what do you mean by non-movement action ?

Counterfactual situations differ from hypotheticals in that the condition upon which they depend is known to be unrealizable, they are expressed by Ardı /MazdI or [y]acaktı

terk etmezdim --> terk et [verb stem] + mez [neg.aor.] + di [past] + m [1sg]

I wouldnt have left

dokunmazdım --> I wouldnt have touched

[ O konsere gitmek ] hoş olurdu / olacaktı

it would have been nice to go to that concert.

hoş ol [verb stem] + ur [AOR] + du [past]

hoş ol [verb stem] +acak [FUT] +tı [past]

Being stubborn in learning is a good quality. Bravo sana ! 

One of my old post due to this issue ;

The verb istemek can take either  "infinitive verb" or " verb in accusative form" before it.

Oraya gelmek istiyorum ---> I´d like to come over there. --> Infinitive form

Oraya gelmeyi istiyorum ---> I´d like coming over there. ---> Accusative form

If you like to know the differences between two sentences then look at the "red highlighted" letters. In practice we Turks would use both for the same situation. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Türkçe öğrenmek istiyorum ---> I´d like to learn Turkish

Türkçe öğrenmeyi istiyorum ---> I´d like learning Turkish.

In both forms the first verb[al] [öğrenmek and öğrenmeyi ]  can be classified as an object of the main verb [istiyorum]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

However, using the accusative case for the verb before´istemek´ is NOT always sounding good in Turkish , such as ;

Çay içmek istiyorum ---> I´d like to drink tea. ---> This is what we would normally say.

Çay içmeyi istiyorum ---> I´d like drinking tea.--> This form is sounding bit weird.

May be it is like in English, you wouldnt say "I´d like [to] drinking tea" instead you normally would say " I´d like to drink tea"

If we take the same example and refer 3"rd person. Than you might be happy.

Bilgisayarımı kaybetmesini istemiyorum.

I don´t want him to lose my computer.

[literally, I don´t want his losing my computer]

loss of time is " vakit kaybı ", 

noun kaybolması ---> may be you have seen it in the context as below ;

Bilgisayaramın kaybolmasını istemem. --> I wouldn´t like my pc getting lost.

Quoting SuiGeneris

Quote: (Please could someone translate? It´s from someone very dear to me, and I need to send him an SMS back, but I don´t know what this message means that he sent me. Many many thanks in advance): ASKINLA DOLUP TASAN BIR ("v") ´v´ KALBIM VAR. DiKKAT ET PATLAYABiLiR: 00:03 00:02 00:01 (((((BOOM))))) SENi SEVIYORUM gulum

he says that.. i have a heart that is full of with your love and can overflow... be careful it can blow... 3-2-1- BOOOM i love you, rosa... sth like that.. how funny huh

Allahtan 2005 yılında yapılmış bu espri !.Şimdi yapılsa harbiden patlardı. Akıllara zarar. 

It refers a possesive construction. 

Onun  vakit  kaybetmesi ---> His loosing time

We can apply it onto the sentence , but the meaning would be ;

[Onun] vakit  kaybetmesi kötüdür ---> His loosing time is bad.

and it sounds bit odd.

I agree with friends. Both ways means same however "şey"  should be written seperately. I sometimes write it as one word