Welcome
Login:   Pass:     Register - Forgot Password - Resend Activation

Turkish Class Forums / News articles, events, announcements

News articles, events, announcements

Add reply to this discussion
Why should Turkey restrain from entering Irak?
(122 Messages in 13 pages - View all)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...  >>
1.       KeithL
1455 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 06:52 pm

Rather than take the current popular post in the forum, in a new direction, I have started this one so the Armenian issue is not confused with the PKK issue.

How can the world expect Turkey to act with restraint against the PKK? This has been going on for over 30 years! Did the US use restraint when attacking Irak over 9/11? Did US ally, Israel use restraint went it leveled Beirut again over one single soldier? The problem with American diplomacy is its incredible hypocracy applied for itself and its allies.

2.       Serdar07
428 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 07:15 pm

The Republican government of USA has terrorized all the world in the name of fighting terrorism, are you calling for the same action to be done by the Turkish Army? To be with the same level with those Republican Hypocrates??
To shed blood in the name of fighting terror...
I can ask you one question and it is so easy :
If a thief entered your house and took all of your family as hostages, then could give all the right to the police to kill all of you in the sake of getting that thief arrested???

3.       KeithL
1455 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 07:41 pm

Turkey has the absolute right to defend its borders. The Republic of Turkey is being consistently attacked by members of the PKK who train and reside in Irak. Every nation in the world would protect its people and end this threat. Turkey has exercised patience to satisfy the United States long enough. Its now time for Turkey to act in its own interests and protect its people. All peoples of Turkey support this action.

4.       Serdar07
428 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 07:48 pm

So unforunately you are going after the classical games of politicians? Do you have any idea about those terrorists where are they? US Army invaded Afganistan and Iraq but what was the result??

5.       Serdar07
428 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 07:53 pm

By the way let it be clear are you speaking according to the intrests of people or the words coming out from the fat politians pockets... take care there is a big difference between these two cases. None of the politians are acting due to the what people like to make their life secure and happy! Politians saying yes for wars and sheding blood, while the majority of people on this poor earth calling for peace!!!!! And you are free to be on what side you decided.

6.       KeithL
1455 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 07:55 pm

If Turkey is able to mobilize inside the irak border, Turkey is safer. Training bases will be found and eliminated.

7.       teaschip
3870 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 07:59 pm

The US provides Turkey with 1 BILLION dollars in aid every year, which part of my tax dollars are funding their airbases. But WHERE was turkey in 2003 when we needed to use their border to open a northern front on Iraq? Not long after that Bush traveled to Turkey and paid them an
additional 2 billion + $$$$. At times I happen to believe that Turkey is only allied with the US when it is in THEIR interest.

Well, we learned yesterday just how devastating this loss of a northern base was. Because of Turkey’s antics three years ago, and the high cost of their lack of cooperation. We would have been able able to get the 4th Infantry Division into Iraq from the north, more of Saddam’s goons would have been captured or killed, and the insurgency would be far less than it was today.

Actually, it’s also possible we should be pleased that Turkey refused to allow US troops to enter Iraq from the North. As I understand it, the Turkish Parliament voted and the US proposal was defeated by only three votes. What was actually proposed was (1) for US troops to enter Kurdistan from the Turkish side, (2) move south to attack Iraqi nationalist army positions and (3) be replaced by Turkish forces, which were to occupy much of northern Iraq to “prevent Kurdish refugees from flooding into Turkey”.

The leaders of the various Kurdish militias in Northern Iraq stated, in no uncertain terms, that they WOULD treat occupation by Turkish troops as a Turkish invasion and would fight. In other words, we may have just missed kicking off an even wider war by three votes.

So now we face the dilemma that Turkey wants to interviene by uprooting the most stable part of Iraq. I'm curious, why now? If this has been going on for years....It wasn't convienent for you 4 years ago and now it is?

8.       KeithL
1455 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 08:01 pm

Several bombs set by the PKK have gone off near my home. Most notably, the HSBC Bank building at the levent metro station. I do not need a politician to tell me the PKK is a problem and we need to dismantle them. The military has known this for years and has held off because of the politicians.

9.       KeithL
1455 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 08:05 pm

OK Teaship,
Your recent history is very wrong. Turkey turned down money from the US to allow the invasion to take place from Turkish borders. Why? Because Turkey was not allowed to participate in the invasion. This would be the equivelent of the US allowing an ally to attack mexico from texas. And have the nerve to tell the US to stay out of it. Turkey acted honorably. The US money that goes to turkey for air bases is no different than the money all NATO nations receive for allowing air bases in their country. Its called rent. The pentagon considers this rent money well spent I assure you.

10.       KeithL
1455 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 08:07 pm

4 years ago, the PKK was quiet and at a truce with Turkey. In the last 4 years, they have stepped up their attacks. Turkey would have voted to allow the US access to NW Irak as I said if they were allowed to join the operation.

11.       Serdar07
428 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 08:08 pm

Quoting KeithL:

Several bombs set by the PKK have gone off near my home. Most notably, the HSBC Bank building at the levent metro station. I do not need a politician to tell me the PKK is a problem and we need to dismantle them. The military has known this for years and has held off because of the politicians.


Ok If you are seeing the issue personally then I can tell you about my family. 30 persons killed in an evening of May 3rd, 1988 by Saddam's Army in a very far village from any battle field. All civil not armed! Do you have time to tell their gender and ages, to be sure there were not armed people???

12.       KeithL
1455 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 08:09 pm

And your people have a right to defend themselves. I'm not disagreeing with you serdar.

13.       teaschip
3870 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 08:13 pm

Quoting KeithL:

OK Teaship,
Your recent history is very wrong. Turkey turned down money from the US to allow the invasion to take place from Turkish borders. Why? Because Turkey was not allowed to participate in the invasion. This would be the equivelent of the US allowing an ally to attack mexico from texas. And have the nerve to tell the US to stay out of it. Turkey acted honorably. The US money that goes to turkey for air bases is no different than the money all NATO nations receive for allowing air bases in their country. Its called rent. The pentagon considers this rent money well spent I assure you.



You must reread my post then KeithL, I was referring to after the invasion, they did accept 2 billion. Feel free to research this fact. And I can tell you the pentagon did not see this as well spent money for something that they were refused to use. You didn't respond to WHY NOW?

14.       Serdar07
428 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 08:14 pm

Quoting KeithL:

And your people have a right to defend themselves. I'm not disagreeing with you serdar.



Then Good Friend Keithl...
I am in the region and know it well as the Turkish Army know that very well... PKK terrorist in a mountain called ( Kandil) shared by three countries Iraq, Turkey and Iran,, But the Turkish Army now shelling civils in villages which are 300 KM away from that mountain. So the presure now not on the thieves but on the innocent people. Wish you could belive me and best wishes to all!!

15.       KeithL
1455 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 08:17 pm

I believe you serdar. Nothing about this war with the PKK is pretty.

16.       teaschip
3870 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 08:17 pm

Quoting Serdar07:

Quoting KeithL:

And your people have a right to defend themselves. I'm not disagreeing with you serdar.



Then Good Friend Keithl...
I am in the region and know it well as the Turkish Army know that very well... PKK terrorist in a mountain called ( Kandil) shared by three countries Iraq, Turkey and Iran,, But the Turkish Army now shelling civils in villages which are 300 KM away from that mountain. So the presure now not on the thieves but on the innocent people. Wish you could belive me and best wishes to all!!



I hope you can stay safe..

17.       KeithL
1455 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 08:18 pm

As I said teaship, the PKK had a cease fire with turkey for several years. Since the US invasion of Irak, their suicide bombings in turkey have begun again.

18.       Serdar07
428 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 08:22 pm

Quoting teaschip1:

Quoting Serdar07:

Quoting KeithL:

And your people have a right to defend themselves. I'm not disagreeing with you serdar.



Then Good Friend Keithl...
I am in the region and know it well as the Turkish Army know that very well... PKK terrorist in a mountain called ( Kandil) shared by three countries Iraq, Turkey and Iran,, But the Turkish Army now shelling civils in villages which are 300 KM away from that mountain. So the presure now not on the thieves but on the innocent people. Wish you could belive me and best wishes to all!!



I hope you can stay safe..



Thank you dear for your nice feelings and good wish!

19.       teaschip
3870 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 08:23 pm

And you really believe the smart thing for the Turkish people would be to cross into Iraq and fight?

20.       Serdar07
428 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 08:26 pm

Quoting KeithL:

As I said teaship, the PKK had a cease fire with turkey for several years. Since the US invasion of Irak, their suicide bombings in turkey have begun again.



Can't you imagine this new declartion and new situation is a part of the election game in USA between the Republican and Democrates. Oh please read the events very clearly and rember why Clinton lost the last game!!!!

21.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 08:28 pm

Turkey's refusal to open its land for invasion of Iraq one of the most honorable act I have ever seen from Turkey.
Money? money for blood of Iraqies? Thank you!

About invading northern Iraq: I absolutely disagree with that idea. Turkey did it in past several times. PKK is still PKK. And everybody knows that the terror is not going to finish with that operation. Those operations proved to be not successful. Even the prime minister told several months ago there is no need for that.
The timing is quite interesting, however. 2/3 of American supplies are coming from Turkey through northern Iraq. That operation will hamper those supply roots. It might be Turkey's response to USA's armenian decision.
And Turkey and Iran have always been spectical about the Kurds. And I think there will be an Kerkuk referendum about in the near future.
Turkey has been warning Kurds for a long time about their treatment of Turkomans.
I dont think Americans and Turks will be fighting in northern Iraq. I doubt that kurdish pehmerges will try to stop Turkey either, if it happens.
But one thing for sure that it wont finish PKK and it may even force PKK to start active fighting again.
So the result might be more bloodshed.

22.       Serdar07
428 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 08:30 pm

Again dear Kethil!
Don't forget your words about starting this thread!Arminian+Kurds+PKK+North of Iraq= ????
what is this time can you think about clearly???

23.       KeithL
1455 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 09:57 pm

So how many more bombs need to be exploded? If not going after the PKK, then what is the answer? These attacks are not limited to tourist spots. The HSBC Bank, the british consulate, the shopping mall in Ankara. They are doing more than frightening tourists in resort areas.
For now, all the army wants to do is "hot pursuit" after an attack.

24.       teaschip
3870 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 10:02 pm

Quoting KeithL:

So how many more bombs need to be exploded? If not going after the PKK, then what is the answer? These attacks are not limited to tourist spots. The HSBC Bank, the british consulate, the shopping mall in Ankara. They are doing more than frightening tourists in resort areas.
For now, all the army wants to do is "hot pursuit" after an attack.



I do agree Turkey has a right to defend themselves. But I just am a little concerned if they decide to go into Iraq right now.

25.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 10:40 pm

Quoting KeithL:

So how many more bombs need to be exploded? If not going after the PKK, then what is the answer? These attacks are not limited to tourist spots. The HSBC Bank, the british consulate, the shopping mall in Ankara. They are doing more than frightening tourists in resort areas.
For now, all the army wants to do is "hot pursuit" after an attack.



HSBC and British consulate bombings were Alqaida jobs.
And their response to Iraq occupation.
I think, Ankara bomber belonged to a left wing group.

They had nothing to do with PKK.

26.       KeithL
1455 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 11:06 pm

and there is credible evidence that they are linked.

27.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 11:38 pm

Quoting KeithL:

and there is credible evidence that they are linked.


Dear KeithL,
Alkaide is islamist and PKK is marksist. They kind of hate each other. They will never coorporate.
Ankara bombing can be related, because some turkish left coorporated with PKK in the past. But I am still not sure to be honest.
I still think pkk is in the passive/defensive position.

28.       KeithL
1455 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 11:52 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

I still think pkk is in the passive/defensive position.



Say no more. I suspected where your sympathy was directed and now I know. I will not discuss this matter with anyone who supports the PKK..

29.       AlphaF
5677 posts
 18 Oct 2007 Thu 11:54 pm

to all participants in the discussion TUrkia - Iraq - PKK - USA..

1. PKK is a terrorist organisation, hitting Turkia from PKK bases in Northern Iraq. Turkia has had enough of them.

2. USA is run by conceited politicians, who do not hesitate singing disapproval to all forms of terrorism, and pledge allegiance to Turkia in a fight where terrorism appears to hurt Turkish sovereignity...yet Turkish intelligence has irrefutable proof that PKK guns are supplied by the USA (my personal opinion is that tactics used by terrorists are also supplied by either American or British staff officers) - if not directly, through mafiatic private armies run by private US firms. (one interesting point for friends in the group, can be checking who owns companies like BLACKWATER, info is available in the net)

3. The ideal solution would be for Iraq Army (as the legal sovereign power in the area)or the US ARMY (as the democracy singing bandits in power) to stop and destroy the terrorists within Iraq boundaries.. This does not seem to happen: Mainly because Iraq is temporarly incapable, and US government is run by a bunch of crooks.

Under the conditions I expect Turkia will intervene, not in hostility to a brother neighbour, but to clear the terrorist elements within reach of Turkish border. The operation will be limited and will in no way relieve Americans from the mess they got themselves into in Southern Iraq.

Anyone who wants to fight against Turkia, to protect PKK terrorism, will be more than welcome to join forces agaoinst this thoruoghly justified intervention..We shall see whether a permission from USA is required for this operation or not, when the right time comes.

30.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 12:31 am

Quoting KeithL:

Quoting thehandsom:

I still think pkk is in the passive/defensive position.



Say no more. I suspected where your sympathy was directed and now I know. I will not discuss this matter with anyone who supports the PKK..


Vow
How did you come up with that idea from that line?
lol lol
I am not Kurdish btw.

31.       AlphaF
5677 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 12:35 am

Being Kurdish is not something to be frowned upon.

Be careful in differentiating terrorists and Kurdish citizens of Turkia...

32.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 12:36 am

Quoting AlphaF:

...yet Turkish intelligence has irrefutable proof that PKK guns are supplied by the USA



This is a common misconception. I have posted the ACTUAL figures of seized terrorist weapons elsewhere on this site before. Its pretty much from across the board - the majority coming from Eastern Europe. Landmines used by terrorists are mostly of Turkish manufacture

33.       KeithL
1455 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 12:36 am

Quoting AlphaF:

Being Kurdish is not something to be frowned upon.

Be careful in differentiating terrorists and Kurdish citizens of Turkia...



+1000

34.       catwoman
8933 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 01:02 am

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting AlphaF:

...yet Turkish intelligence has irrefutable proof that PKK guns are supplied by the USA



This is a common misconception. I have posted the ACTUAL figures of seized terrorist weapons elsewhere on this site before. Its pretty much from across the board - the majority coming from Eastern Europe. Landmines used by terrorists are mostly of Turkish manufacture


I wonder what else some people posted here without checking the facts first. I would guess that the most emotional reactions are the most suspicious.

35.       alameda
3499 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 01:11 am

Quoting KeithL:

Quoting AlphaF:

Being Kurdish is not something to be frowned upon.

Be careful in differentiating terrorists and Kurdish citizens of Turkia...



+1000



Yes, that is so true....people who are not familiar with the situation think it's a Kurdish thing, when from what I see, that has very little to do with ethnicity. In fact it seems they suffer the most from this terrorism in their names, so to speak.

I hate war and the destruction it causes. I wish mankind would learn to resolve issues in a constructive manner. What is this, might makes right? Haven't we evolved past this primitive way of solving disputes?

When there is a victor and a looser, there is also enmity. The losers plot for the next time when maybe they will win. The cycle continues....

36.       kafesteki kus
0 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 01:12 am

Quoting KeithL:

Rather than take the current popular post in the forum, in a new direction, I have started this one so the Armenian issue is not confused with the PKK issue.

How can the world expect Turkey to act with restraint against the PKK? This has been going on for over 30 years! Did the US use restraint when attacking Irak over 9/11? Did US ally, Israel use restraint went it leveled Beirut again over one single soldier? The problem with American diplomacy is its incredible hypocracy applied for itself and its allies.


never in the history of mankind American allies ended up well!American govermant acts itself and only for its interests!Look at former Yugoslavia!
Poland for supporting Americans-although the nation is against- the goverment still follows has nothing to gain..only to lose!We still have to apply for visas!what a gratefulness!

37.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 01:13 am

Quoting AlphaF:

Being Kurdish is not something to be frowned upon.


I would never do that..You have my word..

Quoting AlphaF:


Be careful in differentiating terrorists and Kurdish citizens of Turkia..


And when I was talking about 'making mistakes about fighting the problem in the southeast' is something like what you are saying in the second quote.

38.       caliptrix
3055 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 01:58 am

Quoting thehandsom:

I still think pkk is in the passive/defensive position.



And who killed so many people, in these days? Is there any other terrorist group that we don't know?

39.       kat007
95 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 04:32 am

Quoting Serdar07:

Quoting teaschip1:

Quoting Serdar07:

Quoting KeithL:

And your people have a right to defend themselves. I'm not disagreeing with you serdar.



Then Good Friend Keithl...
I am in the region and know it well as the Turkish Army know that very well... PKK terrorist in a mountain called ( Kandil) shared by three countries Iraq, Turkey and Iran,, But the Turkish Army now shelling civils in villages which are 300 KM away from that mountain. So the presure now not on the thieves but on the innocent people. Wish you could belive me and best wishes to all!!



I hope you can stay safe..



Thank you dear for your nice feelings and good wish!



Please be safe and take care of your family too. It's a difficult time.

40.       AlphaF
5677 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 10:29 am

It is very unfortunate that totally innocent civilians suffer in a fight with terrorists. This is the nature of terrorizm where terrorists cohabit with civilians: it sometimes becomes hard to make a clear distinction between the two. Turkish Army, if they are bombing at all, aim at very specific targets. Even Serdaro knows KANDIL MOUNTAIN houses the terrorists, and that is where the shells fall.

No terrorist group can forever hide under skirts of innocent civilians and hope to survive.

What is unfortunate is while everybody knows where the terrorist are, after scores of bombings in Turkey killing many civilians, and after Turkia declares that- in the absence of cooperation fron USA or Iraqi Government - a unilateral solution will be found to destroy the terrorists, at whatever the cost...no local authorities, neither Iraqi government nor the local bandits, appear interested to cooperate in solutions that woukd endanger less civilian lives. THAT SOLUTION CAN NOT BE "LET TERRORISTS LIVE", PKK has to go...

People here in this group can perhaps now understand why the Ottoman Empire had to force the non-terrorist Armenian citizens to leave the problem area, when rebel Armenians donned French Army uniforms/weapons and took to mountains, against their own country.

41.       Janette1169
92 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 10:55 am

I have read this thread with great interest but its getting a little deep now for me to follow lol.

However, i will try and word this question in a way not to offend or insult anyone. Please write and tell me, if it has in any way.

Here in England, some people not all might i had, see Muslims or should i say asian people as Terrorists. This is down to lack of education about the Asian community here and peoples ignorance too

Do the Kurdish community have the same problem because of the organisations causing problems.

42.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 01:22 pm

Quoting kafesteki kus:

Quoting KeithL:

Rather than take the current popular post in the forum, in a new direction, I have started this one so the Armenian issue is not confused with the PKK issue.

How can the world expect Turkey to act with restraint against the PKK? This has been going on for over 30 years! Did the US use restraint when attacking Irak over 9/11? Did US ally, Israel use restraint went it leveled Beirut again over one single soldier? The problem with American diplomacy is its incredible hypocracy applied for itself and its allies.


never in the history of mankind American allies ended up well!American govermant acts itself and only for its interests!Look at former Yugoslavia!
Poland for supporting Americans-although the nation is against- the goverment still follows has nothing to gain..only to lose!We still have to apply for visas!what a gratefulness!


it sounds like the blood of iraqis for american visas.
are americans now to gratify you visas for joining the war in iraq?
what was the exact reason of poland joining the war?

43.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 01:28 pm

my question is: will turkey end the problem with pkk if it enters iraq today?
is pkk only in iraq?
what about other neighbouring countries where pkk hides?
if entering iraq solves the problem for now and ever, and pkk will disappear for ever then why not?

44.       kafesteki kus
0 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 02:01 pm

Quoting femme_fatal:

Quoting kafesteki kus:

Quoting KeithL:

Rather than take the current popular post in the forum, in a new direction, I have started this one so the Armenian issue is not confused with the PKK issue.

How can the world expect Turkey to act with restraint against the PKK? This has been going on for over 30 years! Did the US use restraint when attacking Irak over 9/11? Did US ally, Israel use restraint went it leveled Beirut again over one single soldier? The problem with American diplomacy is its incredible hypocracy applied for itself and its allies.


never in the history of mankind American allies ended up well!American govermant acts itself and only for its interests!Look at former Yugoslavia!
Poland for supporting Americans-although the nation is against- the goverment still follows has nothing to gain..only to lose!We still have to apply for visas!what a gratefulness!


it sounds like the blood of iraqis for american visas.
are americans now to gratify you visas for joining the war in iraq?
what was the exact reason of poland joining the war?


the decision was taken on 17 march 2003 by the former president who did it against the will of more than 80% Poles and appeal of The Pope.It rose a great controversy in my country as it is against ethics and historical achievement of Polish nation to cooperate peacefully.It is still a great shame!!!!Poland has always been experienced as a country with struggling to gain independence or getting rid of invaders,supporting Americans in this war means conflict with our painful national experience,denying Catholic values ,exposing its citizens to danger,breaking international law and acting against our constitution.
I am not a politician and find hardly to understand decisions of them.I do not know the exact reason for joining Americans,we as a nation are fed by lies and our goverment behaves as if it was totally deaf.
What I know for sure is that there is no need for Polish army to be in Iraq and that is a great shame upon my nation bcs of it!

45.       kafesteki kus
0 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 02:02 pm

I hope that PKK problem will find its solution soon

46.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 07:50 pm

We have been discussing this in other Turkish forums as well. It is a very hot topic. And, somehow, it always ends up somebody is accusing others as traitors.

First of all some facts :

-We have around 15 million kurds in Turkey.

-Their social economical conditions are pretty bad comparing to what we have in rest of Turkey. (GDP 500$ to 7.000-8.000$ in avg)

-The recent conflict started earlier around first part of 1980s (Military times! in Turkey) because of military regime was extra harsh on Kurds changing the village names, forcing the Turkish names etc. (They were harsh everywhere but specially in the southeast they really showed their teeth)

-First reaction of the military for the rebels was 'they are handful terrorists.we will finish them'

-was it finished? NO

-Later on officials tried to describe kurds by saying that 'there is no ethnic group in Turkey called Kurds. They are mountain Turks'. It was a quite pathetic description!

-Harsh approach continued towards the mountain Turks. The theme was same as today. 'There are terrorists. We dont have kurdish problem'.And PKK flourished.

-During this period, many villages, somehow, destroyed. Many cases went to EU Human rights courts. Kurdish population become thin in rural areas.

-PKK was so strong at some stage. They would stop and search coaches.

-Governments changed tactics and started to cooperate with the local tribes, arming them against pkk. The result of that was blood bath.(In the end, a huge war machine has been created with local militias and everything. Of course, each war machine needs fuel to continue!)


-Capturing their leader was a turning point in this war. Because he is the undisputed leader of pkk, he started to soften his group. (that is where my comment 'I still think pkk is in the passive/defensive position. ' is coming from!! and everybody, who has a little bit of knowledge about politics in Turkey, knows that)


-The official line has always been the same :'we have terrorism only, we dont have Kurdish problem'

-Turkey performed several incursions into Northern Iraq in the past. Did they finish the terror? NO. Did those hot pursuits damaged them? NO

And now, most of the intellectuals in Turkey realize that we have a problem.
And the problem is between our borders. Not somewhere else. The problem we have is generating the terrorism. And the terrorism wont go away unless we deal with the problem.

I am against the hot pursuit into northern Iraq because it will achieve nothing as far as the terrorism is concerned.
I simply, dont want any of my country men dying for this problem anymore. Enough is enough

47.       Serdar07
428 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 08:36 pm

Maybe my post is somehow different but I am sure it's going on the same line as this thread!
Somedays ago in one of Learning Turkish and cuture forums I suggested to post some learning materials in Turkish- Kurdish language especially for those in North Iraq that are fond of learning Turkish. But the moderators of that forum afraid and appologized that if I posted a thread in Kurdish hundreds of Turkish members will leave that forum,
Now I can ask, the Turkish Army and government saying there are about 3500 terrorists of PKK in North of Iraq. How about millions of Turkish and Kurdish in this world you want to creat enamity among them???????????????
Who will get all the benefits from that?!

48.       ciko
784 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 10:07 pm

i dont think that entering iraq will solve any problem. there will always be terrorists among kurdish as long as the governments ignore the problems in east. 80 % men in southeast are jobless!!! only about 10% people have computer!!! there are lots of problems...

imagine ..you are a kurdish in one of the towns in the east of Turkey and seeing beautiful lives on TV..in TV series..wonderful houses..beautiful cars..beautiful women..Istanbul..bosphorus..and you turn the TV off..and you look around..you realise how different your life is to lives you see on TV.. this make them think life in this country is unfair to them..this make them think that the state is not equal to its all citizens.

the next day..you get out of house..and suddenly a soldier or cop stops you on street and ask your ID card as if you did something wrong. he asks you questions like ' why you are here'.. then you go somehwere like cafe which all your friends ( most of them are jobless) sit until evening. you have nothing to do..no money to buy anything for your family..

i cant belive that our clever generals and politicans think the problem will be solved by a military campaign:S

49.       portokal
2516 posts
 19 Oct 2007 Fri 10:44 pm

Quoting ciko:

i dont think that entering iraq will solve any problem. there will always be terrorists among kurdish as long as the governments ignore the problems in east. 80 % men in southeast are jobless!!! only about 10% people have computer!!! there are lots of problems...

imagine ..you are a kurdish in one of the towns in the east of Turkey and seeing beautiful lives on TV..in TV series..wonderful houses..beautiful cars..beautiful women..Istanbul..bosphorus..and you turn the TV off..and you look around..you realise how different your life is to lives you see on TV.. this make them think life in this country is unfair to them..this make them think that the state is not equal to its all citizens.

the next day..you get out of house..and suddenly a soldier or cop stops you on street and ask your ID card as if you did something wrong. he asks you questions like ' why you are here'.. then you go somehwere like cafe which all your friends ( most of them are jobless) sit until evening. you have nothing to do..no money to buy anything for your family..

i cant belive that our clever generals and politicans think the problem will be solved by a military campaign:S



Few post in this forum talked about the social problems lying behind terorism.
I think that, as for a logterm action, violence will not be succesfull in solving problems of racism or terorism (i intentionately included racism here, along with xenofobia, chauvinism). Terorism and social conflicts correlate also with poverty. People living in poverty, people facing low life-level, oppression, cultural isolation will tend to fall more easily in extremist behaviour. So a long term decision would be to integrate those that are economically, culturally disadvantaged. If these are neglected, violences will continue. There were governments and programs that dedicated big ammounts to cultural integrations, for eg.
If integration or efforts to improve present situation are not a clear intention and assumed mission, then were will conflicts lead? You bombed me, i bomb you. You kill me, i kill you. This is in some way irresponsable decision. in this case maybe resources are lacking. Or maybe other interests come first.

50.       teaschip
3870 posts
 22 Oct 2007 Mon 06:50 am

Quoting ciko:

i dont think that entering iraq will solve any problem. there will always be terrorists among kurdish as long as the governments ignore the problems in east. 80 % men in southeast are jobless!!! only about 10% people have computer!!! there are lots of problems...

imagine ..you are a kurdish in one of the towns in the east of Turkey and seeing beautiful lives on TV..in TV series..wonderful houses..beautiful cars..beautiful women..Istanbul..bosphorus..and you turn the TV off..and you look around..you realise how different your life is to lives you see on TV.. this make them think life in this country is unfair to them..this make them think that the state is not equal to its all citizens.

the next day..you get out of house..and suddenly a soldier or cop stops you on street and ask your ID card as if you did something wrong. he asks you questions like ' why you are here'.. then you go somehwere like cafe which all your friends ( most of them are jobless) sit until evening. you have nothing to do..no money to buy anything for your family..

i cant belive that our clever generals and politicans think the problem will be solved by a military campaign:S



All though I haven't agreed with some of your posts in the past, you really gave me a good perspective of how some of the southeast of Turkey feels and lives.

But my question is, we have under priviledged people in every country, including mine. Some turn to violence, drugs and crime. But then you have the exceptions, those that change the cycle. These people become good standing citizens and have successful lives. Do they happen just to have more ambition or are they just plain lucky to have broken the cycle. This is what bothers me the most about my country. We have so many government grants and programs to assist people who are products of their enviornment and they don't seek the help.

Then I read posts like this and it just frustrates the hell out of me even more. To know that people in your country want to get help and the government doesn't hear the outcry.

So should we conclude that terrorism is basically based on the governments lack of response to help the under priviledged? These are terrorists from families who have no other means of life? Do terrorists typically follow in their parents shoes?

I would really would like to know what in the world would ever possess someone to strap a bomb on their back and blow themselves up. I always referenced this as a religous motivator for some of these terrorists.

51.       Badiabdancer74
382 posts
 22 Oct 2007 Mon 07:13 am

This will make me the most unpopular by both sides. If countries involved cared about peace they would give the Kurdish people their own country. Kurdistan. A little bit of Turkey and a little bit of Iraq. OH NO! No one would want to do that, even though isn't it kind of the right thing to do? Not out of fear of the PKK, but aren't the Kurdish people a unique people and that is what they want? Just an idea...feel free to attack me now.

52.       teaschip
3870 posts
 22 Oct 2007 Mon 07:23 am

Quoting Badiabdancer74:

This will make me the most unpopular by both sides. If countries involved cared about peace they would give the Kurdish people their own country. Kurdistan. A little bit of Turkey and a little bit of Iraq. OH NO! No one would want to do that, even though isn't it kind of the right thing to do? Not out of fear of the PKK, but aren't the Kurdish people a unique people and that is what they want? Just an idea...feel free to attack me now.



No attacks from me. But in an ideal world and under God's eyes your insight is wise...However, being realistic and living in the present,this will never happen.

53.       alameda
3499 posts
 22 Oct 2007 Mon 03:22 pm

This is a very naive statement. Are you really making the proposition that Turkey, Iran and Iraq give part of their territory to make a larger Kurdistan? Do you think this will bring peace in the area? Do this simple test. Put "map of kurdistan" & "map of armenia" in Google, pick image and see what you get. Then drill down and look at the resources included in the maps. You will see the maps all go to waterfront territory and include some of the same vital resources.

What you are calling for is segregation based on ethnic background. It's the same as whites wanting to live with and go to school with "their own kind", and give them territory where then can do it. Where will this end up?

If you extrapolate, we will we be doing DNA analysis to see just who belongs to what group and then "give" them their own territory? What then?

Turkey is a democratic country that has many ethnic groups as well as people who of mixed ethnicity. No country willingly gives up territory, and in particular vital territory.

Quoting teaschip1:

Quoting Badiabdancer74:

This will make me the most unpopular by both sides. If countries involved cared about peace they would give the Kurdish people their own country. Kurdistan. A little bit of Turkey and a little bit of Iraq. OH NO! No one would want to do that, even though isn't it kind of the right thing to do? Not out of fear of the PKK, but aren't the Kurdish people a unique people and that is what they want? Just an idea...feel free to attack me now.



No attacks from me. But in an ideal world and under God's eyes your insight is wise...However, being realistic and living in the present,this will never happen.

54.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 22 Oct 2007 Mon 04:37 pm

Quoting alameda:

This is a very naive statement. Are you really making the proposition that Turkey, Iran and Iraq give part of their territory to make a larger Kurdistan? Do you think this will bring peace in the area? Do this simple test. Put "map of kurdistan" & "map of armenia" in Google, pick image and see what you get. Then drill down and look at the resources included in the maps. You will see the maps all go to waterfront territory and include some of the same vital resources.

What you are calling for is segregation based on ethnic background. It's the same as whites wanting to live with and go to school with "their own kind", and give them territory where then can do it. Where will this end up?

If you extrapolate, we will we be doing DNA analysis to see just who belongs to what group and then "give" them their own territory? What then?

Turkey is a democratic country that has many ethnic groups as well as people who of mixed ethnicity. No country willingly gives up territory, and in particular vital territory.



+100000000 I completely agree with you. You only have to look at history to ensure we don't make the same mistakes. Israel is a perfect example of the mess you cause when you "create" a new country...

55.       teaschip
3870 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 07:41 pm

It did not take more than a few months for Indonasia and the representatives of Aceh to solve the "Aceh Problem," but it has taken more than 80 years for the Turks to recognize the very existence of the Kurdish people.

Turkey wants to become a member of the EU, but the behavior of Turkey is far from that of civilized Europe. The Turks don't even recognise the Iraqi Constitution and refuse negotiating with any Iraqi delegation with representatives of the Kurdistan Regional Government in it. If you don't negotiate with the constitutionally recognized Kurdistan Regional Government, then how can you expect them to solve your problems?!

Turks are famous for their nationalism. How does the average Turk view the possibility of getting more involved in this war?

56.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 07:54 pm

Quoting teaschip1:

It did not take more than a few months for Indonasia and the representatives of Aceh to solve the "Aceh Problem," but it has taken more than 80 years for the Turks to recognize the very existence of the Kurdish people.

Turkey wants to become a member of the EU, but the behavior of Turkey is far from that of civilized Europe. The Turks don't even recognise the Iraqi Constitution and refuse negotiating with any Iraqi delegation with representatives of the Kurdistan Regional Government in it. If you don't negotiate with the constitutionally recognized Kurdistan Regional Government, then how can you expect them to solve your problems?!

Turks are famous for their nationalism. How does the average Turk view the possibility of getting more involved in this war?



Of course she will refuse to recognize.
Is there a government in Iraq?
Is there a constitution?
Has Iraq been split and we dont know?
Can you write a constitution under occupation?
Why has Turkey been speaking to USA for this problem then?

questions, questions, questions!!



57.       teaschip
3870 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 08:02 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting teaschip1:

It did not take more than a few months for Indonasia and the representatives of Aceh to solve the "Aceh Problem," but it has taken more than 80 years for the Turks to recognize the very existence of the Kurdish people.

Turkey wants to become a member of the EU, but the behavior of Turkey is far from that of civilized Europe. The Turks don't even recognise the Iraqi Constitution and refuse negotiating with any Iraqi delegation with representatives of the Kurdistan Regional Government in it. If you don't negotiate with the constitutionally recognized Kurdistan Regional Government, then how can you expect them to solve your problems?!

Turks are famous for their nationalism. How does the average Turk view the possibility of getting more involved in this war?



Of course she will refuse to recognize.
Is there a government in Iraq?
Is there a constitution?
Has Iraq been split and we dont know?
Can you write a constitution under occupation?
Why has Turkey been speaking to USA for this problem then?

questions, questions, questions!!





"Is there a constitution?" is a typical answer I was expecting here. What a shame there is so much ignorance you have for your fellow neighbor.

Could it just be that the Turkish government has concern regarding Iraqi Kurdistan, is that if it becomes independent, then Kurds in Turkey will want to separate from Turkey and join the new Kurdish state.

You never answered my question, please...

How does the average Turk view the possibility of getting more involved in this war?

Oh so you must not be an average Turk, my apologies...

58.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 08:38 pm

Quoting teaschip1:

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting teaschip1:

It did not take more than a few months for Indonasia and the representatives of Aceh to solve the "Aceh Problem," but it has taken more than 80 years for the Turks to recognize the very existence of the Kurdish people.

Turkey wants to become a member of the EU, but the behavior of Turkey is far from that of civilized Europe. The Turks don't even recognise the Iraqi Constitution and refuse negotiating with any Iraqi delegation with representatives of the Kurdistan Regional Government in it. If you don't negotiate with the constitutionally recognized Kurdistan Regional Government, then how can you expect them to solve your problems?!

Turks are famous for their nationalism. How does the average Turk view the possibility of getting more involved in this war?



Of course she will refuse to recognize.
Is there a government in Iraq?
Is there a constitution?
Has Iraq been split and we dont know?
Can you write a constitution under occupation?
Why has Turkey been speaking to USA for this problem then?

questions, questions, questions!!





"Is there a constitution?" is a typical answer I was expecting here. What a shame there is so much ignorance you have for your fellow neighbor.

Could it just be that the Turkish government has concern regarding Iraqi Kurdistan, is that if it becomes independent, then Kurds in Turkey will want to separate from Turkey and join the new Kurdish state.

You never answered my question, please...

How does the average Turk view the possibility of getting more involved in this war?

Oh so you must not be an average Turk, my apologies...


An avg Turk? may be I am..
You never get a lesson from History do you?
You dont see what is happening in israel and palestine do you?
you have no idea the entire northern iraq is getting its food from Turkey, do you?
You have no idea what might happen to Kurds once you left, do you?
You have no idea you let them down in the past and Saddam gassed them with the gas bought from you, do you?

You have no idea, how pathetic is to insist that there is a free Iraq, do you?

do you want us to believe and army can invade a country and hold elections and dictate a constitution?
How naive is that?

59.       Serdar07
428 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 08:40 pm

(( Nothing Much Shameful than the Blind and Blood-Sucker Nationalism for the Humanity! ))
I mean the both sides of this crisis Turk and Kurds...
Do you want questions and answers about that?

60.       teaschip
3870 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 08:46 pm


Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting teaschip1:

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting teaschip1:

It did not take more than a few months for Indonasia and the representatives of Aceh to solve the "Aceh Problem," but it has taken more than 80 years for the Turks to recognize the very existence of the Kurdish people.

Turkey wants to become a member of the EU, but the behavior of Turkey is far from that of civilized Europe. The Turks don't even recognise the Iraqi Constitution and refuse negotiating with any Iraqi delegation with representatives of the Kurdistan Regional Government in it. If you don't negotiate with the constitutionally recognized Kurdistan Regional Government, then how can you expect them to solve your problems?!

Turks are famous for their nationalism. How does the average Turk view the possibility of getting more involved in this war?



Of course she will refuse to recognize.
Is there a government in Iraq?
Is there a constitution?
Has Iraq been split and we dont know?
Can you write a constitution under occupation?
Why has Turkey been speaking to USA for this problem then?

questions, questions, questions!!





"Is there a constitution?" is a typical answer I was expecting here. What a shame there is so much ignorance you have for your fellow neighbor.

Could it just be that the Turkish government has concern regarding Iraqi Kurdistan, is that if it becomes independent, then Kurds in Turkey will want to separate from Turkey and join the new Kurdish state.

You never answered my question, please...

How does the average Turk view the possibility of getting more involved in this war?

Oh so you must not be an average Turk, my apologies...


An avg Turk? may be I am..
You never get a lesson from History do you?
You dont see what is happening in israel and palestine do you?
you have no idea the entire northern iraq is getting its food from Turkey, do you?
You have no idea what might happen to Kurds once you left, do you?
You have no idea you let them down in the past and Saddam gassed them with the gas bought from you, do you?

You have no idea, how pathetic is to insist that there is a free Iraq, do you?

do you want us to believe and army can invade a country and hold elections and dictate a constitution?
How naive is that?



To answer your questions/statements which ever they are;
1.)You never get a lesson from History? Not sure what you mean.
2.) Yes, I see clearly what is happening to Israel..
3.) Yes, I understand food & equipment is coming through Turkey into Iraq.
4.) Yes, I understand why might happen to Kurds when we leave.
5.) Yes, I understand we have let them down in the past.
6.) Yes, it's pathetic to think Iraq is a totally free country.
7.) Yes, they did hold elections and they do have a constitution.

So, what is your point here?

61.       teaschip
3870 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 08:53 pm

Quoting Serdar07:

(( Nothing Much Shameful than the Blind and Blood-Sucker Nationalism for the Humanity! ))
I mean the both sides of this crisis Turk and Kurds...
Do you want questions and answers about that?



Sure, I would like to hear your perspective.. Do you think Turkey should go into Iraq? How do you feel about the situation..

62.       KeithL
1455 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 09:03 pm

I really dont understand anyones objections here. What would the US do if sandiego was getting attacked by terrorists in tiajuana?

63.       Serdar07
428 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 09:04 pm

As Wilhelm Reich said in his book many years ago " Listen Little Man!"
http://www.listenlittleman.com/
Here I can again tell every blind and empty prouded nationalistic from all nations " Listen Little Nationalist!"
While you are in the middle east and crying that the West World is looking down on you remember you are imitating them but with so bad timing. In Europe the Nationalistic Wars do nothing than making the people poor and backwards but after the World War II they learned the lesson very well and made the EU. But now here in the Middle-East still there are little men calling for imitating the wars done 1000 years ago.
If you are not Deaf , then listen little nationalist better to call for peace in this region than your wild shouting for more blood.

64.       teaschip
3870 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 09:51 pm

Quoting KeithL:

I really dont understand anyones objections here. What would the US do if sandiego was getting attacked by terrorists in tiajuana?



Let's see capture them, take their tequila, smoke their weed and make them work under the table?

65.       Elisabeth
5732 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 09:58 pm

Quoting teaschip1:

Quoting KeithL:

I really dont understand anyones objections here. What would the US do if sandiego was getting attacked by terrorists in tiajuana?



Let's see capture them, take their tequila, smoke their weed and make them work under the table?



Pienso que ha sucedido esto ya, mi hermano

66.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 10:01 pm



Quoting teaschip1:

Let's see capture them, take their tequila, smoke their weed and make them work under the table?



lol lol lol

67.       teaschip
3870 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 10:02 pm

Quoting Elisabeth:

Quoting teaschip1:

Quoting KeithL:

I really dont understand anyones objections here. What would the US do if sandiego was getting attacked by terrorists in tiajuana?



Let's see capture them, take their tequila, smoke their weed and make them work under the table?



Pienso que ha sucedido esto ya, mi hermano



No comprende!

68.       Elisabeth
5732 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 10:04 pm

Quoting teaschip1:

Quoting Elisabeth:

Quoting teaschip1:

Quoting KeithL:

I really dont understand anyones objections here. What would the US do if sandiego was getting attacked by terrorists in tiajuana?



Let's see capture them, take their tequila, smoke their weed and make them work under the table?



Pienso que ha sucedido esto ya, mi hermano



No comprende!



Means...we already did, my friend!!

69.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 10:14 pm

Me burro esta muerto

70.       Serdar07
428 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 10:26 pm

Quoting Elisabeth:

Quoting teaschip1:

Quoting Elisabeth:

Quoting teaschip1:

Quoting KeithL:

I really dont understand anyones objections here. What would the US do if sandiego was getting attacked by terrorists in tiajuana?



Let's see capture them, take their tequila, smoke their weed and make them work under the table?



Pienso que ha sucedido esto ya, mi hermano



No comprende!



Means...we already did, my friend!!


Then keep in your minds all friends how the westrern people laughing and lookin down on our mentality here in the middle east... We are wild toys and want much of our blood to be sheded!! Turks to drink kurds blood and then Kurds to drink Turkish blood what else of nonesense we can do for the west world than this... Oh Almighty please let my people in this poor region to think???

71.       Elisabeth
5732 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 10:30 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Me burro esta muerto



Sorry about the donkey!

72.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 10:33 pm

Quoting Serdar07:

Turks to drink kurds blood and then Kurds to drink Turkish blood what else of nonesense we can do for the west world than this... Oh Almighty please let my people in this poor region to think???



My biggest fear is that this is not just political - it is radically racial too. Will it just be terrorists who are targeted?

Too many innocent people have died in Iraq. Please no more...

73.       teaschip
3870 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 10:35 pm

Quoting Serdar07:

As Wilhelm Reich said in his book many years ago " Listen Little Man!"
http://www.listenlittleman.com/
Here I can again tell every blind and empty prouded nationalistic from all nations " Listen Little Nationalist!"
While you are in the middle east and crying that the West World is looking down on you remember you are imitating them but with so bad timing. In Europe the Nationalistic Wars do nothing than making the people poor and backwards but after the World War II they learned the lesson very well and made the EU. But now here in the Middle-East still there are little men calling for imitating the wars done 1000 years ago.
If you are not Deaf , then listen little nationalist better to call for peace in this region than your wild shouting for more blood.



I just finished reading this. It seems to be a pretty deep book, Serdar07 with some reflection involved. Have you ever heard of "little man syndrome"? I appreciate you sharing this with us..

74.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 11:02 pm

Quoting teaschip1:


Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting teaschip1:

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting teaschip1:

It did not take more than a few months for Indonasia and the representatives of Aceh to solve the "Aceh Problem," but it has taken more than 80 years for the Turks to recognize the very existence of the Kurdish people.

Turkey wants to become a member of the EU, but the behavior of Turkey is far from that of civilized Europe. The Turks don't even recognise the Iraqi Constitution and refuse negotiating with any Iraqi delegation with representatives of the Kurdistan Regional Government in it. If you don't negotiate with the constitutionally recognized Kurdistan Regional Government, then how can you expect them to solve your problems?!

Turks are famous for their nationalism. How does the average Turk view the possibility of getting more involved in this war?



Of course she will refuse to recognize.
Is there a government in Iraq?
Is there a constitution?
Has Iraq been split and we dont know?
Can you write a constitution under occupation?
Why has Turkey been speaking to USA for this problem then?

questions, questions, questions!!





"Is there a constitution?" is a typical answer I was expecting here. What a shame there is so much ignorance you have for your fellow neighbor.

Could it just be that the Turkish government has concern regarding Iraqi Kurdistan, is that if it becomes independent, then Kurds in Turkey will want to separate from Turkey and join the new Kurdish state.

You never answered my question, please...

How does the average Turk view the possibility of getting more involved in this war?

Oh so you must not be an average Turk, my apologies...


An avg Turk? may be I am..
You never get a lesson from History do you?
You dont see what is happening in israel and palestine do you?
you have no idea the entire northern iraq is getting its food from Turkey, do you?
You have no idea what might happen to Kurds once you left, do you?
You have no idea you let them down in the past and Saddam gassed them with the gas bought from you, do you?

You have no idea, how pathetic is to insist that there is a free Iraq, do you?

do you want us to believe and army can invade a country and hold elections and dictate a constitution?
How naive is that?



To answer your questions/statements which ever they are;
1.)You never get a lesson from History? Not sure what you mean.
2.) Yes, I see clearly what is happening to Israel..
3.) Yes, I understand food & equipment is coming through Turkey into Iraq.
4.) Yes, I understand why might happen to Kurds when we leave.
5.) Yes, I understand we have let them down in the past.
6.) Yes, it's pathetic to think Iraq is a totally free country.
7.) Yes, they did hold elections and they do have a constitution.

So, what is your point here?


Well..
Dont you know what happened in 1917s British occupation of Iraq?
In a nut shell:
They invade Iraq easily; after the invasion insurgency start;Lloyd George says they can abondon Iraq to anarchy; They suggest Syria might be involved!!;uprasings in Kufa 1920; Shia -ultimate- leader Yazdi(did not support rebellion); local shia Badr (supported rebellion);Najaf 1920;Fallujah 1920; July 1922 constitution, referandum with 96% majority;
The result was:
THE BRITISH FAILED.
=====
Similarities? can you figure them out?
easy invasion; insurgency; cant leave now because of the mess; Syria, Iran accusations;Ali Sistani; Muqtada El-sadr; kufa;najaf;fellujah; constitution;
The result will be:
...............(you can fill the dots)

you really dont see this..do you?
The point is that IRAQ is not your country.
You are just passing by..
Oil robbers..That is how you are called in the entire middle east.
About the invasion of Northern Iraq, I already told my opinion about it. I am against it. The problem Turkey is having is in its borders not in northern Iraq.

75.       mylo
856 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 11:19 pm

Britain has always invaded and pillaged places that they shouldn't had been in,I'm English(sorry British,I don't want to end up in court in some racist slur)and I can't find a reason to defend this country.
It's a bit off topic but,I heard a great story today about the 'Great Brittishness'
Politicians here are claiming upto 200K per year in expenses(aswell as their 100k per year they already earn),yet my Mother has woked for 55 years without a break,and without claiming any benefits,now she has come to retirement,she's been promised a whole 50 quid a week!Illegal immigrants coming to this country get more than this,sorry and without shame Handsom and being a native even,I agree with you and what you said,we pay the price of the greedy few above us in our illustrious history and our ever undefendable future what can we say?

76.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 11:21 pm

Quoting mylo:

I can't find a reason to defend this country.



Nor can I !!!!! I am glad to NOT be a nationalist

77.       catwoman
8933 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 11:27 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting mylo:

I can't find a reason to defend this country.



Nor can I !!!!! I am glad to NOT be a nationalist


It is really great that both of you can see the problems in your countries and aren't afraid to criticize it, but you should also appreciate the great things you have and defend them. Or... you may end up having much less and not being able to criticize it! Sure, Europe had done bad things in the past, but let's finally move on and build the future instead of shooting ourselves in the feet! You guys really have much more then most of the world does. There ARE reasons to defend your country.

78.       mylo
856 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 11:39 pm

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting mylo:

I can't find a reason to defend this country.



Nor can I !!!!! I am glad to NOT be a nationalist


It is really great that both of you can see the problems in your countries and aren't afraid to criticize it, but you should also appreciate the great things you have and defend them. Or... you may end up having much less and not being able to criticize it! Sure, Europe had done bad things in the past, but let's finally move on and build the future instead of shooting ourselves in the feet! You guys really have much more then most of the world does. There ARE reasons to defend this country.



Please give us some!our health service is being privatised as we speak,we are taxed to the hilt,all public services have been privatised from the Thatcher years,all industry is now in third world countries(jobs gone)we produce nothing!We have a major issue with education,in that 3 out of 5 kids leaving primary school can't even read,the people who built this country are also being rammed by this country,the rich poor divide is similar to that of the Grand Canyon,and we have entered an illegal war on the order of a thicket in America,anyway at least we have the weather..... oh no we don't even have that either.....give me a min i'll find something to celebrate

79.       catwoman
8933 posts
 26 Oct 2007 Fri 11:48 pm

Quoting mylo:

Please give us some!our health service is being privatised as we speak,we are taxed to the hilt,all public services have been privatised from the Thatcher years,all industry is now in third world countries(jobs gone)we produce nothing!We have a major issue with education,in that 3 out of 5 kids leaving primary school can't even read,the people who built this country are also being rammed by this country,the rich poor divide is similar to that of the Grand Canyon,and we have entered an illegal war on the order of a thicket in America,anyway at least we have the weather..... oh no we don't even have that either.....give me a min i'll find something to celebrate


I have not seen any social healthcare work yet, so... maybe the quality will finally improve!
Your taxes go up and lazy people have more money then those who work because of the welfare state, nothing wrong with privatization.
I don't know about the jobs, but there's tons of immigrants in your country, so it can't be that bad! You're still richer per capita then 90% of the world!
Weather...? Give this option to anyone from sunny Antalya, let's see if they will hesitate. Please, set your priorities straight.

Freedom of speech, civil liberties, relative equality, opportunities to name a few! Would you prefer an islamist state? Or something like in Russia where people who criticize Putin mysteriously disappear?
I find it to be quite ignorant when someone claims that they can't say anything good about Britain.

80.       CANLI
5084 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 02:42 am

Quoting alameda:

This is a very naive statement.


+ 1000000

And İtaly should demand the Roman's land, and Pharaoh's ask for their land too,and the chance will come finally for Native americans to take both their land and their rights !

81.       CANLI
5084 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 03:08 am

Quoting teaschip1:

It did not take more than a few months for Indonasia and the representatives of Aceh to solve the "Aceh Problem," but it has taken more than 80 years for the Turks to recognize the very existence of the Kurdish people.

Turkey wants to become a member of the EU, but the behavior of Turkey is far from that of civilized Europe. The Turks don't even recognise the Iraqi Constitution and refuse negotiating with any Iraqi delegation with representatives of the Kurdistan Regional Government in it. If you don't negotiate with the constitutionally recognized Kurdistan Regional Government, then how can you expect them to solve your problems?!

Turks are famous for their nationalism. How does the average Turk view the possibility of getting more involved in this war?


Tea,
Pls,dont assume that we are fools and going to buy it .
İf you 'Americans ' are believeing it to rest your Conscience,we do NOT.
There is NO İraqi Constitution,there is No Iraqi governments too.
They are bunch of traitors serving the enemy,the country which invade them !
And dont give me that nonsense that you were free İraq from Saddam,and you are building new İraq.
Who made Saddam ?!
Who killed him ?
And who destroyed İraq ?
And whose companies are building it ?!!

So talking about being civilized,and asking Türkiye for that is kind of wierd !

You made me feel that you are sitting in a high tower and you dont really know or feel what other suffer there.

Let me tell you a fact tea,you are not making İraq a favour by being there, you are sucking İraq .

Like it or not,you are İNVADERS,and you invaded İraq,and you are still there,so pls dont start talking about being civilized !

A Government under the invaders authority doesnt represent the country,it represnt the enemy.
We've been there too,so we know it.
They wont have a real governemnt until they kick the invaders out of their OWN land.
And untill İraq form a governmet from the İraqian people then all what İraq has is just some Americans puppets .

And as thehandsom said,i too suggest you read some history,Middle East History,and you will understand alot from whats going on there if you want .

82.       AlphaF
5677 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 03:20 am

Time for Iraqies to wake up....Iraq is now practically divided into three parts.

A part under Shiite control, in close ties with Iran; the Sunni part; and the bonus tentatively reserved for PKK , the Northern Iraq.

What USA is looking for is an ally in the area, for his dirty game. If Turkia agrees to support the USA's dirty game (which she will not), Americans will not hesitate to sell the PKK and the whole of the Kurdish population, in Turks favor...not for one second. But Turkish people have now sensed that there is something rotten in USA intentions. There is no civil Turkish government that can fullfil USA wishes against the better judgement of her own people.

Turkey, if she can be lured or intimidated to follow USA, against her own interests is obviously a better organised and stronger ally. But that is not how it is going to work: Syria, Turkia and Iran are now wise to the Americans game..Russia is alert...China is disturbed.

USA REPUBLICANS can start a new world war..

Good luck all!

83.       AlphaF
5677 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 03:33 am

Those who are really interested in the issue should check the international treaties as to how the sovereignity of original IRAQ and her boundaries were set up and try to see what happens if Iraq, which was a party to those treaties, ceases to exist, as defined in those treaties.

84.       mylo
856 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 04:30 am

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting mylo:

Please give us some!our health service is being privatised as we speak,we are taxed to the hilt,all public services have been privatised from the Thatcher years,all industry is now in third world countries(jobs gone)we produce nothing!We have a major issue with education,in that 3 out of 5 kids leaving primary school can't even read,the people who built this country are also being rammed by this country,the rich poor divide is similar to that of the Grand Canyon,and we have entered an illegal war on the order of a thicket in America,anyway at least we have the weather..... oh no we don't even have that either.....give me a min i'll find something to celebrate


I have not seen any social healthcare work yet, so... maybe the quality will finally improve!
Your taxes go up and lazy people have more money then those who work because of the welfare state, nothing wrong with privatization.
I don't know about the jobs, but there's tons of immigrants in your country, so it can't be that bad! You're still richer per capita then 90% of the world!
Weather...? Give this option to anyone from sunny Antalya, let's see if they will hesitate. Please, set your priorities straight.

Freedom of speech, civil liberties, relative equality, opportunities to name a few! Would you prefer an islamist state? Or something like in Russia where people who criticize Putin mysteriously disappear?
I find it to be quite ignorant when someone claims that they can't say anything good about Britain.



Freedom of speech?thanks that'll help pay the bills,civil liberities?give me an example?relative equality?where?how am i equal to everthing here?Islamist state?at least they look after each other,than stab each other in the back,or scratch someones car because they didn't attain it or because one has a newer model of car.Putin's mysterious guests?don't you think the CIA and FBI havent been killing people for years?hello?About Britain?what good things are you talking about?the way the Government turns us over?the Tax rate of %25 of everything you earn?the National insurance %8 of everything you earn?the Tax on everything you buy from a hairbrush to a tin of beans?the way they get us to 'recycle' disposables in the name of 'saving the earth' yet they give us F all for it?you don't live here you don't see it! When you've lived here for 30/40 years then you come and tell me about how life is here!

85.       mylo
856 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 04:47 am

Your taxes go up and lazy people have more money then those who work because of the welfare state, nothing wrong with privatization.
I don't know about the jobs, but there's tons of immigrants in your country, so it can't be that bad! You're still richer per capita then 90% of the world!
Weather...? Give this option to anyone from sunny Antalya, let's see if they will hesitate. Please, set your priorities straight.

hmmm lazy people?we work as hard as anyone,welfare state?i refer to my first post on this subject,'nothing wrong with privatisation'?like how?Robbing native people of their jobs?the private companies paying little or if no tax into their country?Their workers?Are they paying into the U.K?
'There are tons of immigrants in the country'
1.They are driving the hourly wage down of native people,so because they work for nothing per hour in their own countries,as one of the strongest nations in the world we should have to drop our wage structure?
2.Are they not a drag on our 'ever lasting' Health system?don't they ever get ill?do they have private insurance?do they pay for medical attention when they come here?Who pays for this treatment 'them'?with their already driven down price per hour?or us paying our taxes 25% and 8% national insurance?
Sunny Antalya seems fine to me,compared to this fiasco,why arent YOU living here?There's always room for one more!

86.       teaschip
3870 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 05:34 am

Quoting catwoman:

Quoting mylo:

Please give us some!our health service is being privatised as we speak,we are taxed to the hilt,all public services have been privatised from the Thatcher years,all industry is now in third world countries(jobs gone)we produce nothing!We have a major issue with education,in that 3 out of 5 kids leaving primary school can't even read,the people who built this country are also being rammed by this country,the rich poor divide is similar to that of the Grand Canyon,and we have entered an illegal war on the order of a thicket in America,anyway at least we have the weather..... oh no we don't even have that either.....give me a min i'll find something to celebrate


I have not seen any social healthcare work yet, so... maybe the quality will finally improve!
Your taxes go up and lazy people have more money then those who work because of the welfare state, nothing wrong with privatization.
I don't know about the jobs, but there's tons of immigrants in your country, so it can't be that bad! You're still richer per capita then 90% of the world!
Weather...? Give this option to anyone from sunny Antalya, let's see if they will hesitate. Please, set your priorities straight.

Freedom of speech, civil liberties, relative equality, opportunities to name a few! Would you prefer an islamist state? Or something like in Russia where people who criticize Putin mysteriously disappear?
I find it to be quite ignorant when someone claims that they can't say anything good about Britain.



I completely agree with this catwoman. People have no idea how good they really have it until they visit some of these other countries. I will take being at the 90% of the world any day.

87.       teaschip
3870 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 05:58 am

Quoting CANLI:

Quoting teaschip1:

It did not take more than a few months for Indonasia and the representatives of Aceh to solve the "Aceh Problem," but it has taken more than 80 years for the Turks to recognize the very existence of the Kurdish people.

Turkey wants to become a member of the EU, but the behavior of Turkey is far from that of civilized Europe. The Turks don't even recognise the Iraqi Constitution and refuse negotiating with any Iraqi delegation with representatives of the Kurdistan Regional Government in it. If you don't negotiate with the constitutionally recognized Kurdistan Regional Government, then how can you expect them to solve your problems?!

Turks are famous for their nationalism. How does the average Turk view the possibility of getting more involved in this war?


Tea,
Pls,dont assume that we are fools and going to buy it .
İf you 'Americans ' are believeing it to rest your Conscience,we do NOT.
There is NO İraqi Constitution,there is No Iraqi governments too.
They are bunch of traitors serving the enemy,the country which invade them !
And dont give me that nonsense that you were free İraq from Saddam,and you are building new İraq.
Who made Saddam ?!
Who killed him ?
And who destroyed İraq ?
And whose companies are building it ?!!

So talking about being civilized,and asking Türkiye for that is kind of wierd !

You made me feel that you are sitting in a high tower and you dont really know or feel what other suffer there.

Let me tell you a fact tea,you are not making İraq a favour by being there, you are sucking İraq .

Like it or not,you are İNVADERS,and you invaded İraq,and you are still there,so pls dont start talking about being civilized !

A Government under the invaders authority doesnt represent the country,it represnt the enemy.
We've been there too,so we know it.
They wont have a real governemnt until they kick the invaders out of their OWN land.
And untill İraq form a governmet from the İraqian people then all what İraq has is just some Americans puppets .

And as thehandsom said,i too suggest you read some history,Middle East History,and you will understand alot from whats going on there if you want .




I agree we shouldn't be in Iraq, we should have just sat back and let Saddam continue to kill thousands of innocent people. While their neighboring countries did absolutely NOTHING. We should also allow North Korea and Iran to build their nuclear welfare, why not? As far as Israel goes, let palestine and Hizbullah continue to bomb eachother. Before long we won't have to worry about anything in the Middle East, there won't be anyone left.

Your statements shows the mentality of why the Middle East continues to be in an uproar over religion and land. This will continue with or without the U.S., your history proves it.

As far as sitting on a high tower you mention, this country gives more aid to any other country in the world. Are you that ignorant to think that Americans don't suffer? Canli, news flash "we are all human". We have the poor, homeless, disease, and death. Yet, most Americans I know still give money to help the unfortunate in other countries. I believe we have one of the biggest hearts in the world. So don't think you can play that card with me.

88.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 12:49 pm

Quoting catwoman:

I find it to be quite ignorant when someone claims that they can't say anything good about Britain.



Nothing good?! Did I say that? OK, I hate our politics and parts of our history and cannot defend it, but I love England and I love living here, its beautiful. I can't think of anywhere else I would rather be .

If I didn't love it so much, I wouldn't criticise the policies of our government so often!

89.       CANLI
5084 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 01:17 pm

Quoting teaschip1:

Quoting CANLI:

Quoting teaschip1:

It did not take more than a few months for Indonasia and the representatives of Aceh to solve the "Aceh Problem," but it has taken more than 80 years for the Turks to recognize the very existence of the Kurdish people.

Turkey wants to become a member of the EU, but the behavior of Turkey is far from that of civilized Europe. The Turks don't even recognise the Iraqi Constitution and refuse negotiating with any Iraqi delegation with representatives of the Kurdistan Regional Government in it. If you don't negotiate with the constitutionally recognized Kurdistan Regional Government, then how can you expect them to solve your problems?!

Turks are famous for their nationalism. How does the average Turk view the possibility of getting more involved in this war?


Tea,
Pls,dont assume that we are fools and going to buy it .
İf you 'Americans ' are believeing it to rest your Conscience,we do NOT.
There is NO İraqi Constitution,there is No Iraqi governments too.
They are bunch of traitors serving the enemy,the country which invade them !
And dont give me that nonsense that you were free İraq from Saddam,and you are building new İraq.
Who made Saddam ?!
Who killed him ?
And who destroyed İraq ?
And whose companies are building it ?!!

So talking about being civilized,and asking Türkiye for that is kind of wierd !

You made me feel that you are sitting in a high tower and you dont really know or feel what other suffer there.

Let me tell you a fact tea,you are not making İraq a favour by being there, you are sucking İraq .

Like it or not,you are İNVADERS,and you invaded İraq,and you are still there,so pls dont start talking about being civilized !

A Government under the invaders authority doesnt represent the country,it represnt the enemy.
We've been there too,so we know it.
They wont have a real governemnt until they kick the invaders out of their OWN land.
And untill İraq form a governmet from the İraqian people then all what İraq has is just some Americans puppets .

And as thehandsom said,i too suggest you read some history,Middle East History,and you will understand alot from whats going on there if you want .




I agree we shouldn't be in Iraq, we should have just sat back and let Saddam continue to kill thousands of innocent people. While their neighboring countries did absolutely NOTHING. We should also allow North Korea and Iran to build their nuclear welfare, why not? As far as Israel goes, let palestine and Hizbullah continue to bomb eachother. Before long we won't have to worry about anything in the Middle East, there won't be anyone left.

Your statements shows the mentality of why the Middle East continues to be in an uproar over religion and land. This will continue with or without the U.S., your history proves it.

As far as sitting on a high tower you mention, this country gives more aid to any other country in the world. Are you that ignorant to think that Americans don't suffer? Canli, news flash "we are all human". We have the poor, homeless, disease, and death. Yet, most Americans I know still give money to help the unfortunate in other countries. I believe we have one of the biggest hearts in the world. So don't think you can play that card with me.



Tea,i suggest that you try to see things as they REALLY are and again STOP assuming that we are naive!

İm not talking if you suffer İN your country as other people suffer,im talking you are CAUSİNG other people suffer by being in THEİR country and SUCKİNG THEİR resources !

''one of the biggest hearts in the world'' ??!!

Pleaseeeee, do you think ANY country do anything to the other out of having good heart ?!
That is a very NAİVE statment!
İt called political interest dear ,if you told this to even a KİD,he wont buy it .

Ok,let's see,
As for İraq,you were letting Saddam killes his people,and you didnt object,and even you were helping him too in his war,then after war has finished you suddenly discovered what a bad boy he was ?
Or was it better to control the oil mines ,and have a strong present in the area ?!

As for allowing North Korea and Iran to build their nuclear welfare, if you did, it will harm the power balance in the world which YOU have the upper hand in it by countries not from your allies.
So its YOUR benefits AGAİN.
At same time you allow it for Israel because she is YOUR ally !

And as for Israel,palestine and Hizbullah one of them trying to have HİS land back and the other trying to prevent Israel from taking HİS land .
And by whose side are you ?! İsrael
Because AGAİN she is YOUR ally and giving you upper hand in the area .

So pls,dont give me that crap about big hearts !

Quoting teaschip1:


Before long we won't have to worry about anything in the Middle East, there won't be anyone left.



Btw,Middle East is far more than 200 yrs old,so we were here long before you and we WİLL stay here too with or without USA.

That is the MOST arrogant statment i've ever heard !

90.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 01:31 pm

Quoting teaschip1:


I agree we shouldn't be in Iraq, we should have just sat back and let Saddam continue to kill thousands of innocent people. While their neighboring countries did absolutely NOTHING.



Teaship this is utter crap, and you know it! The US were quite happy with Saddam's killings for years - in fact they PUT HIM THERE! How many innocent people have been killed since the US and UK went to Iraq? Do you know?

And, strangely enough, I seem to remember that Bush's reason for being in Iraq was originally because of their "weapons of mass distruction" NOT because of Saddam's killings! Incidently, whatever DID happen to those weapons? Did they suddenly just disappear into a puff of smoke?

Quoting teaschip1:

As far as Israel goes, let palestine and Hizbullah continue to bomb eachother. Before long we won't have to worry about anything in the Middle East, there won't be anyone left.



This is so ignorant. This problem is AGAIN caused by the US and the Allies. The continuing problem in Israel is now caused by American citizens who fund Israelis millions of pounds to build townships further and further into Palestinian territory. These "kind" citizens (mostly religious groups/churches (of all donominations)who are brainwashed into thinking they are doing a good thing) also funded the IRA terrorists and paid for their bombs in the UK. When former President Carter tries to speak out about this, he receives death threats from these "kind citizens"

Quoting teaschip1:


Yet, most Americans I know still give money to help the unfortunate in other countries. I believe we have one of the biggest hearts in the world. So don't think you can play that card with me.



Again, this is utter crap! You dont have the BIGGEST heart - just one of the BIGGEST COUNTRIES! I don't have figures for all charities, but I do know that PER HEAD, the UK citizens gave double the money that American citizens gave to victims of the tsunami. Maybe the US citizens were too busy giving money to fund terrorism or building work to cause more conflict in Palastine?

With regard to foreign aid, please remember that the US is the richest country in the world. You think foreign aid is about being kind hearted? You are naive, MONEY is POWER Teaschip.

91.       nellyphunt
128 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 02:29 pm

I am new to this forum but i am interested to know how the Kurdish people feel about the situation in northern Irak.

Can someone also please explain to me why some Turkish people seem not to like Kurdish people.

92.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 02:34 pm

Quoting nellyphunt:

I am new to this forum but i am interested to know how the Kurdish people feel about the situation in northern Irak.



I am very interested too. I would imagine they find the situation very worrying, because Nationalists are protesting in the streets calling all kurdish PKK supporters.

I would also imagine that the majority do NOT support terrorism.

93.       Serdar07
428 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 03:26 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting nellyphunt:

I am new to this forum but i am interested to know how the Kurdish people feel about the situation in northern Irak.



I am very interested too. I would imagine they find the situation very worrying, because Nationalists are protesting in the streets calling all kurdish PKK supporters.

I would also imagine that the majority do NOT support terrorism.



"For avoiding blamed that I exageerating about the Kurds population in North of Iraq let's say they are only 4 million! So according to some Turkish Nationalists they need to send 200,000 soliders to kill and finish these population because they are the active members of PKK and all of them terrorists. Some of them even planned for 11 September and all the explosions on this earth. Come all the nations on this earth get rid of these evil creature who called Kurds"
I wonder if there will be any Turk Nationalist not thinking in that way??? and pray to have at least 1 person having another good idea!
Please note that I am talking about a number of Turks nationalist and never talking about the people in Turkey...

94.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 03:28 pm

Quoting Serdar07:

"For avoiding blamed that I exageerating about the Kurds population in North of Iraq let's say they are only 4 million! So according to some Turkish Nationalists they need to send 200,000 soliders to kill and finish these population because they are the active members of PKK and all of them terrorists. Some of them even planned for 11 September and all the explosions on this earth. Come all the nations on this earth get rid of these evil creature who called Kurds"
I wonder if there will be any Turk Nationalist not thinking in that way??? and pray to have at least 1 person having another good idea!
Please note that I am talking about a number of Turks nationalist and never talking about the people in Turkey...



I completely agree

95.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 03:35 pm

Quoting Serdar07:

I wonder if there will be any Turk Nationalist not thinking in that way??? and pray to have at least 1 person having another good idea!
Please note that I am talking about a number of Turks nationalist and never talking about the people in Turkey...



I would also guess that out of 14,237 Turkish Class members, you will be lucky if you get one direct reply...

96.       Serdar07
428 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 03:41 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting Serdar07:

I wonder if there will be any Turk Nationalist not thinking in that way??? and pray to have at least 1 person having another good idea!
Please note that I am talking about a number of Turks nationalist and never talking about the people in Turkey...



I would also guess that out of 14,237 Turkish Class members, you will be lucky if you get one direct reply...



Well we can have a clear answer like this:
Turkey's National Security Council on Wednesday called on the government to apply economic sanctions against the Iraqi Kurds, who are accused of supporting ...
http://www.focus-fen.net/index.php?id=n125227

97.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 03:45 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:



I would also guess that out of 14,237 Turkish Class members, you will be lucky if you get one direct reply...


This is UNFAIR.

98.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 03:47 pm

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting AEnigma III:



I would also guess that out of 14,237 Turkish Class members, you will be lucky if you get one direct reply...


This is UNFAIR.



Neden?
Alpha will reply of course - he never minds giving his views on Kurds

99.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 03:51 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting thehandsom:

Quoting AEnigma III:



I would also guess that out of 14,237 Turkish Class members, you will be lucky if you get one direct reply...


This is UNFAIR.



Neden?
Alpha will reply of course - he never minds giving his views on Kurds


cunku, I will be happy to give a direct answer to any questions as one of 14.237 members.

100.       Serdar07
428 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 03:52 pm

What does an economy sanctions mean for you? Can they control not apply that on innocent people or they are considering all who live in North of Iraq are PKK supporters?!

101.       AlphaF
5677 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 03:55 pm

OUESTION
Why do Turks seem to hate Kurds?
REPLY
This is a stupid question. Equivalent to "Why do Americans hate blacks?". Turkia's problem is with PKK, not Kurds. As events become clearer, we shall see that PKK is not only Kurds.
QUESTION
Why the Kurds who are also Turkish citizens and who hold a seat in Turkish Parliment, do not openly denounce PKK as a terror group?
REPLY
You certainly got me on that question !

102.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 03:57 pm

Quoting AlphaF:

OUESTION
Why do Turks seem to hate Kurds?
REPLY
This is a stupid question. Equivalent to "Why do Americans hate blacks?". Turkia's problem is with PKK, not Kurds.
QUESTION
Why the Kurds who are also Turkish citizens and who hold a seat in Turkish Parliment, do not openly denounce PKK as a terror group?
REPLY
You certainly got me on that question !



I told you he would answer
Unfortunately, like most Turkish members here, he only answers a question with more questions!

103.       Serdar07
428 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 04:03 pm

Then let's be clear and more open...
We are against war and killing.
Then kurds in north of Iraq fought sholder to sholder with Turkey Army against PKK in 1993 and 1996 and also 1998!
Many Kurdish families in Iraq suffered from what PKK did for their teenager when some PKK members were cheating them and made them to join that group.

104.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 04:10 pm

Quoting AlphaF:

Why the Kurds who are also Turkish citizens and who hold a seat in Turkish Parliment, do not openly denounce PKK as a terror group?



My mothers cousin was killed in an IRA bomb attack. Many USA politicians at the time would not openly denounce the IRA as a terrorist group for fear of losing the Irish vote. Many Irish Americans sent the IRA more money. Many IRA terrorists are still being given sanctury in the USA.

This does not make me hate Northern Irish people or American Irish people. It makes me hate extremists and terrorists.

105.       thehandsom
7403 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 04:21 pm

Quoting Serdar07:

What does an economy sanctions mean for you? Can they control not apply that on innocent people or they are considering all who live in North of Iraq are PKK supporters?!


I hope they dont apply it strictly. it is worse than turkish army entering the region.
It looks like, you -northen iraqi kurds-,again , got caught in the middle. Not between pkk and turkey though, turkey and usa.

106.       elham
579 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 04:32 pm

Quoting AlphaF:

OUESTION
Why do Turks seem to hate Kurds?
REPLY
This is a stupid question. Equivalent to "Why do Americans hate blacks?". Turkia's problem is with PKK, not Kurds.
QUESTION
Why the Kurds who are also Turkish citizens and who hold a seat in Turkish Parliment, do not openly denounce PKK as a terror group?
REPLY
You certainly got me on that question !



your question prompted me to another question
why Turkey in recent negotiations objected to the presence of officials from Iraq's Kurds?
Do turkey think that iraqi kurd supporting PKK??
of course no, but there is a fact , When Saddam was removed from government , the Kurds became racists and showed hostility to our friends Turkmen in Iraq Perhaps this reaction because they suffered from the scourge of Saddam, but also Turkmens have been persecuted by Saddam, i think this fact infuriate my friends Kurds, but that not mean Iraqi kurds supporting PKK

107.       elham
579 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 04:43 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:


The US were quite happy with Saddam's killings for years - in fact they PUT HIM THERE! How many innocent people have been killed since the US and UK went to Iraq? Do you know?

And, strangely enough, I seem to remember that Bush's reason for being in Iraq was originally because of their "weapons of mass distruction" NOT because of Saddam's killings! Incidently, whatever DID happen to those weapons? Did they suddenly just disappear into a puff of smoke?


AEnigma, i think only you , who understand it well

108.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 05:10 pm

Quoting elham:

Quoting AEnigma III:


The US were quite happy with Saddam's killings for years - in fact they PUT HIM THERE! How many innocent people have been killed since the US and UK went to Iraq? Do you know?

And, strangely enough, I seem to remember that Bush's reason for being in Iraq was originally because of their "weapons of mass distruction" NOT because of Saddam's killings! Incidently, whatever DID happen to those weapons? Did they suddenly just disappear into a puff of smoke?


AEnigma, i think only you , who understand it well



Just waiting for Catwoman to come online and tell me again that I am being anti-American, anti-Teaschip, unpatriotic and unsupportive of my own country ...

109.       teaschip
3870 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 05:34 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting teaschip1:


I agree we shouldn't be in Iraq, we should have just sat back and let Saddam continue to kill thousands of innocent people. While their neighboring countries did absolutely NOTHING.



Teaship this is utter crap, and you know it! The US were quite happy with Saddam's killings for years - in fact they PUT HIM THERE! How many innocent people have been killed since the US and UK went to Iraq? Do you know?

And, strangely enough, I seem to remember that Bush's reason for being in Iraq was originally because of their "weapons of mass distruction" NOT because of Saddam's killings! Incidently, whatever DID happen to those weapons? Did they suddenly just disappear into a puff of smoke?

Quoting teaschip1:

As far as Israel goes, let palestine and Hizbullah continue to bomb eachother. Before long we won't have to worry about anything in the Middle East, there won't be anyone left.



This is so ignorant. This problem is AGAIN caused by the US and the Allies. The continuing problem in Israel is now caused by American citizens who fund Israelis millions of pounds to build townships further and further into Palestinian territory. These "kind" citizens (mostly religious groups/churches (of all donominations)who are brainwashed into thinking they are doing a good thing) also funded the IRA terrorists and paid for their bombs in the UK. When former President Carter tries to speak out about this, he receives death threats from these "kind citizens"

Quoting teaschip1:


Yet, most Americans I know still give money to help the unfortunate in other countries. I believe we have one of the biggest hearts in the world. So don't think you can play that card with me.



Again, this is utter crap! You dont have the BIGGEST heart - just one of the BIGGEST COUNTRIES! I don't have figures for all charities, but I do know that PER HEAD, the UK citizens gave double the money that American citizens gave to victims of the tsunami. Maybe the US citizens were too busy giving money to fund terrorism or building work to cause more conflict in Palastine?

With regard to foreign aid, please remember that the US is the richest country in the world. You think foreign aid is about being kind hearted? You are naive, MONEY is POWER Teaschip.



In 2006 alone 200 Iraqi civilians were killed by American bombs and weapons. In 2006, 16,000 Iraqi civilians were killed by Islamic terrorists. Where is the problem, I ask?
Even this statistic is highly exaggerated, since the enemy there is not known to fight in uniform. In all probability, the immense effort of coalition forces to avoid civilian casualties was quite successful and the true number is between 2,000 and 3,000, perhaps lower.

The ridiculous figure of 650,000 was published by the same people who lumped victims of terror together with casualties of war to come up with the claim that 100,000 had been killed.

George W. Bush never claimed to have been to Iraq. Rather, both he and Tony Blair deferred to intelligence reports and, at the same time, complained that their sources were limited by the fact that Saddam would not allow inspections under the agreements that ended the Gulf War; nor would he respect numerous UN mandates to allow unrestricted monitoring.

Though rare, there are some in the world who allege that Bush knew the reports were wrong (in some mysterious fashion), but went to war under false pretenses anyway. This would certainly qualify as a lie, but it also defies common sense and probably speaks to the ignorance, delusion, or dishonesty of the person making such an assertion.

For obvious reasons, first-term American Presidents do not send troops into combat with a primary justification that they know will be proven false before the next election. Neither do second-term Presidents for that matter, since the fallout would have devastating consequences for their political party, to say nothing of personal conscience.

Ironically, those most critical of America over the relative absence of WMDs also happen to have been the most sympathetic toward Saddam?s manipulative shell games that made the war necessary in the first place. Their shallow and unbalanced moralizing gave the dictator confidence that the American President would never follow through with his threats to hold his government accountable under the WMD inspections agreements that it signed. Saddam never believed that he would wind up in a spider hole or in a hangman's noose.

Had the world united against Saddam Hussein and required that he honor international law, then the war would never have happened and the good people of Iraq would still be living under his sublime and gentle hand.

Anti-war activists often pretend that the killing in Iraq began the moment American bombs started falling, and will end the minute coalition troops leave the country, but mass graves uncovered from the Saddam era, and present-day terror attacks against ordinary Iraqis are clear indicators of the odd mixture of insincerity and ignorance that characterizes the peace movement.

In fact, true sympathy for the Iraqi people would have to run pretty thin among those pressing for the premature removal of peacekeeping forces. Leaving innocent people exposed and vulnerable to the forces of terror or a bloody civil war hardly qualifies as a humane gesture. Neither did these activists appear visibly moved by the plight of more than 300,000 - 600,000 missing and murdered Iraqis under the Baathist regime.

Foreign aid crap? Take a look at the numbers then.
US 22,739 million
UK 12,607 million
Japan 11,608 million
France 10,448 million
Germany 12,351 million

So, please don't tell me this is all crap!




110.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 05:39 pm

I am not going to argue today because it is LOVE DAY ! However, I cannot agree with any of your statements Teaschip.

With regard to foreign aid. I didn't say it was crap. I said your comments about the USA being "kind hearted" were crap! Foreign aid is not about being kind hearted - it is not PERSONALLY donated by citizens of that country. You cannot deny that foreign aid is used as a tool. The USA rarely gives it without "conditions" to their advantage. Please check what I say next time you "google".

Incidently, when you compare the population of the UK compared to the USA, I would say that the USA are definitely not giving enough foreign aid!!!!!

111.       teaschip
3870 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 05:42 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting elham:

Quoting AEnigma III:


The US were quite happy with Saddam's killings for years - in fact they PUT HIM THERE! How many innocent people have been killed since the US and UK went to Iraq? Do you know?

And, strangely enough, I seem to remember that Bush's reason for being in Iraq was originally because of their "weapons of mass distruction" NOT because of Saddam's killings! Incidently, whatever DID happen to those weapons? Did they suddenly just disappear into a puff of smoke?


AEnigma, i think only you , who understand it well



Just waiting for Catwoman to come online and tell me again that I am being anti-American, anti-Teaschip, unpatriotic and unsupportive of my own country ...



I notice with your combative attitude today, you could be useful over in Iraq about now.

112.       teaschip
3870 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 05:46 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting teaschip1:

Foreign aid crap? Take a look at the numbers then.
US 22,739 million
UK 12,607 million
Japan 11,608 million
France 10,448 million
Germany 12,351 million

So, please don't tell me this is all crap!



I am not going to argue today because it is LOVE DAY ! However, I cannot agree with any of your statements Teaschip.

With regard to foreign aid. I didn't say it was crap. I said your comments about the USA being "kind hearted" were crap! Foreign aid is not about being kind hearted - it is not PERSONALLY donated by citizens of that country. You cannot deny that foreign aid is used as a tool. The USA rarely gives it without "conditions" to their advantage. Please check what I say next time you "google".

Incidently, when you compare the population of the UK compared to the USA, I would say that the USA are definitely not giving enough foreign aid!!!!!



I have no problem with agreeing to disagree. Yes, I also would like to believe today is a "Love Day"

113.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 05:47 pm

Population of UK: 60,776 million - Foreign Aid: 12,607 million
Population of US: 301,139 million - Foreign Aid: 22,739 million

You do the maths!

114.       teaschip
3870 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 05:50 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Population of UK: 60,776 million - Foreign Aid: 12,607 million
Population of US: 301,139 million - Foreign Aid: 22,739 million

You do the maths!



Remember your words it's a "Love Day" no arguing allowed!

115.       Serdar07
428 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 05:58 pm

Quoting teaschip1:

Quoting AEnigma III:

Population of UK: 60,776 million - Foreign Aid: 12,607 million
Population of US: 301,139 million - Foreign Aid: 22,739 million

You do the maths!



Remember your words it's a "Love Day" no arguing allowed!



Is it a lovely day or Love day?
if it's a love day , so according to which calender, today is not February 14th!!

116.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 06:01 pm

Quoting teaschip1:

In 2006 alone 200 Iraqi civilians were killed by American bombs and weapons. In 2006, 16,000 Iraqi civilians were killed by Islamic terrorists. Where is the problem, I ask?
Even this statistic is highly exaggerated, since the enemy there is not known to fight in uniform. In all probability, the immense effort of coalition forces to avoid civilian casualties was quite successful and the true number is between 2,000 and 3,000, perhaps lower.

The ridiculous figure of 650,000 was published by the same people who lumped victims of terror together with casualties of war to come up with the claim that 100,000 had been killed.

George W. Bush never claimed to have been to Iraq. Rather, both he and Tony Blair deferred to intelligence reports and, at the same time, complained that their sources were limited by the fact that Saddam would not allow inspections under the agreements that ended the Gulf War; nor would he respect numerous UN mandates to allow unrestricted monitoring.

Though rare, there are some in the world who allege that Bush knew the reports were wrong (in some mysterious fashion), but went to war under false pretenses anyway. This would certainly qualify as a lie, but it also defies common sense and probably speaks to the ignorance, delusion, or dishonesty of the person making such an assertion.

For obvious reasons, first-term American Presidents do not send troops into combat with a primary justification that they know will be proven false before the next election. Neither do second-term Presidents for that matter, since the fallout would have devastating consequences for their political party, to say nothing of personal conscience.

Ironically, those most critical of America over the relative absence of WMDs also happen to have been the most sympathetic toward Saddam?s manipulative shell games that made the war necessary in the first place. Their shallow and unbalanced moralizing gave the dictator confidence that the American President would never follow through with his threats to hold his government accountable under the WMD inspections agreements that it signed. Saddam never believed that he would wind up in a spider hole or in a hangman's noose.

Had the world united against Saddam Hussein and required that he honor international law, then the war would never have happened and the good people of Iraq would still be living under his sublime and gentle hand.

Anti-war activists often pretend that the killing in Iraq began the moment American bombs started falling, and will end the minute coalition troops leave the country, but mass graves uncovered from the Saddam era, and present-day terror attacks against ordinary Iraqis are clear indicators of the odd mixture of insincerity and ignorance that characterizes the peace movement.

In fact, true sympathy for the Iraqi people would have to run pretty thin among those pressing for the premature removal of peacekeeping forces. Leaving innocent people exposed and vulnerable to the forces of terror or a bloody civil war hardly qualifies as a humane gesture. Neither did these activists appear visibly moved by the plight of more than 300,000 - 600,000 missing and murdered Iraqis under the Baathist regime.



Teaschip, I surrender! I really DO NOT KNOW WHERE TO BEGIN with this text! It would take me hours to write a response to this garbage! I take it you are a Bush supporter?

117.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 06:02 pm

Quoting Serdar07:

Is it a lovely day or Love day?
if it's a love day , so according to which calender, today is not February 14th!!



Ermmmm you want to wait until February 14th for me to NOT argue?

118.       Serdar07
428 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 06:07 pm

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting Serdar07:

Is it a lovely day or Love day?
if it's a love day , so according to which calender, today is not February 14th!!



Ermmmm you want to wait until February 14th for me to NOT argue?



Your argue was not with me I think but it was with Teaschip1!!

119.       AEnigma III
0 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 06:29 pm

Quoting Serdar07:

Quoting AEnigma III:

Quoting Serdar07:

Is it a lovely day or Love day?
if it's a love day , so according to which calender, today is not February 14th!!



Ermmmm you want to wait until February 14th for me to NOT argue?



Your argue was not with me I think but it was with Teaschip1!!



Indeed

120.       femme_fatal
0 posts
 27 Oct 2007 Sat 10:01 pm

Quoting mylo:

Please give us some!our health service is being privatised as we speak,we are taxed to the hilt,all public services have been privatised from the Thatcher years,all industry is now in third world countries(jobs gone)we produce nothing!We have a major issue with education,in that 3 out of 5 kids leaving primary school can't even read,the people who built this country are also being rammed by this country,the rich poor divide is similar to that of the Grand Canyon,and we have entered an illegal war on the order of a thicket in America,anyway at least we have the weather..... oh no we don't even have that either.....give me a min i'll find something to celebrate


never in my life heard of an excellent healthcare system!
privatisation must go on!
bad educated kids? its all the fault of stupid non-punishing system. when i went to school there wasnt any excuse for a wrong spelling, no excuse for being unprepared, no one heard of dyslexia. today every third suffers from so called dyslexia. wrong spelling? dont worry, you are a star!
you live there and dont see that your country applies the pure form of communism, tho you wish its wasnt so?
you work or not you get money, the harder you work the more work you will get, but the lazy bottoms and criminals should enjoy their rights, you cant offend them by disliking them.

so, mylo, why not swop with a guy from pakistan or afghanistan to live in the peaceful countries to enjoy the societies where everybody cares of each other?
apparently you should try before moaning.

121.       libralady
5152 posts
 28 Oct 2007 Sun 01:30 pm

Quoting mylo:

Your taxes go up and lazy people have more money then those who work because of the welfare state, nothing wrong with privatization.
I don't know about the jobs, but there's tons of immigrants in your country, so it can't be that bad! You're still richer per capita then 90% of the world!
Weather...? Give this option to anyone from sunny Antalya, let's see if they will hesitate. Please, set your priorities straight.

hmmm lazy people?we work as hard as anyone,welfare state?i refer to my first post on this subject,'nothing wrong with privatisation'?like how?Robbing native people of their jobs?the private companies paying little or if no tax into their country?Their workers?Are they paying into the U.K?
'There are tons of immigrants in the country'
1.They are driving the hourly wage down of native people,so because they work for nothing per hour in their own countries,as one of the strongest nations in the world we should have to drop our wage structure?
2.Are they not a drag on our 'ever lasting' Health system?don't they ever get ill?do they have private insurance?do they pay for medical attention when they come here?Who pays for this treatment 'them'?with their already driven down price per hour?or us paying our taxes 25% and 8% national insurance?
Sunny Antalya seems fine to me,compared to this fiasco,why arent YOU living here?There's always room for one more!



Mylo, I think you should emigrate! I don't have time for writing a long reply, but just one point - because of our "wage structure" we have driven maufactring to low paid countries and have been doing so for many years. So I don't think you can blame imigrants today for this problem.

And if all those imigrants who work for low pay, minumim wage of £5.52, in hospitality, cleaning, farming and construction went home, who would then do those jobs? The 1.2m people in our country who will not work? or the 5 million supposedly disabled workforce? These industries with the exception of construction, have always been low paid.

Many of the problems we see today in our country are down to the unions strength in the 70's (Labour years, Harold Wilson etc) before Thatcher, when inflation was running at 27%.

The welfare state is the fault of the Labour governments of the past and present. It is more beneficial for some people to be on benefits than at work, and I beleive that £5.52 is a reasonable minimum wage. Benefits should not give a living wage.

I am also afraid that much of what is happening is being controlled from Brussels.

122.       yilgun-7
1326 posts
 28 Oct 2007 Sun 02:07 pm

28 Ekim 2007 tarihli Türkiye Gazetelerinden haberler=

- Başbakan, "Avrupa ülkelerinin ve ABD'nin, terrörist örgütlerle mücadelede, Türkiye'ye destek olmadıklarını," söyledi."Samimi değiller ve bir takım projeler peşindeler".

- MASAK Başkanı " Terör örgütü ile bağlantılı kimselere her saldırı için yurt dışından adam başı 150 Euro gönderildiğini saptadık," dedi.

- Eski Terörle Mücadele Koordinatörü, "Terör örgütünü kollayan ABD ve AB'dir," dedi."Uluslararası destekçileri olmasa, terör örgütü ayakta kalamaz".

- Bir Türk Vatandaşı, "Türkiye'nin iki yüzlü dostları ve müttefikleri var.Bunlar açıkça belli.Atatürk'ün dediği gibi, Türk ulusunun düşmanları, aynı zamanda insanlığın da düşmanlarıdırlar.Ama Yüce Türk milleti, Allahın izniyle, bunlara gereken cevabı ve karşılığı verecek kadar güçlüdür," dedi.

(122 Messages in 13 pages - View all)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...  >>
Add reply to this discussion




Turkish Dictionary
Turkish Chat
Open mini chat
New in Forums
Why yer gördüm but yeri geziyorum
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much, makes perfect sense!
Etmeyi vs etmek
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much!
Görülmez vs görünmiyor
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much, very well explained!
Içeri and içeriye
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much for the detailed ...
Present continous tense
HaydiDeer: Got it, thank you!
Hic vs herhangi, degil vs yok
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much!
Rize Artvin Airport Transfer - Rize Tours
rizetours: Dear Guest; In order to make your Black Sea trip more enjoyable, our c...
What does \"kabul ettiğini\" mean?
HaydiDeer: Thank you very much for the detailed ...
Kimse vs biri (anyone)
HaydiDeer: Thank you!
Random Pictures of Turkey
Most liked
Major Vowel Harmony

Turkish lesson by admin
Level: beginner