|
Hi Bod,
in general its well done. There are just a few corrections.
1. correct
2. correct
"3. Ayşe havadayı uçtu." -no accusative here, -da is already locative suffix so it should be:
3. Ayşe havada uçtu.
Notice that the question matches the case of answer.
nerede-evde (in/at/on where?)
nereden-evden (from where?)
nereye-eve (to where)
nereyi-evi (what place?)
4. correct, vardı with ı
"5. Evet, Ayşe çocuklar el salladı." There is no need to add Ayşe here. You can add it only with dative case: Ayşe'ye (to/towards Ayşe). Here are two alternatives:
5. Evet.
5. Evet el salladılar.
5. Evet, çocuklar el salladı.
5. Evet, çocuklar el salladılar.
5. Evet, çocuklar Ayşe'ye el salladı.
5. Evet, çocuklar Ayşe'ye el salladılar.
6. correct
7. correct
"8. Ayşe uçakta vardı." Sorry bod. The verb here isn't varmak (to arrive). It is "var olmak" (to exist). Its noun form is var and this is used in the sentence.
Varmak (to arrive) and var (existing) are two different things.
Because the story focuses on simple past tense I have used the di suffix many times. Here is my translation for var:
var: exists, there is/are
yok: doesn't exist, there isn't/aren't
vardı: there was/were
yoktu: there wasn't/weren't
The correct answer should be one of these:
8. Pilot.
8. Pilot vardı.
8. Uçakta pilot vardı.
9. correct
10. correct
11. correct, çaldı and uyandı with ı
|