Yes I realize it, thank you Yarvik364. I used the superfluous structure here so that you could see the difference between the sentences without me going too deep into grammatical terms.

Maybe we could say if you can (in theory) bring it back into a relative clause it probably takes -ki. I sometimes use this method when I try to understand what a sentence consists of.

What is the thing he/she cannot compromise on now? I can not compromise on anything that concerns my son. We are happy no problem. In any case if there are people who want us to divorce let´s do it and let them feel relieved.

Haha I managed to combine them...

Another Try:

There must be someone in your life to whom you can say excitedly: "I cameeee."

After all, it is Bingölü who says this.

My Try:

Bingölü says: after all there must be someone in your life to whom you will be able to say excitedly "I cameee."

When climbing up from the shore and Barbaros as soon as you pass Pizza Hut and Burger King on the left, opposite to the traffic lights.

A good remark.

Quote: Yarvik364

Bana öyle geliyor ki bizi anlıyoruz .

Nice. Just remember the attached -ki and the conjunction ki (which stands on its own) are two different things.

No.

grub|u, merkez|i are marked with a (technically 3rd person) possessive suffix. It ties these compounds together as one unit:

                              müzik grubu

                              şehir merkezi

Sometimes the first part takes nominative sometimes genitive but that is another story. You can find many articles on that issue.

1. Which monkey did you see? (The head of the pink part is the following noun.)

2. Where did you see the monkey? (The head of the pink part is the predicate.)

3. Where does this animal live? (The head of the pink part is the predicate also.)

Syntactically

                         (hayvanat bahçesinde)ki maymun

is like

                         komik maymun

                         küçük maymun

                         oynayan maymun...

Because there is no such structure in English local adverbial + -ki usually translates as a relative clause: ´The monkey which is in the zoo´.

Ambiguity confuses (read: irritates) me. My favourites are straight and honest:

                                dost

                                yâr

                                evet