The question is not whether or not to allow the politically oriented head scarfs into the university.

The question is how to melt the head scarved graduates into the civil state, after their graduation.

How many of the non moslem or secular citizens of Turkey can be indifferent to or at ease with facing a head scarved lady judge at the bench, if they had to face her judgement with a head scarved defendant (opposing rival)?

ONE SOLUTION MAY BE TO GIVE UP THE CIVIL SECULAR STATE ALTOGETHER. iS THAT WHAT WE ARE AFTER?

Are you saying judges with hijab are not objective?

is this queation no valid for who doesn't wear scarf,if the her/his aim not to deal justice???

Azade,
How would I know?
I certainly would feel unconfortable...

How so?

As a judge of course she would have to be objective in all cases, but what's more important - as a person, she would not have any interestin doing injustice.

allow today a headscarf, hidjab, tomorrow they'll demand a burka, and after this they will want to hang or stone raped girls and then goodbye turkey of ataturk and welcome taliban regime.
allow today a head cover tomorrow you will have this:
EGYPT: FATWA ALLOWS "BREASTFEEDING COLLEAGUES"
(ANSAmed) - CAIRO, MAY 21 - The only way to remain in private with a female colleague in the workplace is to let her breastfeed you, according to a fatwa (Egyptian religious decree) of two theologists from al-Azhar which has sparked scandals and polemics in the Egyptian media over the past days. The Islam bans a person from being in private in one and the same room with a person from the opposite sex - unless they are married or have close relations (parents and children, brothers and sisters, and so forth). The fatwa in question was issued recently by Izat Atiyah and Abd el-Mahdi Abd el-Kader, professors at the Cairo-based al-Azhar University, the world's most important centre of Sunni theology. According to them, a woman can lift her veil and remain in private with a male colleague at their workplace only if she had breastfed him five times already. "Entering a public office you should not be surprised if you one day happen upon a 50-year-old employee who is sucking milk from his colleague," ridiculed the al-Distur independent newspaper. A theologian from al-Azhar judged as "senseless" the discussion of a topic of the kind. "If the al-Azhar Mufti himself said such things, he would be a non-respected person and would be considered crazy," theologian Malika Yussef said, quoted by the independent daily al-Karama. Another al-Azhar theologian, Mabruk Attia, believes that the fatwa in question is a wrong interpretation of a "particular case" from the times of Prophet Mohammed. The latter is believed to have advised a woman to milk her adopted son, already grown up, in order to become his milk mother, after adoption was banned by the Islam. The woman gave him her milk to drink from a container, and not via direct breast feeding.

its not so innocent as it seems... always look beyond and check the past!

Wearing hijab and such things as stoning are so far from eachother. The matter of hijab is simply a question of (lack of) personal freedom, stoning etc. is a matter of the law, and which of course never will be allowed in a secular country like Turkey. The fatwa above is just absurd.

What do you (plural, general speaking) care what people are wearing? By banning garments like the hijab, many women are "forced" not to get a proper education/job etc. because they will think of it like this - do I want to educate myself and work while I'm in this dünya or do I want to go to cennet forever?
A woman wearing a regular hijab is capable of doing the same jobs as a woman without.

What's the context?