Look, tristerecuerdos, you can´t think of it that way. If you want to speak Turkish you will have to forget about the English way of expressing things. As for your example, start with the verb düşünmek and if you are not on terms with it yet check what the dictionary tells you:

düşünmek /ı/
1. to think of.
2. to consider, think about.
3. to worry (about). Düşün düşün boktur işin. vulg. The more you worry about your troubles the worse they seem. düşünüp taşınmak /ı/ to think over carefully, consider at length.

Can you see the pink part? It is important information for you. /ı/ after the verb means accusative (just like /a/ means dative, /dan/ means ablative). The verb düşünmek takes accusative object. The accusative of sen is seni.

>>>>>>>> Seni düşündüm.

My Try:

The 3rd person possessive suffix changes the postposition structure into an noun.

Neither the time before you

nor the time after you.

My Try:

Assalamu alaikum. How are you? I saw my big brother tonight, there is a match you know. A match of GS-fb. You have always dreamt about it. About going together to the match. My brother also wants to watch it together with you. He says he can’t reach you. Will you call him? He is waiting for a call from you. See you. God bless.

My Try:

Hello my love. Even though you are in Istanbul now you don’t want to see me. Why are you prejuriced against me without listening to me even once?

You are very valuable and special to me. No one can fill your place. I still have so special feelings for you.

I never forgot you. When you were in America I thought about you all the time. I was waiting patiently the day you would come. I loved you and I actually didn’t lie to you. I told you about my family. You met my dearest friends. I told you where I work. Please think, XXXX. I don’t have a relationship.

Please call me. Let’s talk. I want to see you tonight.

http://haber5.com/kultursanat/bati-onu-deccal-olarak-gorurdu

Batı onu Deccal olarak görürdü

Fetih 1453 is one of the most popular Turkish movies of all times. It has made the personality of Mehmed II more interesting to masses. The Conqueror’s problem is there are a lot of stories about him both in Turkey and in the West but less critical information is available.

Bizim tarafta Fatih, mitolojik bir karakter gibi algılanıyor, batı ise Deccal olarak nitelendiriliyor. From our side Mehmed II is perceived as a mythological character, as for in the West he as been labelled as the Antichrist.

In this article, researchers and writers straighten some of the false ideas that people have about the Sultan and his achievements.

Mehmed the Conqueror may not have led prayers or generally been as religious as he is described in some sources, Istanbul may not have been as strong an opponent as the legend of the conquest in 1453 makes us believe but rather a retarded rural area with decreasing population, and the Western leaders including Constatine XI and the Pope were not necessarily as incapable and stupid as they are described in the entertaining movie.

Unutmayalım ki, Konstantin’i küçültmek, Fatih’i büyütmez; aksine onun büyüklüğünden de bir şeyler eksiltir. Let’s not forget that belittling Constatine doesn’t make the Conqueror any greater but the opposite happens: it lacks something from his greatness.

But historians seem to agree about two things:

1) Mehmet II was a great statesman. This was apparent especially at the time of the 54-day blockade which tired both Ottoman leaders and the army. The Conqueror was strong enough to unite his men for one more military attempt which finally opened Istanbul for them.

2) Mehmed II reconstructed the city of Istanbul. Mosques, madrasas, baths, covered bazaars, castles and citadels were built during his reign.

But yes, he was poisoned on his journey to Italy:

                  Fatih hastaydı ama hastalıktan değil zehirlenerek öldurüldü. The Conqueror                                  was sick but he didn´t die from illness but was poisoned.

Thank you, tunci. Now there is a model here for everyone to follow. Trying to figure out the ruling on my own has cost me a good headache. The forms look so similar that you sometimes need to see them in a sentence before you can be sure. They even get mixed with other stems: boyun and boy with certain set of grammatical markers look so much the same sometimes in my eyes...

Learners of Turkish have been coddled with too much regularity I guess.

Ok, clear. But what if there was no possessive suffix but the case ending was attached straight to the stem?

NOM gönül

ACC gönl|ü

DAT gönl|e

LOC gönül|de

ABL gönül|den

GEN gönül|ün,

is it?

And it looks to me like the form given in the dictionary

gönül ,-nlü <----- here
1. heart; mind.
2. inclination, desire, willingness.

is the accusative.

In words like

gönül ,-nlü
1. heart; mind.
2. inclination, desire, willingness.

boyun ,-ynu
1. neck.
2. cervix.
3. geog. pass, defile.
4. responsibility.

koyun ,-ynu
1. bosom, breast,
2. arms, embrace.

in which forms of the paradigm does the stem vowel disappear? In all cases sg and pl? What if a possessive suffix is added, does the vowel go or stay?

I found this accidentally. Not my favourite, but someone might like it.

Hisham Abbas, Ya habibi

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODPAuRGk41A

Duets in two languages are nice when you hear them rarely.

I am just thinking to myself what the Arab audience would say if it was a Turkish boy and an Arab girl singing this. They would find it completely unsuitable  -  or am I wrong?

fazla sounds very yabancı to me always. But I´ll try to keep these examples in mind. Thanks, tunci.