I guess this is an equivocal statement.

Barba_Mama is a Dutch citizen and she is one of the valuable contributors of this site. I can´t understand the reason of this recent anti-Dutch sentiment. I can understand the difference in mind sets which lead to different interpretations of certain matters. Why do we take the time and post here? We are seeking to understand one another and to converge as much as possible.

Good. Yours is a senior cat now. They tend to develop health problems and need very close attention including the choice of catfoot, hygene of the litter box. We´ve recently lost an 11 year old cat. He had the cancer. My other cat which is about the smae age is sick with feline AIDS. So, we don´t let it leave the house. His immune system is very fragile. I carried him to the vet every single day for more than a month for injections. It is OK now but who knows what future holds for him.

Natasha was formerly an American fantasy. It was the name of the sexy Russian spy of adventure books. Natasha was almost synonymous with the cold, exotic and dangerous but equally desirable female character. Today there are companies promoting Russian brides seeking American husbands; so, there is no need anymore for the book.

Barba_Mama why are you trying your best not to understand me:

I say there is suspicion over ..... I have never said there is the proof of. Powell made people believe that there was proof on file whereas all he had was mere unsubstantiated suspicion. He and the majority of the executionary body in the US took action based on that suspicion acting as if and officially declaring that they had convincing evidence.

I repeat what I said, there is a suspicion at present. I am not in favour of taking action based on that suspicion. I just gave those examples to show how other people use mere suspicion as a basis for such large scale military interventions.

You and thehandsom will eventually make me mad. Try to focus on the meaning of suspicion. Don´t you ever become suspicious of people or institutions? Do you trust people unconditionally? Aren´t we a bit picky when it comes to whom we should trust? Do we need hard proof for becoming suspicious of someone? Don´t we look for signs or clues and lose confidence on seeing even the traces of improper trait?

I am suspicious because I have something to lose. I am directly affected by the lack of security in this country. I have a right to become suspicious and take action to protect myself in the face of mounting suspicion? I start by establishing parallelisms and investigating them. My suspicion can be pointless but I had better be safe than sorry.

The other party (Israel) has been canceling touristic tours, hostile statements targeting the leaders of the two countries come one after another. That shows they are suspicious of Turkey or its leadership too. They have even officially declared this if my memory is not fooling me. 

There is a perfect climate fostering susipicions and feelings of waryness.

America invaded Iraq after making everyone believe that Iraq has chemical weapons in their arsenal. You know what happened later on. There are indeed fabricated news making the headlines, at least one of the major players must now be considered as a proven fabricator... Need I say more?

I am sorry I misunderstood you. You are doing this to set a new Guiness world record as the thickest person on the planet. Wow, man, I can post you a few more difficult texts to make your reactions look real.

Barba and thehandsom. I suggest that you should go and get a dictionary to look up the exact meaning of suspicion and explain to me the role of suspicion in the US invasion of Iraq and the execution of their legitimate leader.

Legally, politically and military wise, suspicion is a step towards subsequent procedural actions. The police may apprehend you on the basis of suspicion, a judge may arrest you on the same ground. Although your verdict is not given, you may have a hard time trying to defend yourself. All of this may happen to you on the ground of mere suspicion.

Likewise governments tend to keep vital information confidential. Other governments may become suspicious of them and ask for an explanation. The West is currently suspicious of Iran´s nuclear program although the latter repeatedly wowed that they are seeking to use that technology for non-military purposes. Turkey and Brazil acted as moderator and persuaded Iran to deliver their uranium in exchange of nuclear power plant grade uranium. The aforementioned parties considered this as a confidence boosting step but guess what the West would not be satisfied and put pressure on the moderators instead. Iran is being threatened by military action and what is the reason here: suspicion. Has it been substantiated? No it is mere suspicion. Probably, much the same as the unsubstantiated suspicion over Iraq.

Well, my wise guys, now answer my question. All the civilized world can capitalize on their suspicions killing tens of thousands of people if need be but I can not link actions together and develop a suspicion.

I often stay up till the morning usually working on something.

There is no compulsion in religion. Man is free without doubt... He is free to get burned either in this world or in afterlife.

get burned could also be understood as mature, or to gain experience.

 Do you have proof for this?