the dematerialisation process or scattering of a person´s molicules has already been acheived... this with the help of explosives... now we just need to figure how to be able to reassemble the scattered molicules  and it is called quantum teleportation and has been tested on protons and laser beams, so basicly a biological structure is analised, destroyed and reconstructed at the other end.

I think the explanation is here:

When tense/aspect/modality markers co-occur they appear in the order given below (Göksel – Kerslake). Copular markers (group 4) are composite. They consist of the copula -(y)- < *-i- and the grammatical marker –DI, -mIş or –sA. Copular markers attach to

1. nouns

2. verbs that contain one of the tense/aspect/modality suffixes in group 3

So, in görseydim there is a suffix -sA- from group 3. That is why in further affixation it is treated like it was a noun and the copula -(y)DI-  -  buffer included  -  is used with it.

The situation would be the same in gördüysem btw  -  -DI- from group 3 and -(y)se- from copular markers.

I have understood the buffer is a relic from the old *er- stem, so no wonder.

Sorry there is something i couldn´t understand here.

Does the imaginary "i" is always with the "di" past tense or only with if clause.

Meaning that when i say "I ran" would it be "yürüdüm" or "yürüydüm"

Thanks again

I was learning If clause (type 3 unrealistic) -as they call it in Merhaba Turkish site-  i have some questions please:

Seni görseydim, selam verirdim

1. Why the buffer "y" is used here?

2. Does "ir" refers to present simple tense and also "dim" for past simpletense? And if so, why it is not only "dim" or even "miş"?

Thanks in advance

man can travel faster than light, the problem is not bursting into flames or stopping. just like man can be teleported from one location to another, we just haven´t mastered the rematerialisation process yet

My Try:

Orhan Pamuk´un "Kara kitap"ı OR

Orhan Pamuk´un "Kara kitap" romanı OR

Orhan Pamuk´un "Kara kitap" adlı romanı