Ok, thanks  So I´d better stick to the "right" version then if I want to appear semi-educated in Turkish  

I understand the aorist tense. It´s funny how everybody says it´s wrong, yet in dictionaries it appears to be an acceptable version. Manisa Turkish calls it a "special case". All languages have exceptions, is it too much of a stretch to question whether that is not the case here?

It makes sense to me, thank you for the explanation.

So, the official, proper way is without the "me", but, if I understand correctly, in daily use you add the "me" then? Which one seems more natural for you to use?

Yeah, since 1972 PC is inactive in Turkey.

I looked in the Milet´s Ýngilizce Öðrenci Sözlüðü and it gives the definition for 

"görmemezlikten gelmek" as "to pretend not to see, to cut, to ignore. You can also check on www.tureng.com and it´ll give you multiple entries for that expression.

I´m not trying to be a pain in the neck here, I just want to make sure that I learn correctly.

Geliþ  - arrival

Gelmeyiþ - non-arrival

Why is it wrong? The dictionary has that form and the Manisa website also talks about how in this construction you double the negative. Is it not used that way in everday speech?

Here´s how the Manisa Turkish website explains it:

A Special Case

How to say - To pretend not to...

The use of the Negative of the Heavy Infinitive in the ablative case followed by the verb - gelmek - means - to pretend not to...

This pretend not to.. form is a reduplicated negative ie: bakmazlýk - becomes bakMAmazlýk meaning - to not NOT to see...

It is mentioned here because in this form it is daily use.

1. Bana bakmamazlýktan geldi - He pretended not to look at me
2. Onu görmemezlikten geliyorsunuz - You are pretending not to see it
3. Ayþe hanýmý görmemezlikten gelir misiniz? - Are you pretending not to like Miss Ayþe?

This construction is a special locution and only used with - gelmek - as an auxiliary verb. But it is used widely to mean - To pretend not to...

Opps, I needed to modify again, sorry for the multiple posts.

Just wanted to add that, "you are" in the first stentence, is implied, it´s not directly stated in the sentence.

Hopefully a native/more experienced learner will correct it if I´m off track.

I can´t modify my post, so I´m just going to add a note, I think the meaning of "iyi ki varsin" can be better conveyed by "thank you for being there" - it´s not the exact translation, but I think you will find that sentiment expressed that way in English more often than "it´s good you exist".