My Try:

You come and go in a blink of an eye,

my mind stays with you.

You say it won´t be long until you come back.

You have no right to do this believe me.

What a pity on so many things don´t you think?

Look, a pavilyon of glass changed into ruins.

There was no need

for that deathblow of yours.

You said you can die for love,

where are those promises you made?

The wound of my heart is at your peril

-  he who laughs last laughs best.

Namely depending on the person of the main clause predicate.

                   Virane olmuşum seni seveli. ´I was ruined since I loved you.´

Well well grammatically they are very full subjects. Embed them into a sentence and they act exactly like subjects do:

                       Bütün işler yapıldı > Bütün işlerin yapıldığını anlattı.

But of course the semantic role they play in the sentence is not the most typical one for a subject, i.e. actor, They can rather be seen as the patients of the predicate.

Neşet Ertaş, Karlı dağlar geçit vermez olunca

Thanks for your views. I do understand ellerini kırarız is an expression of great anger but when translated literally it may give wrong connotations in languages where such a metaphor does not exist.

I have asked Turks before about what kind of a speaker Mr. Erdoğan is, at least he seems to attract attention.

What about the infinitive

                    ilişiliş ´the manner/action of (some people) touching, handling´?

Unfortunately, Gönül yarası (Yavuz Turgul, 2004) is made exactly with the same recipe. What a disappointment.

I think it looks too much like two competing groups fighting for their privileges. The true instrument against corruption in every country is free press.

Thanks for this. We come accross the structure many times but not so often see it explained.

After the corruption scandal the Turkish PM said in his speech

                           Kirli tuzaklar kuran elleri kırarız

and in the Western media it was widely quoted and translated word-to-word as ´we will break their arms´. People connected it with the physical punishments in the shariah criminal law. I was wondering if it really should be taken literally in this sentence. There are dozens of metaphors with el in Turkish, couldn´t this be one of them, i.e. something like ´we will make their plans go astray´? (In that case, the literal translation would be incorrect.)