Welcome
Login:   Pass:     Register - Forgot Password - Resend Activation

Turkish Class Forums / Living - working in Turkey

Living - working in Turkey

Thread locked by a moderator or admin.
Moderators: libralady, sonunda
Buddhist marry Muslim
(280 Messages in 28 pages - View all)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...  >>
1.       DaMoonGirl
3 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 11:54 am

I have turkish boyfriend but I'm so afraid to talk or to think about marry with him because it look like a dream, build castle in the air. If Buddhist girl wanna marry with muslim guy in Turkey, what will be happened later? Do I have to change religion to be muslim? It would be appreciated if you have experience or heard anything about this before. Please advice me, thanks alot

Adambawlak liked this message
2.       selin21
206 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 12:03 pm

Yes You must be muslim.

3.       CANLI
5084 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 12:09 pm

Quoting selin21:

Yes You must be muslim.


Only Muslim ?
Or can she be Christian or jewish too ?
I guess she can be,right ?

4.       Peace
108 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 12:10 pm

Changing your religion will depend on your boyfriend's views. His family might influence this issue also. I mean if they are very religious then you will most likely be asked to convert to Islam, but if they are more openminded it won't matter much if you decide to remain a Buddhist. I suggest you discuss this matter with your boyfriend. Ask him how he honestly feels about your religious beliefs.

5.       Peace
108 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 12:20 pm

Quoting CANLI:

Quoting selin21:

Yes You must be muslim.


Only Muslim ?
Or can she be Christian or jewish too ?
I guess she can be,right ?




Yes, a small population of Turks are Christian or Jewish but the majority are muslim so I'm assuming her boyfriend is a muslim.

6.       CANLI
5084 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 12:22 pm

Ohh no, you dont understand,its acceptable for Muslims to marry Christian or Jewish only,i mean not forbidden.

7.       xkirstyx
363 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 12:26 pm

You can't change your religion for somebody. It's crazy. If you are Bhuddist it means you believe this religion. If you change what you believe for someone else, you are not true to yourself. And most of all, you cannot lie to God. If you believe in something, surely what you believe about God is more important than what your boyfriend believes in. This issue isn't something about culture differences. Being true to your religion is a very different matter.

8.       margaretka_84
0 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 12:29 pm

If I know good, Muslim can marry with somebady who believes in one God, so Muslim can marry with Muslim, with Christian or with Jew. Of course if they are more religous, they want (his family) marriage only with other Muslim. As every realigous people they worry about future belief their grandchildren, and belief their son. You should ask your boyfriend about answer, because somebady often says "it's not important, all people believe in the same God or our kids will choose their belief when they will be adult" but really it isn't so "pink" and it's not true. Everything looks so easy only for start. Good luck!

9.       mltm
3690 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 12:45 pm

In fact, muslim men are allowed to marry a girl who is monotheist (who believes in one god), they are not allowed to marry with an atheist, or with a buddhist, but he can marry with a christian, jewish, or even deist (who doesn't believe in religions but believe in one God).
On the other hand, muslim girls are only allowed to marry muslim boys.
But it depends how much you're engaged to the islamic rules.

10.       mltm
3690 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 12:48 pm

Quoting CANLI:

Quoting selin21:

Yes You must be muslim.


Only Muslim ?
Or can she be Christian or jewish too ?
I guess she can be,right ?



Are you joking or you really don't know the answer?

11.       CANLI
5084 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 12:54 pm

Quoting mltm:

Quoting CANLI:

Quoting selin21:

Yes You must be muslim.


Only Muslim ?
Or can she be Christian or jewish too ?
I guess she can be,right ?



Are you joking or you really don't know the answer?



Raising my Eyebrow,hmmmm
If i give an answer,you say that is in Islam but not what Turkiye apply,if i ask you dont accept?!!
Of course i know the answer in Islam,but how shall i know the answer in your Turkish law ?!!!

12.       mltm
3690 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 01:05 pm

There's the rules written in Kouran and they're unique. This is an islamic rule and in Turkey it's the same, but as you know every muslim is free to apply the laws as he likes and is responsible of himself. As long as he believes in Allah, that the İslam is the last religion, the prophets and ahiret, he is considered a muslim.
I know muslim turkish girls who marry christian men. The point is in Turkey, because we are not an islamic republic, we don't judge or punish people because they don't apply islamic rules.

13.       CANLI
5084 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 01:15 pm

Ok, you mean you apply Islam rules as it written in Kur'an in your life but you dont use them in laws.
And it is people's choices to follow them or not .
Yes ?

ALLAH will ask everyone for himself,and wont ask everyone for the other.
People are grown up know the right from the wrong and its their own choices .
I agree for that.

14.       mltm
3690 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 01:27 pm

Quoting CANLI:

Ok, you mean you apply Islam rules as it written in Kur'an in your life but you dont use them in laws.
And it is people's choices to follow them or not .
Yes ?



Yes, exactly.

And you have just said that you don't apply Sharia law in Egypt, so is it free for a muslim girl to marry a christian man?

15.       CANLI
5084 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 01:39 pm

In marriage we have 2 seperates laws,one for Muslims and other for Christians.
And i guess it cannt be both way.
But i dont know for sure,so that i will check it and feed it back to you.

Its Haram by Islam of course,but i dont know about the law.

16.       azade
1606 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 02:22 pm

To get back on the topic...

Technically you can't marry a muslim man unless you're also muslim, christian or jewish but by regular people in Turkey I don't think it's being put to practice much.

And of course his family can't force you to change you're religion. It is blasphemic to say the shadada (what you say in order to become muslim) if you don't mean it in your heart.

If you're practicing buddhism and he's practicing islam it's going to be really hard.

17.       karekin04
565 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 06:18 pm

First of all I really get sick of this kindoff thing when people say "if he or his family are so religous you must convert"! Well if he was so damn religous he wouldn't be getting in a relationship with a buddhist or athiest, jew or christian in the first place right?

My advice to you is not take anyone from heres advice, only you can know your boyfriend and his family so if your in love or starting to fall in love you need to investigate his family and him yourself before its to late and your heart gets broken. Like someone said earlier if you believe in your religion you would be a fool to even consider converting... it sickens me that just because you love a muslim you have to be one! Religion is not a pair of socks so don't pretend you can take off and on whenever its befitting to be religous.

18.       Chantal
587 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 06:29 pm

Quoting karekin04:

First of all I really get sick of this kindoff thing when people say "if he or his family are so religous you must convert"! Well if he was so damn religous he wouldn't be getting in a relationship with a buddhist or athiest, jew or christian in the first place right?

My advice to you is not take anyone from heres advice, only you can know your boyfriend and his family so if your in love or starting to fall in love you need to investigate his family and him yourself before its to late and your heart gets broken. Like someone said earlier if you believe in your religion you would be a fool to even consider converting... it sickens me that just because you love a muslim you have to be one! Religion is not a pair of socks so don't pretend you can take off and on whenever its befitting to be religous.



+1!!! Even though you are quite direct here Only convert to another religion if you really believe in that religion as well.. if you start practising another religion just because of your boyfriend, then what's the use of believing...

19.       karekin04
565 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 06:35 pm

Quote:

+1!!! Even though you are quite direct here Only convert to another religion if you really believe in that religion as well.. if you start practising another religion just because of your boyfriend, then what's the use of believing...

Thanks ChantAl, I'm all about being direct today guess I'm in a fiesty mood today... probably not the best time to voice my opinions huh?

20.       mltm
3690 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 06:45 pm

I think we are also free to convert to a religion just because we want to marry someone. It's a decision about yourself, and if you want to pretend that you're a muslim or a christian, you should do it.

21.       azade
1606 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 06:46 pm

Quoting mltm:

I think we are also free to convert to a religion just because we want to marry someone. It's a decision about yourself, and if you want to pretend that you're a muslim or a christian, you should do it.



Why would anybody do that?

22.       mltm
3690 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 06:48 pm

Quoting azade:

Quoting mltm:

I think we are also free to convert to a religion just because we want to marry someone. It's a decision about yourself, and if you want to pretend that you're a muslim or a christian, you should do it.



Why would anybody do that?



In order to be a happy person.
Sometimes we have to choose the things that we don't really belive but we think that it would make us happier.

23.       karekin04
565 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 06:49 pm

Quoting azade:

Quoting mltm:

I think we are also free to convert to a religion just because we want to marry someone. It's a decision about yourself, and if you want to pretend that you're a muslim or a christian, you should do it.



Why would anybody do that?

Its not really a decision about yourself at all then, its actually you being just plain phony, wich is a very low thing to do. To pretend you are weatlhy is dreaming, to "pretend" to be muslim or any religion is just sick

24.       mltm
3690 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 07:03 pm

Quoting karekin04:

Quoting azade:

Quoting mltm:

I think we are also free to convert to a religion just because we want to marry someone. It's a decision about yourself, and if you want to pretend that you're a muslim or a christian, you should do it.



Why would anybody do that?

Its not really a decision about yourself at all then, its actually you being just plain phony, wich is a very low thing to do. To pretend you are weatlhy is dreaming, to "pretend" to be muslim or any religion is just sick



I think humans are not like computers. It's not white or black. Choosing a religion is a personal decision, but how do we make this choice, how do we really believe in a religion? When we're born to a muslim family and into a muslim society, most of us become muslim because somehow we have to be, and I think usually later believing comes automatically. We don't make our choices really independantly. And we can convert to a religion for whatever reason, it's later nobody's problem how much we believe in it. The choice is ours and it's not really deceiving someone. Maybe we make this choice because we think it would be better for us, for our life, or maybe we think we will start to really believe it as time passes. I don't think it's a low thing to do.

25.       karekin04
565 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 07:08 pm

Quote:

I think humans are not like computers. It's not white or black. Choosing a religion is a personal decision, but how do we make this choice, how do we really believe in a religion? When we're born to a muslim family and into a muslim society, most of us become muslim because somehow we have to be, and I think usually later believing comes automatically. We don't make our choices really independantly. And we can convert to a religion for whatever reason, it's later nobody's problem how much we believe in it. The choice is ours and it's not really deceiving someone. Maybe we make this choice because we think it would be better for us, for our life, or maybe we think we will start to really believe it as time passes. I don't think it's a low thing to do.

It is true, we are not like computers we have feeling and reason... so I would think that if later in life we do not believe in what we grew up on it would be for a "reason" not just to pretend. I respect your opinion I think I just don't get why you are saying that someone does not need a reason to convert. Small or big there should always be a reason, who would do such a thing just for fun?

26.       janissary
0 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 07:29 pm

Başımıza "Buda" mı gelecekti


in islam, a woman doesnt have to change her religion when she marries with a muslim. Because father is the leader of family anf children took father's surname. in islam Children grow with their father's culture and religion. but it s not allowed for a muslim woman to marry with a man different religion.


but everything is depends on family. they may refuse or accept. it s impossible to say they will refuse you or accept you. coz in turkey there are very strict families.

27.       TeresaJana
304 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 08:31 pm

how old was "muhammed" or any previous prophet when he got 'religion' ? was he or any prophet born able to even speak or know themselves what 'religion' is...he/she learned from whomever 'taught' them to live and get along with the people in the family, the community, etc.
some people feel a need for reflection and reason for their lives at some point in their lives, at whatever age or even due to some traumatic event...why is marriage any different?...choice of religion or way of life...is not first a choice...it is whatever you are born to, whatever your environment, your experiences, likes and dislikes.
if marrying into a 'muslim' religion because of marriage brings a new inner enlightenment...who would want to say ...no sorry..you can join our exclusive club? How long does it take for a child to learn namaz or any rules for that matter and become habit? pls dont discourage people from the muslim religion. it takes time to make certain 'lifestyle changes' but it doesnt take much time after reading the Quran to know that it is something truly beautiful. (my personal opinion)

28.       xkirstyx
363 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 11:11 pm

No-one is trying to discourage anyone from being muslim. The point is , she has already said she is Bhuddist. She believes in something else. It's about pretending to believe in something else for someone else.

29.       TeresaJana
304 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 11:20 pm

I 'pretended' to be a mommy when I played with my dolls as a little girl. pretending, familiarizing is in fact a learning tool to the real thing...nothing wrong with that.

30.       azade
1606 posts
 02 May 2007 Wed 11:50 pm

But it's not the way to become religious.
There's no forcing in islam.

By the way as a practicing buddhist can you even marry?

31.       DaMoonGirl
3 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 06:49 am

Thanks alot for all suggestions, it's so appreciated for me. Deep inside my mind I can see the impossible between he and I but little part always say everything is possible. We never talk about this topic before, maybe coz he knows that I will fight if he starts this topic. During the last Ramadhan, he asked me when I would fast for Ramadhan then I did that for one day and it's made me understand the feeling of poor people.

My believe is in Buddhism...BUT
My heart is belong to him.

Thanks once again for all of you...Teşekkürler

32.       kat007
95 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 07:27 am

DaMoon-

Hey, I want to write what I (myself) am going through and hopefully someone will benefit from these experiences as I've searched for someone in a similar boat and haven't found one to talk to about this.

The person I like/care about is Muslim from a traditional/religious family. Well, in order for us to be together (marriage) then I'd have to convert/revert to Islam. Since I believe in one God but am not firmly religious (leaning towards Christianity before) but now I am investigating and researching Islam. I like a lot of what I read, especially all the strong values and beliefs. I think if people really adhere to all those guidelines and live their life following Allah's guidance than they are striving to be better people.

However, the bad thing is that most of those guidelines are in direct conflict with what I grew up with or am used to. Shall I say all the "freedom" of the West has somehow gotten me used to it, even if I'm starting to realize that kind of lifestyle may not be the best.

Ex: 5.2 million couples live together and are not married in america. 40% of those couples will split in 5 years. 28% of men are never married. Married couples are only 49.7% in the U.S.

And all those sources that try to get us to try different men/women like magazines, movies, friends, society/western culture etc. it's sickening. We want to date/sleep with everyone and not marry anyone (western culture). Yet how do you go from one extreme to the next? It's like a bad disease, and you know you're dying from it but how to quit your bad habits?

I think Islam is a great religion but we are human (with all our human failings). I've talked to Muslims living in western areas that are committing all kinds of sins that they are aware of and yet keep doing. It makes me wonder if I am strong enough to convert to Islam and be a more virtuous person or if after my conversion I am still following my old behaviors/habits which I think is worse than not converting. It's kind of an internal battle if you will. Hopefully, I'll have it sorted out soon.

Kat

33.       gezbelle
1542 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 08:48 am

Quoting azade:

By the way as a practicing buddhist can you even marry?



yes, you can marry if you are buddhist...

34.       DaMoonGirl
3 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 09:45 am

Thanks Kat. It's a great that you can share your experiences to me. I come from other side of this world "Asia" so totally different from West or Arab. However, I learn many things about that from books or websites and my boyfriend tells me about Islamics as well. I believe that all religions wanna people to be good persons. Now I'm still confuse and think too many things. Your suggestion give me some ideas how to step forward in the next day, thanks.

35.       elyas_520
1 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 10:00 am

waaawww,a big Battlefield!!!
but in a word, you must be convert to muslim.

36.       jamila
4 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 10:26 am

of course you have to be amuslim

37.       Trudy
7887 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 12:15 pm

Quoting jamila:

of course you have to be amuslim



I don't get the 'of course' part. Let everyone make their own choice, have their rights in believing what they want or not. Again I agree so much with karekin who said: http://www.turkishclass.com/forumTitle_11_7983_106

38.       panta rei
0 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 01:26 pm

Quoting gezbelle:

yes, you can marry if you are buddhist...



Nice! Then I must immediately switch to Buddhism! lol

39.       Roxy
209 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 01:43 pm

Hello everyone,

I am muslim and my husband is catholic..and I havent changed my religion or my husband didn't change his religion..so there are no rules or laws that muslim person can or can not marry someone from a different religion.It is all up to you basically..

40.       selin21
206 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 01:58 pm

Abdestsiz namaz olur mu demişler ben kıldım oldu demiş.Yani lafı buraya getirmeyin.Sizin yapıyor olduklarınız islamın cevaz verdiği anlamına gelmez.

They asked ? can pray be without ablution ? He said i did.and it did. İ say do not bring the word here.

The wrong things that you do does not mean islam let it.

41.       Roxy
209 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 02:00 pm

Quoting selin21:

Abdestsiz namaz olur mu demişler ben kıldım oldu demiş.Yani lafı buraya getirmeyin.Sizin yapıyor olduklarınız islamın cevaz verdiği anlamına gelmez.



You know what, I've decided to modify my answer to your reply, because to me it is not worth to argue about it. We are all human and we all have our differences.

42.       azade
1606 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 03:25 pm

Here are the conditions for a man marrying a non-muslim:

"For a Muslim man to marry a non-Muslim woman, several conditions must be met:

1. She must be from the People of the Book, i.e., Jewish or Christian.

2. She must believe in a divinely-revealed scripture recognized by Islam.

3. She must be chaste.

4. The man must be positive his children will be raised as Muslims.

Otherwise, such a marriage would be considered sinful and prohibitively disliked.

There is nothing wrong with letting her know that you prefer to marry a Muslim. However, it is completely up to her to decide whether or not she wants to accept Islam."

from sunnipath.com

Sorry about that...but I don't think his family will object unless they are practicing muslims. If you're both culture-religious (or what's the word?) there should be nothing standing in your way if you really want to get married. I was technically a christian before I married but I'm muslim now, by choice.

The reason I asked about buddhists marrying is that they are supposed to seperate themselves from all kinds of desire and so forth and I thought that marriage counts there as well. Anyway I'm not an expert of course

43.       azade
1606 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 03:27 pm

elyas_520 and jamila > WHY? It's haram to force islam upon anyone

44.       panta rei
0 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 04:11 pm

Quoting jamila:

so she has to leave him



I supposed religions exist not to part people, lovers in particular, but to join them together.

45.       Roxy
209 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 04:20 pm

Quoting jamila:

of course its not good, so she has to leave him



wow!!! a bit harsh isn't it???? :-S

46.       Elisa
0 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 04:44 pm

Quoting TeresaJana:

I 'pretended' to be a mommy when I played with my dolls as a little girl. pretending, familiarizing is in fact a learning tool to the real thing...nothing wrong with that.



This falls a bit short, doesn't it?
Pretending to be a muslim when you're not is deluding and cheating yourself and others. It's like faking to love your husband while your heart is with your secret lover..

47.       Chantal
587 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 05:07 pm

Why respond to Jamila, she's not even giving arguments for why someone should leave their bf

48.       armegon
1872 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 06:05 pm

If you believe in one God ,you do not set up partners with God and do good deeds(then you are also muslim ), then you can marry a muslim(if he is the same), that is what Kur’an says…This is the condition. In Kur’an Allah only forbids to marry with Idolworshippers and the people who set up partners with Allah. Only Allah knows what is in heart, who is faithful.

49.       catwoman
8933 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 07:12 pm

So the situation is that the boyfriend expects you to adjust your beliefs about the world, god, life... according to his wishes. As you said, he already showed that he "expects" you to do that, without even wondering about your feelings about it - whether you would want to do this at all, how you would feel about it, what his and your concerns are, or maybe whether it would be better for him to move to your country to avoid the family's expectations... any of this! Instead, he thinks that it's your duty to adjust to him. It's like telling somebody "since you are my girlfriend, you have to believe what I tell you to believe". That's treating the person as his possession, as an object without thoughts and feelings. Faith is not something you just change like socks (as it was well put earlier). It's a result of your own thought process, your own view on life, something that reflects who you are, and NOT a result of someone telling you what you should think. That is manipulation and emotional slavery!
It's really weird to me why so many women keep boyfriends that obviously don't respect them enough. Could be a result of the brainwashing of Disney films that perpetually tell us that you still have to love the prince that hides behind the beast. What kind of love is it when the guy tells you that in order to be with him, you have to hypocritically change your thoughts, ideas, faith, roots... everything!

50.       panta rei
0 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 07:18 pm

In the case that a woman does want her boyfriend to change his belief, -which is very likely everywhere- your thoughts immediately goes invalid, catwoman! Pity!

51.       catwoman
8933 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 07:27 pm

Quoting panta rei:

In the case that a woman does want her boyfriend to change his belief, -which is very likely everywhere- your thoughts immediately goes invalid, catwoman! Pity!



If you think that something became invalid, then you obviously didn't get the point. If a woman expects her boyfriend/husband to change his beliefs according to her whims, the guy should dump her right away! The same philosophy applies to both parts equally!

52.       panta rei
0 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 07:34 pm

So, it has nothing to do with men and/or women. Or better, it is not the case of being man and/or woman.

53.       karekin04
565 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 07:38 pm

Quote:


I don't get the 'of course' part. Let everyone make their own choice, have their rights in believing what they want or not. Again I agree so much with karekin who said: http://www.turkishclass.com/forumTitle_11_7983_106

awww thanks Trudy, sending you my big invisible hug smily

54.       catwoman
8933 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 07:39 pm

Quoting panta rei:

So, it has nothing to do with men and/or women. Or better, it is not the case of being man and/or woman.



It has to do with the type of behavior, not whether it's a man or a woman. However, majority of the problems (especially the really serious ones) are caused by men, so it is an issue that is specifically about men.

55.       Trudy
7887 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 08:04 pm

Quoting catwoman:

It has to do with the type of behavior, not whether it's a man or a woman.



To me it has to do with respect for the (non-)belief of others, especially a partner. Assuming your partner (m/f) will automatically change his/her belief just because you say so, is as disrespectful as it can be. Freedom of belief is basic, if you do not give that, you do not love.

(You is not personal.)

56.       aslı
342 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 08:39 pm

You better ask this question to your boyfriend. May be he is not that religious at all. You can feel sorry, think if its worth to abandon your beliefs. Read more about islam and sufizm. May be you will find some similarities, make you feel better!

57.       TeresaJana
304 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 08:39 pm

For me personally...God gave me a mind and a heart and freedom of choice to open doors or to close them. By my own curious nature and admiration for many muslim people or any culture or religion I find that I have hands to open a book, I have a mind to be able to read and a heart to accept all people and brain enough to realize God made all humans. I found something lacking in christianity...answers and contradictions mainly same as I find in any religion or culture. I personally find the Quran to be truthful, the fact that it was maintained not to be altered in any way appealed to me as does the writings. yet as one poster put "one condition to marry is one must be chaste' however, in the Quran there is divorce and remarriage allowances and a time with which one can do this. There is conditions upon who you can marry but allowances for inviting to become muslim.
Opening and closing doors is a personal thing. Not a religious thing. pretending or practicing or physically going thru the motions of adapting to a new environment, changes in the community...all things necessary to get along, survive and exist happily within one's heart and mind and spirit.

58.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 10:59 pm

Quoting TeresaJana:


pretending or practicing or physically going thru the motions of adapting to a new environment, changes in the community...all things necessary to get along, survive and exist happily within one's heart and mind and spirit.


if you're pretending (to be a muslim), then keep pretending, but dont give such "wisdoms" to other young people. your "wise" words may do harm.

59.       Umut_Umut
485 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 11:23 pm

Look in islam marrying with nonmuslims is not a good idea. But its not forbidden. For muslim men its more easy to marry. Its a bit hard and nearly forbidden for muslim women. So no problem.

By the way your religion is to you and his religion is to him. Who cares if you are budhist, muslim, christian or whatelse. If you want to revert to islam do it. But if you dont want its really nonsense if you will make it only for a man.
And nobody deserve to ask you to revert.

Take care. And decide yourself. Byee

60.       TeresaJana
304 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 11:25 pm

your "wise" words may do harm.

there are far more powerful thıngs ın thıs world than myself but ı see my ınexpertıse ın ıslam culture has nothıng to do wıth extendıng love to a person of a dıfferent faıth ıt could be the reason to be drawn to one another somethıng ın theır style that ıs appealıng ıs dırectly ın proportıon to theır faıth and belıefs and culture

61.       mltm
3690 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 11:50 pm

Quoting Roxy:

Hello everyone,

I am muslim and my husband is catholic..and I havent changed my religion or my husband didn't change his religion..so there are no rules or laws that muslim person can or can not marry someone from a different religion.It is all up to you basically..



You cannot say that there're no laws, if we're talking about the laws in the Kuran, yes, there's such a law that a muslim girl is only allowed to marry a muslim man, but it's up to you to respect this rule or not.

62.       azade
1606 posts
 03 May 2007 Thu 11:58 pm

Yes exactly mltm!
Did nobody read what I wrote earlier?? -caugh- post 42 -caugh- Please refer from giving false advice arkadaşlar.

63.       armegon
1872 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 12:03 am

Quoting mltm:


You cannot say that there're no laws, if we're talking about the laws in the Kuran, yes, there's such a law that a muslim girl is only allowed to marry a muslim man, but it's up to you to respect this rule or not.



As far as i know, there is not a verse like that mltm, i think its source is hadiths. If you know there is a verse in Kur'an like this, can you please share it to us?

64.       azade
1606 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 12:06 am

Quoting armegon:

Quoting mltm:


You cannot say that there're no laws, if we're talking about the laws in the Kuran, yes, there's such a law that a muslim girl is only allowed to marry a muslim man, but it's up to you to respect this rule or not.



As far as i know, there is not a verse like that mltm, i think its source is hadiths. If you know there is a verse in Kur'an like this, can you please share it to us?



I'll try to find out. Hang on.

65.       mltm
3690 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 12:22 am

Look, I'm not a muslim that really practises the religion, but I have muslim friends,a friend whose father is imam, and other good practising muslim friends, and I referred to them and they all told me that a muslim woman is not allowed to marry a muslim man, and even if it's more accepted for a muslim man to marry a monotheist woman, a muslim woman is strongly preferred. Here it's explained (in turkish)http://www.hayrettinkaraman.net/sc/00100.htm

66.       panta rei
0 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 12:22 am

Are there any similar rules in the Koran, mltm, such as "A muslim girl is not allowed to go to France, a non-Muslim country, to learn French, not-Arabic"?

67.       mltm
3690 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 12:24 am

Quoting panta rei:

Are there any similar rules in the Koran, mltm, such as "A muslim girl is not allowed to go to France, a non-Muslim country, to learn French, not-Arabic"?



France is not a non-muslim country, here there're 5 million muslims, and also hundred thousands of jews besides catholics.

68.       catwoman
8933 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 12:26 am

Quoting mltm:

Look, I'm not a muslim that really practises the religion, but I have muslim friends,a friend whose father is imam, and other good practising muslim friends, and I referred to them and they all told me that a muslim woman is not allowed to marry a muslim man, and even if it's more accepted for a muslim man to marry a monotheist woman, a muslim woman is strongly preferred.



That's a very nice, tolerant, equal, loving "law"... makes me wonder who came up with it...

69.       armegon
1872 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 12:33 am

Quoting mltm:

Look, I'm not a muslim that really practises the religion, but I have muslim friends,a friend whose father is imam, and other good practising muslim friends, and I referred to them and they all told me that a muslim woman is not allowed to marry a muslim man, and even if it's more accepted for a muslim man to marry a monotheist woman, a muslim woman is strongly preferred. Here it's explained (in turkish)http://www.hayrettinkaraman.net/sc/00100.htm



But its source is hadiths not the Kur'an i think, Kur'an is a book on justice, if men can do something, also women can do it...Others are humans interpretation...Allah does not say something like that, do you think Allah forgot something in Kur'an whereas Allah says Kur'an is fully detailed. And that hadiths contradict with Kur'an, so we must believe in Allah not Hayrettin Karaman...

70.       mltm
3690 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 12:34 am

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting mltm:

Look, I'm not a muslim that really practises the religion, but I have muslim friends,a friend whose father is imam, and other good practising muslim friends, and I referred to them and they all told me that a muslim woman is not allowed to marry a muslim man, and even if it's more accepted for a muslim man to marry a monotheist woman, a muslim woman is strongly preferred.



That's a very nice, tolerant, equal, loving "law"... makes me wonder who came up with it...



The reason of this is I think and probably is because woman and man nature are different in İslam (maybe also in other religions). The chief of the family is man in İslam and the woman nature is weaker, but this does not mean that she's inferior (but some men sees women inferior, it's true). The man is dominant and the children are raised according to the man's religion (because he has a dominant nature). Anyway, a muslim woman is preferred because two muslim parents is better than one muslim parent, and if all muslim men marry with nonmuslims, and if the muslim women are not allowed to marry non muslim then how can she marry some one?

71.       catwoman
8933 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 12:38 am

Quoting mltm:

The reason of this is I think and probably is because women and men nature are different in İslam (maybe also in other religions). The chief of the family is man in İslam and the woman nature is weaker, but this does not mean that she's inferior (but some men sees women inferior, it's true). The man is dominant and the children is raised according to the man's religion (because he has a dominant nature). Anyway, a muslim woman is preferred because it's better than one muslim parent, and if all muslim men marries with nonmuslims, and if the muslim women are not allowed to marry non muslim then how can marry some one?



mltm, please spare more of these explanations, I gathered more then enough that in islam women are inferior to men, because koran said so!!!

72.       catwoman
8933 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 12:39 am

Quoting panta rei:

Are there any similar rules in the Koran, mltm, such as "A muslim girl is not allowed to go to France, a non-Muslim country, to learn French, not-Arabic"?



great point lol lol lol lol

73.       azade
1606 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 12:42 am

Quoting catwoman:



mltm, please spare more of these explanations, I gathered more then enough that in islam women are inferior to men, because koran said so!!!



Can you please give an example catwoman?

I think that the thought of women being inferior is a cultural thing, but a religious thing.

74.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 12:43 am

Quoting mltm:

Anyway, a muslim woman is preferred because two muslim parents is better than one muslim parent, and if all muslim men marry with nonmuslims, and if the muslim women are not allowed to marry non muslim then how can she marry some one?


i just cant see the point in here. dont raise an artificial issue please.

75.       kaddersokak
130 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 12:46 am

Quoting DaMoonGirl:

I have turkish boyfriend but I'm so afraid to talk or to think about marry with him because it look like a dream, build castle in the air. If Buddhist girl wanna marry with muslim guy in Turkey, what will be happened later? Do I have to change religion to be muslim? It would be appreciated if you have experience or heard anything about this before. Please advice me, thanks alot



if u are so afraid of him, then what do u like about him yes muslim guys loooooove to convert girls into Islam. but i recommend you to be urself.

76.       catwoman
8933 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 12:52 am

Quoting azade:

Can you please give an example catwoman?

I think that the thought of women being inferior is a cultural thing, but a religious thing.



did you mean "NOT a religious thing"? then you must not see what you're looking at. religion and culture always mingle together and are influenced by one another. it's strange to say that something is cultural but not religious in a country that's 99% muslim and every part of social life is affected by religious tradition (not necessarily beliefs).
what other examples do you want? mltm explained it very clearly .

77.       azade
1606 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 01:03 am

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting azade:

Can you please give an example catwoman?

I think that the thought of women being inferior is a cultural thing, but a religious thing.



did you mean "NOT a religious thing"? then you must not see what you're looking at. religion and culture always mingle together and are influenced by one another. it's strange to say that something is cultural but not religious in a country that's 99% muslim and every part of social life is affected by religious tradition (not necessarily beliefs).
what other examples do you want? mltm explained it very clearly .



Ahh yes sorry I meant "not". Don't know where that but came from.
You're completely right that religion and culture mingle but when talking about inferiosity and traditions it's still important to keep them apart, because this doesn't come from islam it comes from some of the cultures where people happen to be muslim.
I'm looking for an example from Qur'an-i kerim, not interpretations.

78.       mltm
3690 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 01:04 am

Quoting armegon:

Quoting mltm:

Look, I'm not a muslim that really practises the religion, but I have muslim friends,a friend whose father is imam, and other good practising muslim friends, and I referred to them and they all told me that a muslim woman is not allowed to marry a muslim man, and even if it's more accepted for a muslim man to marry a monotheist woman, a muslim woman is strongly preferred. Here it's explained (in turkish)http://www.hayrettinkaraman.net/sc/00100.htm



But its source is hadiths not the Kur'an i think, Kur'an is a book on justice, if men can do something, also women can do it...Others are humans interpretation...Allah does not say something like that, do you think Allah forgot something in Kur'an whereas Allah says Kur'an is fully detailed. And that hadiths contradict with Kur'an, so we must believe in Allah not Hayrettin Karaman...



Yes, it's said that there's not any "ayet" that clearly bans the woman from marrying non muslim man, but there're ayets about man marrying woman, and it's said that on such an important matter if a woman was allowed to marry a non muslim man, there should have been an ayet about it. And in some ayets there're some points that we can come to this conclusion. This page explains better(again in turkish):http://www.geocities.com/IslamPencereleri/gayrimuslimevlilik.htm
Hadiths are not Kouran laws ofcourse, but isn't it weird that we can come to a conclusion that a muslim woman can marry a non muslim man whereas there's not any ayet about it while there's a detailed ayet about man marrying non muslim woman.

79.       mltm
3690 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 01:08 am

Quoting armegon:


Kur'an is a book on justice, if men can do something, also women can do it..



I think the justice is not the same in Kur'an as we have created it in our society. The duties of woman and man are not always same in the book. While a woman needs the permission of a father or an uncle etc to marry the man that she wishes, a man doesn't need a permission.

80.       armegon
1872 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 01:12 am

Quoting mltm:



Yes, it's said that there's not any "ayet" that clearly bans the woman to marry non muslim man, but there're ayets about man marrying woman, and it's said that on such an important matter if a woman was allowed to marry a non muslim man, there should have been an ayet about it. And in some ayets there're some points that we can come to this conclusion. This page explains better(again in turkish):http://www.geocities.com/IslamPencereleri/gayrimuslimevlilik.htm
Hadiths are not Kouran laws ofcourse, but isn't it weird that we can come to a conclusion that a muslim woman can marry a non muslim man whereas there's not any ayet about it while there's a detailed ayet about man marrying non muslim woman.



Check over on 2/221 that verse addresses both women and men

81.       mltm
3690 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 01:14 am

Quoting catwoman:



mltm, please spare more of these explanations, I gathered more then enough that in islam women are inferior to men, because koran said so!!!



I think the problem with you is you always challenge with yourself, it should be a very tiring thing. You don't accept your own nature, and your own nature makes you frustrated. Being weaker at some points to men doesn't make me feel inferior to them, I am at peace with my own nature.

82.       armegon
1872 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 01:14 am

Quoting mltm:

Quoting armegon:


Kur'an is a book on justice, if men can do something, also women can do it..



I think the justice is not the same in Kur'an as we have created it in our society. The duties of woman and man are not always same in the book. While a woman needs the permission of a father or an uncle etc to marry the man that she wishes, a man doesn't need a permission.



You are right here

83.       catwoman
8933 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 01:16 am

Quoting mltm:

I think the justice is not the same in Kur'an as we have created it in our society. The duties of woman and man are not always same in the book. While a woman needs the permission of a father or an uncle etc to marry the man that she wishes, a man doesn't need a permission.



Yes, exactly! DaMoonGirl - read this, you won't get such a clear explanation of this religion anywhere else - and decide whether you really want to live like this! (My advice is run away).

84.       catwoman
8933 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 01:21 am

Quoting mltm:

I think the problem with you is you always challenge with yourself, it should be a very tiring thing. You don't accept your own nature, and your own nature makes you frustrated. Being weaker at some points to men doesn't make me feel inferior to them, I am at peace with my own nature.



Hehehehe, this made me laugh like hell lol lol lol. Thanks for your psychoanalysis, worthy of a sect leader. I'm really happy for you that you accepted your weak, naive, unable to survive without a man nature. I'm very well, thanks for caring!

85.       azade
1606 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 01:21 am

That's not completely true because the Qur'an says that you should respect and obey your parents so a man shouldn't marry someone that his parents oppose to.

86.       armegon
1872 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 01:25 am

Quoting azade:

That's not completely true because the Qur'an says that you should respect and obey your parents so a man shouldn't marry someone that his parents oppose to.


Then man who marry without permission of his parents, doing something wrong, so man should also take permission

87.       azade
1606 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 01:28 am

Quoting armegon:

Quoting azade:

That's not completely true because the Qur'an says that you should respect and obey your parents so a man shouldn't marry someone that his parents oppose to.


Then man who marry without permission of his parents, doing something wrong, so man should also take permission



Well yes. Who would want to marry someone that their parents hate anyway? Ok maybe in our time people do that because of the disintegration of family values but I can't imagine it being a nice situation for anyone.

88.       catwoman
8933 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 01:33 am

Quoting azade:

That's not completely true because the Qur'an says that you should respect and obey your parents so a man shouldn't marry someone that his parents oppose to.



This is kind of funny, you can't even agree on these things among yourself... lol.

89.       azade
1606 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 01:43 am

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting azade:

That's not completely true because the Qur'an says that you should respect and obey your parents so a man shouldn't marry someone that his parents oppose to.



This is kind of funny, you can't even agree on these things among yourself... lol.



Care to elaborate?

I don't know what some muslims do...all religious are being disintegrated, I'm talking about what actual islam, not peoples interpretations.

90.       mheart72
73 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 02:07 am

Damoon,
You mention that you havent really discuss this "religion" thing with your boyfriend. Do you you think its wiser and better if you do so that you know what he really thinks about this subject. You will just make yourself sick of thinking too much. For all you know he might not want you to convert then you're stressing yourself for nothing. If he does then its time for you to really weigh the relationship especially your feelings for him. If you dont mind converting then no problem but then i presume you value your religion too. If he wants you to convert and you don't want to, then i think its time to move on. Spare yourself and the guy more heartaches .

91.       gezbelle
1542 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 02:08 am

Quoting azade:

The reason I asked about buddhists marrying is that they are supposed to seperate themselves from all kinds of desire and so forth and I thought that marriage counts there as well. Anyway I'm not an expert of course



The Buddhist views on marriage are very liberal: in Buddhism, marriage is regarded entirely as personal and individual concern, and not as a religious duty. There are no religious laws in Buddhism compelling a person to be married, to remain as a bachelor or to lead a life of total chastity. It is not laid down anywhere that Buddhists must produce children or regulate the number of children that they produce. Buddhism allows each individual the freedom to decide for himself all the issues pertaining to marriage. It might be asked why Buddhist monks do not marry, since there are no laws for or against marriage. The reason is obviously that to be of service to mankind, the monks have chosen a way of life which includes celibacy. Those who renounce the worldly life keep away from married life voluntarily to avoid various worldly commitments in order to maintain peace of mind and to dedicate their lives solely to serve others in the attainment of spiritual emancipation.

from: http://web.singnet.com.sg/~alankhoo/MoreQA.htm#Marriage

Because Buddhists are accepting of other religions, even within the same household, there are no religious laws that require that both individuals in a marriage should be Buddhist or that conversion to either's religious conviction is warranted or expected.

Although the Buddha expressed no specific rules and regulations regarding marriage, advice on leading a happy married life was offered, and suggested that fidelity and loyalty are the most essential attributes of a happy marriage.


from: http://www.deaconministry.com/buddhism.htm

one side of my family are buddhists and they are all married

92.       vineyards
1954 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 02:43 am

93.       panta rei
0 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 02:46 am

Quoting catwoman:

(My advice is run away).



Mine would exactly be the same! The further away the better! lol

94.       kaddersokak
130 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 04:46 am

Quote:


But its source is hadiths not the Kur'an i think, Kur'an is a book on justice, if men can do something, also women can do it...Others are humans interpretation...Allah does not say something like that, do you think Allah forgot something in Kur'an whereas Allah says Kur'an is fully detailed. And that hadiths contradict with Kur'an, so we must believe in Allah not Hayrettin Karaman...



I am sure u know better than Hayrettin Karaman Give Allah some advice too.

95.       armegon
1872 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 05:17 am

Quoting kaddersokak:


I am sure u know better than Hayrettin Karaman Give Allah some advice too.


I believe in Allah, not Hayrettin Karaman. You go and kiss Hayrettin Karaman’s hand(or your moderate Islam leader), maybe he can give some advices to you or who knows may be he can put you into the heaven

96.       kaddersokak
130 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 05:51 am

Quoting armegon:

Quoting kaddersokak:


I am sure u know better than Hayrettin Karaman Give Allah some advice too.


I believe in Allah, not Hayrettin Karaman. You go and kiss Hayrettin Karaman’s hand(or your moderate Islam leader), maybe he can give some advices to you or who knows may be he can put you into the heaven



If u beleive in Allah, then why do you hate people who study Islam? are you smarter than a renown professor (Hayreddin Karaman)? Why do wee need teachers to understand maths and not just read the math book? are mat teachers telling us lies/ and what about christinaity? do you think the Christians should not listen their priests either? please tell us because you seem to know Islam better than prof. karaman

97.       kat007
95 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 06:52 am

Quoting mheart72:

Damoon,
You mention that you havent really discuss this "religion" thing with your boyfriend. Do you you think its wiser and better if you do so that you know what he really thinks about this subject. You will just make yourself sick of thinking too much. For all you know he might not want you to convert then you're stressing yourself for nothing. If he does then its time for you to really weigh the relationship especially your feelings for him. If you dont mind converting then no problem but then i presume you value your religion too. If he wants you to convert and you don't want to, then i think its time to move on. Spare yourself and the guy more heartaches .



This is good advice for her.

98.       kat007
95 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 07:13 am

Quoting catwoman:

So the situation is that the boyfriend expects you to adjust your beliefs about the world, god, life... according to his wishes. As you said, he already showed that he "expects" you to do that, without even wondering about your feelings about it - whether you would want to do this at all, how you would feel about it, what his and your concerns are, or maybe whether it would be better for him to move to your country to avoid the family's expectations... any of this! Instead, he thinks that it's your duty to adjust to him. It's like telling somebody "since you are my girlfriend, you have to believe what I tell you to believe". That's treating the person as his possession, as an object without thoughts and feelings. Faith is not something you just change like socks (as it was well put earlier). It's a result of your own thought process, your own view on life, something that reflects who you are, and NOT a result of someone telling you what you should think. That is manipulation and emotional slavery!
It's really weird to me why so many women keep boyfriends that obviously don't respect them enough. Could be a result of the brainwashing of Disney films that perpetually tell us that you still have to love the prince that hides behind the beast. What kind of love is it when the guy tells you that in order to be with him, you have to hypocritically change your thoughts, ideas, faith, roots... everything!



I know you're probably not talking about me but I want to add my own 2cents to this anyway. At first I did think like you and some of those thoughts did cross my mind. But he does not expect nor is he forcing his religion on me. The entire decision of converting or not is up to me, that's why I'm taking my time to learn about it and decide what I want to do and this may even take a year or two. Well, I can't exactly ask him to give up his religion and be like me (since I don't even have a religion) and I would never ask.

As to a man changing all my thoughts, ideas, faith, roots...everything (lol) that's kind of a extreme statement. But my thoughts are that if I do indeed convert, then he's not changing anything about me...I would be following Allah's guidance and the Quran. I told him that I would still do whatever the heck I want if it's not covered in the Quran... like eat at 3am in the morning, wear purple or blue sock if I feel like it or eat with chopsticks (he laughed and said I'm being difficult now.) lol, hey look the Quran doesn't focus on minor details, it basically is more of a guide on how to live morally.

I don't think a marriage where 2 people with such opposing beliefs/value could live in harmony. I believe that it's the best to adapt the ideas/beliefs/value that will help things run more smoothly and to ensure that there is minimal amounts of arguments. It's called "compromising".

99.       catwoman
8933 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 07:48 am

Katoo7, please don't get me wrong. If you are happy this way, if it's something you believe in and feel good about doing - keeping your free thinking and independence - I absolutely agree with you. However, I'm against the attitude of a guy who expects the woman to compromise or change for him, and of course doesn't even consider himself doing anything similar for the sake of the relationship. I'm against women being coerced into converting because the boyfriend threatens that otherwise they cannot be together or marry. This is a horrible type of manipulation that establishes the man's dominance and ownership of the woman's thinking and her choices, which is just the beginning to all the other manipulation he's ready to do if he has the capacity for it. Seeing how strongly a male dominant religion Islam is (remember - women are inferior according to them!!!), you need to be very careful what you're getting yourself into and what your bf's and his family's attitude is if you don't want to end up in a place of misery and no return. There are too many examples of women converting into Islam for their bf's, then moving to their country at which point the sweet, loving man she thought she knew turned into a beast under the influence of his family and culture.

Also, "compromising" is something BOTH sides are supposed to do, not one.

100.       kat007
95 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 08:22 am

By Sharrifa Carlo

"In reference to women, the Quran and the Hadiths have mandated various rules in regard to behavior, appearance and rights. Some of these may seem constricting to western women, causing them to pity Muslim women, but these women fail to realize that Muslim women do not feel constricted by these rules; we feel liberated, and in fact, as Muslim women we should pity western women. The Muslim woman is not forced to display herself to find a husband. She does not lower herself into competition with other women, using her body as a lure. Secondly, the Muslim women supports no man. Her property is off limits to her husband. It is his duty to provide for her and her children, regardless of her personal wealth. Thirdly, the man has no right to physically harm his wife. While some western scholars negate this by quoting from the Quran that a man is allowed to beat his wife, they fail to mention that the only condoned instrument for this beating is a siwak. (A siwak is a piece of wood, used as a toothbrush, about as thick as a pencil, and about half the length.) It is highly doubtful that this instrument could cause a child any damage, much less a woman."

The second and third reason is hilarious.

The Western concept of women's freedom and rights, in reality, equates women's rights to their "right" to three main things:

1. Taking off their clothes or wearing skimpy clothes.

2. Taking on jobs outside of the home

3. Mixing with men.

Sigh, there goes the drinking, clubbing, wearing halter tops or skimpy dresses. And all the guy friends and exes...can't talk to them anymore. As to the 9-5 gig, sigh, geez women will just have to sit on their butts all day, do a little cooking and maybe switch to commodities trading or something from home. Ok, I'm just joking... who knows what the heck I'll do (I don't even know myself) and men say that women can't make up their minds lol.

101.       Trudy
7887 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 08:33 am

Quoting mltm:

I think the problem with you is you always challenge with yourself, it should be a very tiring thing. You don't accept your own nature, and your own nature makes you frustrated. Being weaker at some points to men doesn't make me feel inferior to them, I am at peace with my own nature.



Women weaker than men? From what era does this thinking come, the 18th century? (And I'm not talking about muscles!)

102.       kat007
95 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 08:58 am

Quoting mltm:



I think the problem with you is you always challenge with yourself, it should be a very tiring thing. You don't accept your own nature, and your own nature makes you frustrated. Being weaker at some points to men doesn't make me feel inferior to them, I am at peace with my own nature.



I think what she means is that it's stressful to always try to prove that we are more competent and more successful than men. In the end, who cares and what does it matter? Sure, we can put our minds to it and do anything we want ex: fly an airplane, be a doctor, run marathons, be an executive, a lawyer, make millions...but the only person we're trying to prove something to is "ourselves" because in the end, we only have to live with and face the person we are (in the mirror).

In Islam, men and women have different roles and it doesn't mean that women are inferior (I've talked to different people about this.) For instance, do you know that being a housewife is equivalent to doing multiple jobs (cook, cleaner, van driver, tutor, caretaker, laundry operator etc.) and if she did all those jobs outside she would be paid $183,000 yr according to a survey.

My mom is a housewife and I had no respect for her "position" for a long time, I always use to tell her that she should have a career and more ambition. I even said things like I hate cooking and cleaning,...I don't want to do that and I'll get a maid for that. But I am starting to have an appreciation for motherhood despite my not wanting to give up my freedom or to ever be a housewife.

In Islam, when asked who is the most important person in a family... the answer is "mothers" and the prophet said "mother, mother, mother" then "father" so that role is important and that's why the children are so respectful of their parents.

103.       Capoeira
575 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 09:19 am

Quoting kat007:

Quoting mltm:



I think the problem with you is you always challenge with yourself, it should be a very tiring thing. You don't accept your own nature, and your own nature makes you frustrated. Being weaker at some points to men doesn't make me feel inferior to them, I am at peace with my own nature.



I think what she means is that it's stressful to always try to prove that we are more competent and more successful than men. In the end, who cares and what does it matter? Sure, we can put our minds to it and do anything we want ex: fly an airplane, be a doctor, run marathons, be an executive, a lawyer, make millions...but the only person we're trying to prove something to is "ourselves" because in the end, we only have to live with and face the person we are (in the mirror).

In Islam, men and women have different roles and it doesn't mean that women are inferior (I've talked to different people about this.) For instance, do you know that being a housewife is equivalent to doing multiple jobs (cook, cleaner, van driver, tutor, caretaker, laundry operator etc.) and if she did all those jobs outside she would be paid $183,000 yr according to a survey.

My mom is a housewife and I had no respect for her "position" for a long time, I always use to tell her that she should have a career and more ambition. I even said things like I hate cooking and cleaning,...I don't want to do that and I'll get a maid for that. But I am starting to have an appreciation for motherhood despite my not wanting to give up my freedom or to ever be a housewife.

In Islam, when asked who is the most important person in a family... the answer is "mothers" and the prophet said "mother, mother, mother" then "father" so that role is important and that's why the children are so respectful of their parents.



There seems to be an issue of romanticizing the Islamic and the Western view of women. Indeed to say that 'Western' society or 'islam' values women more is nothing but an attempt to look at our world through rose colored lenses. Look around and just look at women and their lives in "Christian" and "Islamic" nations and you will see...reality is not a pretty picture. Covered or mini-skirted women across the world are NOT being respected or valued!

104.       vineyards
1954 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 12:03 pm

105.       Trudy
7887 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 12:19 pm

Quoting vineyards:

This world is full of unjustice. I am 40 and I spent all my childhood with the dream of going abroad, seeing the world up and down. I observed youngsters like me as they received papers from embassies bearing that bleeding red "rejected" stamp. Everyone could come to Turkey but Turks had to be very rich to be able to go abroad.

I promised I would not go abroad if it meant being treated that way. After all those years, although having enough means, I have still not attempted to obtain a visa for once. If you ask me whatever the reason for restricting this world to people of other countries can be, it is still something to be ashamed of.



I fully agree, I am ashamed that I can come into your country without any hassle but you cannot come to mine the same way.

106.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 01:08 pm

vineyards
1. you went offtopic.
2. you are still that boy at 20, afraid of being "rejected", too proud to get refused. life isnt that easy, there are people who try again and again upon "rejections". and in your case you even didnt try!
sitting on your bottom and blaming the rest of the world isnt wise. take your bum up and make your dreams come true!

107.       azade
1606 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 02:25 pm

Quoting gezbelle:



Thanks gezbelle, it's always nice to learn something new

108.       CANLI
5084 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 02:50 pm

Quoting mltm:


You cannot say that there're no laws, if we're talking about the laws in the Kuran, yes, there's such a law that a muslim girl is only allowed to marry a muslim man, but it's up to you to respect this rule or not.



+1000000

Yes,that is true,Muslim girl can't marry other man except Muslim man,and

Muslim man is allowed only to marry a woman with a holly book,meaning

Muslim,Christian,Jewish, not anything else.

And YESSS,its in Kor'an not just in Hadith too

İ suggest for those who argue is to read Kur'an....and UNDERSTAND!

And btw,Muslim girl can marry without her father or uncle permission.
İts not haram.

When its written her father marry her,or uncle,that was for virgins,because in the old days girls were shy to say i want to marry this man infront of people so she tells her father or uncle that she accept.

And last,in İslam we should respect our parents of course and do what they want but not for a personal bases.
İ mean,if Father said something we should obay,but if he told his son to divorce his wife,then if the son didnt obay is that haram ?!

Of course NOT !

There was a post here,and its more than logic,if you need a teacher to understand Math ,or even to study Language,so of course you ned a teacher to understand what you read,and dont understand it well,or understand it wrong

So,how come you dont need same in İslam or Kur'an?!
You see yourself better than mathe teacher or language teacher ?
Why do you think you understand better than İmam ?

Read first,understand firts,then start to have own opinion.

How can you have opinion in something you dont understand ?!

109.       CANLI
5084 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 02:55 pm

Quoting Trudy:

Quoting jamila:

of course you have to be amuslim



I don't get the 'of course' part. Let everyone make their own choice, have their rights in believing what they want or not. Again I agree so much with karekin who said: http://www.turkishclass.com/forumTitle_11_7983_106



İts not achoice to agree on the of course part or not Trudy.
They are talking about rules in İslam,so its not negotiable!

İf i say Salat is must in İslam for 5 times at the day,someone will say 3 are enough and start negotiate ?!

İts a RULE !

110.       CANLI
5084 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 03:08 pm

İslam as any other religions consist of rules,and those rules are NOT negotiable.

Maybe you could've done it if we were at prophets time,but unfortunately Muhamed SAV and Christ RA have died !

So if we follow the rules all,we would be good Muslims or Christians or what ever !

İf we dont follow,its between us and ALLAH.

But at least be honest and say we know and dont follow,and dont hide behinde 'there is no ayat in Kor'an'

No there is ayat,if you dont know,its your responsibility,if you dont understand its also your responsibility.

As you see,in Kor'an there is ayat said Father,or Uncle should marry the girl,that was for a reason,and it didnt say its forbidden the girl marry herself.
What did people understand ?
That its haram'forbidden' a girl marry herself !

There are teachers of each religion 'İmam ,priests,...'
And there are the Holy books make them explain to you !

And if you dont want to obay ,then say i dont do obay,dont day its not there !

We're not kids,at least carry on responsibilities of what you're doing,or not doing.

We are mature enough to do that...i think !

111.       azade
1606 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 03:23 pm

barâk allâhu fîki Canlı inşallah people will listen to you.

112.       vineyards
1954 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 03:30 pm

113.       CANLI
5084 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 03:33 pm

Quoting kat007:




My mom is a housewife and I had no respect for her "position" for a long time, I always use to tell her that she should have a career and more ambition. I even said things like I hate cooking and cleaning,...I don't want to do that and I'll get a maid for that. But I am starting to have an appreciation for motherhood despite my not wanting to give up my freedom or to ever be a housewife.

In Islam, when asked who is the most important person in a family... the answer is "mothers" and the prophet said "mother, mother, mother" then "father" so that role is important and that's why the children are so respectful of their parents.



You know that in İslam housework NOT woman responsibility ?

Woman responsibilities only to manage the house and to rais the kids and take care of them and her husband.

And for all houseworks man should hire a maid or 2 accourding to his wealth and house needs.

And if he couldnt afford,because he's poor or something,then woman does houseworks and he helps her when he comes from work.
And be GRATEFUL to her too.

Because raising the kids and make them good individuals is a very hard work and even not equivalent to the man work but more important too.

Thats why in hadith Rasul said that when a man asked him who is the most one i should care for,Rasul said your mother for 3 times then said your father.

Rasul Muhamed SAV was helping his wife,and sewing his clothes too.

Come to reality how many of Muslims men think and do that now ?!

But at least women should understand when she does a house work,she is doing her husband and her kids a favor,not a duty !

114.       kat007
95 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 03:56 pm

Quoting CANLI:




You know that in İslam housework NOT woman responsibility ?

Woman responsibilities only to manage the house and to rais the kids and take care of them and her husband.

And for all houseworks man should hire a maid or 2 accourding to his wealth and house needs.

And if he couldnt afford,because he's poor or something,then woman does houseworks and he helps her when he comes from work.
And be GRATEFUL to her too.

Because raising the kids and make them good individuals is a very hard work and even not equivalent to the man work but more important too.

Thats why in hadith Rasul said that when a man asked him who is the most one i should care for,Rasul said your mother for 3 times then said your father.

Rasul Muhamed SAV was helping his wife,and sewing his clothes too.

Come to reality how many of Muslims men think and do that now ?!

But at least women should understand when she does a house work,she is doing her husband and her kids a favor,not a duty !



WOW!!! I did not know maids were permissable. Thanks CANLI for telling me, I will bring up this point next time (hehe...) You're the greatest!!!! Now that I imagine myself not doing all the cooking, cleaning, and housework I feel more relief that it is an option.

115.       CANLI
5084 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 05:59 pm

Quoting kat007:

Quoting CANLI:




You know that in İslam housework NOT woman responsibility ?

Woman responsibilities only to manage the house and to rais the kids and take care of them and her husband.

And for all houseworks man should hire a maid or 2 accourding to his wealth and house needs.

And if he couldnt afford,because he's poor or something,then woman does houseworks and he helps her when he comes from work.
And be GRATEFUL to her too.

Because raising the kids and make them good individuals is a very hard work and even not equivalent to the man work but more important too.

Thats why in hadith Rasul said that when a man asked him who is the most one i should care for,Rasul said your mother for 3 times then said your father.

Rasul Muhamed SAV was helping his wife,and sewing his clothes too.

Come to reality how many of Muslims men think and do that now ?!

But at least women should understand when she does a house work,she is doing her husband and her kids a favor,not a duty !



WOW!!! I did not know maids were permissable. Thanks CANLI for telling me, I will bring up this point next time (hehe...) You're the greatest!!!! Now that I imagine myself not doing all the cooking, cleaning, and housework I feel more relief that it is an option.



Of course it is permitted to hire a maid,its not like you are buying them,they are not slaves,you are paying them for their works.

And i said that what should be in İslam,but how many men doing this ? hehe

Even men did exactly like all these argument up when İmam here said that,he said housework are not women's duty,and men should help women in housework if they dont afford a maid,they said,he didnt mean that,and there are no ayat in Kur'an about that !
Even as you know....hmmm well maybe you dont know ..lol
Ok we are ordered from ALLAH to obay Kur'an and Rasulallah so saying its in hadith not in Kur'an is nonsense.

But i guess men are men,and if they cant control men by religion,they try to do it by tradition and customs.

But at least even if women doing the houseworks,they should know they are making a favor and must tell the men that too by logic and true events.

116.       panta rei
0 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 06:24 pm

So, Canlı, what is the case of the maid's husband to be? Will he, too, be able to hire another maid for their houseworks while some other husbands can do? If not, which is obvious, does the Koran say anything about such inequity between people apart from advicing husbands should in that case help their wives? Or does Islam not care such inequity at all?

117.       CANLI
5084 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 07:33 pm

Quoting panta rei:

So, Canlı, what is the case of the maid's husband to be? Will he, too, be able to hire another maid for their houseworks while some other husbands can do? If not, which is obvious, does the Koran say anything about such inequity between people apart from advicing husbands should in that case help their wives? Or does Islam not care such inequity at all?


İm sorry,but i dont get your question right,i'll answer as i understood it,if not so pls tell me.

Well,if the maid's husband is capable of hiring a maid,then so be it.
İf he is not,then he should help his wife.

People've got different income levels,and you cannt expect all levels live the same !

And as i said before,if he is not capable,he should help his wife and be grateful for her efforts.

And i didnt say it was written in Kur'an that is husband should hire a maid,i said Rasullah was doing that,and if they dont afford it,he was helping.

But again,can you tell me where it is written in Kur'an that women should do the housework ?!

118.       catwoman
8933 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 08:00 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

vineyards
1. you went offtopic.
2. you are still that boy at 20, afraid of being "rejected", too proud to get refused. life isnt that easy, there are people who try again and again upon "rejections". and in your case you even didnt try!
sitting on your bottom and blaming the rest of the world isnt wise. take your bum up and make your dreams come true!



femme! good catch, great point!

119.       catwoman
8933 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 08:31 pm

Quoting kat007:


The second and third reason is hilarious.

The Western concept of women's freedom and rights, in reality, equates women's rights to their 'right' to three main things:

1. Taking off their clothes or wearing skimpy clothes.

2. Taking on jobs outside of the home

3. Mixing with men.

Sigh, there goes the drinking, clubbing, wearing halter tops or skimpy dresses. And all the guy friends and exes...can't talk to them anymore. As to the 9-5 gig, sigh, geez women will just have to sit on their butts all day, do a little cooking and maybe switch to commodities trading or something from home. Ok, I'm just joking... who knows what the heck I'll do (I don't even know myself) and men say that women can't make up their minds lol.



The difference is that in the western world, a woman can do whatever she wants, can say openly what she thinks and doesn't have to follow anybody, can be free and independent. Yes, there is brainwashing, there is discrimination and rampant sexism, women are highly valued only for their sexuality and not much more, but they can CHOOSE to not be that way and then they will be respected. And NO, the three things you mentioned are NOT the only things women gained in the modern world. I'm sure you wouldn't want to live the life your grandmother lived and there are many things we take for granted now. In a way, the restrictions of islamic world even sound appealing to some people who don't really understand what it's like to be born in those extremely patriarchal, conservative cultures. To them it might feel like an adventure, especially if they weren't very good at establishing boundaries in their own culture. A few examples of other things women gained (on top of mixing with men and wearing skimpy clothes) is - work opportunities, voting rights, the right to choose who they want to marry, the right to go to school, sharing home responsibilities with the husband, more equal justice towards men and women (for example, when a man has an affair, it's ok, but if a woman has an affair, she deserves punishment if not by death in some islamic countries), punishment of men when they are abusive towards women, or even the freedom to divorce.

It seems to me that you really don't see the reality very well and tend to 'romanticize' (as Capoiera rightly noticed) Islam. If you feel so good about becoming a muslim, good for you, but seeing how you are blind and completely uncritical and one-sided in your criticism, scares me.

In islamic world, there's usually not that much choice for women, while men are allowed almost anything they want to do (multiple wifes, prostitution, porn, few or no responsibilities at home, and what the fuck is that piece about beating wife with a pencil-thick piece of wood!!!!!). Of course it varies from family to family and from person to person, but there's a consistent pattern when you look at the big picture.
Please, don't tell me that women don't wear skimpy clothes in islamic countries or that there's no porn or prostitution. I heard MANY, MANY people say that these things are even more rampant in those countries then anywhere else. Those people excuse themselves very effectively for doing such things. The only difference is that they are more hypocritic about it. Just take Turkey as an example and you'll see how much soft porn is openly published in daily newspapers, it's MUCH worse then it is in any western country and add to that all the more hard core porn that's regularly added to magazines and newspapers and readily available everywhere. You can ask about this any honest man or woman or just see it for yourself and you'll be in for a toxic shock. Yes, they condemn scantily clad women, but they all use them all the time, it's VERY hypocritical.

120.       Annemarrie
33 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 08:45 pm

i accidently saw this quote, and i have a question to ask:how can u marry with a turkish but still keeping ur religion?

121.       Trudy
7887 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 08:45 pm

Quoting catwoman:

The difference is that in the western world, a woman can do whatever she wants, can say openly what she thinks and doesn't have to follow anybody, can be free and independent. Yes, there is brainwashing, there is discrimination and rampant sexism, women are highly valued only for their sexuality and not much more, but they can CHOOSE to not be that way and then they will be respected. And NO, the three things you mentioned are NOT the only things women gained in the modern world. I'm sure you wouldn't want to live the life your grandmother lived and there are many things we take for granted now. In a way, the restrictions of islamic world even sound appealing to some people who don't really understand what it's like to be born in those extremely patriarchal, conservative cultures. To them it might feel like an adventure, especially if they weren't very good at establishing boundaries in their own culture. A few examples of other things women gained (on top of mixing with men and wearing skimpy clothes) is - work opportunities, voting rights, the right to choose who they want to marry, the right to go to school, sharing home responsibilities with the husband, more equal justice towards men and women (for example, when a man has an affair, it's ok, but if a woman has an affair, she deserves punishment if not by death in some islamic countries), punishment of men when they are abusive towards women, or even the freedom to divorce.

It seems to me that you really don't see the reality very well and tend to 'romanticize' (as Capoiera rightly noticed) Islam. If you feel so good about becoming a muslim, good for you, but seeing how you are blind and completely uncritical and one-sided in your criticism, scares me.

In islamic world, there's usually not that much choice for women, while men are allowed almost anything they want to do (multiple wifes, prostitution, porn, few or no responsibilities at home, and what the fuck is that piece about beating wife with a pencil-thick piece of wood!!!!!). Of course it varies from family to family and from person to person, but there's a consistent pattern when you look at the big picture.
Please, don't tell me that women don't wear skimpy clothes in islamic countries or that there's no porn or prostitution. I heard MANY, MANY people say that these things are even more rampant in those countries then anywhere else. Those people excuse themselves very effectively for doing such things. The only difference is that they are more hypocritic about it. Just take Turkey as an example and you'll see how much soft porn is openly published in daily newspapers, it's MUCH worse then it is in any western country and add to that all the more hard core porn that's regularly added to magazines and newspapers and readily available everywhere. You can ask about this any honest man or woman or just see it for yourself and you'll be in for a toxic shock. Yes, they condemn scantily clad women, but they all use them all the time, it's VERY hypocritical.



Great text. I want to add a few other things that are gained: the right to have your own house instead of living with your parents until you get married (which means a life time if you don't marry); the right to choose not to marry but just live together without being 'the shame of the family'; the right to choose your partner, not only a man.

122.       karekin04
565 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 08:59 pm

Quoting catwoman:

The difference is that in the western world, a woman can do whatever she wants, can say openly what she thinks and doesn't have to follow anybody, can be free and independent. Yes, there is brainwashing, there is discrimination and rampant sexism, women are highly valued only for their sexuality and not much more, but they can CHOOSE to not be that way and then they will be respected. And NO, the three things you mentioned are NOT the only things women gained in the modern world. I'm sure you wouldn't want to live the life your grandmother lived and there are many things we take for granted now. In a way, the restrictions of islamic world even sound appealing to some people who don't really understand what it's like to be born in those extremely patriarchal, conservative cultures. To them it might feel like an adventure, especially if they weren't very good at establishing boundaries in their own culture. A few examples of other things women gained (on top of mixing with men and wearing skimpy clothes) is - work opportunities, voting rights, the right to choose who they want to marry, the right to go to school, sharing home responsibilities with the husband, more equal justice towards men and women (for example, when a man has an affair, it's ok, but if a woman has an affair, she deserves punishment if not by death in some islamic countries), punishment of men when they are abusive towards women, or even the freedom to divorce.

It seems to me that you really don't see the reality very well and tend to 'romanticize' (as Capoiera rightly noticed) Islam. If you feel so good about becoming a muslim, good for you, but seeing how you are blind and completely uncritical and one-sided in your criticism, scares me.

In islamic world, there's usually not that much choice for women, while men are allowed almost anything they want to do (multiple wifes, prostitution, porn, few or no responsibilities at home, and what the fuck is that piece about beating wife with a pencil-thick piece of wood!!!!!). Of course it varies from family to family and from person to person, but there's a consistent pattern when you look at the big picture.
Please, don't tell me that women don't wear skimpy clothes in islamic countries or that there's no porn or prostitution. I heard MANY, MANY people say that these things are even more rampant in those countries then anywhere else. Those people excuse themselves very effectively for doing such things. The only difference is that they are more hypocritic about it. Just take Turkey as an example and you'll see how much soft porn is openly published in daily newspapers, it's MUCH worse then it is in any western country and add to that all the more hard core porn that's regularly added to magazines and newspapers and readily available everywhere. You can ask about this any honest man or woman or just see it for yourself and you'll be in for a toxic shock. Yes, they condemn scantily clad women, but they all use them all the time, it's VERY hypocritical.


x a million!!!!

123.       mltm
3690 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 09:01 pm

The real islam is another thing, the male dominant culture in islamic countries is another thing.
You blame some men in islamic countries to be hypocritical, but in fact watching porn, drinking alcohol, having sex without marriage are all forbidden to men. There are men who really obey these rules, and putting forward these things to someone to make her prevent to convert to İslam is nonsense. I really know men who are not hypocritical and who try to apply the rules as it should be.

124.       catwoman
8933 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 09:34 pm

Quoting mltm:

The real islam is another thing, the male dominant culture in islamic countries is another thing.
You blame some men in islamic countries to be hypocritical, but in fact watching porn, drinking alcohol, having sex without marriage are all forbidden to men. There are men who really obey these rules, and putting forward these things to someone to make her prevent to convert to İslam is nonsense. I really know men who are not hypocritical and who try to apply the rules as it should be.



Thank you mltm for exposing more hypocricy in your culture.
I don't know how you manage to make sense out of all the things you guys are claiming. You must be extremely smart!!! So, the male dominant culture has nothing to do with the religion, but I thought you said that women are inferior to men according to islam... And how come men are never inhibited from 'breaking the law', but women are at every occasion...? (remember about the so called 'honor killings' when a woman is killed by her family for having pre-marital sex, but the man she had sex with has no consequences, obviously I don't think either of them should be punished)

So the last line of defense is saying that what you see is not the so called "real islam", that's laughable because none of you really know what "real islam" is. You can't agree on anything consistently and whenever there's a conflict you can't resolve, you say that these things are supposed to be individually interpreted.

To me, it's nonsense to join a group of people that behave hypocritically and don't do what they claim to believe in, even if I liked their religion (it's quite a small population of those who follow everything).

125.       azade
1606 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 09:56 pm

Honor killings has nothing to do with islam either.
But anyway guys this is just going to explode soon I think we should all be openminded and take the blaming a notch or two down.

126.       catwoman
8933 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 10:31 pm

Quoting azade:

Honor killings has nothing to do with islam either.



Then I wonder why nobody in the islamic world criticizes it and tries to do something to prevent them. Only in Turkey, the secular laws are trying to stop these killings by persecuting the murderers. Unfortunately, the family chooses a small child in the family to do the shooting so that nobody goes to prison (yes, the laws aren't that good about it).

127.       panta rei
0 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 10:33 pm

Quoting CANLI:



Well,if the maid's husband is capable of hiring a maid,then so be it.
İf he is not,then he should help his wife.

People've got different income levels,and you cannt expect all levels live the same !



You know, some people are rich by birth as they are born into a rich family. Accordingly their income levels are much higher than those of the rest. They can hire maids while the others can't. One thing is clear: actual economies don't care such inequity. The question is, does Islam as a religion of humankind not care that either? Or let me ask this way: Why can I not expect all levels to be the same? What is it that I lack while some have, in order to have income enough to hire a maid (suppose that I am one who cannot hire a maid.)? Aren't we all human beings? Shouldn't we all be equall in every respect, including income levels? After all, aren't we all the creatures that the same God created? I mean, does the Koran say anything about this point?

128.       qdemir
811 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 10:36 pm

The Relationship Between Men and Women in Islam

Written by Dr. Z. Saritoprak
09.09.2005

The Qur'an invites people to form a family life and points out many wisdoms and benefits of marriage. 'And Allah has given you wives of your own kind, and has given you, from your wives, sons and grandsons, and has made provision of good things for you. Is it then in vanity that they believe and in the grace of Allah that they disbelieve?' (16:72). The Qur'an views marriage as a serious commitment on the part of the husband and wife; it is a covenant between the husband and wife. It speaks of the rights of the husband and the wife. 'If you wish to divorce one wife and marry another, do not take from her the dowry you have given her, even if it be a talent of gold. Is it appropriate to take this by making up reasons for divorce and intentionally sinning? How can you take it back when you have lain with each other and put your heads on the same pillow and entered into a firm contract? That would be improper and grossly unjust' (4:20–21).

In addition to this, the Holy Book in principle emphasizes what is good and consistently declares that spouses should do what is good towards each other. 'O you who believe! It is not lawful for you forcibly to inherit the women (of your deceased kinsmen), nor (that) you should put constraint upon them that you may take away a part of that which you have given them, unless they be guilty of flagrant lewdness. But consort with them in kindness, for if you hate them it may happen that you hate a thing wherein Allah has placed much good' (4:19).

In order to strengthen the ties of marriage, the Qur'an places more responsibility upon the husband's shoulders. It also imposes part of the responsibility upon the community, in the case of a disagreement between spouses. It views divorce, which God dislikes, as the last resort when reconciliation becomes impossible. 'O Prophet! When you (men) divorce women, divorce them for their (legal) period and reckon carefully the period, and keep your duty to Allah, your Lord particularly about the rights of your wives. Expel them not from their houses nor let them go forth unless they commit an immorality such as adultery. Such are the limits (imposed by) Allah; and whoso transgresses Allah's limits, he verily wrongs his soul. You know not: it may be that Allah will afterward bring some new thing to pass. Then, when they have reached their term (a three month period), take them back in kindness or part from them in kindness, and call to witness two just men among you, and keep your testimony upright for Allah. Whoever believes in Allah and the Last Day is exhorted to act thusly. And whosoever keeps his duty to Allah, Allah will appoint a way out for him.' (65:1–2).

Another Qur'anic verse says, 'When you divorce your wives, lodge them where you dwell according to your wealth, and do not pressure them to leave through harassment. And if they are with child, give them their expenses until they give birth to their child. After you cut your relationship with them, if they continue to suckle your children, give them their due payment. Resolve the issue of payment due with kindness amongst yourselves according to your legal customs. If the mother of the child, by not suckling the child causes problems, the father should pay for another woman to suckle his child. Those who are wealthy should give according to their wealth. Those who have limited income, let them give according to their wealth from what God has given them. God makes people responsible only according to their capacity. God bestows ease after difficulty' (65:6-7).

Thus, the Qur'an, as in many cases in this matter, in addition to reminding spouses about their duties towards one another, emphasizes the main principles of human morality, and invites individuals to be respectful to God and virtuous towards each other. Such an atmosphere of respect is necessary for the continuation of humane and legal relations. That is because institutions such as marriage with a unique aspect of privacy can hardly be controlled by outsiders. As a matter of fact, it is a considerable issue to refer to a judge or a referee in the case of disagreement between spouses. Yet, the fundamental issue is to prevent the problems from the very beginning, or to solve them at the very time of occurrence. This is in great part related to the personality, ethics, and characteristics of the two parties. It is highly difficult to keep the harmony of married life through various philosophical and legal orders without putting the faith of God in the heart without a sense of self-criticism and respect for people.

The Qur'an, in various places, draws attention via emphasis on the warm atmosphere of the home 'And one of the signs of His existence and power is this: He has created for you helpmates in order to make you feel comfortable with one another, and He ordained between you love and mercy. There are lessons in this sign for those who reflect' (30:21).

Islam addresses women and men equally and raises women, with its remarkable breath, to a blessed position. It has taken women from being objects for men to the level that paradise lay under their feet. After the emergence of Islam, no one could force such gentle creatures to adultery, whoredom, and impurity. She would not be treated as property; she could not be accused of impurity. Such an accusation would result in a severe punishment on the part of the accuser. 'And those who accuse honorable women but bring not four witnesses, scourge them (with) eighty stripes and never (afterward) accept their testimony — They indeed are evil-doers. Save those who afterward repent and make amends. (For such) lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. As for those who accuse their wives but have no witnesses except themselves; let the testimony of one of them be four testimonies, (swearing) by Allah that he is of those who speak the truth; And yet a fifth, invoking the curse of Allah on him if he is of those who lie' (24:4–7). Female children would not be looked down upon. Infanticide would be prohibited. 'Slay not your children, fearing a fall to poverty, We shall provide for them and for you. Lo! The slaying of them is great sin,' The Qur'an has declared. Even if she is physically different, this is not a reason to be looked down upon. In the Qur'anic view of creation, Adam is created first and Eve is created from the same leaven (7:189). This Qur'anic picture reminds us that men and women are both equally humans. They are two entities that complete one another, as the Qur'an presents. The difference between both is based on certain purposes and designs and is not ontological. The Qur'anic verses that give the impression of the superiority of men over women are expressions with regard to certain capacities. 'Do not desire something that God has given more of to someone else other than you. Men have the share of what they have earned, and women have the share of what they have earned. (Envy not one another) but ask Allah of His bounty. Lo! Allah is ever Knower of all things.' (4:32). The Qur'an reminds us of these differences, and that being from a certain gender should not be seen as a reason for complaint. There is no difference at all as far as human relationships are concerned. Whoever gains, gains for him or her.

As stated above, with regard to humanity and human relationships with God, there is no difference between women and men. They are equals concerning their rights and responsibilities. Woman is equal to man in the rights of freedom of religion, freedom of expression, freedom to live a decent life, and freedom of finance. Equality before the law, just treatment, marriage and founding a family life, personal life, privacy and protection are all among the rights of women. Her possessions, life and dignity are assured like that of men. Violation of any of these rights results in severe punishment. Yes, woman is free and independent before the law. Her femaleness does not limit or invalidate any of her eligibilities. When her rights are violated, she can seek justice just as men can. If someone takes her possessions wrongly, she has all rights of reclamation. Considering some qualities of women and men, Islam has developed certain legal prescriptions: for example, women are exempted from certain charges such as military services, going to war, taking care of the financial obligations of a family and herself, etc.

As for testimony, yes, the Qur'an says that when you cannot find two men to testify, find one trustworthy man and two women, for if one forgets the other, the other will remind her (2.282). It is not acceptable to deduce any meaning from this verse to indicate the superiority of men over women in humanity and in value. The fundamental issue here is the realization of justice. This is not a matter unique to women. The testimony of some male Bedouins has been rejected when the matter is related to the rights and realization of justice. The issue of testimony is related to a strong commitment to communal life. The involvement of witnesses in all segments of social life — even today a reality — the lack of witnessing many aspects of the life of people are always possible for some men and women. This issue of testimony in the Qur'an relates to oral testimony with regard to financial matters and loans. Otherwise, the testimony of women in writing, when needed, is accepted as equal by some scholars of Islamic law.

The Muslim World, Special Issue, July 2005 - Vol. 95 Issue 3 Page 325-471



..and see

forumTitle_11_16621

129.       cat_leo
51 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 10:41 pm

Quoting mltm:

The real islam is another thing, the male dominant culture in islamic countries is another thing.
You blame some men in islamic countries to be hypocritical, but in fact watching porn, drinking alcohol, having sex without marriage are all forbidden to men. There are men who really obey these rules, and putting forward these things to someone to make her prevent to convert to İslam is nonsense. I really know men who are not hypocritical and who try to apply the rules as it should be.



Oh yeah, where are these men such as you say there are in islamic countries? I have yet to meet one. After being married to 2 very different, but 'hypocritical' turks I have to say that they did exactly all the things mention here, watching porn, drinking alcohol, having sex without marriage (and let me add one more, beating his wife as I was by one of them) that as you say are 'supposably' forbidden to all men.

130.       mltm
3690 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 10:55 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting mltm:

The real islam is another thing, the male dominant culture in islamic countries is another thing.
You blame some men in islamic countries to be hypocritical, but in fact watching porn, drinking alcohol, having sex without marriage are all forbidden to men. There are men who really obey these rules, and putting forward these things to someone to make her prevent to convert to İslam is nonsense. I really know men who are not hypocritical and who try to apply the rules as it should be.



Thank you mltm for exposing more hypocricy in your culture.
I don't know how you manage to make sense out of all the things you guys are claiming. You must be extremely smart!!! So, the male dominant culture has nothing to do with the religion, but I thought you said that women are inferior to men according to islam... And how come men are never inhibited from 'breaking the law', but women are at every occasion...? (remember about the so called 'honor killings' when a woman is killed by her family for having pre-marital sex, but the man she had sex with has no consequences, obviously I don't think either of them should be punished)

So the last line of defense is saying that what you see is not the so called "real islam", that's laughable because none of you really know what "real islam" is. You can't agree on anything consistently and whenever there's a conflict you can't resolve, you say that these things are supposed to be individually interpreted.

To me, it's nonsense to join a group of people that behave hypocritically and don't do what they claim to believe in, even if I liked their religion (it's quite a small population of those who follow everything).



When you choose a religion, you consider it joining a group? You would be responsable just of yourself after death, in İslam you won't be responsable of the things some terrorists or honor killers have done.
As I said, I do not practise any religion, but I cannot stand the prejudices against all the muslims and I cannot make something seem as it is not just because I don't like it or I want it to seem this way to support my thoughts, this is also hypocritical. I didn't say in İslam women were inferior to men, but as we have said, their duties are different and men protect their women.
And if we go back to some hundreds year, in the name of christianity, we can see how many cruel acts have been done. The cultures have changed but the religion stays the same, so it depends the interpretations.
And don't show the honor killings as a proof because it's the Kurds that do honor killings and it's a part of their cruel beliefs. If it was something that belonged to İslam and which is very unrealistic because according to İslam no one but Allah can take a life) then in all the muslim societies they should have been applied, but Turks do not apply it.
And you're wrong about your claim that always only woman is killed. in Taliban regime, a man that has had sex without marriage is also killed just like the woman. So, that's why we support secularism, because the people tend to use religion as they like.

131.       mltm
3690 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 11:05 pm

Quoting cat_leo:

Quoting mltm:

The real islam is another thing, the male dominant culture in islamic countries is another thing.
You blame some men in islamic countries to be hypocritical, but in fact watching porn, drinking alcohol, having sex without marriage are all forbidden to men. There are men who really obey these rules, and putting forward these things to someone to make her prevent to convert to İslam is nonsense. I really know men who are not hypocritical and who try to apply the rules as it should be.



Oh yeah, where are these men such as you say there are in islamic countries? I have yet to meet one. After being married to 2 very different, but 'hypocritical' turks I have to say that they did exactly all the things mention here, watching porn, drinking alcohol, having sex without marriage (and let me add one more, beating his wife as I was by one of them) that as you say are 'supposably' forbidden to all men.



It's you that have choosen them. I would never choose such a man because I know them enough, and I can understand such an unworthy man just in a short time. Why haven't I even gone out with such a hypocritical muslim man? So, don't say that you know all the muslim men. And again and again, as long as you find something like this in Kuran "alcohol, sex without marriage, porn, violonce towards your wife are forbidden", no matter how many muslim men you meet with these habits, you cannot change it to a statement like "muslim man are allowed to do all ot these"Everyone is free to do what he wants. My ex boyfriend has not been doing these, so?

132.       azade
1606 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 11:14 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting azade:

Honor killings has nothing to do with islam either.



Then I wonder why nobody in the islamic world criticizes it and tries to do something to prevent them. Only in Turkey, the secular laws are trying to stop these killings by persecuting the murderers. Unfortunately, the family chooses a small child in the family to do the shooting so that nobody goes to prison (yes, the laws aren't that good about it).



It's a cultural thing. You can find some wack christians who do the same kind of things so does that mean that christianity supports it too?

Quoting cat_leo:



Oh yeah, where are these men such as you say there are in islamic countries? I have yet to meet one. After being married to 2 very different, but 'hypocritical' turks I have to say that they did exactly all the things mention here, watching porn, drinking alcohol, having sex without marriage (and let me add one more, beating his wife as I was by one of them) that as you say are 'supposably' forbidden to all men.



That you have married some scum in the past doesn't mean that the majority is like that.


I'm really surprised that as turks, people don't know much about actual islam, they just know horror stories they see on tv. You can't critizise something you don't know anything about. The vast majority of muslims are regular people NOT crazy fundamentalists, why hate on them?
By the way I'm not making a general assumption here.

133.       Trudy
7887 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 11:23 pm

Quoting mltm:

....

I find your fourth paragraph very offending for many people.

134.       mltm
3690 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 11:30 pm

Quoting Trudy:

Quoting mltm:

....

I find your fourth paragraph very offending for many people.



Maybe, but we cannot hide the truth. It's a fact and because of their cruel act, I don't want all the turks and muslims be labelled. That tradition belongs to kurdish origined turks.

135.       Elisa
0 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 11:34 pm

Quoting mltm:

And don't show the honor killings as a proof because it's the Kurds that do honor killings and it's a part of their cruel beliefs.




How can you make such a blatant and generalizing (or should I rather say "narrow-minded?") remark? Yeah, it's been a long time since there was some bashing here so you thought you'd seize the opportunity?

Anyway, sounds like you could do with some extra information on honor killings

136.       panta rei
0 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 11:36 pm

Quoting mltm:



And don't show the honor killings as a proof because it's the Kurds that do honor killings and it's a part of their cruel beliefs.



mltm- you act (and thus write) as if you had never lived in Turkey. Because you do know very well that those whom you called Kurds and implied as murderers generally extremer believers than those who live in other regions of turkey, for they still live according to feudal traditions. And you must also know that "adultery" and its supposedly "punisment", firstly and above all, is related to the religion, rather than nations or ethnic groups. Kurds, too, do believe in Islam. Since the subject here is "Islam" or "Muslims", take them as "muslims", and thus correct your statement like the following:

"Some muslims do honor killings."

In another subject where ethnic groups or nations (or whatever) are dealt with, you can then mention them as "Kurds".

137.       azade
1606 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 11:43 pm

WHAT!?? I object to that having anything to do with kurds in particular. I doubt you have ever gone to kurdish regions. If you had, you would know that people are openminded about their religion and have very tightly knit families who would never dream of murdering eachother. Ya rab.

138.       mltm
3690 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 11:52 pm

In Turkey in particular which cultural group practises honor killings or forced honor suicides? They're also muslims, but in İslam is there something like that?

139.       mltm
3690 posts
 04 May 2007 Fri 11:55 pm

Quoting panta rei:

and thus correct your statement like the following:

"Some muslims do honor killings."



Then let me do this:

Muslims:
- Turkish muslims:
- Kurds:
- kurds living in feodal patriarchal culture:
- traditions:
- honor killings

140.       panta rei
0 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:02 am

Quoting mltm:

In Turkey in particular which cultural group practises honor killings or forced honor suicides?



This is not and in fact cannot be a problem of any nations or cultural groups, but that of practisers of a religion.

Quoting mltm:


They're also muslims,



At last- you accept that!

Quoting mltm:

but in İslam is there something like that?



So, can you define any cultural group or nation like the following?:

".... are who do honor killings."

141.       azade
1606 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:04 am

Quoting mltm:

Quoting panta rei:

and thus correct your statement like the following:

"Some muslims do honor killings."



Then let me do this:

Muslims:
- Turkish muslims:
- Kurds:
- kurds living in feodal patriarchal culture:
- traditions:
- honor killings



That is very judgemental and generalizing.

142.       mltm
3690 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:10 am

Ok, it's out of the original subject. Anyway, I showed a fact. Honor killings are widespread in the kurdistan region, so it's a patriarchal cultural thing rather than islamic.

143.       panta rei
0 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:13 am

Quoting mltm:


Then let me do this:

Muslims:
- Turkish muslims:
- Kurds:
- kurds living in feodal patriarchal culture:
- traditions:
- honor killings



The problem is not Turkish or Kurdish muslims. I can give you tons of similar examples (not honor killings, still similar ones-but this is not the case) from Turkish muslims- the muslims that are from the west of Turkey.

144.       mltm
3690 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:13 am

azade, I don't understand what is generalizing here. So, you reject that honor killings are practised by the kurdish tribes as part of their patriarchal traditional culture? I cannot make it less generalizing.

145.       panta rei
0 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:16 am

Quoting mltm:

part of their patriarchal traditional culture?



Under that patriarchial and feudal culture lies nothing but Islam!

146.       mltm
3690 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:19 am

Quoting panta rei:


This is not and in fact cannot be a problem of any nations or cultural groups, but that of practisers of a religion.


No, they don't do it as part of their religion. If you look at the girls of these families, most of them don't even wear veils. They are not fanatic muslims. And they don't scream as "Allahü Ekber" as they do it. And when they explain their reason for doing it, they say that "the girl has shamed their family and they have done it for the reputation of their family".

147.       azade
1606 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:20 am

Quoting mltm:

azade, I don't understand what is generalizing here. So, you reject that honor killings are practised by the kurdish tribes as part of their patriarchal traditional culture? I cannot make it less generalizing.



Yes I reject that statement.
It is not practiced excessively by kurds. There are (regretfully) always a few rotten berries everywhere, so to speak. Have you ever stayed with a kurdish family? They are, as a people, one of the most loving and close knit you can ever find.
See post 143.

Anyway this is waaay of topic. The original topic author was simply asking some advice and she's getting nothing out of this

148.       mltm
3690 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:22 am

Quoting azade:


Yes I reject that statement.
It is not practiced excessively by kurds. There are (regretfully) always a few rotten berries everywhere, so to speak. Have you ever stayed with a kurdish family? They are, as a people, one of the most loving and close knit you can ever find.



I am sure that kurds are lovely people in general, but in the kurdish tribes that cruel punishment exist.

149.       azade
1606 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:24 am

Quoting mltm:

Quoting azade:


Yes I reject that statement.
It is not practiced excessively by kurds. There are (regretfully) always a few rotten berries everywhere, so to speak. Have you ever stayed with a kurdish family? They are, as a people, one of the most loving and close knit you can ever find.



I am sure that kurds are lovely people in general, but in the kurdish tribes that cruel punishment exist.



And it exists in many other cultures as well.

150.       panta rei
0 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:27 am

Quoting mltm:


No, they don't do it as part of their religion. If you look at the girls of these families, most of them don't wear even veils.



I presume you don't wear veil either. And in that case you mustn't be a muslim either.

Quoting mltm:


They are not fanatic muslims.



Do they have to be so? Do you desire they become fanatic or you mean you would regard them as muslims providing that they are "fanatic"?

Quoting mltm:


And they don't scream as "Allahü Ekber" as they do it.



Is this really a sign that they aren't muslims?

Quoting mltm:


And when they explain their reason to do it, they say that "the girl has shamed them and they do it for the reputation of their family".



The term "shame" is religious as well as cultural.

151.       azade
1606 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:32 am

Quoting panta rei:



The term "shame" is religious as well as cultural.



What is your source?

152.       panta rei
0 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:35 am

Quoting azade:

Quoting panta rei:



The term "shame" is religious as well as cultural.



What is your source?



I can give you many sources, but I don't think this is needed, for culture(s) and religion(s) has been forming each other for thousands of years. You can hardly separate one from the other.

153.       azade
1606 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:37 am

Quoting panta rei:

Quoting azade:

Quoting panta rei:



The term "shame" is religious as well as cultural.



What is your source?



I can give you many sources, but I don't think this is needed for culture(s) and religion(s) has been forming each other for thousands of years.



Yes that's true but what does that have to do with shame? Sorry I don't follow..

154.       mltm
3690 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:42 am

Quoting panta rei:


Is this really a sign that they aren't muslims?



I did not say they were not "MUSLIMS" but they don't do honor killings for their religion, they do them for their family honor, I have never heard any of them quoting something from Islam when they're interogated and askd why they have committed it.

155.       panta rei
0 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:42 am

Quoting azade:

Quoting panta rei:

Quoting azade:

Quoting panta rei:



The term "shame" is religious as well as cultural.



What is your source?



I can give you many sources, but I don't think this is needed for culture(s) and religion(s) has been forming each other for thousands of years.



Yes that's true but what does that have to do with shame? Sorry I don't follow..



azade- the terms "shame", "shameful" and their relatives get their meaning and values according to things/references/basics beased on culture and religion. You must have at least one reference value or thing (which is based on culture and religion) in order to be able to judge or regard "something", let's say "adultery", as "shame" or "shameful". Something in itself cannot be "shame" and "shameful" unless you have values, references.

156.       CANLI
5084 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:43 am

Quoting catwoman:



To me, it's nonsense to join a group of people that behave hypocritically and don't do what they claim to believe in, even if I liked their religion (it's quite a small population of those who follow everything).



As i recall,its forbidden to drink alcohol ,and to have sex,or live with a man you are not married to him in Christianity too.

No need to say how many christians in Western drink alcohol and have sex with people they are not married to.

So,they are not christians ?
They dont believe in Christianity ?
Or something wrong in Christianity ?!

And you think its nonsense to join a group of people that behave hypocritically and don't do what they claim to believe in ?

İ wonder then if so,so how many christians will be left if we exclude the people who do things not in the Bible?!

And btw,we called Muslims,not group of people!

157.       mltm
3690 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:46 am

Quoting CANLI:

İ wonder then if so,so how many christians will be left if we exclude the people who do things not in the Bible?!


It's a good point. As if only they are forbidden in İslam and there're only muslims doing the opposites.

158.       panta rei
0 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:47 am

Quoting mltm:

Quoting panta rei:


Is this really a sign that they aren't muslims?



I did not say they were not "MUSLIMS"



So true! You said they weren't "fanatic" muslims! lol

159.       mltm
3690 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:52 am

Quoting panta rei:

Quoting mltm:

Quoting panta rei:


Is this really a sign that they aren't muslims?



I did not say they were not "MUSLIMS"



So true! You said they weren't "fanatic" muslims! lol


What's this? Are you playing with words?
You claimed that I ddidn't consider them muslim because they didn't wear veils, and they were not fanatics. I wanted to show that since killings in İran or in the Taliban regime have been doing in the name of İslam, the honor killings I'm talking about are not the same. I wanted to tell that they were not fanatics at all since killings are done by fanatics of that religion if they're done for religious reasons.

160.       panta rei
0 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 12:54 am

Quoting CANLI:


As i recall,its forbidden to drink alcohol



I think this is wrong; because in Christianity (red) wine, for example, is believed and considered to symbolize "the blood of Jesus", that's why even in Churchs Christians are served wine.

161.       CANLI
5084 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 01:00 am

What i really dont understand, whey we are always in this position?

Why we are always have to defend our rules and explain them?

Why we always have to argue about what WE believe ?!

God,i dont accept some rules in Christianity too ,it cant pass on my mind,not logic to me,same in Torah.

But its Christianity,or Torah rules,its that religions rules,so i accept it as it is,i dont judge,i dont look at it from above,and look at you as if you dont have any sense of joining that religion !

Ohhh,i really fed up of that !

You are talking about woman's right in İslam .

And how about woman's rights in Christianity,in Torah ??!

honor killing ?
Hmmm,how about honor killing in India,in Japan,China,...

Are they also Muslims ?

Do they practice İslam too ?!

And how about women rights there ?!!

How about woman rights in Western ?

How about woman dont earn same salary as a man even if they are in same position not for anything except she is a woman !

How about violence against women ?!
How about rates of husbands beating their wives ?

How about all of that ?

That too is İslam ?

Why the heck its always about İslam,trying to prove its a bad religion and Muslims are monsters ?!


Why its always about İslam ?!
What have we done to you that bad ?!

162.       panta rei
0 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 01:02 am

Quoting mltm:

I wanted to tell that they were not fanatics at all since killings are done by fanatics of that religion if they're done for religious reasons.



Whether honor killings are committed by fanatic or non-fanatic muslims can only be a footnote to the subject. The actual fact remains the same- they are committed by ones who believe in Islam.

163.       armegon
1872 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 01:08 am

Quoting kaddersokak:

If u beleive in Allah, then why do you hate people who study Islam? are you smarter than a renown professor (Hayreddin Karaman)? Why do wee need teachers to understand maths and not just read the math book? are mat teachers telling us lies/ and what about christinaity? do you think the Christians should not listen their priests either? please tell us because you seem to know Islam better than prof. karaman



Religion is not under anybody’s monopoly. Religion belongs to Allah.Why do you need to compare Islam with Christianity?.In Islam there is no clergy, religion is between God and the believer, don’t you know?(ahh i forgot you are the new evangelist muslims). Allah says Kur’an is clearly explained, can be undestood well. Then why ask a student when you can learn from The Teacher? There are also some scholars throughout the history, and some say Kur’an is incomplete, some think women are sex captives etc do you think they do not study Islam? Why do i need to believe in Hayrettin Karaman, does he know better than Allah? I have my mind moreover when people far away from Kur’an, there always exist seyhs, şıhs to exploit religion and people’s beliefs.

164.       armegon
1872 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 01:14 am

What happened here? this thread gone out of topic

165.       mltm
3690 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 01:16 am

Quoting panta rei:

Quoting mltm:

I wanted to tell that they were not fanatics at all since killings are done by fanatics of that religion if they're done for religious reasons.



Whether honor killings are committed by fanatic or non-fanatic muslims can only be a footnote to the subject. The actual fact remains the same- they are committed by ones who believe in Islam.



But it is an incomplete conclusion, and thus it causes error and leads to misinterpretation because while large groups of muslims do not practice it, only certain groups pratice it, that generalizing is like concluding tthat "the actual fact remains the same, the ones that commit the honor killings are the men, then men commit honor killings" it's right but incomplete as if like all men commit it. Usually all misinterpretations are because we don't care about the "footnotes".

166.       aslı
342 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 01:20 am

Armegon if your guys would find out what you are defending here, they wont like it at all. Remember the photo, the guy you are suggesting for being president and most democratic around country, sitting on his knees, next to some sheikh. They are accepting a students lessons, why you are not?

167.       mltm
3690 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 01:23 am

"IN Europe right now the statistics of male violence against female partners are terrible. For European women aged 16-44 violence in the home is the primary cause of injury and death, more lethal than road accidents and cancer. Between 25% and 50% of women are victims of this violence. In Portugal 52.8% of women say that they have been violently treated by their husbands or partners. In Germany almost 300 women a year - or three women every four days - are killed by men with whom they used to live. In Britain one woman dies in similar circumstances every three days.

In Spain it is one every four days. In France six women die this way every month: 33% of them are knifed, 33% shot, 20% strangled and 10% beaten (1). In the 15 member states of the European Union (before enlargement to 25), more than 600 women die every year because of sexist brutality in the family (2).

The profile of the aggressor is not what you might imagine. There is a public perception that these types of killers tend to be from poor backgrounds and with little education. That is not the case. The death of the actress Marie Trintignant, who was killed on 6 August 2003 by her partner, a famous artist, is an example.

A report from the Council of Europe (3) says that "it is even proved that the incidence of domestic violence seems to increase with income and level of education". It stresses that in the Netherlands "almost half of all those who commit violence against women hold university degrees". In France attackers are usually men whose professional status gives them a degree of power. A sizeable percentage of the attackers are management personnel (67%), health professionals (25%) and officers in the police or army (4).

Another misconception is that violence of this kind is more common in the macho cultures of southern Europe than in northern countries. Here too the image needs adjustment. Romania is the European country with the worst record: every year almost 13 in every million women there are killed by their male partners.

However, next on the dismal honours list come countries where women’s rights are highly respected. In Finland more than eight in every million women are killed in the home every year: the list runs on down through Norway (6.58), Luxembourg (5.56), Denmark (5.42) and Sweden (4.59). Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland in fact come at the bottom of the list."

by By Ignacio Ramonet, LE MONDE DIPLOMATIQUE


So, what is the thing in common in all these countries? Being a muslim country?

168.       armegon
1872 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 01:25 am

Quoting aslı:

Armegon if your guys would find out what you are defending here, they wont like it at all. Remember the photo, the guy you are suggesting for being president and most democratic around country, sitting on his knees, next to some sheikh. They are accepting a students lessons, why you are not?



Exactly Aslı!!

169.       kaddersokak
130 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 01:34 am

Quoting mltm:

"IN Europe right now the statistics of male violence against female partners are terrible. For European women aged 16-44 violence in the home is the primary cause of injury and death, more lethal than road accidents and cancer. Between 25% and 50% of women are victims of this violence. In Portugal 52.8% of women say that they have been violently treated by their husbands or partners. In Germany almost 300 women a year - or three women every four days - are killed by men with whom they used to live. In Britain one woman dies in similar circumstances every three days.

In Spain it is one every four days. In France six women die this way every month: 33% of them are knifed, 33% shot, 20% strangled and 10% beaten (1). In the 15 member states of the European Union (before enlargement to 25), more than 600 women die every year because of sexist brutality in the family (2).

The profile of the aggressor is not what you might imagine. There is a public perception that these types of killers tend to be from poor backgrounds and with little education. That is not the case. The death of the actress Marie Trintignant, who was killed on 6 August 2003 by her partner, a famous artist, is an example.

A report from the Council of Europe (3) says that "it is even proved that the incidence of domestic violence seems to increase with income and level of education". It stresses that in the Netherlands "almost half of all those who commit violence against women hold university degrees". In France attackers are usually men whose professional status gives them a degree of power. A sizeable percentage of the attackers are management personnel (67%), health professionals (25%) and officers in the police or army (4).

Another misconception is that violence of this kind is more common in the macho cultures of southern Europe than in northern countries. Here too the image needs adjustment. Romania is the European country with the worst record: every year almost 13 in every million women there are killed by their male partners.

However, next on the dismal honours list come countries where women’s rights are highly respected. In Finland more than eight in every million women are killed in the home every year: the list runs on down through Norway (6.58), Luxembourg (5.56), Denmark (5.42) and Sweden (4.59). Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland in fact come at the bottom of the list."

by By Ignacio Ramonet, LE MONDE DIPLOMATIQUE


So, what is the thing in common in all these countries? Being a muslim country?




i would say violence against women are is common in muslim countries. women in western Europe are counted as individuals. but in many of muslim countries they just should obey their husbands. I am sorry but this is what I think. there is no honour killing in Europe. especially in rural regions in Turkey violence and sexual abuse are very common. do not judge Turkey just by looking at istanbul or touristic resorts...

170.       TeresaJana
304 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 01:38 am

the fact that the 'honor killings' are given this name to a religion instead of individuals is hurtful and slanderous and made for media headlines to scare non-muslims to fear the 'religion' itself. my personal opinion. when in any other country where there is a 'murder' he/she is simply called a murderer, a 'gang' member, a scorned spouse or stalker, etc.

171.       mltm
3690 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 01:58 am

Quoting kaddersokak:



i would say violence against women are is common in muslim countries. women in western Europe are counted as individuals. but in many of muslim countries they just should obey their husbands. I am sorry but this is what I think. there is no honour killing in Europe. especially in rural regions in Turkey violence and sexual abuse are very common. do not judge Turkey just by looking at istanbul or touristic resorts...



In Turkey, women are also counted as individuals according to the laws. We have the same rights as the women in Europe, but violence against women is a different thing, it's in the long patriarchial culture of the men, are you really sure that women are really treated socially equally to men in practice in Europe too? One way or another, women are still seen and treated inferiorily in Europe. So, the real reason cannot be any of the religions.

172.       panta rei
0 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 02:01 am

Quoting mltm:


because while large groups of muslims do not practice it, only certain groups pratice it, that generalizing is like concluding tthat "the actual fact remains the same, the ones that commit the honor killings are the men, then men commit honor killings" it's right but incomplete as if like all men commit it. Usually all misinterpretations are because we don't care about the "footnotes".



In one of my above posts I already wrote some Muslims. I supposed we already agreed I didn't make a generalization since I had once showed it earlier. But now I see that was my fault. Whereas, in order to avoid generalizations each time I should have indicated an uncertain amount of muslims.

"Now I will write 'some muslims' just for once, but you should certainly consider that I don't have an intention to make a generalization about muslims even if I don't use the word 'some' each time."

"Please be adviced that in the following lines I will actually mean and mention 'fanatic muslims' when using only 'muslims'. Because I already showed this, by writing 'fanatic muslims' earlier."

Will we speak English like that?

173.       mltm
3690 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 02:12 am

Quoting panta rei:



Will we speak English like that?



You said that anyway the important thing was they were muslims, but I wanted to show you that being a muslim was not their reason to do honor killings, they could have been a christian or jew but still do these honor killings.

Anyway, I already guess your answer, and I will answer you in return, and it will go like this for ages.

174.       CANLI
5084 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 02:14 am

Quoting panta rei:



"Please be adviced that in the following lines I will actually mean and mention 'fanatic muslims' when using only 'muslims'. Because I already showed this, by writing 'fanatic muslims' earlier."

Will we speak English like that?



No,not really,i dont agree.

İm muslim and i dont agree you address me by what ever you want to say about some certain groups or some certain behavior.

When you want to point at something you should use 'some muslims' not just Muslims.

And also,be sure what ever you talk about ONLY muslims doing it,not some other groups.

Like in honer killing for example,if you want to say some Muslims,you must say and some İndians,and some Japanese,and some ....ect

Because if you not sure ONLY Muslims doing it,then i dont accept the words 'some Muslims' too.
And your words will lose its reliability,because not only 'some Muslims' performing it,but some other groups and nationalities too.

İf you want attack something or someone at least be fair !

175.       panta rei
0 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 02:44 am

Quoting Elisa:

Yeah, it's been a long time since there was some bashing here so you thought you'd seize the opportunity?



This is what I would called a clever retort! And the hat was already taken off to that.

176.       CANLI
5084 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 02:57 am

Quoting panta rei:

Quoting CANLI:


As i recall,its forbidden to drink alcohol



I think this is wrong; because in Christianity (red) wine, for example, is believed and considered to symbolize "the blood of Jesus", that's why even in Churchs Christians are served wine.



Ohhh then how come our Church saying drink alcohol is forbidden ?!
Aren't all Churches saying same rules in the Bible ?

177.       CANLI
5084 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 03:13 am

Quoting panta rei:

Quoting CANLI:



Well,if the maid's husband is capable of hiring a maid,then so be it.
İf he is not,then he should help his wife.

People've got different income levels,and you cannt expect all levels live the same !



You know, some people are rich by birth as they are born into a rich family. Accordingly their income levels are much higher than those of the rest. They can hire maids while the others can't. One thing is clear: actual economies don't care such inequity. The question is, does Islam as a religion of humankind not care that either? Or let me ask this way: Why can I not expect all levels to be the same? What is it that I lack while some have, in order to have income enough to hire a maid (suppose that I am one who cannot hire a maid.)? Aren't we all human beings? Shouldn't we all be equall in every respect, including income levels? After all, aren't we all the creatures that the same God created? I mean, does the Koran say anything about this point?



İ understood your questions,but your point is away too far from what we are talking about.

You are starting from the beginning,that why God created us differently

God testing both rich and poor,testing the rich how would he spend his money,and testing the poor if he would be patient ,and will keep believing in God that when HE close a door will open a window or not.

And maybe to teach us a lesson,that maybe a person can be very rich,and hiring lots of maids,but not happy.

And that same maid,is poor and cannt afford to hire someone who can help her,but she is happy by the little help her husband giving to her.

İf we are all equal,then we'll be the same,there wont be something new,not new lessons,...ect

178.       longinotti1
1090 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 09:14 am

Quoting CANLI:

Quoting panta rei:

Quoting CANLI:


As i recall,its forbidden to drink alcohol



I think this is wrong; because in Christianity (red) wine, for example, is believed and considered to symbolize "the blood of Jesus", that's why even in Churchs Christians are served wine.



Ohhh then how come our Church saying drink alcohol is forbidden ?!
Aren't all Churches saying same rules in the Bible ?



Absolutely NOT. Some Christians drink "as fishes".. Some other (SECTS) say it is forbidden. There is no single version of what the Bible says. ESPECIALLY with Christians.

Examples. Catholics can drink. The Morman sect says don't drink, but many Mormans do anyway. There is no single answer.

179.       kat007
95 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 09:15 am

Quoting cat_leo:



Oh yeah, where are these men such as you say there are in islamic countries? I have yet to meet one. After being married to 2 very different, but 'hypocritical' turks I have to say that they did exactly all the things mention here, watching porn, drinking alcohol, having sex without marriage (and let me add one more, beating his wife as I was by one of them) that as you say are 'supposably' forbidden to all men.



I'm sorry to say this, but I think you found the wrong type of men to marry. And one of my criterias is I would never ever marry someone who's actions contradicts his own beliefs/values. If he won't do what he says or believes then how can I trust him or believe in him. After talking to 35-40 Turkish/Kurdish men I believe that only 2 out of those are actually living a righteous type of lifestyle according to their beliefs and I really respect that. So again, I don't think it's the religion (I think it's human weakness and failings). And men that actually do what they say are in the minority.

180.       kat007
95 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 09:27 am

Quoting CANLI:

Quoting panta rei:

Quoting CANLI:


As i recall,its forbidden to drink alcohol



I think this is wrong; because in Christianity (red) wine, for example, is believed and considered to symbolize "the blood of Jesus", that's why even in Churchs Christians are served wine.



Ohhh then how come our Church saying drink alcohol is forbidden ?!
Aren't all Churches saying same rules in the Bible ?



Yeah drinking alcohol is forbidden in Christianity. Sex before marriage is forbidden too. And divorce is forbidden. But lots of people do these things even if they go to church, and are religious. And if you are a Jehovah's Witness it's even more strict... you can not date, have bf/gf relationships, go to clubs, etc. but I know people that do. And adultery is a major sin in Christianity but then why is one of my friends telling me the pastor is having an affair.

181.       Elisa
0 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 10:58 am

Quoting kat007:


Yeah drinking alcohol is forbidden in Christianity.



No, that's putting it too strongly. It's not simple though to give an unambiguous answer.

This is from gotquestions.org:

'Again, Scripture does not necessarily forbid Christians from drinking beer, wine, or any other drink containing alcohol. Alcohol is not, in and of itself, tainted by sin. It is, rather, drunkenness and addiction to alcohol that a Christian must absolutely refrain from (Ephesians 5:18; 1 Corinthians 6:12)'

Full article

182.       kat007
95 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 11:17 am

Today, the views on alcohol in Christendom can be divided into moderationism, abstentionism, and prohibitionism. Abstentionists and prohibitionists are sometimes lumped together as "teetotalers" (compare list of teetotalers) and share some similar arguments for their positions, but the distinction between them is that the latter abstain from alcohol as a matter of law (that is, they believe God requires abstinence in all ordinary circumstances), while the former abstain as a matter of prudence (that is, they believe total abstinence is the wisest and most loving way to live in the present circumstances).

The moderationist position is accepted almost universally outside of Protestant Christianity and within Protestantism, it is accepted by most Lutherans, Anglicans, and Reformed churches. Moderationism is also accepted by Jehovah's Witnesses. Moderationism argues that, according to the biblical and traditional witness, (1) alcohol is a good gift of God that is rightly used for making the heart merry, and (2) while its dangers are real, it may be used wisely and moderately rather than being shunned or prohibited because of potential abuse.

The abstentionist position is held by many Baptists, Pentecostals, Methodists, and other evangelical and Protestant groups including the Salvation Army. Abstentionists believe that although alcohol consumption is not inherently sinful or necessarily avoided in all circumstances, it is generally not the wisest or most prudent choice. While most abstentionists don't require abstinence from alcohol for membership in their churches, they do often require it for leadership positions.

Prohibitionist denominations such as the Seventh-day Adventists hold that the Bible forbids partaking of alcohol altogether, with some arguing that even the alleged medicinal use of wine in 1 Timothy 5:23 is a reference to unfermented grape juice. The Word of Wisdom, which is a section in Doctrine and Covenants, part of the Mormon canon, also forbids the use of alcohol.


-----
Geez, isn't that confusing. If someone wanted to be a Christian they'd have to pick which demonination they want to belong/follow and which rules they want to listen to.

183.       xkirstyx
363 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 11:56 am

Not all religious people are on the same level as eachother. some people do things other people dont do, some people put what they believe in to practice while some don't so much. Thats up to each individual, and how strong their faith is. But in this situation, the question should be if you really believe in Bhuddism, or if it is more like the religion you were raised in. If you want to find out more about islam for yourself thats fine. But if you really believe in Bhuddism, you shouldn't just put it aside for someone else. When you have children, if your husband wants to raise them as muslim, but you believe in Bhuddism, really believe in it, and see your own children disbelieveing it while your husband teaches them things you don't believe in. That could break your heart. Marriage isn't just about a lovey dovey feeling. You have to be compatible. Want the same things in life, want the same things for your children etc. How are so many people in relationships , talking about marriage, without really knowing eachother. Surely things like how you would raise/discipline your children, religion, how you feel about important descions should be discussed before you commit to spend your life with someone. Religion is a very personal thing. I think the question shouldn't be if you are allowed to marry someone of a different religion, but if you really want to. How important are your religions to both of you? will you be compatible together? Again, marriage takes a lot more than that 'lovey' feeling.

184.       cat_leo
51 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 04:44 pm

Quoting kat007:

Quoting cat_leo:



Oh yeah, where are these men such as you say there are in islamic countries? I have yet to meet one. After being married to 2 very different, but 'hypocritical' turks I have to say that they did exactly all the things mention here, watching porn, drinking alcohol, having sex without marriage (and let me add one more, beating his wife as I was by one of them) that as you say are 'supposably' forbidden to all men.



I'm sorry to say this, but I think you found the wrong type of men to marry. And one of my criterias is I would never ever marry someone who's actions contradicts his own beliefs/values. If he won't do what he says or believes then how can I trust him or believe in him. After talking to 35-40 Turkish/Kurdish men I believe that only 2 out of those are actually living a righteous type of lifestyle according to their beliefs and I really respect that. So again, I don't think it's the religion (I think it's human weakness and failings). And men that actually do what they say are in the minority.



Actually kat, their true characters did not show until much later into the marriage. In the begining they were as most turks are, all sweet and charming even after knowing them for more then 2 and 3 years before marrying them. Again these were 2 very different men with different background and education, so none of these even matter.

There are far too many women marrying these type of men and I have met way too many women of different nationalities that married turks that were abusive to them and some of them don't show this until years later, so don't tell me that I don't know what I'am talking about when there are more of them then you all realize!

As for azade, you may think that you have married prince charming there, but honey I watch myself because I'am more important now any man will ever be.

185.       catwoman
8933 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 08:52 pm

Quoting mltm:

"IN Europe right now the statistics of male violence against female partners are terrible. For European women aged 16-44 violence in the home is the primary cause of injury and death, more lethal than road accidents and cancer. Between 25% and 50% of women are victims of this violence. In Portugal 52.8% of women say that they have been violently treated by their husbands or partners. In Germany almost 300 women a year - or three women every four days - are killed by men with whom they used to live. In Britain one woman dies in similar circumstances every three days.

In Spain it is one every four days. In France six women die this way every month: 33% of them are knifed, 33% shot, 20% strangled and 10% beaten (1). In the 15 member states of the European Union (before enlargement to 25), more than 600 women die every year because of sexist brutality in the family (2).

The profile of the aggressor is not what you might imagine. There is a public perception that these types of killers tend to be from poor backgrounds and with little education. That is not the case. The death of the actress Marie Trintignant, who was killed on 6 August 2003 by her partner, a famous artist, is an example.

A report from the Council of Europe (3) says that "it is even proved that the incidence of domestic violence seems to increase with income and level of education". It stresses that in the Netherlands "almost half of all those who commit violence against women hold university degrees". In France attackers are usually men whose professional status gives them a degree of power. A sizeable percentage of the attackers are management personnel (67%), health professionals (25%) and officers in the police or army (4).

Another misconception is that violence of this kind is more common in the macho cultures of southern Europe than in northern countries. Here too the image needs adjustment. Romania is the European country with the worst record: every year almost 13 in every million women there are killed by their male partners.

However, next on the dismal honours list come countries where women’s rights are highly respected. In Finland more than eight in every million women are killed in the home every year: the list runs on down through Norway (6.58), Luxembourg (5.56), Denmark (5.42) and Sweden (4.59). Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland in fact come at the bottom of the list."

by By Ignacio Ramonet, LE MONDE DIPLOMATIQUE


So, what is the thing in common in all these countries? Being a muslim country?



As I said before, sexism and domestic violence is horrendous in almost all countries. However, such statistics don't even exist for the muslim world because people like you have ideological, rosy glasses on and are willing to let millions of women suffer daily without anybody even being concerned with them. I guarantee you that the statistics in the muslim world would be 10 times higher then the ones you quoted.

186.       cat_leo
51 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 09:07 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting mltm:

'IN Europe right now the statistics of male violence against female partners are terrible. For European women aged 16-44 violence in the home is the primary cause of injury and death, more lethal than road accidents and cancer. Between 25% and 50% of women are victims of this violence. In Portugal 52.8% of women say that they have been violently treated by their husbands or partners. In Germany almost 300 women a year - or three women every four days - are killed by men with whom they used to live. In Britain one woman dies in similar circumstances every three days.

In Spain it is one every four days. In France six women die this way every month: 33% of them are knifed, 33% shot, 20% strangled and 10% beaten (1). In the 15 member states of the European Union (before enlargement to 25), more than 600 women die every year because of sexist brutality in the family (2).

The profile of the aggressor is not what you might imagine. There is a public perception that these types of killers tend to be from poor backgrounds and with little education. That is not the case. The death of the actress Marie Trintignant, who was killed on 6 August 2003 by her partner, a famous artist, is an example.

A report from the Council of Europe (3) says that 'it is even proved that the incidence of domestic violence seems to increase with income and level of education'. It stresses that in the Netherlands 'almost half of all those who commit violence against women hold university degrees'. In France attackers are usually men whose professional status gives them a degree of power. A sizeable percentage of the attackers are management personnel (67%), health professionals (25%) and officers in the police or army (4).

Another misconception is that violence of this kind is more common in the macho cultures of southern Europe than in northern countries. Here too the image needs adjustment. Romania is the European country with the worst record: every year almost 13 in every million women there are killed by their male partners.

However, next on the dismal honours list come countries where women’s rights are highly respected. In Finland more than eight in every million women are killed in the home every year: the list runs on down through Norway (6.58), Luxembourg (5.56), Denmark (5.42) and Sweden (4.59). Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland in fact come at the bottom of the list.'

by By Ignacio Ramonet, LE MONDE DIPLOMATIQUE


So, what is the thing in common in all these countries? Being a muslim country?



As I said before, sexism and domestic violence is horrendous in almost all countries. However, such statistics don't even exist for the muslim world because people like you have ideological, rosy glasses on and are willing to let millions of women suffer daily without anybody even being concerned with them. I guarantee you that the statistics in the muslim world would be 10 times higher then the ones you quoted.



This is also another reason why I made point here to women about abusive husbands, not always will the women say anything for fear of their lives.

187.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 09:16 pm

catwoman
stop, it doesnt work. dont you see?
it took hundred years and thousands of victims for european suffragists to achieve what we have today. liberation didnt come from outside, they had to fight themselves for themselves.
as for the eastern women it will take them 10 times more of time and victims. and it should be initiated by only themselves. by the time their mentality changes it will be a year 2500 or 2800, when the democracy will be introduced closer and will require the revolution. every revolution takes its victims. nothing comes free.
and so far, see, theres no problem, muslim women are the happiest unders the sun. they happily give their fate to their fathers or brothers and they decide what its good for them. amazingly wonderful!

188.       panta rei
0 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 10:24 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

catwoman
stop, it doesnt work. dont you see?
it took hundred years and thousands of victims for european suffragists to achieve what we have today. liberation didnt come from outside, they had to fight themselves for themselves.
as for the eastern women it will take them 10 times more of time and victims. and it should be initiated by only themselves. by the time their mentality changes it will be a year 2500 or 2800, when the democracy will be introduced closer and will require the revolution. every revolution takes its victims. nothing comes free.
and so far, see, theres no problem, muslim women are the happiest unders the sun. they happily give their fate to their fathers or brothers and they decide what its good for them. amazingly wonderful!



Woow! Impressive! It will be great to argue with you as well as to marry you! Imagine our lifetime-lasting marriage with full of arguments.

189.       catwoman
8933 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 10:27 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

catwoman
stop, it doesnt work. dont you see?
it took hundred years and thousands of victims for european suffragists to achieve what we have today. liberation didnt come from outside, they had to fight themselves for themselves.
as for the eastern women it will take them 10 times more of time and victims. and it should be initiated by only themselves. by the time their mentality changes it will be a year 2500 or 2800, when the democracy will be introduced closer and will require the revolution. every revolution takes its victims. nothing comes free.
and so far, see, theres no problem, muslim women are the happiest unders the sun. they happily give their fate to their fathers or brothers and they decide what its good for them. amazingly wonderful!



So true! You are right to the point.

190.       catwoman
8933 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 10:39 pm

Quoting cat_leo:

This is also another reason why I made point here to women about abusive husbands, not always will the women say anything for fear of their lives.



Absolutely!!!

There are those who are ok with male dominance and don't experience abuse, those who don't experience abuse, aren't affected by male dominance in daily life and have weird ideologies about it (without understanding what they are really talking about and ruining it for the women who can't speak up for themselves - like mltm), those who wish they could get away but know they can't or are in fear of their lives to do so, and those who are abused and brainwashed so badly that they still think the "deserve" the suffering. It's pathetic.

191.       mltm
3690 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 10:43 pm

I don't deny that the numbers are much higher in the muslim countries, but what I want to say is that it's also very frequant in christian countries because you warned the girl who considered converting to İslam and marrying a muslim that it was nearly certain that she would be abused. Marrying a muslim is not a guarantee to be beaten or be seen inferior because in the religion itself domestic violence is not supported. I find you very prejudiced against the muslims and İslam, I doubt that you really know a lot of them personally, catwoman.

192.       catwoman
8933 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 10:48 pm

Quoting mltm:

Marrying a muslim is not a guarantee to be beaten or be seen inferior because in the religion itself domestic violence is not supported.



If you're a member of the dominant group (a muslim) and don't speak up against the oppression that the dominant group commits, then you are SUPPORTING IT. This is what all muslims do, they are supporting violence and abuse, therefore it essentially is part of islam. Take off your pink glasses (but then again, you accepted your weak nature lol).

193.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 10:53 pm

mltm
i found catwoman prejudeced to the women discrimination be it in muslim countries or non-muslim.
meanwhile i found you prejudiced to the christian countries.

you re the most interesting case, since your mother is french. how does it look like ? you could share to make it clear to some ppl. of course, its your privacy. i ll respect if you say : NO.
did she conver to islam?
or you may have atheist parents.

194.       panta rei
0 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 11:08 pm

Quoting catwoman:


therefore it essentially is part of islam.



Nope! This is not a good reasoning; you can hardly say so.

195.       mltm
3690 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 11:17 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:


you re the most interesting case, since your mother is french. how does it look like ? you could share to make it clear to some ppl. of course, its your privacy. i ll respect if you say : NO.
did she conver to islam?
or you may have atheist parents.



Yes, it's a bit personal but let me make it clear. My mother did not convert to İslam because there was no need. My father used to practise it when he was a young man, I don't know since how many years, but he does not believe in religions. I don't know about my mother, she says she is a christian, but I doubt whether she is. As for me, I used to be everything in my mind, because no one forced me to be something, but also I was raised in such a religion free family that I did not dare to be a muslim, and I always thought they would see me less intelligent or they would get worried about me.
Now it has been months that I'm very far away from my family and
I am in the beginner stage of being a muslim, I call myself a muslim.

196.       mltm
3690 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 11:24 pm

Quoting catwoman:


If you're a member of the dominant group (a muslim) and don't speak up against the oppression that the dominant group commits, then you are SUPPORTING IT. This is what all muslims do, they are supporting violence and abuse, therefore it essentially is part of islam. Take off your pink glasses (but then again, you accepted your weak nature lol).



I critisize and hate the men who beat their wife, or who are really macho, and you're wrong that in muslim countries, no one does somethnig against it, and you always use "all muslims", it's very weird. Have you lived in a muslim dominant country?
I don't wear pink glasses, and you intentionally want to misunderstand my phrase about "having weaker points". If I explain it, I'm sure you won't understand because you think you're a leopar woman. I think first of all you have to accept that you are a female human.

197.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 11:26 pm

mltm
thank you for sharing!
that gives some picture.
recently married you are, arent you? or going to marry? have i guessed right?

198.       mltm
3690 posts
 05 May 2007 Sat 11:40 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

mltm
thank you for sharing!
that gives some picture.
recently married you are, arent you? or going to marry? have i guessed right?


No, you're wrong! But when I moved to a christian dominant country, I realized that I didn't really belong to their culture, and I found out that rather I was closer to so-called muslim culture even if I had never practised it. I wore off my prejudices, I met practising muslim girls, and I let myself be more open to İslam, I found myself defending the muslims since here I see a lot of prejudiced people against Turkey and muslims. I also went out with a real muslim man, I say real because he was not hypocrite or fundamentalist, he was such a modest respectful and pure man, he helped me to wear off my prejudices a lot.
I think we have to find the line between being cautious and being prejudiced.

199.       CANLI
5084 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 12:26 am

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting mltm:

Marrying a muslim is not a guarantee to be beaten or be seen inferior because in the religion itself domestic violence is not supported.



If you're a member of the dominant group (a muslim) and don't speak up against the oppression that the dominant group commits, then you are SUPPORTING IT. This is what all muslims do, they are supporting violence and abuse, therefore it essentially is part of islam. Take off your pink glasses (but then again, you accepted your weak nature lol).



You are not Muslim,you dont live among Muslims,and i doubt that you ever went to a Muslim country,but STİLL,you talk about us as group,as countries,as religion as if you know better.
Muslims say thats not true,it doesnt happen as much as you say,maybe there are people who abuse women,but not all,such as in any groups,but you still dont accept and even you make fun of that !

Ok,Muslim husband beats his wife 3 times a day,after eating same as medicine.
And in national holidays there is an extra time beating to celebrate the occasion.

And the top of course is in Holy occasion,that is the hight season for men,they having it like a party of beating their wives.

And all those Millions of women in the İslamic world are so weak and they cannt do anything about it except accepting the domain male !

Ohhhhh GOD !!!!!!!!

İ cannt believe it!

İf that satisfy you...SO BE İT

Go a head and believe what you want,your mind is set on something and doesnt accept other wise,but as for me as a Muslim,
Who said i have to take anyone approval about the kind of life i live it,who said Muslims have to take western's approval on our lives,our religion ?
Who said we approve to be put in a position that we have to defend ourselves and take your accusations,Western's accusations?

All you know about us is from your Media,and your Media says whatever make it ok for your countries to march in and interfear in others countries afairs.

So if you dont know about us,and you know only what you've been told,its your problem not ours.

İ live my life as i want and also you do so.

And i dont have to defend and say,its not true,we dont live that way,
We wont live as you choose for us to have your approval and you say ,yess,Muslims are modern.

No need to defend what is mine,because im sorry,but its just my business !

200.       heidilovesosman
208 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 12:33 am

Quoting CANLI:

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting mltm:

Marrying a muslim is not a guarantee to be beaten or be seen inferior because in the religion itself domestic violence is not supported.



If you're a member of the dominant group (a muslim) and don't speak up against the oppression that the dominant group commits, then you are SUPPORTING IT. This is what all muslims do, they are supporting violence and abuse, therefore it essentially is part of islam. Take off your pink glasses (but then again, you accepted your weak nature lol).



You are not Muslim,you dont live among Muslims,and i doubt that you ever went to a Muslim country,but STİLL,you talk about us as group,as countries,as religion as if you know better.
Muslims say thats not true,it doesnt happen as much as you say,maybe there are people who abuse women,but not all,such as in any groups,but you still dont accept and even you make fun of that !

Ok,Muslim husband beats his wife 3 times a day,after eating same as medicine.
And in national holidays there is an extra time beating to celebrate the occasion.

And the top of course is in Holy occasion,that is the hight season for men,they having it like a party of beating their wives.

And all those Millions of women in the İslamic world are so weak and they cannt do anything about it except accepting the domain male !

Ohhhhh GOD !!!!!!!!

İ cannt believe it!

İf that satisfy you...SO BE İT

Who said i have to take anyone approval about the kind of life i live it,who said Muslims have to take western's approval on our liives,our religion ?

İ live my life as i want and also you do so.

So,no need to defend what is mine,because im sorry,but its just my business !





is this true cos if it is i just converted about 1month ago:O is it the biggest mistake of my life???????

201.       armegon
1872 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 12:40 am

Quoting mltm:


Yes, it's a bit personal but let me make it clear. My mother did not convert to İslam because there was no need. My father used to practise it when he was a young man, I don't know since how many years, but he does not believe in religions. I don't know about my mother, she says she is a christian, but I doubt whether she is. As for me, I used to be everything in my mind, because no one forced me to be something, but also I was raised in such a religion free family that I did not dare to be a muslim, and I always thought they would see me less intelligent or they would get worried about me.
Now it has been months that I'm very far away from my family and
I am in the beginner stage of being a muslim, I call myself a muslim.



I appreciate you mltm, inşallah be happy rest of your life. I think you are such open-minded and brave person.

202.       mltm
3690 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 12:44 am

Quoting armegon:


I appreciate you mltm, inşallah be happy rest of your life. I think you are such open-minded and brave person.


Thanks armegon , inşallah you too.

203.       CANLI
5084 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 12:45 am

Quoting heidilovesosman:

Quoting CANLI:

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting mltm:

Marrying a muslim is not a guarantee to be beaten or be seen inferior because in the religion itself domestic violence is not supported.



If you're a member of the dominant group (a muslim) and don't speak up against the oppression that the dominant group commits, then you are SUPPORTING IT. This is what all muslims do, they are supporting violence and abuse, therefore it essentially is part of islam. Take off your pink glasses (but then again, you accepted your weak nature lol).



You are not Muslim,you dont live among Muslims,and i doubt that you ever went to a Muslim country,but STİLL,you talk about us as group,as countries,as religion as if you know better.
Muslims say thats not true,it doesnt happen as much as you say,maybe there are people who abuse women,but not all,such as in any groups,but you still dont accept and even you make fun of that !

Ok,Muslim husband beats his wife 3 times a day,after eating same as medicine.
And in national holidays there is an extra time beating to celebrate the occasion.

And the top of course is in Holy occasion,that is the hight season for men,they having it like a party of beating their wives.

And all those Millions of women in the İslamic world are so weak and they cannt do anything about it except accepting the domain male !

Ohhhhh GOD !!!!!!!!

İ cannt believe it!

İf that satisfy you...SO BE İT

Who said i have to take anyone approval about the kind of life i live it,who said Muslims have to take western's approval on our liives,our religion ?

İ live my life as i want and also you do so.

So,no need to defend what is mine,because im sorry,but its just my business !





is this true cos if it is i just converted about 1month ago:O is it the biggest mistake of my life???????



Are you serious ?!

Shaking head !

204.       heidilovesosman
208 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 12:55 am

yesss i am why?? got a problem with that we can take it outside

205.       CANLI
5084 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 01:03 am

Well, i dont think you've converted and you dont know what you are getting in.
So no need to say what you already know .

Mübarek olsun

İf you need anything,or something not clear ,feel free to ask,and i will try to help as much as i can

Ps:i've edited my privous post ,so i dont get other similar question

206.       heidilovesosman
208 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 01:15 am

do you no me!!!! NO!!!! so you cant say what i am. i am msulim darling soooo if ya dont like it i dont really care

207.       mltm
3690 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 01:18 am

This thread has become like a comedy!
Heidi, don't be a parasite there, we talk seriously here!

208.       heidilovesosman
208 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 01:21 am

yeaahhh tottaly looks like it!!!!from what i have read but no comments im out i was just asking a simple question thats all!!!!it didnt get answered i just got "i dont think your muslim" blahhh blaahh!!! but im sorry i was just asking a question

209.       CANLI
5084 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 01:22 am

Quoting heidilovesosman:

do you no me!!!! NO!!!! so you cant say what i am. i am msulim darling soooo if ya dont like it i dont really care



Have i said that whether you are Muslim or not ?!
İ said sure you know what is İslam that is why you've convered ,so no need to talk about what you already know .

Hmmm,i guess we have some miss communication here !

210.       CHARRY
11 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 01:28 am

Quoting heidilovesosman:

do you no me!!!! NO!!!! so you cant say what i am. i am msulim darling soooo if ya dont like it i dont really care



Intersting, for someone who converted to muslim you're quick to rise your voice when asked a simple question when someone else is not sure of your faith. One needs to be tolerance when is comes toward the opinions of others.

211.       CANLI
5084 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 01:34 am

mltm,was she really asking a question ?
heidilovesosman i mean ?

İ thought she is surelly kidding !

212.       mltm
3690 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 01:35 am

Quoting CANLI:

mltm,was she really asking a question ?
heidilovesosman i mean ?

İ thought she is surelly kidding !



I am not sure! Though having looked at her picture, she looks like someone who likes to laugh.

213.       heidilovesosman
208 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 01:53 am

ohhh sorry soo im not aloud to laugh haha right ok sorry!!!!n if you look when THOSE PICTURE were put on here you will clearly see it was more then a month agoo.. soooo infact i wasnt anything soo i could do what i want thanks

214.       CANLI
5084 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 01:54 am

Well,in that case,then to answer your question heidi.
No,its not true,i was kidding,men dont hit their wives unless they are not respectable,same as in any society.

And wife can leave him divorce him anytime if he did.
İts her choice to accept and be with him,or not accept and leave him .

215.       panta rei
0 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 02:00 am

Quoting gezbelle:


one side of my family are buddhists and they are all married



So, are you a Buddhist, gezbelle? I mean, is there any barrier for us not to marry? lol

216.       kat007
95 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 05:39 am

Quoting heidilovesosman:



is this true cos if it is i just converted about 1month ago:O is it the biggest mistake of my life???????



lol, this is funny. The beating women question is the first one I asked everyone regarding converting to Islam. The second one is, "Are you guys terrorists?" Third one, "Am I going to be a slave and have my husband order me around?" Haha...

Actually, I think she's just being sarcastic. If I converted, I might say something sarcastic like that knowing that it's untrue. Heck, who really counts the number of times they beat their wives right? (joke)

217.       Capoeira
575 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 06:02 am

Going back to the original post...about a relationship or possible marriage with dual religions...I think that it really depends on the the individuals involved. If both are tolerant and truly follow their religious upbringing which most teach love of God and love and respect of others then there should not be a problem.

But, there are few that can live in such harmony. As human nature is more selfish than love. Which is very unfortunate. I think that converting to marry is problematic for the simple reason that you have to change yourself to fit into the relationship. I can't seem to understand how one can change religious beliefs that simply. I have been in the this situation of being in a dual relationship and was told that I had to convert or marriage would not be possible. I chose to remain true to my God. I am not preaching here. I just don't think that true spirituality can be so true if one is ready to give it up so easily for the simple acceptance of another human being...

I think one should question themselves and their true motives before converting to fit into a relationship. As a religion is a personal experience between one person and whoever they believe is their higher power.

218.       Elisa
0 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 11:02 am

Quoting mltm:

This thread has become like a comedy!



I think "farce" is more appropriate here..

219.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 11:44 am

as for me, im personally against such marriages.
sooner or later the consequences start showing up in a form of cultural clashes. if not themsleves, then their parents start interfering and pressure after pressure will bring to the point that the marrige will be ruined and both become the mental wrecks. there will appear fights for the influence on rising children like "in my country all youth respect elders and in your stupid country theres absolutely no respect to anyone at all".
it is quite dangerous, therefore those who decide to be together should protect their marriage from other "caring and loving" families(parents, uncles, aunts), friends, wise advisors.

220.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 11:53 am

Quoting mltm:

Quoting femme_fatal:

mltm
thank you for sharing!
that gives some picture.
recently married you are, arent you? or going to marry? have i guessed right?


No, you're wrong! But when I moved to a christian dominant country, I realized that I didn't really belong to their culture, and I found out that rather I was closer to so-called muslim culture even if I had never practised it. I wore off my prejudices, I met practising muslim girls, and I let myself be more open to İslam, I found myself defending the muslims since here I see a lot of prejudiced people against Turkey and muslims. I also went out with a real muslim man, I say real because he was not hypocrite or fundamentalist, he was such a modest respectful and pure man, he helped me to wear off my prejudices a lot.
I think we have to find the line between being cautious and being prejudiced.


mltm,
so i was right.
1. you're prejudiced to christian countries (i may understand you, why, not only culture but also mentality difference)
2. you have a man "boyfriend" who's working on your perception of the world. (many non-muslim women did and do so, you're not the first and last).

thanks,
take care

221.       azade
1606 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 06:12 pm

Look we have people from all over the spectrum calling themselves muslim, but that doesn't mean they are. They are all lacking dîn. You can't judge all of us because of that.

222.       mltm
3690 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 06:40 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:


mltm,
so i was right.
1. you're prejudiced to christian countries (i may understand you, why, not only culture but also mentality difference)
2. you have a man "boyfriend" who's working on your perception of the world. (many non-muslim women did and do so, you're not the first and last).

thanks,
take care



I already knew you would say these.
I'm not prejudiced against the european countries, it's the other way around, there's an ignorance about Turkey and Turks, I just try to preserve my identity and defend my people and country against the unjust prejuduces, being among them has made me be closer to my ties, that's all. Maybe, I should thank this, it has caused me be more productive.
2. It's already over, but what I wanted to say was that he helped me erase my prejudices a lot. Who can say that he is never influenced by people around him? By this way, we discover ourselves and create our personality.

223.       TeresaJana
304 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 08:56 pm

In keeping with the flavor of how this thread has gone on...I am wondering if any Muslim living in Turkey has understood any difference in the dynamics between the men/women they meet or know who are Christian living in Turkey? I mean if a Muslim person comes into a Christian home...Does that person notice a great difference in how the husband and wife interact with one another that is in great contrast to how a Muslim husband and wife interact?

224.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 06 May 2007 Sun 10:09 pm

Quoting mltm:


I already knew you would say these.
I'm not prejudiced against the european countries, it's the other way around, there's an ignorance about Turkey and Turks, I just try to preserve my identity and defend my people and country against the unjust prejuduces, being among them has made me be closer to my ties, that's all. Maybe, I should thank this, it has caused me be more productive.
2. It's already over, but what I wanted to say was that he helped me erase my prejudices a lot. Who can say that he is never influenced by people around him? By this way, we discover ourselves and create our personality.


you're a victim of patriotism.
as for the ignorance of turkey and turks, whats wrong in that? is it forbidden?
you were tabula raza before, its easy to shape up a such state, so someone has already taken the advantage.
its absolutely your business.
anyway, never stop searching.
good luck!

225.       vineyards
1954 posts
 07 May 2007 Mon 02:09 am

226.       CANLI
5084 posts
 07 May 2007 Mon 02:19 am

Quoting vineyards:


For sure, Turks are not as obsessed with religion as Arabs are.



İ dont understand your sentence vineyards,raising many questions in my mind.

First,is obaying a religion is an obsession ?!
Second,is being Muslim means to miss treat your wife ?!
Third,is obaying a religion is something we must be shame of ?!
Forth,%99 of Turkish people are Muslims,sorry for the question,but did you ALL saw your father miss treat your mother ?
Or ALL Turk not obsessed with religions,and they dont follow it,so that doesnt happen in Türkiye ?!

Or maybe,just maybe,they treat their wives well because,its written in the Holy books ?!

227.       CANLI
5084 posts
 07 May 2007 Mon 02:23 am

TeresaJana,im curios,how do you think a Muslim husband and wife interact with each other ?

228.       gezbelle
1542 posts
 07 May 2007 Mon 02:40 am

Quoting panta rei:

Quoting gezbelle:


one side of my family are buddhists and they are all married



So, are you a Buddhist, gezbelle? I mean, is there any barrier for us not to marry? lol



no i'm not buddhist

229.       TeresaJana
304 posts
 07 May 2007 Mon 02:56 am

to answer your question Canli, I would say they interact quite nicely with each other considering they are both brought up in the same culture. My question was what does a person of turkish or muslim culture notice what they might or might not tolerate specifically by observing others from another culture or religion. i was hoping for some actual examples but perhaps that might be too inflammatory?? scared? lol for example I did know of a pakistan man married to a christian american woman and she was okay to wear western clothing, but she was not allowed into a room full of men nor to smile at them in any way or talk to any unless they specifically asked her a question. you see, she had to 'learn' a different way of mingling with people from what she was used to and may I add, he taught her rather forcefully instead of kindly.

230.       CANLI
5084 posts
 07 May 2007 Mon 03:02 am

Well,i guess its something got to do with culture rather than religion.
For example,here,we are Muslims and Christians living in same country,if you go int a Muslim house,or a christian house you wouldnt feel any differences,except in Muslim house the woman put on the Scarf if she wears it and the visitor was a man,and in the Christian house the cross on the wall,nothing more.

İ travelled to some Arabic country long time ago,about 10 yrs,and in that time women werent allowed to sit at same room with men if they are strangers,but if they are family it was ok.

So,its different cultures more than religions.

231.       panta rei
0 posts
 07 May 2007 Mon 03:42 am

Quoting gezbelle:

Quoting panta rei:

Quoting gezbelle:


one side of my family are buddhists and they are all married



So, are you a Buddhist, gezbelle? I mean, is there any barrier for us not to marry? lol



no i'm not buddhist



I am not either. Hehehe! Sooooo.....! Hehehe! Do you also think of what I am thinking of? We can marry... yes, gezbelle, we can do it!

232.       gezbelle
1542 posts
 07 May 2007 Mon 03:47 am

Quoting panta rei:

Quoting gezbelle:

Quoting panta rei:

Quoting gezbelle:


one side of my family are buddhists and they are all married



So, are you a Buddhist, gezbelle? I mean, is there any barrier for us not to marry? lol



no i'm not buddhist



I am not either. Hehehe! Sooooo.....! Hehehe! Do you also think of what I am thinking of? We can marry... yes, gezbelle, we can do it!



didn't you already ask femme_fatal in this post:
http://www.turkishclass.com/forumTitle_7_16656

233.       panta rei
0 posts
 07 May 2007 Mon 03:49 am

Forget about femme fatal! She is too fatal to be married!

234.       catwoman
8933 posts
 07 May 2007 Mon 06:25 am

Quoting panta rei:

So, are you a Buddhist, gezbelle? I mean, is there any barrier for us not to marry?



Geez... I'm so tired with this whole marriage thing you're replaying over and over like a broken record. Are you ever going to stop or is it really amusing to you :-S ?? It would be so nice if you actually meant what your nickname implies!

235.       panta rei
0 posts
 07 May 2007 Mon 01:27 pm

Have you ever listened to Bolero by Ravel, catwoman? It is one of the masterpieces I like listening to most. The same melody is repeated "over and over again, orchestrated differently each time." Each time, at least one instrument join to play, and thus towards the end it goes more and more magnificent. As a result, nothing sounds same, but many things change. Even you before and after listening to it, wouldn't remain the same catwoman.

This one is not a good performance of it, but enjoy!

Also found this.

(the sitting man there is so funny. Made me laugh out loud! lol )

236.       girleegirl
5065 posts
 08 May 2007 Tue 08:02 am

Wow! Comparing yourself to Ravel now??? Obviously you hold yourself in very high regard but how can you honestly compare the two?

237.       catwoman
8933 posts
 08 May 2007 Tue 08:15 am

The only possible answer is - lunacy .

238.       panta rei
0 posts
 08 May 2007 Tue 01:04 pm

I am not a human of this era; my posts and their great merit are going to be understood in the next hundred years; so are going to be done my proposals!

239.       catwoman
8933 posts
 08 May 2007 Tue 10:40 pm

I think they were all kind of crazy too lol.

240.       culday
0 posts
 08 May 2007 Tue 11:12 pm

The religions and cultures should not be compared...because culture rules people and society.
If so, a clash of culture begins...problems cannot be solved.This is my advice.Experience is talking...

241.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 09 May 2007 Wed 12:45 am

Quoting culday:

The religions and cultures should not be compared...because culture rules people and society.
If so, a clash of culture begins...problems cannot be solved.This is my advice.Experience is talking...


why should not be compared?
culture rules over society? wow, you've just opened my eyes! thats why there are so many idiots who prefer to be ruled by customs and traditions instead of using brains!!! they do not have their own ideas for their lives therefore they go and share their ancestrial damn fate.
thank you!

242.       culday
0 posts
 09 May 2007 Wed 01:45 am

For the attention of femme_fatal =
I understand you little girl…I see your feelings about this topic..This topic is not a topic between (a) and (b) religion.İt is international confllict and dilemma.…I can tell it like you.İt is an easy way. But you will learn it as time goes on……Because you build a dream castle in the air…Maybe you are a cultured and well-educated person.But everybody is not like you…This is your personal and sincere and honest opinion..Because their culture is their brain..Their brain is their culture..Traditions and customs are laws.An organism…They rule the community like laws.. Could you change their brain soon?It takes a long time..Is it easy way?. One-winged bird doesn’t fly. It is a big process and challenge...Are you a hero?I understand your feelings.

243.       catwoman
8933 posts
 09 May 2007 Wed 03:20 am

Quoting culday:

The religions and cultures should not be compared...because culture rules people and society.
If so, a clash of culture begins...problems cannot be solved.This is my advice.Experience is talking...



Culday, I respect your ideas, but you really didn't give enough reason to agree with your statement. While I agree that cultures differ fundamentally and it takes the insider's knowledge to be able to judge them rightly, but why not gather your knowledge and try to justly question some aspects of a culture? It is running away out of fear of a conflict to say that there will be a cultural clash and it's better not to question cultural behavior. Obviously, one has to be knowledgeable about the true causes and understand the underlying reasons, but what is so wrong with trying to do that? Isn't it by self criticism and comparison with the more successful ones in the desired area that people and places can change for the better?

244.       vineyards
1954 posts
 09 May 2007 Wed 12:14 pm

245.       culday
0 posts
 09 May 2007 Wed 01:39 pm

For the attention of Catwoman friend=
The biggest war in this world is the war against the ignorance.Look at the world.The cultures, customs, traditions and laws rule the world countries.Who are well-educated and cultured and intellectual?What is culture and civilizations?You are having culture and civilization from the community and the community is giving you culture and civilization..This is a cultural, economical and social trade.You know and get the only culture and civilization they give.You don’t create a new culture and civilization.Your opinion is limited according to your culture.Your brain is limited according to your world.Except marginal opinions…What is your culture?I don’t know.Is you culture excellent and scientific?Can you judge your culture by using your brain? Can you criticize?Can you stop cultural and hot wars in the world?Can you solve internatonal conflicts and dilemmas? In fact, Culture and civilizations we have rule the world.Have you read these books = (1) "The Rise and fall of the great powers" by Paul Kennedy, (2) "The Clash of civilizations and the remarking of world order" by Samuel P.Huntington And the other books.Have you read the novel “Crime and punishment”by Dostoyevski?According to science and history and literature , civilization is unique, but culture are differents.There is diversity in the world.And we should respect other people’s cultures.(Sorry my English is not good, I am just a student).But good brain,true path and enlightenment are important concepts.

246.       catwoman
8933 posts
 09 May 2007 Wed 11:07 pm

I'm not sure if I understand your point of view correctly, but it's a dangerous message to say that nobody should ever judge other cultures. In that case, all the human rights violations happening around the world, "because it's their culture" would never be questioned and the mentality of those people would never be challenged or shown another way.

247.       TeresaJana
304 posts
 09 May 2007 Wed 11:30 pm

Quote:

Catwoman
I'm not sure if I understand your point of view correctly, but it's a dangerous message to say that nobody should ever judge other cultures. In that case, all the human rights violations happening around the world, "because it's their culture" would never be questioned and the mentality of those people would never be challenged or shown another way.


I would like to finish your paragraph with a more fair thought... that 'those people' would also challenge our mentality and show us another way as well. Humans are symbiotic. We need each other same as the flower needs the bee...

248.       TeresaJana
304 posts
 09 May 2007 Wed 11:48 pm

hehe..sorry i didnt know how to put catwoman's quote in the quote box.

249.       duda
0 posts
 10 May 2007 Thu 12:04 am

Quoting catwoman:

but it's a dangerous message to say that nobody should ever judge other cultures. In that case, all the human rights violations happening around the world, "because it's their culture" would never be questioned and the mentality of those people would never be challenged or shown another way.



Sorry, but I think THIS message is dangerous... who is the judge to decide which culture is better and which culture is endangering human rights? Each nation has right to have its own culture and to be respected. If I wouldn't respect all the cultures of this world, I would call myself a racist and a nationalist. Why? Because EACH culture has its own faults and must rid of them by its own strength, not with "help" of other nations and countries, which are maybe even worse. What's good for me maybe isn't good for someone else and vice versa. If I ever dare to say "My culture is better", then I claim right to send my airplanes and bombs as well... no, catwoman, you know I respect you, but this was very wrong.

250.       culday
0 posts
 10 May 2007 Thu 12:05 am

I agree with you..Me too..Same thing..Nothing much to tell.

251.       culday
0 posts
 10 May 2007 Thu 12:12 am

Yes, DUDA is right.Because Duda is thinking universal and intellectual..I agree with DUDA.Thank you for your kind and positive opinion for this topic.

252.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 10 May 2007 Thu 12:14 am

culday,
you big girl or old girl, as you wish, thank you again for widening horizontally my views on this world and its clashes! im impressed!

253.       duda
0 posts
 10 May 2007 Thu 12:33 am

Quoting femme_fatal:

Quoting culday:

The religions and cultures should not be compared...because culture rules people and society.
If so, a clash of culture begins...problems cannot be solved.This is my advice.Experience is talking...


why should not be compared?
culture rules over society? wow, you've just opened my eyes! thats why there are so many idiots who prefer to be ruled by customs and traditions instead of using brains!!! they do not have their own ideas for their lives therefore they go and share their ancestrial damn fate.
thank you!



This comment is for CULDAY: I agree with you deeply... and I think you will agree with me again: culture means all the legacy of one nation or country, but some people are just not capable to separate culture from civilisation... the underground trains and computers mean civilisation, yes, but our poetry, tradition, customs, they make our culture. (And some people maybe even think hamburgers being a part of civilisation... or culture.) I am quoting a couple of paragraphs from the synopsis written on my dear philosopher Oswald Spengler and his famous book "The Decline of the West":

"Cultures are "living" things -- organic in nature -- and must pass through the stages of birth-development-fulfillment-decay-death. Hence a "morphology" of history. All previous cultures have passed through these distinct stages, and Western culture can be no exception. In fact, its present stage in the organic development-process can be pinpointed.

The high-water mark of a High Culture is its phase of fulfillment -- called the "culture" phase. The beginning of decline and decay in a Culture is the transition point between its "culture" phase and the "civilization" phase that inevitably follows.

The "civilization" phase witnesses drastic social upheavals, mass movements of peoples, continual wars and constant crises. All this takes place along with the growth of the great "megalopolis" -- huge urban and suburban centers that sap the surrounding countrysides of their vitality, intellect, strength, and soul. The inhabitants of these urban conglomerations -- now the bulk of the populace -- are a rootless, soulless, godless, and materialistic mass, who love nothing more than their panem et circenses. From these come the subhuman "fellaheen" -- fitting participants in the dying-out of a culture.

With the civilization phase comes the rule of Money and its twin tools, Democracy and the Press. Money rules over the chaos, and only Money profits by it. But the true bearers of the culture -- the men whose souls are still one with the culture-soul -- are disgusted and repelled by the Money-power and its fellaheen, and act to break it, as they are compelled to do so -- and as the mass culture-soul compels finally the end of the dictatorship of money."

Wise man was he... And interesting, some people call Spengler's bearers of the culture "idiots"...

254.       catwoman
8933 posts
 10 May 2007 Thu 12:41 am

Who said that we are negating cultural values or saying "my culture is better then yours"??? This is a part you added yourself. I'm talking about human rights violations!
If you're so culturally neutral, then please, stop criticizing the Americans for doing what's culturally valuable to them or the European Union, and obviously things like Darfur or situation of women around the world is absolutely not our business or anything we should lose sleep over. Let's just keep patting each other on the back. You're looking a bit one-sidedly and I think naively.

I want to add that I love the diversity of different cultures and ideas and I'd hate all countries to become the same capitalistic place. However, there are some things that I would always criticize and judge - especially if I see a culturally sanctioned cruelty and inequality.

255.       duda
0 posts
 10 May 2007 Thu 01:23 am

Quoting catwoman:

Who said that we are negating cultural values or saying "my culture is better then yours"??? This is a part you added yourself. I'm talking about human rights violations!



No one said explicitly. But the very statement that we are allowed to judge leaves space for someone - and anyone - to say "this culture is better". So the basic principle is wrong. I may watch, analyse, criticize, but not JUDGE.

Quoting catwoman:

If you're so culturally neutral, then please, stop criticizing the Americans for doing what's culturally valuable to them or the European Union, and obviously things like Darfur or situation of women around the world is absolutely not our business or anything we should lose sleep over. Let's just keep patting each other on the back. You're looking a bit one-sidedly and I think naively.



I never mentioned Americans, you understood something wrog. It's the matter of principle again. And my attitude doesn't mean indolence and sleeping over, but not interferring unasked. It's much better to give an example; unfortunately, I don't think Western culture is giving a good example of democracy and human rights to anyone, and especially concerning tolerance. Word "tolerance" is the key word, and I just must be culturally neutral because I live in a multinational and multicultural country and I know exactly what word tolerance means. Believe me it's not naivety. Interferring other cultures' traditions (including rights) usually brings hatred and wars.

Quoting catwoman:

I want to add that I love the diversity of different cultures and ideas and I'd hate all countries to become the same capitalistic place. However, there are some things that I would always criticize and judge - especially if I see a culturally sanctioned cruelty and inequality.



Here you are right. But that's the point of what I said - we don't have right to force anybody to change their way of living, otherwise we are worse than them. (Just remember Russian Revolution or some cases of religious "missions".) We wouldn't like anyone to change ours, in most cases. And again I say, the term "human rights" is very a vague phrase. I always remember the case from many years ago - it happened somewhere in Scandinavia. A social service took a child from his mother because she was "too fat", and giving him "bad example". A human gesture... from their point of view. So we must be extremely careful when deciding what is "cruelty" and what is modus vivendi.

256.       culday
0 posts
 10 May 2007 Thu 02:29 am

Yes, the diversity is a wealth, a world wealth…The diversity is life.The diversity is world.The diversity is nature…The diversity is humanity…The wide variety of everything = Ethnic diversity...Cultural diversity…Religious diversity…God loves the diversity.
Who owns “Culture”?As DUDA said “You may watch, analyse, criticize, but not judge cultures”. Because cultures are just like an organism. Culture rights violations and human rights violations are same thing…As DUDA said “Each nation has right to have its own culture and to be respected”.”We don't have right to force anybody to change their way of living”. We should respect other people’s cultures and values.This is the basic principle..I believe CATWOMAN and FEMME _ FATAL agree….
I respect CATWOMAN, DUDA and FEMME _ FATAL..
As a result=
Dont’t worry friend…
Buddhist can marry with Muslim…
Muslim can marry with Christian…
Jewish can marry with Muslim.
Christian can marry with Jewish.
And a person from World can marry with a person from another world in the universe or cosmos.
If you really love… If you really wanna marry with…
Because all cultures belong to God.
(PS: I am sorry, my English is not good).

257.       catwoman
8933 posts
 10 May 2007 Thu 04:44 am

What I mean by human rights violations are blatant violations and not the gray issues. In case of more gray cases, nothing should be influenced by violence and I'm not saying that you were criticizing the US, but many other people (who preach tolerance towards their culture) do. Yeah, the west is not setting the example I wish it did, but undoubtedly there's more equality and tolerance here then anywhere else.

258.       vineyards
1954 posts
 10 May 2007 Thu 03:33 pm

259.       catwoman
8933 posts
 10 May 2007 Thu 03:41 pm

Quoting vineyards:

Quoting catwoman:

... but many other people (who preach tolerance towards their culture) do. Yeah, the west is not setting the example I wish it did, but undoubtedly there's more equality and tolerance here then anywhere else.



Catwoman, that's only your account of the truth and when you hear the accounts of others you tend to push yours as the norm. That's indeed very prejudiced. When I blame a country I base my arguments on historical records. For example, I can claim on the solid ground that antisemitism,racism, nazism, slavery, (nuclear) mass destructions, blody secterian wars, crusades have their roots in the West.

I am sorry I cannot show any tolerance to anyone of those crimes and I can not be reproached just because I refered to them.



The thing is that I agree with you vineyards, I think that these things SHOULD be criticized, doesn't matter what culture they are from. And this is basically what I mean when I'm being critical of other cultures. For example discrimination of Kurds or women in Turkey is one of those things. And there are things I agree with when they criticize the western culture. One thing I abhor though is imposing anything through violence (as duda gave an example of a child taken away from a fat mother). Any changes for the better can only be implemented by means based on understanding, cultural compatibility, and smart ideas. And obviously not everything I don't like or agree with needs to be criticized or changed at all.
I'm sure though that you don't think duda that it shouldn't be criticized when a culture sanctions it when women are abused, denied equal rights, sold as commodities... etc.

260.       azade
1606 posts
 10 May 2007 Thu 10:24 pm

culday that's a nice thought but practicing muslims simply can't marry someone not off the books.

261.       culday
0 posts
 10 May 2007 Thu 10:32 pm

Azade,
can you explain your opinion/question, ı don't know good English like you, and then I 'lll give you an answer.

262.       azade
1606 posts
 10 May 2007 Thu 10:54 pm

Sorry your english is MUCH better than my turkish But yani, this is süra 5:5 "Bu gün size temiz ve hoş şeyler helâl kılındı. Kendilerine kitap verilenlerin yiyecekleri size helâl, sizin yiyecekleriniz de onlara helâldir. Mü'min kadınlardan iffetli olanlarla, daha önce kendilerine kitap verilenlerden olan iffetli kadınlar da, mehirlerini vermeniz kaydıyla; evlenmek, zina etmemek ve gizli dost tutmamak üzere size helâldir. Her kim de inanılması gerekenleri inkar ederse bütün işlediği boşa gider. Ahirette de o, ziyana uğrayanlardandır."
= muslims can only marry people of the book.

263.       panta rei
0 posts
 10 May 2007 Thu 11:25 pm

Quoting azade:

= muslims can only marry people of the book.



I think you have missed the following point, azade.

Quoting azade:

Mü'min kadınlardan iffetli olanlarla, daha önce kendilerine kitap verilenlerden olan iffetli kadınlar da,



"Mümin" above must mean "believer", but not "muslim" (because saying "the chaste ones among believer women", -mumin kadınlardan iffetli olanlar-, tells that "there may be non-chaste women among the believers" which is understandable. But there cannot be non-chaste women among "the Muslims", because in that case they wouldn't be called "Muslim". Or if they are still called "Muslim", this would purely go absurdity.)

So, "beliver women" refers to a more general defitinion than "belivers/people of the book", unless it is defined or limited somewhere else in the Koran. Now, whom would you call "a believer"? Only those from the people of the book? Namely, only a Muslim, a Christian or a Jewish? Can't a Buddhist be called "a believer"? If so, why?

264.       culday
0 posts
 11 May 2007 Fri 12:29 am

For the attention of AZADE=
According to Islam=
There are three holy religions in the world =
1. Jewishness (Judaism) ( Jewish)
2. Christianity (Christian)
3. Islam (Muslim)
Buddhism (Buddhist) is not a religion.
But a Buddhist of course may be a Muslim, like a Jewish, a Christian, if she/he wish.
But people don't have right to force anybody to change their way of living, according to Islamic philosophy .

265.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 11 May 2007 Fri 12:48 am

culday,
buddhism is not a religion.
are you sure you went to school?

266.       Deli_kizin
6376 posts
 11 May 2007 Fri 12:55 am

Quoting femme_fatal:

culday,
buddhism is not a religion.
are you sure you went to school?



Well I definitely went to school and there I was taught Buddhism is not a religion but a lifestyle based on a certain phylosophy and psychology and the main figure, Buddha, is never seen as divine, but just one of the rare human beings that lead us to enlightment.

267.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 11 May 2007 Fri 12:58 am

to panta rei:
you really dont know or pretending?
1. its about monotheistic god
2. mohammed had no idea about buddhism and other religions, how could he?

268.       panta rei
0 posts
 11 May 2007 Fri 01:00 am

I doubt you have properly understood my post above, femme fatal. Would you like to try again?

269.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 11 May 2007 Fri 01:03 am

Quoting Deli_kizin:

Quoting femme_fatal:

culday,
buddhism is not a religion.
are you sure you went to school?



Well I definitely went to school and there I was taught Buddhism is not a religion but a lifestyle based on a certain phylosophy and psychology and the main figure, Buddha, is never seen as divine, but just one of the rare human beings that lead us to enlightment.


oh deli deli,
then you dont know the definition of the word "religion". go to school one more time, together with culday.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism

all my best regards to a princess of TC

270.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 11 May 2007 Fri 01:06 am

Quoting panta rei:

I doubt you have properly understood my post above, femme fatal. Would you like to try again?


i have no doubt i caught your idea.
why cant be a believer? is it problem to you?

271.       panta rei
0 posts
 11 May 2007 Fri 01:10 am

femme fatal - I still doubt you have understood my post properly. All I wrote were according to the quote that azade quoted above. Please try again.

272.       Deli_kizin
6376 posts
 11 May 2007 Fri 01:11 am

Quoting femme_fatal:



oh deli deli,
then you dont know the definition of the word "religion". go to school one more time, together with culday.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism

all my best regards to a princess of TC



With all due respect, whats up with the nasty comment? I know that princess from your mouth cannot be a compliment and I would not take it so from anyone else either.

I dont know any Buddhist who considers himself religious, neyse I didnt think of the fact that we could also be talking of a non-theistic religion.

273.       duda
0 posts
 11 May 2007 Fri 01:14 am

Culday was very clear: "According to Islam". Not "according to Culday". And...

Quoting femme_fatal:

to panta rei:
2. mohammed had no idea about buddhism and other religions, how could he?



I wonder how could he, really... living in the very neighbourhood of Buddhism... and establishing a religion based on Judaism... well, I also suppose Isa Peygamber appears in Kur'an just by chance... Panta rei, really, shame on you, did you go to school? Or you wasted your time reading books and enriching your knowledge... lol

274.       azade
1606 posts
 11 May 2007 Fri 01:20 am

panta rei and culday I know all about that, I am muslimah myself. Sorry my example wasn't perfect, that's all I could find then, but the point is that according to islam

1) A muslim man can marry a muslim, a christian or a jew
2) A muslim woman can only marry a muslim man

unless you're just a culture muslim then you can do whatever the heck you want, but you're not gonna go to cennet just because you call yourself muslim

275.       culday
0 posts
 11 May 2007 Fri 01:32 am

femme_fatal,
your school and your teachers do not know the real meaning of the "religion" consept.
1. Jewishness (Judaism) ( Jewish)
2. Christianity (Christian)
3. Islam
Buddhism is an ethical belief/thinking.
According to religion science, there are 3 religions on earth.Buddhism in the atheist category
I'll not give any answer again.

276.       azade
1606 posts
 11 May 2007 Fri 01:35 am

Quoting culday:

femme_fatal,
your school and your teachers do not know the real meaning of the "religion" consept.
1. Jewishness (Judaism) ( Jewish)
2. Christianity (Christian)
3. Islam
Buddhism is an ethical belief/thinking.
According to religion science, there are 3 religions on earth.Buddhism in the atheist category
I'll not give any answer again.



Some definitions of "religion" explain that it doesn't have to have anything to do with a concept of a god, it sometimes goes under a very broad definition which could include political ideas as well.
But personally I agree with you, there's no god in buddhism so I wouldn't call it an actual religion either. Unless you want to compare nirvana to a kind of heaven (yes I know it's not the same thing)

277.       culday
0 posts
 11 May 2007 Fri 01:37 am

Yes DUDA,you are right.
According to ISLAM,
(not according to me)...

My belief belongs to me.

278.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 11 May 2007 Fri 01:39 am

Quoting duda:

Culday was very clear: "According to Islam". Not "according to Culday". And...

Quoting femme_fatal:

to panta rei:
2. mohammed had no idea about buddhism and other religions, how could he?



I wonder how could he, really... living in the very neighbourhood of Buddhism... and establishing a religion based on Judaism... well, I also suppose Isa Peygamber appears in Kur'an just by chance... Panta rei, really, shame on you, did you go to school? Or you wasted your time reading books and enriching your knowledge... lol


well, duda,
1. i think it was a mistake you came across me.
2. its all about the location which arabia peninsula is, if you know the geography, its neighbourhood is africa, judea and middle east (those times). the penisula was out the games. and no one had an influence on this piece of land.
3. i havent mentioned judaism and christianity in my previous post. so, pls, pay more attention to what you say, and dont waste my precious time.

279.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 11 May 2007 Fri 01:50 am

Quoting culday:

femme_fatal,
your school and your teachers do not know the real meaning of the "religion" consept.
1. Jewishness (Judaism) ( Jewish)
2. Christianity (Christian)
3. Islam
Buddhism is an ethical belief/thinking.
According to religion science, there are 3 religions on earth.Buddhism in the atheist category
I'll not give any answer again.


culday,
back to school!
you speak what you heard from you neighbours or friends. they possibly told you about 3 main religions they are familiar with.
a religion is a set of beliefs, practices, rituals, moral codes and other blah-blah! such brief definition should be enough for you, i think.
if its not enough, pls, here you're:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion#Definition_of_religion

280.       duda
0 posts
 11 May 2007 Fri 02:02 am

Quoting femme_fatal:


well, duda,
1. i think it was a mistake you came across me.
2. its all about the location which arabia peninsula is, if you know the geography, its neighbourhood is africa, judea and middle east (those times). the penisula was out the games. and no one had an influence on this piece of land.
3. i havent mentioned judaism and christianity in my previous post. so, pls, pay more attention to what you say, and dont waste my precious time.



1. I was addressing Panta rei, not you. But I agree with you. It's always a mistake to came across ignorance.
2. Please, for God's sake, look at maps... Buddhism was present in Ancient Greece and Bysant, as well as in the north of Arabian Peninsula. And please again, study the path of Arabs' migrations. It's something I learned about on my university, both on History of Byzant and History of Islam Culture lessons.
3. You were not precise, you just said "religions". And even if we leave apart Judaism and Christianity, of course Mohammed knew for many other polyteistic systems of belief; Arabs were polytheistic themselves before Islam. When Mohammed says "non-believers", he obviously doesn't think monotheistic religions. (So you can't exclude Buddhism so easily.)
4. My time is precious too... very precious, so I stop here. But I really wonder why you always want to quarrel, even if we are just bringing out history facts??? And no one wants to offend you personally. Why do you always think so? Discussion doesn't mean quarrel amongst polite people.

(280 Messages in 28 pages - View all)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...  >>
Thread locked by a moderator or admin.




Turkish Dictionary
Turkish Chat
Open mini chat
New in Forums
Why yer gördüm but yeri geziyorum
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much, makes perfect sense!
Etmeyi vs etmek
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much!
Görülmez vs görünmiyor
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much, very well explained!
Içeri and içeriye
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much for the detailed ...
Present continous tense
HaydiDeer: Got it, thank you!
Hic vs herhangi, degil vs yok
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much!
Rize Artvin Airport Transfer - Rize Tours
rizetours: Dear Guest; In order to make your Black Sea trip more enjoyable, our c...
What does \"kabul ettiğini\" mean?
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much for the detailed ...
Kimse vs biri (anyone)
HaydiDeer: Thank you!
Random Pictures of Turkey
Most commented