General/Off-topic |
|
|
|
|
|
You have to kill terrorists. Nothing else works.. (really?)
|
| 60. |
13 Jan 2009 Tue 11:18 pm |
|
Your knowledge of middle east history a huge ´nill´. You have no idea what palestine was like 200 years ago, 100 years ago, 70 years ago .
Show me your sources about what you wrote above?
The section I higlighted above is a lie and pure racism!!
Nobobody has right to label any ethnicity in the world like you are doing..
heres a link to wikipedia. there were no arabs until the 7th century.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Israel
|
|
| 61. |
13 Jan 2009 Tue 11:26 pm |
|
why do you feel like you have to expose your ignorance every chance you get, femme?
I think you meant Israelis, because there isn`t a Jewish race. sorry to disappoint you but Israelis are of semitic race which simply means they are arabic. even what they call hebrew is the same as arabic. so your accusing arabs of occupying their own lands is so dumb. just because they have a different religion doesnt mean that they are a distinct race, they are all arabic.
did you know that your beloved Jesus was an Arab too? what a dissapointment for you, isn`t it?
tami, what a shame! there were no arabs when jews existed back to babylon. nobody so far heard of arabs until 7th century. did anyone care for wild camel driving robbers ruling the vast sands of arabia? we just cant simply find anything about the history of arabs. who are they? why are they called arabs? where did they get that name?
and why do you relate arabs to jews? what are their relations? bible doesnt mention a single word regarding arabs. why is that? it speaks about many other neighbours, empires and how would they not mention about their so called "relatives"?
you think i get disappointed by such a clown like you?
|
|
| 62. |
13 Jan 2009 Tue 11:28 pm |
|
To Femme,
And by the way, if you loved the Jews so much why didn´t you give a place in your own country?? instead sent them to Palestine??
such an irrevelant thing to say. shame on you.
|
|
| 63. |
13 Jan 2009 Tue 11:29 pm |
|
You sound like you lived there and was someone (Jew) who was treated badly, but I guess from the other comments you just like to make things up 
hmm... i donno what to say now ...  im lost.
|
|
| 64. |
13 Jan 2009 Tue 11:34 pm |
|
tami, what a shame! there were no arabs when jews existed back to babylon. nobody so far heard of arabs until 7th century. did anyone care for wild camel driving robbers ruling the vast sands of arabia? we just cant simply find anything about the history of arabs. who are they? why are they called arabs? where did they get that name?
and why do you relate arabs to jews? what are their relations? bible doesnt mention a single word regarding arabs. why is that? it speaks about many other neighbours, empires and how would they not mention about their so called "relatives"?
you think i get disappointed by such a clown like you?
It seems like you`re really pissed off femme. Truth hurts?
I don`t relate arabs to jews. It`s you who is doing that because you`re so ignorant that you don`t even know the difference between an "Israeli" and a "Jew".
he first written attestation of the ethnonym "Arab" occurs in an Assyrian inscription of 853 BCE, where Shalmaneser III lists a King Gindibu of mâtu arbâi (Arab land) as among the people he defeated at the Battle of Karkar. Some of the names given in these texts are Aramaic, while others are the first attestations of Proto-Arabic dialects. In fact several different ethnonyms are found in Assyrian texts that are conventionally translated "Arab": Arabi, Arubu, Aribi and Urbi. The Hebrew Bible occasionally refers to Arvi peoples (or variants thereof), translated as "Arab" or "Arabian." The scope of the term at that early stage is unclear, but it seems to have referred to various desert-dwelling Semitic tribes in the Syrian Desert and Arabia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab
|
|
| 65. |
13 Jan 2009 Tue 11:40 pm |
|
It seems like you`re really pissed off femme. Truth hurts?
I don`t relate arabs to jews. It`s you who is doing that because you`re so ignorant that you don`t even know the difference between an "Israeli" and a "Jew".
he first written attestation of the ethnonym "Arab" occurs in an Assyrian inscription of 853 BCE, where Shalmaneser III lists a King Gindibu of mâtu arbâi (Arab land) as among the people he defeated at the Battle of Karkar. Some of the names given in these texts are Aramaic, while others are the first attestations of Proto-Arabic dialects. In fact several different ethnonyms are found in Assyrian texts that are conventionally translated "Arab": Arabi, Arubu, Aribi and Urbi. The Hebrew Bible occasionally refers to Arvi peoples (or variants thereof), translated as "Arab" or "Arabian." The scope of the term at that early stage is unclear, but it seems to have referred to various desert-dwelling Semitic tribes in the Syrian Desert and Arabia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab
why should i get pissed off?  you think i take you serious?
is that all? not many sources there about them well, they counted arabs into a semitic group just because arabs claimed to be ishmailates. while i think there were no relations between arabs and ishamilates.
|
|
| 66. |
13 Jan 2009 Tue 11:45 pm |
|
But Femme, can you see how unconvincing and how rediciolus your argument looks?
According to your judgment, Romans (or greeks) can return to Anatolia today and rightly claim (and establish a country )that Anatolia is theirs after 1400 years. There were no Turks (or little amount of Turks existed at the time) and they ruled Anatolia.
Or we Turks leave from Anatolia, go to central Asia and insist that we lived there once so it is ours..
Please come back with less laugable claim...
|
|
| 67. |
13 Jan 2009 Tue 11:47 pm |
|
why should i get pissed off? you think i take you serious?
is that all? not many sources there about them well, they counted arabs into a semitic group just because arabs claimed to be ishmailates. while i think there were no relations between arabs and ishamilates.
take a break femme, you`re being funny. yea, I`m sure there is no relationship, that`s why arabs and israelis speak the same language.
|
|
| 68. |
13 Jan 2009 Tue 11:58 pm |
|
But Femme, can you see how unconvincing and how rediciolus your argument looks?
According to your judgment, Romans (or greeks) can return to Anatolia today and rightly claim (and establish a country )that Anatolia is theirs after 1400 years. There were no Turks (or little amount of Turks existed at the time) and they ruled Anatolia.
Or we Turks leave from Anatolia, go to central Asia and insist that we lived there once so it is ours..
Please come back with less laugable claim...
romans dont exist anymore, greeks have their own country (you turks failed to destroy them all), why not, i think the whole area belongs to greeks.
btw, jews always lived there, they never stopped existing there.
the land belonged to brits, they gave it to jews and arabs. but arabs didnt agree to co-exist. then there was a declaration from UN, the whole world accepted the existence of israeli state, except for arabs.
i think arabs will never accept this fact and always fire up poor palestines to fight against israel. its a shame that wealthy arabs dont help them by building them schools, hospitals.
i ignored your comments ad personam.
|
|
| 69. |
14 Jan 2009 Wed 12:00 am |
|
take a break femme, you`re being funny. yea, I`m sure there is no relationship, that`s why arabs and israelis speak the same language.
we all speak russian, but it doesnt make us russians neither slavic.
|
|
| 70. |
14 Jan 2009 Wed 12:16 am |
|
we all speak russian, but it doesnt make us russians neither slavic.
you can speak Russian but you still have a distinct national language which is completely different from Russian. Most of the Latinos speak Spanish but their original language had nothing to do with Spanish. The case of Arabic and Hebrew is more like the example of Turkish and Azeri. We all know that Turkish and Azeri come from the same common Turkic language, thus we are the same race. That`s the same for Arabic and Hebrew, They are both semitic languages.
The most widely spoken Semitic language today is Arabic[1] (322 million native speakers, approx 422 million total speakers)[2][3]. It is followed by Amharic (27 million),[4][5] Tigrinya (about 6.7 million),[6] and Hebrew (about 5 million).[7]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic_languages
|
|
|
