A man can't be a feminist, he can't argue with a feminist nor can he be in the same line of thinking with a feminist because feminism is a camp designed by and for women where they can fight for their own cause.
If a woman states that she is a feminist and that she protests legal/traditional sexual discrimination in society, I would consider her reaction as a sociological phenomenon and I would categorize it alongside the unfair treatment she is subjected to which is another sociological phenomenon. I would probably conclude that neither of those problem categories could be solved by punishing one of the sexes or applying restrictions on it.
We know that independence is won by fighting, peace is achieved by shedding blood and oppressive regimes are overthrown at the expense of countless innocent people. Once the objective is reached fighting subsides and life runs normally. As a matter of fact, some aspects of the feminist movement is reminiscient of all the aforementioned. Therefore it is more on the side of being an anomaly serving a purpose in a period of transition. Nevertheless, this transition is age long and it is still nowhere close to satisfying related needs in society.
By way of reasoning, feminist women and especially those who are male haters or those who are overly aggressive toward the other sex do not behave the way a benign individual would. Her anger causes her to develop a dysfunction that affects her relations with other individuals. Add to that the charecteristic obsessive attitude of feminists and their selective interests in certain matters and you will end up with a problematic personality who is impossible to get along with.
|