It looks like an ergative clause where the object has been risen to the position of subject with no passive marking involved.

They are not very usual. I collect them in my handbag. Thanks, sufler.

A. imzala|r|ken = verb stem + aorist marking + gerund marking. No plural anywhere.

oku|r|um in C: -um is a personal ending. It´s my answer.

But I doubt D also: kapı|cı|mız|ı has a possessive suffix but in my opinion it is the pink piece of the word.

Idiots.

They all look causative to me but you made this distinction between factitive and causative the other day...

içmek is an already transitive verb. My answer is D.

Progressive assimilation.

Very good. Thank you again, tunci.

No, my fault, tunci. We always understand each other...in the end.

It seems that it takes a noun here.

                           *Adam hapishaneden yaşlı çıktı

is ungrammatical, right? An adjective would be interpreted as an adverb I suppose.

Embarassing...they were supposed to mean

                       ´The man walked out of jail as a free man.´

I guess you can say this in English, can´t you? But obviously you can´t in Turkish. It´s something about the concept of tenses I guess.

But if it was something else, let´s say

                       ´The man walked out of jail as a millionaire/as an elderly man´

would my suggestions make more sense?

Adam hapishaneden serbest olarak çıktı.

Adam hapishaneden serbest iken çıktı.

Adam hapishaneden serbest çıktı.

Are they ok? Are they as good? Do they mean the same?