking, im not trying to show anything to anyone, i just try to response the posts here. Have u ever seen me starting a thread like u mentioned in this biased forum?

Quoting Daydreamer:

What I gather from discussions like yours is that the fear and hatred towards 'the others' (those who dare to express their thoughts freely) is a proof of your nationalism. You just have to have enemies...How sad...


Dont I express my thoughts freely? Ahh i forgot, im narrow-minded, here who says Kurds/PKK are freedom-fighters express their thoughts freely but when i say Kurds are nothing but new petrol guardians of Yankees then i became nationalist/racist. But in fact in my entire life i have no connection with the nationalists or ülkücü thats the ironic part . Also i have to add that it is impossible for an ordinary Turk become more patriot among you. And what i gather from the discussions like yours is that the fear and hatred towards the people who love their country even the girls here who has Turkish/Kurdish lovers. I have problems with the ones who think instead of Turks as they try to mention that they know everything better, arrogantly and i have problems with the domestics who are flatterers and who are ungratefuls.

Quoting thehandsom:

The concept of 'foreign powers, dark forces, foreign elements, pressing of a button, secret agenda, seeds of discord etc' were invented long time ago in 70s and 80s.

*They are the ones trying to divide Turkey
*They are the ones made us lost the WWI when Germany lost
*They are the ones made Turks and Kurds enemy of each other while we were living peacefully.
*They caused the entire ermenian thing
*They are the ones who are trying to enter the unis with their turbans
*They are trying to convert our people to cristianity with those missionaries.
*They placed the entire left/right problem into Turkey years ago
*They are the people having a button somewhere in EU and USA and pressing on when Turkey does well.
*They have budgets and pay the enemy of Turks in other countries.
*They killed Ugur Mumcu, Hrant Dink etc
*They are behind the energy problem of Turkey and the death of labours in Tuzla Dockyard-It is a recent invention btw-


This is one of the current trends which foreign admirer liberals began to voice in media during the past several years. They are taking lessons for this in Europe . A propaganda method to develop insensible, unconcerned people who are kept sleep with TV series or any kind of pursuit.

Quoting thehandsom:

I am still expecting, somebody will come up with the idea that 'farting problem after eating too much kuru fasulye' is the result of 'dark forces' as well.


lol, no it is the result of nationalism , well-leveled expression btw Mr.thehandsom.

81.       armegon
1872 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 03:51 am

Quoting thehandsom:

You seem to forget what we have done to Kurds/Armenians/Greeks and what we are still doing to the kurds which seems to the only crowded ethnic group.


You again seem to forget what they have done to Turks, thehandsom .

82.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 03:51 am

Quoting cynicmystic:

Sure that many has disappeared.

What I would like to ask you is this.

In other places, such as North America, Western Europe and China, haven't people been dissappearing as well. Authoritarianism is everywhere, and criticisizing Turkey as if it is the only country in the worlds suffering from this is pointless.

How do you feel about the UK deriving 1/3 of its income from international arm sales, which eventually leads to war & oppression? Do I need to mention Guantanamo Bay? The Brazilian shot to death in the London subway, the Polish guy tasered to death by the Canadian airport police, or the numerous cases of police brutality from Europe or north America. There people going missing all over the world. Whenever you challenge or pose a risk to the established status-quo, you are eliminated.

Talking about these problems as if they are political issues that can be resolved with the right kind of legislation is not only annoying, but is naive.

If you live in a glass house, don't cast stones at your neighbour! The social issues you highlight are happening all over the world. So, don't single out Turkey as an example. All of our governments are equally involved in everything at the upper levels.

Perhaps it is about time to wake up...


Sorry but there is nothing to wake up..
This is turkish language website and mainly the subjects are related to Turkey.
I think from time to time, the subjects you mentioned in your posts like Guantanama Bay , USA internal/foreign politics come up and we all comment including me.
I dont think Turkey is being singled out.
But not talking about 'what is wrong' is not negotiable in my terms.
They have to be talked about, they have to be critisized.
In the end, personally I believe that 'finding the wrongs' is the first but crucial step to make them right.

Without critisism nothing gets better!!


83.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 03:57 am

Quoting armegon:

Quoting thehandsom:

You seem to forget what we have done to Kurds/Armenians/Greeks and what we are still doing to the kurds which seems to the only crowded ethnic group.


You again seem to forget what they have done to Turks, thehandsom .


Tell us then.. Go on..
Tell what Kurds have done to Turks.
So we all learn.

84.       cynicmystic
567 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 04:17 am

Talk about what ever you like...

It is just that those things that you relate to Turkey are not unique to Turkey. The examples that you suggest as role models are suffering from the exact same problems.

That's what i meant by it is perhaps time to wake up...

The world has gone to "shits" my friend. There is no European model, or the American Dream in a world smeared with hypocrasy. Your examples serve no social purpose. You are just renaming a global epidemic.

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting cynicmystic:

Sure that many has disappeared.

They have to be talked about, they have to be critisized.
In the end, personally I believe that 'finding the wrongs' is the first but crucial step to make them right.

Without critisism nothing gets better!!


85.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 04:29 am

Quoting armegon:


Ask Mr.thehandsom , im sure he knows what im putting forward moderator . Im too lazy to find some articles to post here at the moment.


I simple asked you a question about what you think my agenda is..
Can you answer? do you have an answer? can you possible have an answer?
Look.. This 'secret agenda' thing is not your idea..it is 'embeded' into your head by years and years of listening pathetic statements of the army generals and disfunctional politicans.
The sad thing is, you DONT EVEN REALISE IT.

Quote:


This is one of the current trends which foreign admirer liberals began to voice in media during the past several years. They are taking lessons for this in Europe . A propaganda method to develop insensible, unconcerned people who are kept sleep with TV series or any kind of pursuit.


Now look above, you are unable take this 'foreign element' out of your brains. You have no answers without 'foreign hands or dark forces'.
What lessons do you think I am taking here?
who are they you think giving lessons?
what are they? be specific!!

This is pathetic man..

86.       catwoman
8933 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 04:38 am

Quoting cynicmystic:

You ought to be kidding...

First, you post replies to people (that's me in this case) without even bothering to read what they have written (what I had written in this case.) Then, having realized how ridicuolous you must have sounded with your first post, you confess to not having read my post in the first place, go back to read it, and with your half-understanding, you still attempt to shove words down people's throats. Do you really expect people to take you seriously when you post responses without knowing what you are responding to, since you haven't bothered to read?

On the contrary to your comprehension, what my post shows is not dissidence against anyone who criticizes Turkey. I am under the impresion that you still haven't bothered to read the post.

Regarding your fine example of comparing Turkey to Russia, where dissidents disappear over night, I regret to say that I don't agree with that statement either. Anyone who has ever been to Russia & Turkey knows very well that Turkey has never been as oppressive as the Cold War Era Russia.

I also love the way you make all these phoney assumptions about how we have been taught to "hate" each other.

You sound like you have been taught to hate a lot more than we do.


You said you weren't going to flirt with me, and what is this, eh?

87.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 04:40 am

Quoting cynicmystic:

Talk about what ever you like...

It is just that those things that you relate to Turkey are not unique to Turkey. The examples that you suggest as role models are suffering from the exact same problems.

That's what i meant by it is perhaps time to wake up...

The world has gone to "shits" my friend. There is no European model, or the American Dream in a world smeared with hypocrasy. Your examples serve no social purpose. You are just renaming a global epidemic.


I am not sure the world has gone to shits will be a right statement.
I find it a bit unsophisticated.

Those type of conclusions should not be made by looking at past 5/10/15 years of the world.

You should learn to look at the events and the developments of the civilization from a wider angle and larger time scale.

This is just a phase which was triggered by 9/11.
It will pass.


88.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 05:02 am

Quoting libralady:

I am a little upset here. I feel left out. Is it that I am insignificant in this one sided battle between Cynic wotsit and Catwoman over the virtues of Thehandsom and his new country? How can I be noticed in between the glorisouly LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG posts (Yawn!!)

All I ask is, who is Mustafa Akyol ................ please? And no, I refuse to google!


he is here
http://www.thewhitepath.com/archives/2004/01/about_mustafa_akyol.php
although he is an islamist, but I like his ideas when he is not talking about religion or 'intelligent desing'.

In a nut shell: He is a young guy (1972), breed of istanbul education, islamist, somehow worked in the usa for intelligent desing theory, clever, good knowledge of kurdish issue. I think he will produce many things in the coming years.

89.       Daydreamer
3743 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 10:40 am

Quoting armegon:


Yeah i am free to disagree but i am not accusing anyone, i just voiced what i sense and it has nothing to do weakening the message of my posts.



Absolutely right about the former, and wrong about the latter. Perhaps you fail to notice that the whole idea of "they're here to get us" is a bit like warning people against the UFO. Everybody is there to get you - USA, UE, and Handsom with his Secret Agenda.

Quoting armegon:


, simple thinking, im not trying to show anything to anyone, i just try to response the posts here. Have u ever seen me starting a thread like u mentioned in this biased forum?


No, you're not trying to show anything. Good point. You just come looking for conspirators. As for this forum being biased, I don't see how. Everybody is free to post what they like, how other members respond is everybody's individual business. As long as you don't get vulgar and rude, you may have any opinion you like. Biased forums allow only one-sided view, here you may speak what you like. In case you haven't noticed, there are many positive things written about Turkey here. You just have to get used to the fact that people have different opinions about your country's policies than you.

Quoting armegon:


And what i gather from the discussions like yours is that the fear and hatred towards the people who love their country even the girls here who has Turkish/Kurdish lovers. I have problems with the ones who think instead of Turks as they try to mention that they know everything better, arrogantly and i have problems with the domestics who are flatterers and who are ungratefuls.


Now that's a bit of an overstatement, don't you think? Nobody here fears or hates those who love their country. I dearly love my homeland and I'm sure so do most of the users here. It is the paranoia and nationalism that we find ridiculous. Even joking about A La Turka toilets results in us being accused of being enemies of Turkey. Isn't that silly?
As for experts or those who arrogantly claim to know better. If people write about their conclusions based on some material they read or experiences they were through what makes their logic worse than yours? For me it's hard to understand Turkish justice if a person is banished for what he writes (not talking about whether he is right or wrong but merely about the fact that in 21st century somebody is banished for intellectual crimes), or when a person faces a trial for saying that she wouldn't like her son to die on war. Or when Turks say there's no problem with Kurds but Kurds say otherwise - well...somebody must be lying. If Kurds felt fine, PKK wouldn't stand a chance to exist.

Quoting armegon:


This is one of the current trends which foreign admirer liberals began to voice in media during the past several years. They are taking lessons for this in Europe . A propaganda method to develop insensible, unconcerned people who are kept sleep with TV series or any kind of pursuit.



Liberal is wrong? National-militaristic is better? Sure, a police state has les problems, not because they don't exist, but because those who speak about them disappear. People are taught to think in line, work in line and act in line. No perverts like homosexuals, no ethnicity problems (as you either exterminate them or force to assimilate). Welfare of the country is better than the welfare of an individual. Oh, and there's always "THEM" that we need to take measures against. A war and enemies of the state. Right. That's the way. That's unacceptable for me as I've been there. And I don't want to go back. Whether it is German national socialism (ok, I haven't been there but my family experienced it) or Soviet socialism, they're the same. And I am sorry to say, Turkey in some aspects reminds me of that. It doesn't mean though that I don't see differences between Turkey and Germany or the Soviet Union.

90.       Daydreamer
3743 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 10:57 am

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting catwoman:


lol
... and paranoid that handsom and his extraterrestial army will wipe Turkey off the map, establish Handsomye instead and elevate himself to the ranks of Ataturk/god, the father of all Handsoms. You will have to sing hymns every morning to praise his greateness and your foremost duty will be to defend Handsomye from every foreigner, either with words or your own blood.



Once I am in that position , do you think DD will answer all my pms and I will get an msn invitation from her?



Why of course, there's nothing I like more about men than ambition! Oh and a big........bank account lol But here one means the other Become a Handsomurk and my MSN is yours

91.       cynicmystic
567 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 05:41 pm

This is not called flirting...

It is a simple way of teaching others manners.

The next time you decide to enlighten the rest of us with your deep understanding of things, at least save yourself the emberrassment of posting replies without having read the original post to which you reply. Simple as that.

Regarding flirting with you, I already told you that I am a bit afraid of cats (more of a dog-person, really), and unless you are willing to change that nick from catwoman to dogwoman, I am afraid you don't stand a chance of dating me

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting cynicmystic:


You said you weren't going to flirt with me, and what is this, eh?

92.       alameda
3499 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 05:55 pm

"They" are who they have always been....those that have a lot and want more.

Keep the masses busy and distracted so they don't think about it, or see the man behind the curtain. The connected elite few. It's not Americans, British or Jewish.

"They" have learned to work together for a common goal.

Exactly who it is a mystery. It's a good idea to follow the money....or look at who looses and who gains. As always, motive.

Quoting thehandsom:

Now look above, you are unable take this 'foreign element' out of your brains. You have no answers without 'foreign hands or dark forces'.What lessons do you think I am taking here? who are they you think giving lessons?
what are they? be specific!!

This is pathetic man..





Look at how complicated some spider webs are....but how often do you see the spider?

93.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 06:04 pm

Quoting alameda:

"They" are who they have always been....those that have a lot and want more.

Keep the masses busy and distracted so they don't think about it, or see the man behind the curtain. The connected elite few. It's not Americans, British or Jewish.

"They" have learned to work together for a common goal.

Exactly who it is a mystery. It's a good idea to follow the money....or look at who looses and who gains. As always, motive.

Quoting thehandsom:

Now look above, you are unable take this 'foreign element' out of your brains. You have no answers without 'foreign hands or dark forces'.What lessons do you think I am taking here? who are they you think giving lessons?
what are they? be specific!!

This is pathetic man..





Look at how complicated some spider webs are....but how often do you see the spider?


Alameda,
Look..
I asked a simple question up there..AND I added 'BE SPECIFIC'
You look at your post and tell me if you have been specific or not!!
you are talking about mystery, webs and elusive spiders ya..lol

94.       alameda
3499 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 06:11 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

Alameda,
Look..
I asked a simple question up there..AND I added 'BE SPECIFIC'
You look at your post and tell me if you have been specific or not!! you are talking about mystery, webs and elusive spiders ya..lol



I'm telling you how it is....It is purposeful obscurity. You want us to do your work for you....? As I said, follow the money. Look at who gains.

95.       catwoman
8933 posts
 14 Jun 2008 Sat 07:16 pm

Quoting cynicmystic:

This is not called flirting...

It is a simple way of teaching others manners.

The next time you decide to enlighten the rest of us with your deep understanding of things, at least save yourself the emberrassment of posting replies without having read the original post to which you reply. Simple as that.

Regarding flirting with you, I already told you that I am a bit afraid of cats (more of a dog-person, really), and unless you are willing to change that nick from catwoman to dogwoman, I am afraid you don't stand a chance of dating me

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting cynicmystic:


You said you weren't going to flirt with me, and what is this, eh?


Thank you for enlightening and guiding me on the path of darkness that I'm on. I am eternally grateful for your teachings and wisdom, simple as it might be.
By the way, I didn't say that I wanted to date you, quite the opposite actually - that's why I urged you not to flirt with me!

96.       CANLI
5084 posts
 15 Jun 2008 Sun 01:06 am

Quoting alameda:

Quoting cynicmystic:




Wow, great post. Thank you, you have given a lot of thought and taken time to actually write out your own original ideas....unlike some... Welcome to Turkish Class.....looking forward to more interesting reading....


Great post,and good debat
Looking forward for more also
Welcome to TLC

97.       catwoman
8933 posts
 15 Jun 2008 Sun 04:50 am

Quoting cynicmystic:

The next time you decide to enlighten the rest of us with your deep understanding of things, at least save yourself the emberrassment of posting replies without having read the original post to which you reply. Simple as that.


That is right, but can only work if you don't write such long, boring posts.

98.       armegon
1872 posts
 17 Jun 2008 Tue 01:31 am

Quoting thehandsom:

Tell us then.. Go on..
Tell what Kurds have done to Turks.
So we all learn.


Simple betrayal, rebellion and now terrorism, the ones you callled “young people”. Why you abstain to explain this? Also why you only asked Kurds what happened to others?

Quoting thehandsom:

I simple asked you a question about what you think my agenda is..
Can you answer? do you have an answer? can you possible have an answer?


Your agenda is simple, your agenda is no different than Ali Kemal’s agenda during the Independence war, your agenda is no different than the today’s so-called intellectuels who are paid by EU in order to weaken army or basis of Turkish Republic, your agenda is like the mentality that Turks cannot do anything by themselves. You are at the side of capital not the labour, you support globalisation not the independence. I come up with the ones like you, they all think people can be liberalized only sermoning about human-rights and freedom but they discard the economical and social rights, human-rights and freedom is nothing if people cannot live like a human. You simply support colonilisation. I bet you are a fan of Sorros.

Quoting thehandsom:

Look.. This 'secret agenda' thing is not your idea..it is 'embeded' into your head by years and years of listening pathetic statements of the army generals and disfunctional politicans.
The sad thing is, you DONT EVEN REALISE IT.


This not secret agenda Mr.thehansom, this all tested and experienced during the history and still we experience not listening the pathetic statements of anyone. You really sold out and the sad thing is YOU REALIZE THIS .

Quoting thehandsom:

Now look above, you are unable take this 'foreign element' out of your brains. You have no answers without 'foreign hands or dark forces'.
What lessons do you think I am taking here?
who are they you think giving lessons?
what are they? be specific!!


You reach the truth via unique answer to a question, Mr thehandsom, i think YOU DONT REALIZE THIS TIME . Thats the fact, and their mission is to attack Mustafa Kemal, Army , try to belittle them in the eyes of Turkish nation, thats continuing propogand and thats the lesson but money given who take lessons .

Quoting Daydreamer:

Absolutely right about the former, and wrong about the latter. Perhaps you fail to notice that the whole idea of 'they're here to get us' is a bit like warning people against the UFO. Everybody is there to get you - USA, UE, and Handsom with his Secret Agenda.


Hmmm, I have to say that you talking nonsense with your UFO simile, last time i gave you an example of Mumcu about this, i think you fail to understand or you are not able to understand. Thats not the fear, not the idea of “everybody is here to get Turkey”, it is observation through the history, what Mumcu wrote was actually portraying future. Now let me ask, what will they gain if Turkey accept genocide? Whats the aim? What if Turkey declare the south east as a province? Whats the aim? Why do you think Turkey forced to sell lands on south east to Israelities? Why do you think Turkey trying to be alienated from nation state? More suitable for colony?

Quoting Daydreamer:

You just come looking for conspirators.


Check again my posts especially first times to see what i was doing here. I posted nearly 700 posts and 70% of them are translations in order to help people. So you should check the others.

Quoting Daydreamer:

As for this forum being biased, I don't see how. Everybody is free to post what they like, how other members respond is everybody's individual business. As long as you don't get vulgar and rude, you may have any opinion you like.


Good lesson thanks, i dont know this . I think i gave a clue why i called forum biased;

Quoting armegon:

Ahh i forgot, im narrow-minded, here who says Kurds/PKK are freedom-fighters express their thoughts freely but when i say Kurds are nothing but new petrol guardians of Yankees then i became nationalist/racist. But in fact in my entire life i have no connection with the nationalists or ülkücü thats the ironic part


No endurance like this posts immediately labelled, seems double standards to me, also i remember members who were forced to leave the site because of posting about sionism, some leave the site because of insults, labelings etc.

Quoting Daydreamer:

In case you haven't noticed, there are many positive things written about Turkey here. You just have to get used to the fact that people have different opinions about your country's policies than you.


By my side, im not looking for positive things about Turkey, im only looking for honesty and justice. And you just have to get used the fact that people do not have to think like you especially for his own country so try to show some respect before labelling people.

Quoting Daydreamer:

Now that's a bit of an overstatement, don't you think? Nobody here fears or hates those who love their country.


Actually not, it is not so hard to observe this for a Turk in the forum, thats the reason there arent so many Turkish contributers to the site except the handsom with the not-secret agenda .

Quoting Daydreamer:

I dearly love my homeland and I'm sure so do most of the users here. It is the paranoia and nationalism that we find ridiculous.


Ohh thats good for you, then i can call you patriot and for sure most of the users are here patriot. I find ridiculous that you are obsessed with paranoia and nationalism more paranoid than the real paranoids.You forgot to say that “Ataturk is not god”. I got bored explaning the same thing.

Quoting Daydreamer:

As for experts or those who arrogantly claim to know better. If people write about their conclusions based on some material they read or experiences they were through what makes their logic worse than yours?


Who said they are experts? Thats not based on logic, thats based on facts actually. It is something like vicious circle, starts same, finishes same. Its something like programmed.

Quoting Daydreamer:

For me it's hard to understand Turkish justice if a person is banished for what he writes (not talking about whether he is right or wrong but merely about the fact that in 21st century somebody is banished for intellectual crimes), or when a person faces a trial for saying that she wouldn't like her son to die on war.


I think i have given you an example of this from the laws of Austria and France before, you never touched them and asking this to me again, i said again banishing people because of thoughts is wrong , as for the laws of Turkish some sure should be revised.

Quoting Daydreamer:

Liberal is wrong?


These are the liberals serve Soros, i explained their aims, now let me ask, is it true for them to slander Army and Atatürk? They go along with the islamists now.

99.       tamikidakika
1346 posts
 17 Jun 2008 Tue 02:09 am

Quoting thehandsom:


Tell us then.. Go on..
Tell what Kurds have done to Turks.
So we all learn.




If you knew some Ottoman history you would be aware of the genocide in which the Kurds slaughtered 30,000 of Alevi Turks only in one day with the order of Yavuz.

So here is your chance to LEARN.

100.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 17 Jun 2008 Tue 03:46 am

Quoting tamikidakika:

Quoting thehandsom:


Tell us then.. Go on..
Tell what Kurds have done to Turks.
So we all learn.




If you knew some Ottoman history you would be aware of the genocide in which the Kurds slaughtered 30,000 of Alevi Turks only in one day with the order of Yavuz.

So here is your chance to LEARN.


Thanks for the info..

But it was 500 years ago though!

I knew Yavuz chopped every alevi's head until Caldiran (in the city of Van) along the way when he was going to battle with persians.
But never heard of what you say..

incase anybody is interested:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Chaldiran

101.       tamikidakika
1346 posts
 17 Jun 2008 Tue 04:52 am

Quoting thehandsom:



But it was 500 years ago though!



You asked what The Kurds have done to Turks, and I told what they did. If it`s a matter of time, why are you still making arguments over this silly "mountain Turks" phrase. It was 50 years ago!!!


Quoting thehandsom:



I knew Yavuz chopped every alevi's head until Caldiran (in the city of Van) along the way when he was going to battle with persians.
But never heard of what you say..



read this article,

Turkmen Katliami

I would also suggest you to read "Osmanli`nin Kanli Tarihi" by Ismail Metin to see the Ottoman-Kurdish collaboration.

102.       Daydreamer
3743 posts
 17 Jun 2008 Tue 11:33 am

Quoting armegon:


Your agenda is simple, your agenda is no different than Ali Kemal’s agenda during the Independence war, your agenda is no different than the today’s so-called intellectuels who are paid by EU in order to weaken army or basis of Turkish Republic, your agenda is like the mentality that Turks cannot do anything by themselves. You are at the side of capital not the labour, you support globalisation not the independence. I come up with the ones like you, they all think people can be liberalized only sermoning about human-rights and freedom but they discard the economical and social rights, human-rights and freedom is nothing if people cannot live like a human. You simply support colonilisation.


I'm not Handsom, but it froze me to read it. Weaken Turkish army? And what will happen after? All surrounding countries will attack you? And occupy your homeland? Right, all the countries are looking for it. Ok, perhaps I don't get the Turkish love for their army as, culturally, I've been taught that the more power the army has, the worse the result as army is a great field for abuse in dangerous hands. But, maybe, Turkish army is the only self-deciding institution of this kind. Also, I don't get that either globalise or be independent thought. No country exists on their own, even if they are not structured in organisations, they have treaties and pacts and other documents organising cooperation with other countries. I don't understand what you fear so much about other countries, like those in EU. Somehow, they didn't lose their cultural identity, they don't have the same laws, they are free to decide for themselves about key factors, other decisions are discussed and best options are advised. Is that so bad? Oh, right...I forgot that if Turkey was structured like that, everybody would immediately want to rob it. So many countries in Europe but everybody's hungry for Turkey.

Quote:


Hmmm, I have to say that you talking nonsense with your UFO simile, last time i gave you an example of Mumcu about this, i think you fail to understand or you are not able to understand. Thats not the fear, not the idea of “everybody is here to get Turkey”, it is observation through the history, what Mumcu wrote was actually portraying future. Now let me ask, what will they gain if Turkey accept genocide? Whats the aim? What if Turkey declare the south east as a province? Whats the aim? Why do you think Turkey forced to sell lands on south east to Israelities? Why do you think Turkey trying to be alienated from nation state? More suitable for colony?


Yeap, I guess I'm unable to understand as I've always had a problem with serious approach to conspiracy theories and mental conditions. Throughout history borders of all countries on all continents have been changing, was it all a conspiracy? Colonisation period is over as well. Those international treaties that you're so afraid of regulate it. They ensure that no country can colonise another one.
What will happen? Let me think...what happened to Germany when they were tried for genocide? Oh, I know. They were colonised - after all it's a nice, well-structured country in the heart of Europe. I don't recall exactly but I think it was either Poles or Jews that got it...

Quoting armegon:

Ahh i forgot, im narrow-minded, here who says Kurds/PKK are freedom-fighters express their thoughts freely but when i say Kurds are nothing but new petrol guardians of Yankees then i became nationalist/racist. But in fact in my entire life i have no connection with the nationalists or ülkücü thats the ironic part


Actually I don't remember anyone writing that PKK are freedom fighters, on the contrary, most members posting here consider them to be a terrorist organisation. Also, US interventions in the east have been widely commented here and usually in a very negative way. Sometimes Americans debate with those issues, sometimes they agree. I haven't noticed anyone being banned for criticising USA, nor have there been people praising terrorists (as far as I remember).

Quote:

also i remember members who were forced to leave the site because of posting about sionism, some leave the site because of insults, labelings etc.


Really? I don't remember that. But I do remember members who openly criticise Zionism and are still members here, also, a Jewish member deleted her membership as she found this site anti-semitic. How come that reading the same site we have such different opinions? Can you please give me the nicks of members forced to leave the site because of their opinions?

As for insults, don't you think this rule is right? Civilised people exchange views, boorish troublemakers do not discuss issues but insult - what good does it bring? Besides, I believe it's a standard in all fora that insults and vulgarism is forbidden.

Quote:


By my side, im not looking for positive things about Turkey, im only looking for honesty and justice. And you just have to get used the fact that people do not have to think like you especially for his own country so try to show some respect before labelling people.


As a matter of fact I do realise that. Actually I think it is the nationalists that have a problem with people thinking not like them. As for respect, I respect people's right to express their opinions, whatever they are. But I also have the right to disagree with them. I don't see a problem here. There's a difference between 'You are stupid, shut up' and 'I don't agree with you.'

Quote:


Actually not, it is not so hard to observe this for a Turk in the forum, thats the reason there arent so many Turkish contributers to the site except the handsom with the not-secret agenda


Wrong, there are many Turkish users, yet, they usually get busy spamming women with PMs or get the feeling of being exploited soon after joining this site (at least that was the case with some of my friends - they said they were flooded with translation requests while their questions about English were often left unanswered)

Quote:


Ohh thats good for you, then i can call you patriot and for sure most of the users are here patriot. I find ridiculous that you are obsessed with paranoia and nationalism more paranoid than the real paranoids.You forgot to say that “Ataturk is not god”. I got bored explaning the same thing.


Yes, you may. And no, I'm not obsessed, it's just a reaction to the conspiracy theories some members here display.

Quote:


Who said they are experts? Thats not based on logic, thats based on facts actually. It is something like vicious circle, starts same, finishes same. Its something like programmed.


Exactly! That's what you called them. In some of your posts you sarcastically called people speaking about Turkey experts. And I don't remember anyone calling themselves that. My point was that your understanding of facts does not need to be better than theirs. Even historians (who, I hope you'll agree here, are experts) disagree on some issues.

Quote:

I think i have given you an example of this from the laws of Austria and France before, you never touched them and asking this to me again, i said again banishing people because of thoughts is wrong , as for the laws of Turkish some sure should be revised.


Sorry, I must have missed them, I'll look for them in a moment. Great that we agree here about laws that need to change. But, try to be honest, if it hasn't been for the international reaction to it, would Turkey ever reconsider those laws? Perhaps, only because that evil west condemned Turkey for that, has Turkey decided to do something about it. If it hadn't been for the western reaction, why would people responsible for these laws want to change them?

Quote:


These are the liberals serve Soros, i explained their aims, now let me ask, is it true for them to slander Army and Atatürk? They go along with the islamists now.


Ok, I got lost here again. I will never understand why it's bad to criticise army and Ataturk. If what they're saying is a lie, then they'll be easy to prove wrong, right? As for Islamists, I don't see a big difference between a system that does not allow open critique of everything, and a religious movement. I'd rather go for religion should be separated from politics, and heroes are a personal matter. Feel free to love God in any way you want, feel free not to admire a person only because you may be punished for that. And loving Army...that's what I don't get at all. Sure, army is necessary, especially in a hot-spot like Turkey, but it is not a creature with its own brain, it is a group of people trained to obey orders. Who can guarantee that those people on top serve good of an individual?

I'm sorry if I missed your point, but, in brief, do you believe that it should be illegal to criticise Ataturk and army? How does it correspond to what you wrote about crimes of thought and freedom of speech?

Do you think the evil west really wants to take over and colonise Turkey? Come on, 80 mln people...West Germany cannot get back on their economy after uniting with East Germany. Do you know what cost it would be to incorporate Turkey into a country. And which country would that be? Or, if those prospective occupants didn't want to invest in Turkey than why would they need it? To plough it? Parts of Europe lie barren and to plough them wouldn't mean having to go on a war. To enslave Turks? Kind of against human rights and then...why? To build pyramids? Sorry. Can you please explain to a non-expert why and who would like to colonise Turkey. Thanks

103.       Daydreamer
3743 posts
 17 Jun 2008 Tue 11:50 am

Found the piece about France. But, what I gather from this article EU condemned France for that.


"The various European institutions, eager not to be seen as possessing double-standards, have been as strong in their condemnations of France’s new bill as they have been of Turkey’s Article 301 in the past. Both pieces of legislation condemn the freedom of discussion on the 1915 genocide issue; in opposition, the respective governments only recognise the acceptance of the genocide (France) or the rejection of it (Turkey). EU Enlargement commissioner, Olli Rehn, has issued many warnings to Turkey over the literary controversies for “insulting Turkishness” but on 9 October, he turned to France to issue a similar warning : “…The French law on the Armenian genocide is of course a matter for French lawmakers, but there is a lot at stake for the European Union as well, and the decision may have very serious consequences for EU-Turkey relations … This [legislation] would put in danger the efforts of all those in Turkey – intellectuals, historians, academics, authors – who truly want to develop an open and serious debate without taboos and for the sake of freedom of expression.” That is to say, in a nutshell, that the predicament of problematic tensions is characterised by a removal of free expression on a very pertinent political issue as well as the damage to Turkey’s future relations in Europe."

104.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 17 Jun 2008 Tue 01:06 pm

Quoting armegon:

terrorism, the ones you callled 'young people'. Why you abstain to explain this?



Well I always said PKK is a terrorist organisation and it is the product of Turkish nationalism which you support wholeheartedly.
Calling them 'young people' wont change this fact. And I mentioned previously, I am unable to understand the 'blood thirsty' hysteria which is supported the idiotic media with headlines 'killed 300/500/700'. End of the day, terrorists or not, you are killing citizens of Turkey and every half way decent thinking person acknowledges the fact that it is not helping 'the main objective of Turks and Kurds living peacefully'.



Quoting armegon:


Your agenda is simple, your agenda is no different than Ali Kemal’s agenda during the Independence war, your agenda is no different than the today’s so-called intellectuels who are paid by EU in order to weaken army or basis of Turkish Republic, your agenda is like the mentality that Turks cannot do anything by themselves. You are at the side of capital not the labour, you support globalisation not the independence. I come up with the ones like you, they all think people can be liberalized only sermoning about human-rights and freedom but they discard the economical and social rights, human-rights and freedom is nothing if people cannot live like a human. You simply support colonilisation. I bet you are a fan of Sorros.


This is a gem I would like to say.
I can show you hundreds/thousands of same type of statements coming from the army generals. You are proving my case that they are not your ideas. They are 'inserted' into your brains.
I never said that 'Turks can not do anything by themselves'. On the contrary, I believe the potential but, boy, your ideas are in the way!
About globalisation, lol, I have heard of many things about it and I would criticize it in generic terms but I would not never put 'if you support the globalisation you are against the independence'.
So where is this secret EU budget which is used to pay these human-rights and freedom loving Turkish intellects? eh?
Look.
This is simply a lie, came up from brain damaged politicians and 'fell off and bumped on the head during training' army generals. They even do NOT believe themselves when they are saying those things..They are addressed to you and you BITE it..

And who is this Sorros?

Quoting armegon:


This not secret agenda Mr.thehansom, this all tested and experienced during the history and still we experience not listening the pathetic statements of anyone. You really sold out and the sad thing is YOU REALIZE THIS .


Now you are talking like a brain damaged person up there.
Please ask your parents if there was an accident, which a pot landed on your head when you were little and playing under a balcony, before labeling people like 'sold out'.

Quoting armegon:


You reach the truth via unique answer to a question, Mr thehandsom, i think YOU DONT REALIZE THIS TIME . Thats the fact, and their mission is to attack Mustafa Kemal, Army , try to belittle them in the eyes of Turkish nation, thats continuing propogand and thats the lesson but money given who take lessons .


I never attack Ataturk. I really have huge respect for him. But the army is a different matter really..
I think of them the power player in the politics and since every power player in politics, they are tend to get corrupt.
I want army in its place.
But you, not wanting to see the army where it belongs to , ultimately betraying them.

Will you tell me where this lessons are and who pays/how much etc?

(104 Messages in 11 pages - View all)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...  >>
Add reply to this discussion




Turkish Dictionary
Turkish Chat
Open mini chat
New in Forums
Why yer gördüm but yeri geziyorum
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much, makes perfect sense!
Etmeyi vs etmek
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much!
Görülmez vs görünmiyor
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much, very well explained!
Içeri and içeriye
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much for the detailed ...
Present continous tense
HaydiDeer: Got it, thank you!
Hic vs herhangi, degil vs yok
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much!
Rize Artvin Airport Transfer - Rize Tours
rizetours: Dear Guest; In order to make your Black Sea trip more enjoyable, our c...
What does \"kabul ettiğini\" mean?
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much for the detailed ...
Kimse vs biri (anyone)
HaydiDeer: Thank you!
Random Pictures of Turkey
Most liked