If all the people who worry about "being slaves to the media", "slaves to indoctrination" ad so forth would worry about people who are actual slaves (like is still very common in the cacao-trade, in the sex-industry, etc.), the world would become a lot better.
My basic premise in life is live and let live. I only have problem with religious people once they break my part of "living". You make choices for your life, I make choices for my life. I get ticked off when I hear that my local supermarket is selling halal meat, without labelling it. I want to be able to make an informed choice, and I should not be secretly fed meat that isn´t stunned before slaughter. But at the same time the newly installed "burka-ban" in Holland ticks me off as well. I don´t want to walk around in a burka, but who am I to decide for others if they can´t? The problem with the burka is that often the family pressures a woman to wear it. Government says it´s against this pressure... So they pressure a woman to not wear it! How distorted.
This discussion reminds me a bit of the Maldives. The first thing that pops into your mind is "tropical islands"... But do you also know that it is a muslim country? And that other religions are in fact illegal there? It seems these tropical islands could teach Iran a lesson.
This is stolen from wikipedia, about the Maldives: The open practice of all other religions is forbidden and such actions are liable to prosecution under the law of the country. According to the revised constitution, in article two, it says that the republic "is based on the principles of Islam." Article nine says that "a non-Muslim may not become a citizen of the Maldives"; number ten says that "no law contrary to any principle of Islam can be applied in the Maldives." Article nineteen states that "citizens are free to participate in or carry out any activity that is not expressly prohibited by sharia or by the law."
Edited (1/5/2011) by barba_mama
|